ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Parent Flood Frequency Distribution
of Turkish Rivers
Omer Levend Asikoglu
More details
Hide details
Ege University, Department of Civil Engineering, Izmir, Turkey
Submission date: 2017-04-04
Final revision date: 2017-07-12
Acceptance date: 2017-07-18
Online publication date: 2018-01-08
Publication date: 2018-01-26
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018;27(2):529-539
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the existence of a single parent flood frequency distribution on a Turkish
scale. In the design of hydraulic structures, estimating the project flood of a given period or probability is
usually the first step. Determining an acceptable design criterion depends substantially on the probability
distribution of floods. In this study, annual peak series from 268 Turkish rivers was collected and
a database of L-Moment ratios was constructed. The best-fit probability distribution (PD) model was
investigated among seven distribution models (generalized logistic, GLO, generalized extreme value,
GEV, generalized Pareto, GPA, three-parameter lognormal, LN3, Pearson type 3, P3, Gumbel, GUM, and
normal distribution, N) by using a framework of L-moment ratio diagrams. The L-Moment ratio framework
used in this study consisted of two sequential procedures. The first graphical procedure evaluated the
L-Moment diagrams visually while the second procedure is based on the hypothetical testing procedure
of L-Moment diagrams. The results of a graphical inspection of the dataset show GEV distribution as a
potential parent PD of the floods in Turkey. A more detailed hypothetical testing procedure comprises
Monte Carlo simulations produced from a GEV model. In a hypothetical testing procedure the variability
of L-skewness and L-kurtosis values of sample data are situated within the theoretical limits of GEV
distribution. Consequently, the GEV distribution is accepted as a single parent PD for annual maximum
flow series of Turkey.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (6):
1.
Experimental and numerical studies on orifice spillway aerator of Bunji Dam
Muhammad Kaleem Sarwar, Ijaz Ahmad, Zulfiqar Ali Chaudary, Habib-Ur-Rehman Mughal
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers
2.
Determining the Overflow of Kalecik Basin Using Fuzzy SMRGT Method
Fatih Şevgin, Zeynel Fuat Toprak, İskender Dölek
Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi
3.
Comparison of four methods to select the best probability distribution for frequency analysis of annual maximum precipitation using Monte Carlo simulations
Roberto S. Flowers-Cano, Ruperto Ortiz-Gómez
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
4.
Accounting for hydroclimatic properties in flood frequency analysis procedures
Joeri B. Reinders, Samuel E. Munoz
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
5.
Flood Frequency and Temporal Variability Analysis of Yeşilırmak Basin Under Homogeneity and Change Point Criteria
İbrahim Halil Deger
Engineering Perspective
6.
Determination of Hydrological Flood Hazard Thresholds and Flood Frequency Analysis: Case Study of Nokoue Lake Watershed
Namwinwelbere Dabire, Eugene Ezin, Adandedji Firmin
Water