ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Decomposition of CO2 Emission Factors
and Analysis of Dynamic Transmission
Effects Based on TVP-VAR Model:
a Case Study in Hubei Province
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Economics and Management, WenHua College, Wuhan 430074, China
2
Department of Management Engineering, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu 241000, China
Submission date: 2024-02-26
Final revision date: 2024-07-19
Acceptance date: 2024-08-03
Online publication date: 2025-01-07
Publication date: 2025-07-22
Corresponding author
Yueting Jiang
Department of Management Engineering, Anhui Institute of Information Technology, Wuhu 241000, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(5):5563-5577
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Under the guidance of the “dual-carbon” target, China is diligently pursuing a distinctively
Chinese emission reduction pathway, and contributing to the global low-carbon transition. Hubei
Province, with its central position in Central China and as the core pilot province for China’s lowcarbon
pathway development, has an inestimable demonstration value in terms of its carbon emission
evolution and control strategy. Focusing on the time series data of Hubei Province, this study applies
Kaya’s constant equation to decompose the key influencing factors of CO2 emissions, and innovatively
constructs a time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP-VAR) model under the Monte Carlo
simulation framework, intending to capture the complex dynamic relationship between carbon emissions
and influencing factors at key time points. The results indicate a long-term stable trend of change
among the factors influencing CO2 emissions in Hubei Province. The short-term positive impact effect
of economic development level on CO2 emissions is significantly higher than the long-term. The shortterm
negative impact effect of energy intensity on CO2 emissions is less pronounced than the longterm
effect, while the short-term negative impact of CO2 emission intensity is more substantial than its
long-term counterpart. The conclusion confirms the obvious policy dynamic emission reduction effect
observed at the key time point in 2014, following the establishment of the carbon emissions trading
market. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the complex dynamics of regional
carbon emissions. Hubei Province should persist in developing a clean energy system and refining
the carbon market trading mechanism, thereby serving as an exemplary case study to elevate
the construction quality of China’s national carbon market.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
ZHEN Y.L., WEN H.J. The Effect of Regulation and Market Competition on Green Total Factor Productivity in China's Industry. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33 (3), 2161, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes... PMid:19015709.
2.
LIN B.Q., LIU X.Y. Carbon emissions in China's urbanization stage: influencing factors and emission reduction strategies. Economic Research, 45 (8), 66, 2010.
3.
WANG H.T., WANG M.P. Grey correlation analysis of the spatial and temporal pattern of carbon emissions and its influencing factors in 30 provinces and regions of China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21 (7), 140, 2011.
4.
WANG S., WANG H., CHEN H. Study on the influencing factors of carbon emission in Jiangsu coastal area based on Divisia decomposition method. Yangtze River Basin Resources and Environment, 20 (10), 1243, 2011.
5.
LEI Z. China's carbon emission impact factor analysis and emission reduction policy thinking. Statistics and Decision, 16, 156, 2011.
6.
MARTINEZ Z.I., MARUOTTI A. The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics, 70 (7), 1344, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
7.
ALMULALI U., BINTI C.S., FEREIDOUNI H.G. Exploring the bidirectional long run relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emission. Energy, 46 (1), 156, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
8.
GAO C.L., GAO G., FENG A.Y. Factor decomposition of regional change of sulfur dioxide emissions in China based on LMDI. Journal of Ecological Environment, 21 (3), 470, 2012.
9.
LI X.M., YAO ZH.S. Analysis of factors affecting carbon emissions of China's energy consumption based on VAR model. Ecological Economy, 30 (1), 39, 2014.
10.
JIE Y., WEI C., MINDA M., LI L., CONGKU L.D., XIN M., LING L., XING Z.CH. Driving forces of China's CO2 emissions from energy consumption based on Kaya-LMDI methods. Science of The Total Environment, 711, 134569, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:32000310.
11.
ALI H.O. Innovation and carbon emissions: Fixed-effects panel threshold model estimation for renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 198, 602, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
12.
BALTAGI B.H., BRESSON G., ETIENNE J. Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Activities: A Mean Field Variational Bayes Semiparametric Panel Data Model with Random Coefficients. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 134, 43, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.15609/annae....
13.
XI Y.L., NIU G.M. Empirical study on the relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth: empirical evidence based on international panel data. Modern Management Science, 8, 13, 2021.
14.
ZHANG X., WANG J.Y. Analysis of the nonlinear impact of China's economic growth on carbon emissions: an empirical study based on PSTR. Technical Economy and Management Research, 11, 27, 2022.
15.
CHANG T., HSU C., CHEN S., WANG M., WU C. Revisiting economic growth and CO2 emissions nexus in Taiwan using a mixed-frequency VAR model. Economic Analysis and Policy, 79, 312, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.....
16.
ZHANG Y., LI S., LUO T., GAO J. The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121843, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
17.
JI Q., ZHANG D., GENG J. Information Linkage, Dynamic Spillovers in Prices and Volatility between the Carbon and Energy Markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 972, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
18.
LYU J., CAO M., WU K., HAIFENG L., GHULAM M.D. Price Volatility in the Carbon Market in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 120171, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
19.
KEOHANE N. Cap and trade, Rehabilitated: Using tradable permits to control U.S. greenhouse gases. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3 (1), 42, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/r....
20.
JOUVET P.A., MICHEL P., ROTILLON G. Competitive markets for pollution permits: impact on factor income and international equilibrium. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 15 (1), 1, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666....
21.
SONG X.L., KONG CH.M. Empirical analysis of the impact of China's carbon trading market on regional structure. Macroeconomics, 9, 98, 2018.
22.
WANG Y., ZHAO H. The impact of China's carbon trading market on regional carbon emission efficiency. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29, 50, 2019.
23.
JIANG Z., XUE J.H., BAO L.J., XUE CH.Y. The efficiency of carbon trading market in China: evidence from variance ratio tests. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 14362, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:30868455.
24.
LIAO W.L., DONG X.K., WENG M., CHEN X.Y. Economic Effect of Market-oriented Environmental Regulation: Carbon Emission Trading. Green Innovation and Green Economic Growth, China Soft Science, 6, 159, 2020.
25.
YU P., LIU J.X. Research on the Effects of Carbon Trading Market Size. Environment and Economic Growth, China Soft Science, 4, 45, 2020.
26.
LI P., ZHANG H., YUAN Y., AIMIN H. Time-Varying Impacts of Carbon Price Drivers in the EU ETS: A TVP-VAR Analysis. Frontiers in Environment Science, 9, 101, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
27.
KAYA Y. Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, 18–26, 1989.
28.
SIMS C.A. Comparison of Interwar and Postwar Business Cycles: Monetarism Reconsidered. American Economic Review, 70, 250, 1980.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w0430.
30.
NAKAJIMA J. Time-Varying Parameter VAR Model with Stochastic Volatility: An Overview of Methodology and Empirical Applications. Monetary and Economic Studies, 29, 107, 2011.
31.
ANTONAKAKIS N., GABAUER D. Refined Measures of Dynamic Connectedness Based on TVP-VAR. MPRA Paper, 4, 1, 2017.
32.
ZUMIAN X., SHIQUN M., HANWEN S., JIAMENG R., CHAO F., SHIHAO C. Time-varying spillovers among pilot carbon emission trading markets in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 57421, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:35349066 PMCid:PMC8961101.
33.
UDDIN G.S., HERNANDEZ J.A., SHAHZAD S.J.H., AXEL H. Multivariate Dependence and Spillover Effects Across Energy Commodities and Diversification Potentials of Carbon Assets. Energy Economics, 71, 35, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
34.
SHAHBAZ M., SHARMA R., SINHA A., JIAO Z. Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: Designing an SDG framework for India. Energy Policy, 148, 111965, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
35.
CHIEN F., AJAZ T., ANDLIB Z., CHAU K.Y., AHMAD P., SHARIF A. The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: A step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy, 177, 308, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
36.
HU J., HUANG N., SHEN H. Can Market Incentivised Environmental Regulation Promote Corporate Technological Innovation? A natural experiment based on China's carbon emissions trading mechanism. Financial Research, 1, 171, 2020.
http://www.jryj.org.cn/EN/Y202...
37.
FU J., ZHANG Y., XIE Z. Does institutional design affect carbon market liquidity? A study based on pilot regions in China. Finance and Trade Economics, 38, 129, 2017.
39.
HU S., LIU S. Do the coupling effects of environmental regulation and R&D subsidies work in the development of green innovation? Empirical evidence from China. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21, 1739, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098....
40.
ZHANG H., YUAN P., ZHU Z. Population size, industrial agglomeration and carbon emissions in Chinese cities. China Environmental Science, 41, 2459, 2021.
41.
MANZOOR A., ZEESHAN K., ZIA U.R., SHOUKAT I.K., ZIA ULLAH K. Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions in the OECD economies? A new perspective. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30, 89, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/104385....
42.
TONG T., ORTIZ J., XU C., LI F. Economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in the E7 countries: A bootstrap ARDL bound test. Energy Sustainability and Society, 10, 1, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705....
43.
JING G. Carbon emissions trading pilot policy and regional economic high-quality development. Contemporary Economic Management, 44 (06), 50, 2022.
44.
BALCLAR M., DEMIRER R., HAMMOUDEH S., NGUYEN D.K. Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk. Energy Economics, 54, 159, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
45.
GUO L.Y., FENG C. Are there spillovers among China's pilots for carbon emission allowances trading? Energy Economics, 103, 105574, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
46.
LIU X., ZHOU X., ZHU B., WANG P. Measuring the efficiency of China's carbon market: a comparison between efficient and fractal market hypotheses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271 (10), 122885, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....