ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Assessment Methods of Small Watershed
Ecosystem Health
More details
Hide details
1
College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China
Submission date: 2020-04-09
Final revision date: 2020-07-15
Acceptance date: 2020-07-18
Online publication date: 2020-12-11
Publication date: 2021-02-05
Corresponding author
Peng Zheng
College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, F,Jiaxi Building, College of Environment and Resou, 350116, Fuzhou, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021;30(2):1749-1769
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The assessment of watershed ecosystem health promotes the construction of ecological civilisation
in China, and assessment results are an important basis for watershed planning and management.
At present, research on and application of small watershed ecosystem health assessment in China are
deficient. Thus, small watershed protection and management in China are restricted. The research object
of this study is a small watershed of Changqing River in Yongtai County of Fuzhou City. Using satellite
image data, digital elevation data as well as field and monitoring data combined with 3S technology, the
health status of the small watershed ecosystem was evaluated by three assessment systems consisting
of remote sensing data, measured survey data and multi-source data. The watershed ecosystem health
status was quantitatively analysed, and a comparative analysis with the results of different evaluation
methods was conducted. Results show that, in general, the comprehensive indexes of ecosystem health
obtained by the three evaluation methods are 70.29, 77.68 and 63.87. The evaluation results support the
notion that the research status of the watershed ecosystem is satisfactory. The overall ecosystem health
status of the high mountains sub-watershed in the northwest and in the southwest of the watershed is
relatively acceptable but that of the middle and lower reaches is relatively poor. Finally, the evaluation
results of the three methods were compared, and their differences were analysed, it can provide a basic
idea for the ecosystem health evaluation of the small watershed.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (8):
1.
Development of Ecosystem Health Assessment (EHA) and Application Method: A Review
Shaokang Fu, Lin Zhao, Zhi Qiao, Tong Sun, Meng Sun, Yuying Hao, Siyu Hu, Yanchang Zhang
Sustainability
2.
Ecosystem health assessment based on AHP-DPSR model and impacts of climate change and human disturbances: A case study of Liaohe River Basin in Jilin Province, China
Yating Ren, Feng Zhang, Jiapeng Li, Chunli Zhao, Qiushi Jiang, Zhiqiang Cheng
Ecological Indicators
3.
Health Assessment of the Waterway from Chongqing to Yibin in the Upper Yangtze River, China
Pinjian Li, Jing Xue, Wei Xia, Tianhong Li
Water
4.
Estimation of Carbon Emissions and Empirical
Analysis of Carbon Compensation
in Rural Tourism Development
Ling Yang
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
5.
Lake ecosystem health assessment using a novel hybrid decision-making framework in the Nam Co, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Zhengxian Zhang, Yi Liu, Yun Li, Xiaogang Wang, Hongze Li, Hong Yang, Wenhao Ding, Yipeng Liao, Nanbo Tang, Feifei He
Science of The Total Environment
6.
Exploration of multi-scale ecological regulation pathways in the arid northwest region of China from the perspective of ecosystem health
Wenyue Hai, Jianghua Zheng, Wei Li, Chuqiao Han, Yang Yan, Feifei Zhang
Ecological Indicators
7.
Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Zerendy District, Kazakhstan
Onggarbek Alipbeki, Pavel Grossul, Daniyar Rakhimov, Przemyslaw Kupidura, Chaimgul Alipbekova, Gauhar Musaif, Rimma Turekeldiyeva, Kairat Augambaev, Maira Begaliyeva
Sustainability
8.
Ecological Environment Security Analysis of Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture Based on GIS and RS
Longqing Liu, Ye Teng, Luo Guo, M.J.K. Bashir, N. Vasudevan, S. Sethupathi
E3S Web of Conferences