ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Yield and Economic Results of Spring Barley Grown in Crop Rotation and in Monoculture
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
 
2
Department of Economics and Agribusiness, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2018-03-22
 
 
Final revision date: 2018-04-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-04-29
 
 
Online publication date: 2019-01-02
 
 
Publication date: 2019-03-01
 
 
Corresponding author
Anna Nowak   

University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019;28(4):2441-2448
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The study aimed to evaluate the yield and economic effectiveness of spring barley grown in crop rotation and cereal monoculture under three tillage systems. The experimental factors were crop sequence systems: 1) crop rotation (peas – spring barley – winter wheat) and 2) cereal monoculture (spring barley – winter wheat – winter wheat) and tillage systems: a) conventional tillage (CT), b) reduced tillage (RT), and 3) herbicide tillage (HT). Spring barley grain yield was significantly higher in crop rotation than in cereal monoculture. Also, yield was significantly higher under RT than under CT and HT. The number of weeds per m-2 in cereal monoculture was significantly higher than in crop rotation. Also, more weeds occurred under RT than under CT and HT. Air-dry weight of weeds was higher in cereal monoculture than in crop rotation and it was also higher under RT than under CT. In crop rotation, for each tillage system the production value (EUR ha-1) was higher than in monoculture, whereas the highest production value (EUR ha-1) was achieved in crop rotation in RT sites. The economic analysis showed a clear competitive advantage of RT sites with crop rotation over other sites. The proof is the highest gross margin and income from activity, and the lowest unit cost of production.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (5):
1.
Opportunities for Low Indirect Land Use Biomass for Biofuels in Europe
Calliope Panoutsou, Sara Giarola, Dauda Ibrahim, Simone Verzandvoort, Berien Elbersen, Cato Sandford, Chris Malins, Maria Politi, George Vourliotakis, Vigh Enikő Zita, Viktória Vásáry, Efthymia Alexopoulou, Andrea Salimbeni, David Chiaramonti
Applied Sciences
 
2.
Impact of cropping and tillage system on take-all disease of winter wheat (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici)
Andrzej Woźniak, Leszek Rachoń, Myroslawa Soroka
Agronomy Science
 
3.
Exploiting the Yield Potential of Spring Barley in Poland: The Roles of Crop Rotation, Cultivar, and Plant Protection
Marta K. Kostrzewska, Magdalena Jastrzębska
Agriculture
 
4.
Economic and risk evaluation of crop rotation systems: literature review
Fernando Pires Vieira, Alcido Elenor Wander
Quaestum
 
5.
Production efficiency of different crop rotations and tillage systems
Andrzej Woźniak
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top