ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Influent Quality and Quantity Prediction in Wastewater Treatment Plant: Model Construction and Evaluation
Rui Wang 1,2,3
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 611756 Chengdu, China
 
2
Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 610041 Chengdu, China
 
3
Environmental Microbiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 610041 Chengdu, China
 
4
School of Environment, Tsinghua University,100091 Beijing, China
 
 
Submission date: 2020-12-03
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-01-22
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-01-25
 
 
Online publication date: 2021-06-29
 
 
Publication date: 2021-07-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Zhouliang Tan   

Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Chengdu Institute of biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.9, 4th Block, People's South Street, Chengdu, C, 610041, Chengdu, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021;30(5):4267-4276
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Influent quality and quantity were important factors that caused the abnormal operation of WWTP. In this study, the prediction models of influent quality and quantity were established based on four machine learning methods of Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, ElasticNet Regression and Lasso Regression. The meteorological conditions (precipitation and air temperature) and influent indicators (influent quantity, COD, and NH3-N) were used as training data. The influent quantity prediction of the models were evaluated using the historical data obtained from a WWTP located in western China, and the results showed that the normal rates of influent quantity were ranged from 98.9%-100%. The highest accuracy was obtained with Ridge method which was 86.19% .
For influent quality (COD) prediction, Ridge method is relatively ideal, with 82% accuracy. For influent quality (NH3-N) prediction, because of higher data normality rates, Lasso and ElasticNet method were more ideal, both with 74% accuracy. Further, in view of the reason of low prediction accuracy, this paper puts forward the idea of model improvement from the three directions of data fluctuation, correlation and amount. It is expected that this study will provide reference for similar research and provide a reference and thought for similar research.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (23):
1.
An effluent risk informed closed-loop framework for early warning of influent anomalies using COD soft sensing
Wenjun Liu, Yang He, Yaorong Shu, Linghao Chen, Feixiang Zan, Xiejuan Lu, Juan Mao, Xiaohui Wu
Water Research
 
2.
Multi-step ahead prediction of hourly influent characteristics for wastewater treatment plants: a case study from North America
Pengxiao Zhou, Zhong Li, Spencer Snowling, Rajeev Goel, Qianqian Zhang
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
 
3.
Quality prediction and sensitivity analysis of fine chemical products based on support matrix machine
Tongwei Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Fei He
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
 
4.
Prediction of compressive strength of GGBFS and Flyash-based geopolymer composite by linear regression, lasso regression, and ridge regression
Ujjwal Sharma, Nakul Gupta, Manvendra Verma
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
 
5.
Machine Learning in Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review
Wenqi Yang, Haiyan Li
ACS ES&T Water
 
6.
Machine learning in industrial wastewater treatment: Critical insights into modelling approaches and digital futures
Nur Diyana Suzaimi, Azzam Abuhabib, Mohamad Darwish, Arifah Che AlHadi, Abdul Wahab Mohammad, Sofiah Hamzah
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
 
7.
FiTiformer: A fluctuation–trend modulation model for multi-step forecasting of wastewater influent parameters
Yiqi Liu, Shuyang Ren, Gang Fang
Journal of Water Process Engineering
 
8.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning-based monitoring and design of biological wastewater treatment systems
Nitin Kumar Singh, Manish Yadav, Vijai Singh, Hirendrasinh Padhiyar, Vinod Kumar, Shashi Kant Bhatia, Pau-Loke Show
Bioresource Technology
 
9.
Predicting Influent and Effluent Quality Parameters for a UASB-Based Wastewater Treatment Plant in Asia Covering Data Variations during COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach
Parul Yadav, Manik Chandra, Nishat Fatima, Saqib Sarwar, Aditya Chaudhary, Kumar Saurabh, Brijesh Singh Yadav
Water
 
10.
Data-Based Modelling of Chemical Oxygen Demand for Industrial Wastewater Treatment
Henri Pörhö, Jani Tomperi, Aki Sorsa, Esko Juuso, Jari Ruuska, Mika Ruusunen
Applied Sciences
 
11.
Enhancing Urban Drainage Resilience Through Holistic Stormwater Regulation: A Review
Jiankun Xie, Wei Qiang, Yiyuan Lin, Yuzhou Huang, Kai-Qin Xu, Dangshi Zheng, Shengzhen Chen, Yanyan Pei, Gongduan Fan
Water
 
12.
Advances in Bioreactor Technologies for Sustainable Aquaculture Water Treatment
Alebachew Molla
American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
 
13.
The AI Cleanse: Transforming Wastewater Treatment Through Artificial Intelligence
Payal Gupta, Garima Bhardwaj, Shivani Dubey, Tarun Tayal, Abhishek Sengupta, Priyanka Narad
 
14.
Application of machine learning at wastewater treatment facilities: a review of the science, challenges and barriers by level of implementation
Sanaz Imen, Henry C. Croll, Nicole L. McLellan, Mark Bartlett, Geno Lehman, Joseph G. Jacangelo
Environmental Technology Reviews
 
15.
Forecasting influent wastewater quality by chaos coupled machine learning optimized with Bayesian algorithm
D. Ramkumar, V. Jothiprakash
Journal of Water Process Engineering
 
16.
A new perspective on real-time monitoring and function interpretation of nitrification based on machine learning and mass-to-charge fingerprint
Chen-Shun Lu, Shilong He, Chunmiao Wang, Jiaxun Guo, Yunzhi Qian, Yonghao Zhu, Xiaoliang Fan, Jiayao Ding, Shen Han, Chao Li, An Xu, Bo Nie, Min Yang
Water Research
 
17.
Base modified mesoporous silica adsorbent for heavy metal adsorption: Optimization of adsorption efficiency with machine learning algorithms
Shital Tank, Madhu Pandey, Jagat Jyoti Rath, Mahuya Bandyopadhyay
Hybrid Advances
 
18.
The pivotal and transformative role of artificial intelligence in advanced multidimensional modeling and optimization of complex cefixime separation processes using 3-hydroxyphenol-formaldehyde nanostructures: A multi-layered analytical approach
Hossein Azarpira, Parsa Khakzad, Mohammad Reza Alipour, Amir Sheikhmohammadi
Microchemical Journal
 
19.
Prediction of Wastewater Quality at a Wastewater Treatment Plant Inlet Using a System Based on Machine Learning Methods
Barbara Wodecka, Jakub Drewnowski, Anita Białek, Ewa Łazuka, Joanna Szulżyk-Cieplak
Processes
 
20.
Lessons learned and perspectives on constrained data collection and preparation for a predictive machine learning model applied to transportation industry in a non-digitalised environment
Isaac KABEYA MWEPU Simon, MUKALA Patrick
International Journal of Computer Engineering Research
 
21.
Bridging Time-Scale Mismatch in WWTPs: Long-Term Influent Forecasting via Decomposition and Heterogeneous Temporal Attention
Wenhui Lei, Fei Yuan, Yanjing Xu, Yanyan Nie, Jian He
Water
 
22.
Linking elevated rainfall with sewage discharge volume
Wiktor Halecki, Anna Młyńska, Tomasz Sionkowski, Krzysztof Chmielowski
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
 
23.
A CEEMDAN-CFO-RF Framework for Wastewater Influent Forecasting with Systematic Time-Series Decomposition Comparison and Multiplant Applicability
Xueying Shi, Yuying Fan, Zeyu Li, Ge Yu, Shuo Li, Xiping Zhao, Dejun Bian
ACS ES&T Water
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top