ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Mechanism of Land Use on Ecosystem Service Values in the Taihu Lake Basin in China
,
 
Yongbo Wu 1,2
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
 
2
Co-Innovation Center of the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing 210037, China
 
 
Submission date: 2025-02-17
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-06-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-08-10
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-01-07
 
 
Corresponding author
Yongbo Wu   

School of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The Taihu Lake basin is a critical ecological protection area in China. Understanding the evolutionary process of land use and the Ecosystem Service Values (ESVs) of the Taihu Lake basin is an important prerequisite for promoting its sustainable development. The land use change patterns in the Taihu Lake basin based on data from 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2022, using land use transition matrices and land dynamic index. Use of the land use classification precision of Kappa coefficient test improves the equivalent factor method for calculating ecosystem services value. The result demonstrated that: (1) the Kappa coefficient of 0.932; From 2005 to 2022, land use in the Taihu Lake basin underwent significant changes, with the most prominent conversion from plowland to construction land. The increase in water and forestland areas led to an 8.31% increase in total ESVs. (2) ESVs increased by $1.181 billion over the past 17 years. Land use types such as water bodies, grasslands, and forestlands accounted for 92.16% of the total ESVs. Key ecosystem services in the region, including hydrological regulation, water resource supply, climate regulation, and environment cleaning, together contributed 83.61% of the total ESVs; (3) the ESVs are relatively insensitive to changes in coefficient values. Currently, the primary challenge of ESVs is from plowland degradation. In the lower reaches, regulatory services should be strengthened, provided that vegetation protection is maintained. Research on land use evolution analysis in the Taihu Lake basin can provide valuable references for environmental protection and urban and rural development.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
LIU S., COSTANZA R., FARBER S., TROY A. Valuing ecosystem services Theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1185 (1), 54, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749....
 
2.
COSTANZA R., DE GROOT R., SUTTON P., VAN DER PLOEG S., ANDERSON S. J., KUBISZEWSKI I., FARBER S., TURNER R. K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions. 26, 152, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloe....
 
3.
SCHMIDT J.P., MOORE R., ALBER M. Integrating ecosystem services and local government finances into land use planning: A case study from coastal Georgia. Landscape and Urban Planning. 122, 56, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
4.
PHAM K.T., LIN T.H. Effects of urbanisation on ecosystem service values: A case study of Nha Trang, Vietnam. Land Use Policy. 128, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
5.
PAPANASTASIS V.P., BAUTISTA S., CHOUVARDAS D., MANTZANAS K., PAPADIMITRIOU M., MAYOR A.G., KOUKIOUMI P., PAPAIOANNOU A., VALLEJO R.V. Comparative Assessment of Goods and Services Provided by Grazing Regulation and Reforestation in Degraded Mediterranean Rangelands. Land Degradation & Development. 28 (4), 1178, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.23....
 
6.
FELIPE-LUCIA M.R., SOLIVERES S., PENONE C., FISCHER M., AMMER C., BOCH S., SCHLOTER M., SCHOENING I., SCHRUMPF M., SOLLY E.F., STEMPFHUBER B., WEISSER W.W., WILCKE W., WUBET T., ALLAN E. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 117 (45), 28140, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2....
 
7.
CHILLO V., VAZQUEZ D.P., AMOROSO M.M., BENNETT E.M. Land-use intensity indirectly affects ecosystem services mainly through plant functional identity in a temperate forest. Functional Ecology. 32 (5), 1390, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2....
 
8.
HENRIQUE M.P., INES S.M., ISABEL M.D.R., HYE J.K. Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050. Science. 384, 458, 2024.
 
9.
LE P.G., SCHENK N.V., PENONE C., THIELE J. The supply of multiple ecosystem services requires biodiversity across spatial scales. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7 (2), 236, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559....
 
10.
ZHOU J., LIU W. Monitoring and Evaluation of Eco-Environment Quality Based on Remote Sensing-Based Ecological Index (RSEI) in Taihu Lake Basin, China. Sustainability. 14 (9), 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1409....
 
11.
CHEN W., CHI G. Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000-2015. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 20 (3), 3221, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762....
 
12.
MOSADEGHI R., WARNKEN J., TOMLINSON R., MIRFENDERESK H. Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers Environment and Urban Systems. 49, 54, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
13.
GONZALEZ J.M., TOMLINSON J.E., MARTINEZ C., EDUARDO A. Designing diversified renewable energy systems to balance multisector performance. Nature Sustainability. 6 (4), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893....
 
14.
CLARET C., METZGER M.J., KETTUNEN M., TEN BRINK P. Understanding the integration of ecosystem services and natural capital in Scottish policy. Environmental Science & Policy. 88, 32, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
 
15.
ALBERT C., GALLER C., HERMES J., NEUENDORF F., VON HAAREN C., LOVETT A. Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework. Ecological Indicators. 61, 100, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
16.
BERKE P., SPURLOCK D., HESS G., BAND L. Local comprehensive plan quality and regional ecosystem protection: The case of the Jordan Lake watershed, North Carolina, USA. Land Use Policy. 31, 450, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
17.
YI H., GUENERALP B., FILIPPI A.M., KREUTER U.P., GUENERALP I. Impacts of Land Change on Ecosystem Services in the San Antonio River Basin, Texas, from 1984 to 2010. Ecological Economics. 135, 125, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
18.
BATEMAN I.J., HARWOOD A.R., MACE G.M., WATSON R.T., ABSON D.J., ANDREWS B., BINNER A., PASCUAL U., PATERSON J., PERINO G., SEN A., SIRIWARDENA G., VAN S.D., TERMANSEN M. Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom. Science. 341 (6141), 45, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
19.
HIMES A., PUETTMANN K., MURACA B. Trade-offs between ecosystem services along gradients of tree species diversity and values. Ecosystem Services. 44, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
 
20.
YAN X., XIA Y., TI C., SHAN J., WU Y., YAN X. Thirty years of experience in water pollution control in Taihu Lake: A review. Science of the Total Environment. 914, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
21.
LIU Y., CHEN W., LI D., HUANG Z., SHEN Y., LIU Y. Cyanobacteria-/cyanotoxin-contaminations and eutrophication status before Wuxi Drinking Water Crisis in Lake Taihu, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 23 (4), 575, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-....
 
22.
LU J., WANG H., WANG W., YIN C. Vegetation and soil properties in restored wetlands near Lake Taihu, China. Hydrobiologia. 581, 151, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750....
 
23.
YU Z., BI H. The key problems and future direction of ecosystem services research. Energy Procedia. 5, 64, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyp....
 
24.
HOBBS R.J. Degraded or just different? Perceptions and value judgements in restoration decisions. Restoration Ecology. 24 (2), 153, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12....
 
25.
DAS A., DAS M., HOUQE R., PEREIRA P. Mapping ecosystem services for ecological planning and management: A case from a tropical planning region, Eastern India. Environmentla Science and Pollution Research. 30, 7543, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
26.
YANG Y., SONG G., LU S. Study on the ecological protection redline (EPR) demarcation process and the ecosystem service value (ESV) of the EPR zone: A case study on the city of Qiqihaer in China. Ecological Indicators. 109, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
27.
CONSTANT N.L., TAYLOR P.J. Restoring the forest revives our culture: Ecosystem services and values for ecological restoration across the rural-urban nexus in South Africa. Forest Policy and Economics. 118, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forp....
 
28.
GAO X., SHEN J., HE W., ZHAO X., LI Z., HU W., WANG J., REN Y., ZHANG X. Spatial-temporal analysis of ecosystem services value and research on ecological compensation in Taihu Lake Basin of Jiangsu Province in China from 2005 to 2018. Journal of Cleaner Production. 317, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
29.
PU J., SHEN A., LIU C., WEN B. Impacts of ecological land fragmentation on habitat quality in the Taihu Lake basin in Jiangsu Province, China. Ecological Indicators. 158, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
30.
XU X., LIU J., TAN Y., YANG G. Quantifying and optimizing agroecosystem services in China's Taihu Lake Basin. Journal of Environmental Management. 277, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
31.
WU Z., WANG X., CHEN Y., CAI Y., DENG J. Assessing river water quality using water quality index in Lake Taihu Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment. 612, 914, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
32.
PAN H., PAGE J., CONG C., BARTHEL S., KALANTARI Z. How ecosystems services drive urban growth: Integrating nature-based solutions. Anthropocene. 35, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ance....
 
33.
KANTER D.R., MUSUMBA M., WOOD S.L., PALM C., ANTLE J., BALVANERA P., DALE V.H., HAVIK P., KLINE K.L., SCHOLES R.J., THORNTON P., TITTONELL P., ANDELMAN S. Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development. Agricultural Systems. 163, 73, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy....
 
34.
SHEN J., GAO X., HE W., SUN F., ZHANG Z., KONG Y., WAN Z., ZHANG X., LI Z., WANG J., LAI X. Prospect theory in an evolutionary game: Construction of watershed ecological compensation system in Taihu Lake Basin. Journal of Cleaner Production. 291, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
35.
NAVI M.S., AGILAND L. Multispectral and hyperspectral images based land use/land cover change prediction analysis: an extensive review. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 79, 29751, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042....
 
36.
YANG T., ZHANG D.Q., SHEN C.Y., MA S., SONG L., LI X. Evaluation of ecosystem service function value of watershed basin based on emergy analysis: A case study of Dongjiang Basin. Journal of Water Ecology. 44 (1), 9, 2023 [In Chinese].
 
37.
ZHU Y., WANG S., FENG Y.Q. Response of wetland ecosystem service value to landscape pattern change in the Taihu Lake Basin in the past 30 years: based on the implementation of the project of "returning land to lake". Chinese Landscape Architecture. 38 (1), 88, 2022 [In Chinese].
 
38.
LIU X.M., ZHANG G.X., SUN G.Z., WU Y., CHEN Y.Q. Assessment of Lake Water Quality and Eutrophication Risk in an Agricultural Irrigation Area: A Case Study of the Chagan Lake in Northeast China. Water. 11 (11), 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112....
 
39.
LACHER I., FERGUS C., MCSHEA W.J., PLISINSKI J., MORREALE L., AKRE T.S. Modeling alternative future scenarios for direct application in land use and conservation planning. Conservation Science and Practice. 5 (7), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.1....
 
40.
RIMAL B., SHARMA R., KUNWAR R., KESHTKAR H., STORK N.E., RIJAL S., RAHMAN S.A., BARAL H. Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal. Ecosystem Services. 38, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
 
41.
LAUTENBACH S., MUPEPELE A.-C., DORMANN C.F., LEE H., SCHMIDT S., SCHOLTE S.S.K., SEPPELT R., VAN TEEFFELEN A.J.A., VERHAGEN W., VOLK M. Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. Regional Environmental Change. 19 (8), 2151, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113....
 
42.
DE NIJS T.C.M., DE NIET R., CROMMENTUIJN L. Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030. Journal of Environmental Management. 72 (1-2), 35, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
43.
WATSON K.B., GALFORD G.L., SONTER L.J., KOH I., RICKETTS T.H. Effects of human demand on conservation planning for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Conservation Biology. 33 (4), 942, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.1....
 
44.
GONZALEZ-GARCIA A., PALOMO I., GONZALEZ J.A., LOPEZ C.A., MONTES C. Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning. Land Use Policy. 94, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
45.
REMME R.P., SCHROETER M. Effects of budget constraints on conservation network design for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity. 26, 45, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoc....
 
46.
DIVINSKY I., BECKER N., BAR P. Ecosystem service tradeoff between grazing intensity and other services - A case study in Karei-Deshe experimental cattle range in northern Israel. Ecosystem Services. 24, 16, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecos....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top