ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Land Use Transitions and Eco-Environmental
Responses in Typical Karst Ecological Restoration
Areas from the Perspective of
“Production-Living-Ecological Spaces”:
A Case Study of Huajiang Gorge, China
More details
Hide details
1
School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
2
Department of Geography and Tourism, Guizhou Normal College, Guiyang, China
Submission date: 2024-10-09
Final revision date: 2025-02-20
Acceptance date: 2025-04-06
Online publication date: 2025-07-21
Corresponding author
Yue Zhou
School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, 550025, Guiyang, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Clarifying the evolution process of “production-living-ecological spaces (PLESs)” and the
related eco-environmental response can provide scientific support for rational allocation of PLESs
and optimization of territorial space development and protection mode and is of great significance for
promoting ecological restoration and high-quality development in ecologically fragile areas. Mainstream
research has not fully discussed the multiple ecological effects of PLES transformation in small-scale
karst ecological restoration areas and has ignored the nonstructural dynamics shaping the transition of
PLESs in the special area. This study uses 3S technology, which is based on karst rocky desertification
(KRD) and the eco-environmental quality index (EQI), to quantitatively analyze the evolution
characteristics of the PLESs and eco-environmental response in the Huajiang Gorge of southwest China
from 2005 to 2020 and to analyze the main driving mechanism of the transformation of the PLESs
in combination with a field survey. The results revealed that the transfer-in of production space (PS)
and living space (LS) and the transfer-out of ecological space (ES) constitute the main types of regional
land use transitions (LUTs). The intensity of LUTs first experienced slow growth but has since significantly
increased. With the transformation of land use, the quality of the ecological environment has improved
overall. The KRD continued to improve, whereas the EQI first decreased but then increased, which
indicates that the ecological transformation from the EQI perspective and the KRD transformation were
not completely synchronized but showed a certain lag. This study revealed that PLES transformation
significantly affects the quality of the regional ecological environment. The impact and contribution
of LUTs to changes in the EQI and KRD do not coincide completely. The internal conversion of ES
and the conversion of ES into PS promote both an increase in the EQI and improvement in the KRD and make the greatest contribution to regional ecological environment improvement. PLES
transformation is a response to the interaction of structural dynamics, nonstructural dynamics, and
villagers’ land use change practices. The interaction and stimulation of different elements lead to
changes in land use practices, modes, and functions in the ecological restoration area.