ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Measurements and Factors of Biased Technological Progress in China’s Marine Economy
,
 
,
 
Lei Wang 2,3
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Economics and Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, P.R. China
 
2
School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, P.R. China
 
3
Marine Development Studies Institute of OUC, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities, Ministry of Education, Qingdao, P.R. China
 
4
School of Management, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, P.R. China
 
 
Submission date: 2019-10-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2020-02-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-03-04
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-05-18
 
 
Publication date: 2020-08-05
 
 
Corresponding author
Lei Wang   

Ocean University of China, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020;29(6):4109-4122
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A new technology may be biased towards saving energy, or reducing pollution emission or increasing economic output. It is necessary for the high-quality development of marine economy to promote environment-based technological progress. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the biased technological progress and its influencing factors of China’s marine economy from 2002 to 2016. We used a DEA-Malmquist model to measure the biased technological progress. Then we further analyzed influencing factors of biased technological progress. Our research found that the TFP of the marine economy was basically growing, and this growth was mainly due to a positive impact of technological progress. In general, the technological progress of marine economy is gradually biased towards energy conservation and emissions reduction. Furthermore, technological progress in the Yangtze River Delta are more conducive to energy conservation. The marine economic production in the Pan-Pearl River Delta is more inclined to promote production growth, while tit is most concerned about environmental protection in the Bohai Rim region. In addition, factors such as environmental regulation, economic level, FDI and industrial scale have different impacts on biased technological progress of marine economy. The results show that the directive regulations have a greater impact on the input-biased technological progress, while the incentive regulations have a greater impact on the output-biased technological progress. Therefore, this study has important guiding significance for energy conservation and emission reduction of marine economy in China. And the green development path of China’s marine economy can provide a reference for the development of European blue economy.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (17):
1.
Heterogeneous industrial agglomeration, its coordinated development and total factor energy efficiency
Wei Zhang, Jing Cheng, Xuemeng Liu, Zhangrong Zhu
Environment, Development and Sustainability
 
2.
The pattern evolution and spatial heterogeneity of green development level of China’s marine economy
Chong Huang, Yaning Zhao, Kedong Yin, Hongshuo Zhang
Frontiers in Marine Science
 
3.
Education, Science and Technology, and Talent Integrated Development: Evidence from China
Fei Fan, Tianyi Song, Xiaoqing Zhai
Regional Science and Environmental Economics
 
4.
The study of coevolution relationship among coastal marine economy, innovation, and ecology based on Chinese complex systems
Jingrong Xu, Jie Tian, Yongjian Liu
Finance Research Letters
 
5.
Green-biased technical change in energy and environmental factors and its influencing factors of transportation industry in China: An analysis based on BAM-DEA model
Yuechi Zhang, Ge Wu, Zhuang Miao
International Journal of Sustainable Transportation
 
6.
Study on the influence mechanism and level measurement of agricultural green development—A case study of China
Hongfeng Liu, Huiliang Liu
Frontiers in Environmental Economics
 
7.
The spatio-temporal characteristics and dynamic evolution of coupling and coordinated development of innovation factor allocation and green economy in China
Kangshun Geng, Xiaotao Zhang, Hong Jiang, Zixuan Zhuang
Frontiers in Environmental Science
 
8.
Research on the dynamic co-evolution of the complex system of economy-innovation-environment of the marine industry in China
Wang Qirong, Xu Jingrong, Zhang Yang
Frontiers in Marine Science
 
9.
Does environmentally biased technological progress reduce air pollution emissions? empirical analysis based on spatial model and PSTR model
Yuxin Meng, Lu Liu, Qiying Ran
Frontiers in Environmental Science
 
10.
The synergy effect of energy security and carbon-haze collaborative management: From the perspective of biased technological progress
Chenxi Zhang, Sasa Yang
Environmental Research
 
11.
Spatiotemporal characteristic and evolution of China's marine economic resilience
Xiaoqing Zhai, Caizhi Sun, Wei Zou, Shuai Hao
Ocean & Coastal Management
 
12.
The impact of marine industrial structure rationalization on marine economic growth
Dongqin Li
Journal of Sea Research
 
13.
Evaluation of China's marine economic growth quality based on set pair analysis
Baiqiong Liu, Min Xu, Jing Wang, Zaifeng Wang, Lin Zhao
Marine Policy
 
14.
Unveiling new insights into China's marine ecosystem: Exploring the fishing grounds load capacity curve
Hicham Ayad, Abdelhak Lefilef
Journal of Cleaner Production
 
15.
Is the green technological progress bias of mariculture suitable for its factor endowment? ——Empirical results from 10 coastal provinces and cities in China
Wenhan Ren, Qi Zeng
Marine Policy
 
16.
Can China’s Campaign-Style Environmental Regulation Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity?
Mingze Du, Tongwei Zhang, Dehui Wang
Sustainability
 
17.
Does digital technology promote the sustainable development of the marine equipment manufacturing industry in China?
Xinhua He, Qiuyun Ping, Wenfa Hu
Marine Policy
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top