ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Plant Biomass from the Mixed Culture of Zea Mays and Phaseolus Vulgaris, and Potential Biomass Use for Methane Production
 
More details
Hide details
1
Agricultural Research, Ltd., Zahradní 400/1, 66441 Troubsko, Czech Republic
 
2
Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
 
3
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
 
4
Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
 
 
Submission date: 2026-01-09
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-06-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-07-27
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-09-10
 
 
Corresponding author
Jakub Elbl   

Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Contemporary agriculture has to face many challenges that are connected with climate change but also with the intensive form of farming. Soil erosion, loss of biodiversity, droughts, soil degradation and pollution with heavy metals (HM) are only a few of the problems. In the presented study, the term “heavy metals” is used operationally to denote metallic elements (Cr, Cd, Cu, Ni, Hg, Zn and Fe), investigated in relation to their accumulation in plant biomass and their potential effects on the process of anaerobic digestion. The use of mixed cropping systems can be an efficient tool to reduce some of these negative aspects. In this study, a possible use of the mixed cropping system (MCS) including Zea mays and Phaseolus vulgaris for phytoremediation processes and methane production was assessed in a two-year experiment. The crops were grown on fields with naturally abundant HM. The HM were accumulated more in legumes than in maize variants. There were no significant differences between HM concentrations in the pure maize culture (M) and maize grown in the MCS. The highest biological accumulation coefficient (BAC) was observed in Cd (1.06) in Variant M in 2021. The calculated theoretical methane yield (TMY) per field growth area (m3/ha) indicated that using the MCS composed of maize and bean led to a higher theoretical methane yield. TMY of the MCS was higher than TMY of the pure maize culture (M) on average by 9.61% in 2020 and by 28.07% in 2021.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (83)
1.
MAKOVÁ J., JAVOREKOVÁ S., ELBL J., MEDO J., HRICÁKOVÁ N., KOVÁČIK P. Impact of vermicompost on biological indicators of the quality of soil under maize in a greenhouse experiment. Journal of Elementology, 24 (1), 319, 2019.
 
2.
BOARDMAN J. How much is soil erosion costing us? Geography 106 (1), 32, 2021.
 
3.
ORTÍZ SANDOVAL P., AGUILERA-GÓMEZ M., KOSTKA A., GRUSZECKA-KOSOWSKA A. Cumulative exposure of xenobiotics of emerging concern from agrifood under the One Health approach (XENOBAC4OH). EFSA Journal, 23 (S1), e231104, 2025.
 
4.
ELBL J., ZÁHORA J. The comparison of microbial activity in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil stressed by drought. In Polák O., Cerkal R., Škarpa P. (Eds.) MendelNet 2014: Proceedings of International Ph.D. Students Conference. Brno, Czech Republic: Mendel University in Brno, pp. 234, 2015.
 
5.
HE Z., SHENTU J., YANG X., BALIGAR V.C., ZHANG. T., STOFFELLA P.J. Heavy Metal Contamination of Soils: Sources, Indicators and Assessment. Journal of Environmental Indicators, 9, 17, 2015.
 
6.
SHAH A., TYAGI S., SINGH R.K., TIWARI K.K., PRASAD G.G., KALIA S., KUMAR R., RAI V. Biotic and abiotic stress management in agriculture: The transformative role of nanotechnology. Plant Nano Biology, 14, 100202, 2025.
 
7.
BOSTOCK R.M., PYE M.F., ROUBTSOVA T.V. Predisposition in Plant Disease: Exploiting the Nexus in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Perception and Response. Annual Reviews Phytopathology, 52 (1), 517, 2014.
 
8.
MULLER A. Sustainable agriculture and the production of biomass for energy use. Climate Change, 94 (3-4), 319, 2009.
 
9.
LI C., HOFFLAND E., KUYPER T.W., YU Y., ZHANG C., LI H., ZHANG F., van der WERF, W. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nature Plants, 6 (6), 653, 2020.
 
10.
SHAHZAD K., MAIER S., NARODOSLAWSKY M. Biogas Production from Intercropping (Syn-Energy). Chemical Engineering Transactions, 39, 1753, 2014.
 
11.
TAKASU A.T., ARF O., MEIRELLES F.C., DE LIMA MILHOSSI E.N., PORTUGAL J.R., DE SOUZA BUZO F., KANEKO F.H., FERREIRA RODRIGUES R.A. Intercropping of grasses or legume species in maize crop in the cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 19, 18, 2020.
 
12.
BROOKER R.W., BENNETT A.E., CONG W.F., DANIELL T.J., GEORGE T.S., HALLETT P.D., HAWES C., IANNETTA P.P.M., JONES H.G., KARLEY A.J., LI L., MCKANZIE B.M., PAKEMAN R.J., PATERSON E., SCHOB C., SHEN J., SQUIRE G., WATSON C.A., THANG C., ZHANG F., ZHANG J., WHITE P.J. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist, 206 (1), 107, 2014.
 
13.
RECKLING M., BERGKVIST G., WATSON C.A., STODDARD F.L., ZANDER P.M., WALKER R.L., PRISTERI A., TONCEA I., BACHINGER J. Trade-Offs between Economic and Environmental Impacts of Introducing Legumes into Cropping Systems. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, 7 (669), 1, 2016.
 
14.
DUCHENE O., VIAN J.-F., CELETTE F. Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 240, 148, 2017.
 
15.
KINTL A., ELBL J., LOŠÁK T., VAVERKOVÁ M.D., NEDĚLNÍK J. Mixed Intercropping of Wheat and White Clover to Enhance the Sustainability of the Conventional Cropping System: Effects on Biomass Production and Leaching of Mineral Nitrogen. Sustainability, 10 (10), 3367, 2018.
 
16.
KINTL A., VÍTĚZ T., ELBL J., VÍTĚZOVÁ M., DOKULILOVÁ T., NEDĚLNÍK J., SKLÁDANKA J., BRTNICKÝ M. Mixed Culture of Corn and White Lupine as an Alternative to Silage Made from Corn Monoculture Intended for Biogas Production. BioEnergy Research, 12 (3), 694, 2019.
 
17.
ATIENZA S.G., RUBIALES D. Legumes in sustainable agriculture. Crop & Pasture Science, 68 (11), i, 2017.
 
18.
THILAKARATHNA M.S., PAPADOPOULOS Y.A., RODD A.V., GRIMMETT M., FILLMORE S.A.E., CROUSE M., PRITHIVIRAJ B. Nitrogen fixation and transfer of red clover genotypes under legume-grass forage based production systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 106 (2), 233, 2016.
 
19.
SUÁREZ J.C., ANZOLA J.A., CONTRERAS A.T., SALAS D.L., VANEGAS J.I., URBAN M.O., BEEBE S.E., RAO I.M. Agronomic performance evaluation of intercropping two common bean breeding lines with a maize variety under two types of fertilizer applications in the Colombian Amazon region. Agronomy, 12 (2), 307, 2022.
 
20.
VITEZ T., DOKULILOVA T., VITEZOVA M., ELBL J., KINTL A., KYNICKY J., HLADKY J., BRTNICKY M. The Digestion of Waste from Vegetables and Maize Processing. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11 (6), 2467, 2020.
 
21.
SOHA T., PAPP L., CSONTOS C., MUNKÁCSY B. The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation - A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, 110822, 2021.
 
22.
WANG J., CAI Y., YANG J., ZHAO X. Research trends and frontiers on source appointment of soil heavy metal: a scientometric review (2000-2020). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (38), 52764, 2021.
 
23.
VAVERKOVÁ M.D., ZLOCH J., ADAMCOVÁ D., RADZIEMSKA M., VYHNÁNEK T., TROJAN V., WINKLER J., ĐORĐEVIĆ B., ELBL J., BRTNICKÝ M. Landfill Leachate Effects on Germination and Seedling Growth of Hemp Cultivars (Cannabis Sativa L.). Waste Biomass Valorization, 10 (2), 369, 2019.
 
24.
WANG S., WANG J., LI J., HOU Y., SHI L., LIAN C., SHEN Z., CHEN Y. Evaluation of biogas production potential of trace element-contaminated plants via anaerobic digestion. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 208, 111598, 2021.
 
25.
GOLUB N., SHYNKARCHUK A., KOZLOVETS O., XINHUA S. Influence of heavy metals on the process of anaerobic fermentation of biomass by the consortia of anaerobic microorganisms. Innovative Biosystems and Bioengineering, 4 (4), 211, 2020.
 
26.
LIU L., ZHANG Q., HU L., TANG J., XU L., YANG X., YONG J.W.H., CHEN X. Legumes Can Increase Cadmium Contamination in Neighboring Crops. PLoS ONE, 7 (8), e42944, 2012.
 
27.
ZHANG H., TIAN Y., WANG L., ZHANG L., DAI L. Ecophysiological characteristics and biogas production of cadmium-contaminated crops. Bioresource Technology, 146, 628, 2013.
 
28.
ZHANG L., YANG H., WEI D., CHEN Z., WANG Q., SONG Y., MA Y., ZHANG H. Tolerance of anaerobic digestion sludge to heavy metals: COD removal, biogas production, and microbial variation. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 55, 104157, 2023.
 
29.
HUNCE S.Y., CLEMENTE R., BERNAL M.P. Energy production potential of phytoremediation plant biomass: Helianthus annuus and Silybum marianum. Industrial Crops and Products, 135, 206, 2019.
 
30.
BERNAL M.P., GRIPPI D., CLEMENTE R. Potential of the Biomass of Plants Grown in Trace Element-Contaminated Soils under Mediterranean Climatic Conditions for Bioenergy Production. Agronomy, 11 (9), 1750, 2021.
 
31.
TOKER P., CANCI H., TURHAN I., İSÇİ A., SCHERZINGER M., KORDROSTAMI M., YOL E. The advantages of intercropping to improve productivity in food and forage production - a review. Plant Production Science, 27 (3), 155, 2024.
 
32.
CHEN C., WESTCOTT M., NEILL K., WICHMAN D., KNOX M. Row Configuration and Nitrogen Application for Barley-Pea Intercropping in Montana. Agronomy Journal, 96 (6), 1730, 2004.
 
33.
WORKAYEHU T., WORTMANN C.S. Maize-Bean Intercrop Weed Suppression and Profitability in Southern Ethiopia. Agronomy Journal, 103 (4), 1058, 2011.
 
34.
PRETTY J., BHARUCHA Z.P. Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Annals of Botany, 114 (8), 1571, 2014.
 
35.
KUBÍKOVÁ Z., HUTYROVÁ H., SMEJKALOVÁ H., KINTL A., ELBL J. Application of extended BBCH scale for studying the development of Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth. Annals of Applied Biology, 181 (3), 332, 2022.
 
36.
KINTL A., SMERINGAI J., SOBOTKOVÁ J., HUŇADY I., BRTNICKÝ M., HAMMERSCHMIEDT T., ELBL J. Mixed cropping system of maize and bean as a local source of N-substances for the nutrition of farm animals. European Journal of Agronomy, 154, 127059, 2024.
 
37.
LOUČKA R., LANG J., JAMBOR V., NEDĚLNÍK J., TŘINÁCTÝ J., TYROLOVÁ Y., KUČERA J. Verified methodical process of obtaining and processing the values in the national system of evaluation of silage corn hybrids, The certified methodology, 1st Ed.; Agricultural Research Institute Ltd.: Troubsko, Czech Republic, pp. 20, 2014 [In Czech].
 
38.
CSN EN 11885, Water quality - Determination of selected elements by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) (ISO 11885:2007) 2009. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/cata... (accessed on 10 June 2022).
 
39.
HELRICH K. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed.;.AOAC: Arlington, Virginia, USA, 1990.
 
40.
LESTEUR M., BELLON-MAUREL V., GONZALEZ C., LATRILLE E., ROGER J.M., JUNQUA G., STEYER J.P. Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: A review. Process Biochemistry, 45 (4), 431, 2010.
 
41.
TRIOLO J.M., SOMMER S.G., MØLLER H.B., WEISBJERG M.R., JIANG X.Y. A new algorithm to characterize biodegradability of biomass during anaerobic digestion: influence of lignin concentration on methane production potential. Bioresource Technology, 102 (20), 9395, 2011.
 
42.
PHAM C.H., TRIOLO J.M., CU T.T.T., PEDERSEN L., SOMMER S.G. Validation and Recommendation of Methods to Measure Biogas Production Potential of Animal Manure. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Science, 26 (6), 864, 2013.
 
43.
AMIN H., ARAIN B.A., JAHANGIR T.M., ABBASI M.S., AMIN F. Accumulation and distribution of lead (Pb) in plant tissues of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): profitable phytoremediation with biofuel crops. Geology Ecology and Landscape, 2 (1), 51 2018.
 
44.
KARASU A., OZ M., BAYRAM G., TURGUT IL. The effect of nitrogen levels on forage yield and some attributes in some hybrid corn (Zea mays indentata Sturt.) cultivars sown as second crop for silage corn. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4 (3), 166, 2009.
 
45.
LI J., WEN, X., YANG J., YANG W., XIN Y., ZHANG L., LIU H., HE Y., YAN Y. Effects of Maize Varieties on Biomass Yield and Silage Quality of Maize-Soybean Intercropping in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Fermentation, 8 (10), 542, 2022.
 
46.
SOE HTET M.N., WANG H., YADAV V., SOMPOUVISETH T., FENG B. Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Regional. Sustainability, 14 (10), 6022, 2022.
 
47.
KINTL A., HUŇADY I., VÍTĚZ T., BRTNICKÝ M., SOBOTKOVÁ J., HAMMERSCHMIEDT T., VÍTĚZOVÁ M., HOLÁTKO J., SMUTNÝ V., ELBL J. Effect of Legumes Intercropped with Maize on Biomass Yield and Subsequent Biogas Production. Agronomy, 13 (11), 2775, 2023.
 
48.
IPTAS S., ACAR A.A. Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52 (11), 515, 2006.
 
49.
JAVANMARD A., NASAB A., JAVANSHIR A., MOGHADDAM M., JANMOHAMMADI H. Forage yield and quality in intercropping of maize with different legumes as double-cropped. International Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 7 (1), 163, 2009.
 
50.
NIELFA A., CANO R., FDZ-POLANCO M. Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge. Biotechnology Reports, 5, 14, 2014.
 
51.
OLADEJO N.A., ANEGBE B., ADENIYI O. Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil and Maize Plant (Zea mays) in the Vicinity of Two Government Approved Dumpsites in Benin City, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences, 3 (3), 1, 2017.
 
52.
LIU W.-H., ZHAO J.-Z., OUYANG Z.-Y., SÖDERLUND L., LIU G.-H. Impacts of sewage irrigation on heavy metal distribution and contamination in Beijing, China. Environment International, 31 (6), 805, 2005.
 
53.
ZHU S.-Y., MA X., GUO R., AI S., LIU B., ZHANG W., ZHANG Y. A Field Study on Heavy Metals Phytoattenuation Potential of Monocropping and Intercropping of Maize and/or Legumes in Weak Alkaline Soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 18 (10), 1014, 2016.
 
54.
BOADI N., OKYERE H., BADU M., MENSAH J., OWUSU-APPIAH I. Effect of Mercury on the Proximate Composition of Maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 3, 487, 2013.
 
55.
WICHE O., SZÉKELY B., KUMMER N.-A., MOSCHNER C., HEILMEIER H. Effects of intercropping of oat (Avena sativa L.) with white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) on the mobility of target elements for phytoremediation and phytomining in soil solution. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 18 (9), 900, 2016.
 
56.
NASAR J., SHAO Z., GAO Q., ZHOU X., FAHAD S., LIU S., LI C., BANDA S.K.J., KGORUTLA L.E., DAWAR, K.M. Maize-alfalfa intercropping induced changes in plant and soil nutrient status under nitrogen application. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Sciences, 68 (2), 151, 2022.
 
57.
SAEED Q., XIUKANG W., HAIDER F.U., KUČERIK J., MUMTAZ M.Z., HOLATKO J., NASEEM M., KINTL A., EJAZ M., NAVEED M., BRTNICKY M., MUSTAFA A. Rhizosphere Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion, Biocontrol, and Bioremediation of Contaminated Sites: A Comprehensive Review of Effects and Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22 (19), 10529, 2021.
 
58.
CLEMENS S., WEBER M. The essential role of coumarin secretion for Fe acquisition from alkaline soil. Plant Signaling and Behaviour, 11 (2), 2016.
 
59.
STASSEN M.J.J., HSU S.-H., PIETERSE C.M.J., STRINGLIS I.A. Coumarin Communication Along the Microbiome-Root-Shoot Axis. Trends in Plant Science, 26 (2), 169, 2021.
 
60.
AN L., PAN Y., WANG Z., ZHU C. Heavy metal absorption status of five plant species in monoculture and intercropping. Plant Soil, 345 (1-2), 237, 2011.
 
61.
GUAN Y., SHAO C., JU M. Heavy Metal Contamination Assessment and Partition for Industrial and Mining Gathering Areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11 (7), 7286, 2014.
 
62.
TIAN Y., ZHANG H., GUO W., CHEN Z.S., WEI X., ZHANG L., HAN L., DAI L. Assessment of the phytoremediation potential of bioenergy crop maize (Zea mays) in soil contaminated by cadmium: Morphology, photosynthesis and accumulation. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 21 (11), 3575, 2012.
 
63.
FITZ W.J., WENZEL W.W. Arsenic transformations in the soil-rhizosphere-plant system: fundamentals and potential application to phytoremediation. Journal of Biotechnology, 99 (3), 259, 2002.
 
64.
WIECZOREK J., BARAN A., BUBAK A. Mobility, bioaccumulation in plants, and risk assessment of metals in soils. Science of The Total Environment, 882, 163574, 2023.
 
65.
ZENG F., ALI S., ZHANG H., OUYANG Y., QIU B., WU F., ZHANG G. The influence of pH and organic matter content in paddy soil on heavy metal availability and their uptake by rice plants. Environmental Pollution, 159 (1), 84, 2011.
 
66.
RADZIEMSKA M., GUSIATIN Z.M., MAZUR Z., HAMMERSCHMIEDT T., BĘŚ A., KINTL A., GALIOVA M.V., HOLATKO J., BLAZEJCZYK A., KUMAR V., BRTNICKY M. Biochar-Assisted Phytostabilization for Potentially Toxic Element Immobilization. Sustainability, 14 (1), 445, 2022.
 
67.
MALAYERI B.E., CHEHREGANI A., YOUSEFI N., LORESTANI B. Identification of the hyper accumulator plants in copper and iron mine in Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11 (3), 490, 2008.
 
68.
ALRAWASHDEH K.A.B., GUL E., YANG Q., YANG H., BARTOCCI P., FANTOZZI F. Effect of heavy metals in the performance of anaerobic digestion of olive mill waste. Processes, 8 (9), 1146, 2020.
 
69.
KADAM R., KHANTHONG K., JANG H., LEE J., PARK J. Occurrence, Fate, and Implications of Heavy Metals during Anaerobic Digestion: A Review. Energies, 15 (22), 8618, 2022.
 
70.
KINTL A., VÍTĚZ T., HUŇADY I., BRTNICKÝ M., NOVÁK D., LOCHMAN J., VÍTĚZOVÁ M., HAMMERSCHMIEDT T., HOLÁTKO J., ELBL J. Anaerobic Fermentation of Silage from the Above-Ground Biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) and Maize (Zea mays L.) as a New and Promising Input Raw Material for Biogas Production. Applied Sciences, 12 (22), 11417, 2022.
 
71.
LI Y., ZHANG R., LIU G., CHEN C., HE Y., LIU X. Comparison of methane production potential, biodegradability, and kinetics of different organic substrates. Bioresources and Technology, 149, 565, 2013.
 
72.
KINTL A., ELBL J., VÍTĚZ T., BRTNICKÝ M., SKLÁDANKA J., HAMMERSCHMIEDT T., VÍTĚZOVÁ M. Possibilities of Using White Sweetclover Grown in Mixture with Maize for Biomethane Production. Agronomy, 10 (9), 1407, 2020.
 
73.
RENGGAMAN A., CHOI H.L., SUDIARTO S.I.A., FEBRISIANTOSA A., AHN D.H., CHOUNG Y.W., SURESH A. Biochemical methane potential of swine slaughter waste, swine slurry, and its codigestion effect. Energies, 14 (21), 7103, 2021.
 
74.
AMON T., AMON B., KRYVORUCHKO V., MACHMÜLLER A., HOPFNER-SIXT K., BODIROZA V., HRBEK R., FRIEDEL J., PÖTSCH E., WAGENTRISTL H., SCHREINER M., ZOLLITSCH W. Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations. Bioresources Technology, 98 (17), 3204, 2007.
 
75.
HERRMANN C., PLOGSTIES V., WILLMS M., HENGELHAUPT F., EBERL V., ECKNER J., STRAUß C., IDLER C., HEIERMANN M. Methane production potential of various crop species grown in energy crop rotations. Landtechnik, 71 (6), 194, 2016.
 
76.
GUNASEELAN V.N. Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26 (4), 389, 2004.
 
77.
AMON T., KRYVORUCHKO V., AMON B., MOITZI G., LYSON D., HACKL E., JEREMIC D., ZOL-LITSCH W., PÖTSCH E. Optimierung der Biogaserzeugung aus den Energie-pflanzen Mais und Kleegras, Forschungsprojekt Nr.1249, 1st ed.; Institut für Land Umwelt- und Energietechnik, BOKU, Wien, Austria, 2003 [In German].
 
78.
PAKARINEN O., LEHTOMÄKI A., RISSANEN S., RINTALA J. Storing energy crops for methane production: Effects of solids content and biological additive. Bioresource Technology, 99 (15), 7074, 2008.
 
79.
KAISER F. Methanerträge verschiedener nachwachsender Rohstoffe. Biogas Journal, 2 (22), 2004 [In German].
 
80.
FERDEȘ M., PARASCHIV G., IONESCU M., DINCĂ M.N., MOICEANU G., ZĂBAVĂ B.Ș. Anaerobic co-digestion: A way to potentiate the synergistic effect of multiple substrates and microbial diversity. Energies, 16 (5), 2116, 2023.
 
81.
LEHTOMÄKI A., VIINIKAINEN T.A., RINTALA J.A. Screening boreal energy crops and crop residues for methane biofuel production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32 (6), 541, 2008.
 
82.
HEIERMANN M., PLÖCHL M., LINKE B., SCHELLE H., HERRMANN C. Biogas Crops - Part 1: Specifications and suitability of field crops for anaerobic digestion. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 11, 1, 2009. .
 
83.
ZHANG W., KONG T., XING W., LI R., YANG T., YAO N., LV D. Links between carbon/nitrogen ratio, synergy and microbial characteristics of long-term semi-continuous anaerobic co digestion of food waste, cattle manure and corn straw. Bioresource Technology, 343, 126094, 2021.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top