ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Evaluation of the Proper Electrode Spacing for ERI Surveys in Open Dumpsites Using Forward Modeling
 
More details
Hide details
1
The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand
 
2
Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment, PERDO, Bangkok, Thailand
 
3
School of Energy, Environment and Materials, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand
 
 
Submission date: 2022-05-07
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-10-11
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-10-21
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-12-19
 
 
Publication date: 2023-01-12
 
 
Corresponding author
Komsilp Wangyao   

The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, 126 Prachauthit Rd, Bangmod, Tungkru, 10140, Bangkok, Thailand
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2023;32(1):535-545
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Electrical resistivity imaging surveys are widely conducted in waste disposal sites due to their ease of operation and accurate results; however, some essential measurement parameters, such as optimal electrode spacing, have not been thoroughly evaluated. Accordingly, this study aims to identify the optimal electrode spacing for electrical resistivity surveys in open dumpsites. An electrical resistivity survey was conducted at the Nonthaburi disposal site, Thailand, and the results were compared to synthetic cases simulated using the forward modeling technique. Electrode spacing values of 2, 2.5, 4, and 5 m were used. The models were evaluated using the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient, model sensitivity, and root mean square error. The real case survey results illustrate that small electrode spacings of 2 and 2.5 m provide a realistic model, however, the root mean square error is higher due to the use of more outlier electrodes during measurement. Consistent with the synthetic case studies, electrode spacing values of 2 and 2.5 m yielded accurate inverted models. Overall, this study illustrates the benefits of using a forward modeling technique for selecting the optimal electrode spacing for open dumpsite surveys.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (7):
1.
Advanced ERT techniques for methane potential evaluation in controlled dump sites: A forward modeling approach
Pornchanok Boonsakul, Desell Suanburi, Sirintornthep Towprayoon, Chart Chiemchaisri, Komsilp Wangyao
Results in Engineering
 
2.
Evaluation of shear strength parameters for municipal solid waste from open dumpsites using direct shear tests and electrical resistivity tomography
Parichat Suknark, Sirintornthep Towprayoon, Sompote Youwai, Chart Chiemchaisri, Komsilp Wangyao
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
 
3.
Landslide Susceptibility Zonation Based on Seismic Vulnerability Index and Subsurface Lithology Derived from Resistivity Values
Ira Jam’iyatul Qalbiyah, Adi Susilo, Eko Andi Suryo
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA
 
4.
Maximizing RDF recovery potential through the integration of electrical resistivity tomography and frequency-domain electromagnetic surveys for waste characterization in open dump mining
Pornchanok Boonsakul, Sasidhorn Buddhawong, Komsilp Wangyao
Science of The Total Environment
 
5.
Investigating soil and groundwater contamination around the Kpone Engineered Landfill site, Ghana, using geoelectrical methods
Ralph Tagoe, Franklin Obiri-Nyarko, Collins Okrah, Patrick A. Mainoo, Evans Manu, David D. Wemegah, Anthony A. Duah, Anthony Y. Karikari, William A. Agyekum
Acta Geophysica
 
6.
Laboratory-Scale Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) of Anomaly Inside Fine Sandy Soil, Comparison of Arrays in 2D and 3D Inversion Results
Reza Ghiassi, Sina Ansari, Ali Kavand
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
 
7.
Investigating the relationship between resistivity tomography and methane emissions in a controlled dumpsite: A comprehensive study of resistivity profiles
Pornchanok Boonsakul, Desell Suanburi, Sirintornthep Towprayoon, Chart Chiemchaisri, Tomonori Ishigaki, Yugo Isobe, Komsilp Wangyao
Results in Engineering
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top