ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Effect of Litter Quality on Leaf-Litter
Decomposition in the Context of Home-Field
Advantage and Non-Additive Effects
in Temperate Forests in China
Jing Gao, Fengfeng Kang, Hairong Han
More details
Hide details
College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University,
QingHua East Road 35, Haidian District, Beijing, China 100083
Submission date: 2016-01-12
Final revision date: 2016-04-22
Acceptance date: 2016-04-24
Publication date: 2016-10-05
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016;25(5):1911-1920
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Litter quality is often considered the main driver of rates of decomposition. Litter decomposes faster
in its home environment than in any other environment, which is called the home-field advantage (HFA).
However, evidence for this phenomenon has not been universal. In addition, litter mixtures of different
species can induce a non-additive effect (NAE) on decomposition processes. However, the direction and
magnitude of NAE vary and underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the
effect of litter quality on leaf-litter decomposition in the context of HFA and NAEs in temperate forests
in China. Litterbags containing aspen (Populus davidiana), birch (Betula platyphylla), and oak (Quercus
liaotungensis) litter were incubated in situ in pure aspen and broadleaved mixed forests in Chinese temperate
forests for 360 days. The main results were:
1. Aspen litter with a low C/N ratio and high initial N concentration decomposed faster than birch
litter, both of which decomposed faster than oak litter, which had the lowest quality.
2. The rate of decomposition of oak litter was significantly higher in the broadleaved mixed forest
than in pure aspen stands; however, the rate of decomposition of birch litter was not significantly
different from pure aspen stands and broadleaved mixed forest.
3. Contrary to what was predicted, the mixture of aspen and birch litter decomposed faster than
expected. However, both the aspen/oak and birch/oak mixtures had a neutral mixing effect where
the rates of decomposition were slightly faster than expected.
4. Controlling factors based on linear models show that the order of the relative importance of their
effect on litter decomposition was as follows: litter quality, forest floor environment, and litter
mixtures.
This study indicates that:
1. The various litter species exhibited different litter-environment interactions, such as favoring or
contradicting the HFA hypothesis.
2. Litter mixture treatments can induce different mixing effects.
3. Compared with environment and litter mixtures, litter quality is the dominant factor in controlling
the rate of litter decomposition.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (21):
1.
Succession of litter-decomposing microbial organisms in deciduous birch and oak forests, northern Japan
Michiru Otaki, Shiro Tsuyuzaki
Acta Oecologica
2.
Leaf Litter Mixtures in Guam: Decomposition Synergism and Antagonism of Two Endangered Tree Species
Thomas E. Marler
Ecologies
3.
Different revegetation types alter soil physical-chemical characteristics and fungal community in the Baishilazi Nature Reserve
Jiaojiao Deng, You Yin, Jiyao Luo, Wenxu Zhu, Yongbin Zhou
PeerJ
4.
Changes in litter decomposition rate of dominant plants in a semi-arid steppe across different land-use types: Soil moisture, not home-field advantage, plays a dominant role
Yanan Wang, Frank Yonghong Li, Xin Song, Xiaoshuai Wang, Guga Suri, Taogetao Baoyin
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
5.
Soil mite communities structure (Acari, Mesostigmata) during litter decomposition of seven tree species in pure Scots pine stands (Pinus sylvestrisL.) growing on a reclaimed post‐industrial area
Cezary K. Urbanowski, Paweł Horodecki, Jacek Kamczyc, Maciej Skorupski, Andrzej M. Jagodziński
Land Degradation & Development
6.
Enhanced release, export, and transport of diffuse nutrients from litter in forested watersheds with climate warming
Xin Hao, Wei Ouyang, Kehao Zhang, Xinyue Wan, Xintong Cui, Weihong Zhu
Science of The Total Environment
7.
Leaf Shape and Self-Mulching by Trees: A Hypothesis
John H. Graham, Rachel Christopher
Symmetry
8.
Emission of CO2 and CH4 From 13 Deadwood Tree Species Is Linked to Tree Species Identity and Management Intensity in Forest and Grassland Habitats
Lydia Kipping, Martin M. Gossner, Matthias Koschorreck, Sarah Muszynski, Florian Maurer, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Nico Jehmlich, Matthias Noll
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
9.
Exotic mangrove Laguncularia racemosa litter input accelerates nutrient cycling in mangrove ecosystems
Hongke Li, Chunlian Chen, Jiayi Zhou, He Bai, Shijie Zhang, Qiang Liu
Frontiers in Plant Science
10.
Soil microbial functional diversity responses to different vegetation types in the Heilongjiang Zhongyangzhan Black-billed Capercaillie Nature Reserve
Xiaohong Weng, Jiayi Li, Xin Sui, Mengsha Li, Weiping Yin, Weichao Ma, Libin Yang, Liqiang Mu
Annals of Microbiology
11.
Invasive Plants and Species Richness Impact Litter Decomposition in Riparian Zones
Xin Hu, Muhammad Arif, Dongdong Ding, Jiajia Li, Xinrui He, Changxiao Li
Frontiers in Plant Science
12.
Soil fauna accelerate litter mixture decomposition globally, especially in dry environments
Denis Mburu Njoroge, Si‐Chong Chen, Juan Zuo, Gbadamassi G. O. Dossa, Johannes H. C. Cornelissen
Journal of Ecology
13.
Pure and mixed litters of Sphagnum and Carex exhibit a home-field advantage in Boreal peatlands
Julia E. Palozzi, Zoë Lindo
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
14.
Site Type Effect on Litter Decomposition Rates: A Three-Year Comparison of Decomposition Process between Spoil Heap and Forest Sites
Paweł Horodecki, Andrzej M. Jagodziński
Forests
15.
Leaf litter decomposition characteristics and controlling factors across two contrasting forest types
Yuan-Yuan Zhao, Zhuo-Ting Li, Ting Xu, An-ru Lou, Ye Deng
Journal of Plant Ecology
16.
Impacts of successive Chinese fir plantations on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics: Conclusive insights from metagenomic analysis
Huimin Zhang, Fangying Pan, Zhumei Wen, Wenwen Chen, Chuifan Zhou
Journal of Environmental Management
17.
Synergistic effects: a common theme in mixed‐species litter decomposition
Jun Liu, Xiaoyu Liu, Qingni Song, Zacchaeus G. Compson, Carri J. LeRoy, Fenggang Luan, Hui Wang, Yalin Hu, Qingpei Yang
New Phytologist
18.
Leaf litter decomposition in tropical freshwater swamp forests is slower in swamp than non‐swamp conditions
Weng Ngai Lam, Jun Jie Lian, Pin Jia Chan, Ying Ying Ting, Rie Chong, Nur Estya Rahman, Lorraine Wen Ai Tan, Qian Yi Ho, Sorain J. Ramchunder, Kelvin S.‐H. Peh, Yixiong Cai, Kwek Yan Chong
Biotropica
19.
Home-field advantage of CWD decomposition in subtropical forests varied by field sites
Chunsheng Wu, Zhijian Zhang, Hankun Wang, Guoxian Huang, Chunjie Shu, Fanqian Kong, Yi Zhang, G. Geoff Wang, Yuanqiu Liu
Forest Ecology and Management
20.
In situ litter decomposition and nutrient release from forest trees along an elevation gradient in Central Himalaya
Meena Bohara, Keshab Acharya, Sabana Perveen, Kiril Manevski, Chunsheng Hu, Ram Kailash P. Yadav, Kamala Shrestha, Xiaoxin Li
CATENA
21.
Scattered trees in smallholder farms improve soil properties and litter decomposition in humid-agroecosystems in Ethiopia
Gizatu Nesi Anbessa, Yonas Ugo Utaile
Agroforestry Systems