ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Research on Evaluation System of Forest
Park Rehabilitation Landscape Environment
Based on AHP – Take Jigong Mountain
Bolden Forest Park as an Example
More details
Hide details
1
Academy of forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
2
Leicester International Institute, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning124221, China
3
School of science and technology, Xinyang University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
4
Suqian Institude of Urban Planning and Design Company Limited, Suqian, Jiangsu 223800, China
Submission date: 2023-10-19
Final revision date: 2024-01-24
Acceptance date: 2024-05-13
Online publication date: 2024-09-11
Publication date: 2025-01-28
Corresponding author
Hui Wang
Academy of forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(3):3257-3268
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
[Objective] This study aims to construct a scientific and rational evaluation system for
the rehabilitation landscape of forest parks, providing a better foundation for the planning and
design of rehabilitation landscapes in forest parks. [Methods] The GST method and AHP method
were used to select and calculate the evaluation indices for the rehabilitation landscape of forest
parks. The internal visitors were selected as the research subjects, and questionnaires were randomly
distributed to score various indicator elements of the rehabilitation landscape in forest parks.
[Results] (1) 25 representative and objective indicators were selected through gray selection, while
8 indicators were not selected due to their lack of direct relevance or low measurability in the evaluation
of rehabilitation landscapes in forest parks. (2) The weight order of the criterion layer was as follows:
Psychological Health B3 (0.385), Landscape Safety B2 (0.297), Physiological Health B4 (0.176),
Landscape Comfort B1 (0.142). (3) The highest degrees of importance in each indicator layer were:
Landscape Spatial Scale (0.237) in Landscape Comfort B1, Spatial Layout (0.357) in Landscape Safety
B2, Mental Relaxation (0.372) in Psychological Health B3, Disease Prevention (0.327) in Physiological
Health B4. (4) The comprehensive score of the rehabilitation landscape in Bolden Forest Park
was 3.924, with a rating of “good”. The scores and rating levels for each individual indicator were
as follows: The comprehensive score of Psychological Health was 4.081, with a rating of “excellent”,
the highest among the four dimensions; the comprehensive score of Landscape Comfort was 3.810,
with a rating of “good”; the comprehensive score of Landscape Safety was 3.967, with a rating
of “good”; and the comprehensive score of Physiological Health was 3.602, with a rating of “good”.
[Conclusion] The overall rehabilitation landscape effect of Bolden Forest Park is at a good level, which
reflects to a certain extent the characteristics of the current rehabilitation landscape in forest parks.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
SLOANE P.D., KATZ P.R., ZİMMERMAN S. The Changing Landscape of Post-acute and Rehabilitative Care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20 (4), 389, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamd... PMid:30954130.
2.
ELDRİDGE D.J., SOLİVERES S. Rewilding soildisturbing vertebrates to rehabilitate degraded landscapes: benefits and risks. Biology Letters, 19 (4), 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2... PMid:37016814 PMCid:PMC10073907.
3.
ZİEMELNİECE A., BALODE L. The transformation of the cultural landscape of Latvian rehabilitation gardens and parks. Landscape Architecture and Art, 14, 67, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.22616/j.lan....
4.
MİN J., PAN T. Landscape Evaluation of Forest Park Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7....
5.
Lİ L., TANG Y. A New Method of Human Reliability Analysis Based on the Correlation Coefficient in the Evidence Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48 (8), 10713, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369....
6.
FENG L., ZHAO J. Evaluation of Urban Park Landscape Satisfaction Based on the Fuzzy-IPA Model: A Case Study of the Zhengzhou People's Park. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2....
7.
HAN X., SUN T., CAO T. Study on landscape quality assessment of urban forest parks: Take Nanjing Zijinshan National forest Park as an example. Ecological Indicators, 120, 106902, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
8.
YU S., DU W., Lİ M. Forest park landscape pattern system based on FPGA and GIS system. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 80, 103533, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micp....
9.
ZHU S., JİANG W. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Environmental Quality for Health Ecotourism in Huangshan National Forest Park. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8....
10.
WANG K., WANG Z., DENG J., FENG Y., Lİ Q. Study on the Evaluation of Emergency Management Capacity of Resilient Communities by the AHP-TOPSIS Method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (23), 16201, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:36498274 PMCid:PMC9738983.
11.
Qİ J., ZHANG Y., ZHANG J., CHEN Y., WU C., DUAN C., PAN Z. Research on the Evaluation of Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on the AHPCRITIC Empowerment Method. Land, 11 (8), 1196, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11....
12.
WANG Z., Lİ M., ZHANG X., SONG L. Modeling the scenic beauty of autumnal tree color at the landscape scale: A case study of Purple Mountain, Nanjing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 47, 126526, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
13.
YANG T., WANG X. Evaluation of the plant landscape suitability in mountain parks based on principal component analysis: A case study of Guiyang City. Agronomy Journal, 113 (2), 760, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.2....
14.
GAO Y., ZHANG T., ZHANG W., MENG H., ZHANG Z. Research on visual behavior characteristics and cognitive evaluation of different types of forest landscape spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54, 126788, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
15.
ZHANG L., WU C., HAO Y. Effect of The Development Level of Facilities for Forest Tourism on Tourists' Willingness to Visit Urban Forest Parks. Forests, 13 (7), 1005, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071....
16.
SHAVNİN S.A., GOLİKOV D.Y., MONTİLE A.A., MONTİLE A.I. Edge Effect: Growth and Morphogenetic Features of Scots Pine Trees in Forest Parks and Natural Stands. Russian Journal of Ecology, 51 (3), 199, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S10674....
17.
LUO J., LİU H. Analysis of Empirical Research Methods of Rehabilitation Landscape. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 668 (1), 012031, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
18.
NADERİ J.R., SHİN W.-H. Humane Design for Hospital Landscapes: A Case Study in Landscape Architecture of a Healing Garden for Nurses. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2 (1), 82, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1177/193758... PMid:21161926.
19.
ABU DABRH A.M., MEORE A., WİLSON E.W., PERLMAN A. Horticultural Therapy: An Ancient Integrative Approach for Modern Times. Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine, 28 (4), 290, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2... PMid:35100045.
20.
LU N., SONG C., KURONUMA T., IKEİ H., MİYAZAKİ Y., TAKAGAKİ M. The Possibility of Sustainable Urban Horticulture Based on Nature Therapy. Sustainability, 12 (12), 5058, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1212....