ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Effect of Polluted Soil and Fertilisation on Growth and Physiology of Silver Birch (Betula pendula Roth.) Seedlings
K. Bojarczuk, P. Karolewski, J. Oleksyn, B. Kieliszewska-Rokicka, R. Żytkowiak, 1. M. G. Tjoelker
More details
Hide details
Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 62-035 Kórnik, e-mail: bojark@man.poznan.pl
1. Department of Forest Science, Texas A&M University, 2135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2135, USA,
e-mail: m-tjoelker@tamu.edu
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2002;11(5):483-492
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
One-year-old seedlings of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) were grown in pots filled with a soil
substrate that originated from an area polluted by a phosphate fertiliser factory and characterised by a high
soil Al level and low Ca/Al ratio or with a substrate from an area regarded as free from toxic pollution. In
addition the effect of fertilisation with a mixture of nutrients was evaluated. Birch seedlings grew slowest in
the unfertilised polluted substrate. In the unfertilised polluted substrate seedlings were characterised by high
biomass allocation to roots (60% vs. 30 to 40% in control or fertilised substrate), lower diversity of ectomycorrhizae
and the lowest rate of root and substrate microbial respiration. Roots of seedlings grown in
the polluted soil were characterised by a significantly higher level of phenolic compounds. Fertilisation of
plants grown in the polluted soil accelerated their growth, and lowered RWR (g root g-1 plant) and increased
biomass allocated to foliage. Our results indicate that elimination of air pollution does not decrease the toxic
effect of a polluted soil. Fertilisation may improve the condition of seedlings growing in polluted soil,
however it was not able to eliminate entirely the adverse effect of soil pollution.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.