About the Journal
In Memory of Professor Jerzy Radecki
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Scope
Impact Factor
Indexed in...
Journal Impact Factor contributing items
Contact
Subscription
Current issue
Online first
Notes to Authors
Frequently Asked Questions
Editorial policies
PJOES Publication Policy Overview
PJOES Peer Review Policy
PJOES Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
PJOES Plagiarism Policy
PJOES Conflict of Interest Policy
PJOES Open Access Policy
PJOES Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Archive
REVIEW PAPER
Ecosystem Service Evaluation and Influencing
Factors Based on Production-Living-Ecological
Spaces: A Case Study of the Lower Yellow River
1
Department of Surveying and Planning, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu, Henan Province, 476000,China
2
Henan Engineering Technology Research Center of Ecological Protection and Management of the Old Course of Yellow
River, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu, Henan Province, 476000,China
3
Henan Environmental and Health Engineering Research Center, Shangqiu Normal University,
Shangqiu, Henan Province, 476000,China
4
School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia
5
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,
CAS, Urumqi 830011, China
Submission date: 2024-03-18
Final revision date: 2024-09-08
Acceptance date: 2024-10-13
Online publication date: 2024-12-17
Publication date: 2025-11-14
Corresponding author
Yaning Chen
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, CAS, Urumqi 830011, China
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, CAS, Urumqi 830011, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):7993-8006
KEYWORDS
the lower Yellow Riverproduction-living-ecological spacesland use transformationecosystem service valuedriving factors
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Under the background of the major national strategy of ecological protection and high-quality
development in the Yellow River Basin, the study on the ecosystem service value (ESV) changes caused
by production-living-ecological spaces transformation has important scientific significance and practical
value. This paper selects five phases of land use data from 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 to construct
a production-living-ecological spaces classification system. By using a land transfer matrix, the ESV
evaluation method, and a geographic detector model, the spatial and temporal change characteristics
and influencing factors of land use and ESV were studied in the lower Yellow River. The results show
that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the production of ecological land and ecological production land decreased
by 4.30% and 22.84%, respectively, while the living production land and ecological land increased by
32.57% and 11.48%, respectively, in the lower Yellow River. (2) The ESV increased by CNY 4.67 billion,
with a change rate of 2.15%, mainly due to the increase in ecological land. The spatial distribution
of ESV presents a “northeast high, southwest low” trend. The largest change in individual ecosystem
service function is hydrological regulation, with an increase of CNY 6.15 billion and a change rate
of 17.99%. (3) The total population and GDP reflecting the socio-economic development conditions have
a greater impact on the ESV, while the slope, slope direction, precipitation, temperature, and elevation
reflecting the natural conditions have a smaller impact on the ESV. The superposition effect of any
two driving factors is greater than a single driving factor. Therefore, more attention should be paid to
preventing the multiple factors’ effects on the deterioration of the ecosystem environment. The results of this study can provide a theoretical basis for government departments to optimize the spatial pattern
and achieve sustainable development of the ecological economy.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (45)
1.
FERREIRA R.B., PARREIRA M.R., NABOUT J.C. The impact of global climate change on the number and replacement of provisioning ecosystem services of Brazilian Cerrado plants. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 193 (11), 731, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661... PMid:34664119.
2.
PAZ D.B., HENDERSON K., LOREAU M. Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Ecological Modelling. 437, 109312, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol... PMid:33343058 PMCid:PMC7116488.
3.
BARNES A.D., JOCHUM M., MUMME S., HANEDA N.F., FARAJALLAH A., WIDARTO T.H., BROSE U. Consequences of tropical land use for multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature Communications. 5, 5351, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms... PMid:25350947.
4.
SONG W., DENG X. Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Science of the Total Environment. 576, 705, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
5.
SOLÓRZANO A., BRASIL-MACHADO A., RIBEIRO DE OLIVEIRA R. Land use and social-ecological legacies of Rio de Janeiro's Atlantic urban forests: from charcoal production to novel ecosystems. Royal Society Open Science. 8 (6), 201855, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.2... PMid:34221437 PMCid:PMC8242837.
6.
LI C., WU J. Land use transformation and ecoenvironmental effects based on production-living-ecological spatial synergy: evidence from Shaanxi Province, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29 (27), 41492, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:35089519.
7.
QIAN Y., DONG Z., YAN Y., TANG L. Ecological risk assessment models for simulating impacts of land use and landscape pattern on ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment. 833, 155218, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:35421487.
8.
FU J., GAO Q., JIANG D., LI X., LIN G. Spatial-temporal distribution of global production-living-ecological space during the period 2000-2020. Scientific Data. 10 (1), 589, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597... PMid:37679369 PMCid:PMC10484904.
9.
XIE X., LI X., FAN H., HE W. Spatial analysis of production-living-ecological functions and zoning method under symbiosis theory of Henan, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28 (48), 69093, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:34283352.
10.
YANG W., DIETZ T., LIU W., LUO J., LIU J. Going beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: an index system of human dependence on ecosystem services. PLoS One. 8 (5), e64581, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMCid:PMC3661539.
11.
WANG Y., GAO J., WANG J., QIU J. Value assessment of ecosystem services in nature reserves in Ningxia, China: a response to ecological restoration. PLoS One. 9 (2), e89174, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMid:24586571 PMCid:PMC3929645.
12.
CAO S., ZHANG J., SU W. Difference in the net value of ecological services between natural and artificial forests in China. Conservation Biology. 33 (5), 1076, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.1... PMid:30693984 PMCid:PMC6850378.
13.
WANG Y., YANG Z., YU M., LIN R., ZHU L., BAI F. Integrating Ecosystem Health and Services for Assessing Ecological Risk and its Response to Typical Land-Use Patterns in the Eco-fragile Region, North China. Environmental Management. 71 (4), 867, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267....
14.
ZHAO Y., ZHANG M., CUI J. Land-use transition and its driving forces in a minority mountainous area: a case study from Mao County, Sichuan Province, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 194 (10), 688, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661... PMid:35982353.
15.
ZHANG Q., GAO M., YANG L., CHEN C., SUN Y., WANG J. Changes in the spatial structure of ecological land and ecosystem services values in nine key districts of Chongqing city over the past 25. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 37 (2), 566, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
16.
HU H., LIIU H., HAO J., AN J. Spatio-temporal variation in the value of ecosystem services and its response to land use intensity in an urbanized watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 33 (8), 2565, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
17.
LI K., ZHANG B. Analysis of the relationship between landscape fragmentation and ecosystem service value in northern Shaanxi, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (41), 94537, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37535285.
18.
XU Q., WANG Y., YANG Y. Spatio-temporal evaluation of ecosystem service value in Gansu Province based on optimization model. Journal of Desert Research. 43 (2), 53, 2023.
19.
HU S., ZOU D., HE Q., SHI X., LIU L. Evaluation for values of ecosystem service functions of cultivated seaweeds in Guangdong Province, China. Algal Research. 63, 102657, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alga....
20.
LIU J., XIAO B., JIAO J., LI Y., WANG X. Modeling the response of ecological service value to land use change through deep learning simulation in Lanzhou, China. Science of the Total Environment. 796, 148981, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
21.
ZHANG P., GENG W., YANG D., LI Y., ZHANG Y., QIN M. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use and ecosystem service value in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Region. Transactions of Agricultural Engineering. 36 (11), 277, 2020.
22.
LU C., ZHANG S., ZENG R., QIU X., DONG G. Land space dynamic changes and cross-sensitivity of ecological service function in the lower Yellow River reaches. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment. 40 (4), 976, 2023.
23.
KONG D., MIAO C., LI J., ZHENG H. Full-stream erosion in the lower Yellow River: Feasibility, sustainability and opportunity. Science of the Total Environment. 807 (2), 150810, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:34626642.
24.
LI Q., PU Y., GAO W. Spatial correlation analysis and prediction of carbon stock of "Production-living-ecological spaces" in the three northeastern provinces, China. Heliyon. 9 (8), e18923, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:37600391 PMCid:PMC10432715.
25.
XIANG J., LI X., XIAO R., WANG Y. Effects of land use transition on ecological vulnerability in poverty-stricken mountainous areas of China: A complex network approach. Journal of Environmental Management. 297, 113206, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:34325371.
26.
QUESADA-MORAGA E., GARRIDO-JURADO I., GONZÁLEZ-MAS N., YOUSEF-YOUSEF M. Ecosystem services of entomopathogenic ascomycetes. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 201, 108015, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.... PMid:37924859.
27.
ZANDEBASIRI M., JAHANBAZI GOUJANI H., IRANMANESH Y., AZADI H., VIIRA A.H., HABIBI M. Ecosystem services valuation: a review of concepts, systems, new issues, and considerations about pollution in ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (35), 83051, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37338682.
28.
COSTANZA R., ATKINS P.W.B., HERNANDEZ-BLANCO M., KUBISZEWSKI I. Common asset trusts to effectively steward natural capital and ecosystem services at multiple scales. Journal of Environmental Management. 280, 111801, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:33360256.
29.
XIAO Y., HUANG M., XIE G., ZHEN L. Evaluating the impacts of land use change on ecosystem service values under multiple scenarios in the Hunshandake region of China. Science of the Total Environment. 850, 158067, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:35981581.
30.
XU J., XIAO Y., XIE G., WANG Y., JIANG Y. Computing payments for wind erosion prevention service incorporating ecosystem services flow and regional disparity in Yanchi County. Science of the Total Environment. 674, 563, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:31022546.
31.
ZHANG L., XIAO Y., GUO Y., QIAN X. Spatial-temporal distribution and key factors of urban land use ecological efficiency in the Loess Plateau of China. Scientific Reports. 13 (1), 22306, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:38102182 PMCid:PMC10724282.
32.
LI W., YUAN Y., WANG S., LIU X. Occurrence, spatiotemporal variation, and ecological risks of organophosphate esters in the water and sediment of the middle and lower streams of the Yellow River and its important tributaries. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 443 (Pt A), 130153, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz... PMid:36244105.
33.
YANG M., XUE L., LIU Y., LIU S., HAN Q., YANG L., CHI Y. Asymmetric response of vegetation GPP to impervious surface expansion: Case studies in the Yellow and Yangtze River Basins. Environmental Research. 243, 117813, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr... PMid:38043893.
34.
ZEWUDE A., GOVINDU V., SHIBRU S., WOLDU Z. Assessment of spatiotemporal dynamics of land and vegetation cover change detection in Maze National Park, Southwest Ethiopia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 194 (7), 460, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661... PMid:35622183.
35.
PENG L., DONG B., WANG P., SHENG S., SUN L., FANG L., LI H., LIU L. Research on ecological risk assessment in land use model of Shengjin Lake in Anhui province, China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 41 (6), 2665, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653... PMid:31104213.
36.
ZHAO F., LIU X., ZHAO X., WANG H. Effects of production-living-ecological space changes on the ecosystem service value of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 195 (9), 1133, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661... PMid:37656251.
37.
HU Z., WU Z., YUAN X., ZHAO Z., LIU F. Spatialtemporal evolution of production-living-ecological space and layout optimization strategy in eco-sensitive areas: a case study of typical area on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (33), 79807, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
38.
DENG G., JIANG H., ZHU S., WEN Y., HE C., WANG X., SHENG L., GUO Y., CAO Y. Projecting the response of ecological risk to land use/land cover change in ecologically fragile regions. Science of the Total Environment. 914, 169908, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:38190905.
39.
ZHOU X., CHU Z., JI X. Changes in the land-use landscape pattern and ecological network of Xuzhou planning area. Scientific Reports. 14 (1), 8854, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:38632291.
40.
FU J., ZHANG S. Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function-A Case Study of Henan Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (15), 8051, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:34360355 PMCid:PMC8345523.
41.
BAO S., CUI W., YANG F. Future land use prediction and optimization strategy of Zhejiang Greater Bay Area coupled with ecological security multi-scenario pattern. PLoS One. 19 (4), e0291570, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMid:38635581.
42.
QIU L., PAN Y., ZHU J., AMABLE G.S., XU B. Integrated analysis of urbanization-triggered land use change trajectory and implications for ecological land management: A case study in Fuyang, China. Science of the Total Environment. 660, 209, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:30640089.
43.
BAI Y., WONG C.P., JIANG B., HUGHES A.C., WANG M., WANG Q. Developing China's Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nature Communications. 9 (1), 3034, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467... PMid:30072771 PMCid:PMC6072749.
44.
LIU Y., YUAN X., LI J., QIAN K., YAN W., YANG X., MA X. Trade-offs and synergistic relationships of ecosystem services under land use change in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2020: A Bayesian network analysis. Science of the Total Environment. 858 (Pt 3), 160015, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:36368379.
45.
LI N., SUN P., ZHANG J., MO J., WANG K. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem services' transformation in the Yellow River basin, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 196 (3), 252, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2083-5906 |
| ISSN: | 1230-1485 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
