ORIGINAL RESEARCH
A Novel Framework for Air Quality
Forecasting Using Graph Convolutional
Network-Based Time Series Decomposition
More details
Hide details
1
School of Electromechanical Engineering, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology
2
Department of Electronic Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea
3
School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University; Nanjing 210023, China
4
Department of Quantitative Analysis, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421,
Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Computer Science, Al Ain University, UAE
Submission date: 2024-01-14
Final revision date: 2024-03-20
Acceptance date: 2024-04-18
Online publication date: 2024-10-25
Publication date: 2025-01-28
Corresponding author
Chan-Su Lee
Department of Electronic Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea
Muhammad Tahir Naseem
Department of Electronic Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si 38541, Republic of Korea
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(3):2175-2186
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study provides an empirical investigation into the effectiveness of several deep learning models in
forecasting ambient concentrations of particulate matter with a diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5),
nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). These pollutants are critical due to their adverse impacts on
human health and the environment. We evaluated four distinct models: Graph Convolutional Network (GCN),
Empirical Mode Decomposition combined with GCN (EMD+GCN), Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition
with Gated Recurrent Unit and GCN, and GCN with an attention mechanism (GCN_ATT). Through rigorous
computational experiments, the models were assessed against multiple statistical metrics including Mean Absolute
Error (MAE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and the Coefficient of
Determination (R2). The EEMD+GRU+GCN model consistently outperformed the others across all pollutants,
demonstrating the lowest MAE, indicating its strong predictive accuracy. Similarly, it maintained the smallest
MSE, suggesting it was particularly adept at reducing the influence of larger errors in predictions. Moreover, it
achieved the lowest MAPE across the datasets, confirming its robustness in percentage terms relative to the scale
of the actual values, a critical indicator of practical applicability for air quality forecasting. The GCN model,
while foundational, showed significant limitations, especially in the prediction of NO2 and SO2, as evidenced
by its negative R2 values, indicating a poor fit that was outperformed by simple average models. The GCN_
ATT model did not show the expected improvement that the attention mechanism might promise, suggesting
that additional fine-tuning or structural model changes are required. In conclusion, the integration of ensemble
empirical mode decomposition techniques with advanced neural network architectures such as GRUs and GCNs
provides a compelling approach to air quality forecasting. The proposed model’s ability to capture complex
spatiotemporal dependencies in environmental data makes it a promising tool for environmental monitoring and
policy-making, offering significant benefits for public health and ecological protection.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (71)
1.
BIKIS A. Urban Air Pollution and Greenness in Relation to Public Health. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2023, 8516622, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8... PMid:36755782 PMCid:PMC9902165.
2.
ZHAN C., XIE M., LU H., LIU B., WU Z., WANG T., ZHUANG B., LI M., LI S. Impacts of urbanization on air quality and the related health risks in a city with complex terrain. Atmospheric. Chemistry and Physics, 23 (1), 771, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23....
3.
SEBASTIÃO B.F., HORTELÃO R.M., GRANADAS S.S., FARIA J.M., PINTO J.R., HENRIQUES H.R. Air quality self-management in asthmatic patients with COPD. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 11 (1), 46, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijns... PMid:38352284 PMCid:PMC10859576.
4.
BARUA S., NATH S.D. The impact of COVID-19 on air pollution: Evidence from global data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126755, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle... PMid:34754147 PMCid:PMC8570089.
5.
MANISALIDIS I., STAVROPOULOU E., STAVROPOULOS A., BEZIRTZOGLOU E. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.... PMid:32154200 PMCid:PMC7044178.
6.
ABUBAKAR I.R., MANIRUZZAMAN K.M., DANO U.L., ALSHIHRI F.S., ALSHAMMARI M.S., AHMED S.M.S., AL-GEHLANI W.A.G., ALRAWAF T.I. Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19 (19), 12717, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:36232017 PMCid:PMC9566108.
7.
GUL H., DAS B. The Impacts of Air Pollution on Human Health and Well-Being: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Environmental Impact and Management Policy, 1, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.55529/jeimp....
8.
ENKH-UNDRAA D., KANDA S., SHIMA M., SHIMONO T., MIYAKE M., YODA Y., NAGNII S., NISHIYAMA T. Coal burning-derived SO₂ and traffic-derived NO₂ linked to respiratory symptoms in schoolchildren. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 24 (1), 66, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199... PMid:31775603 PMCid:PMC6882210.
9.
BĂLĂ G.P., RÂJNOVEANU R.M., TUDORACHE E., MOTIȘAN R., OANCEA C. Air pollution exposure—the (in)visible risk factor for respiratory diseases. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 28 (16), 19615, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:33660184 PMCid:PMC8099844.
10.
ZHENG X.Y., ORELLANO P., LIN H.L., JIANG M., GUAN W.J. Short-term exposure to ozone, NO₂, SO₂ and asthma-related hospital visits. Environmental International, 150, 106435, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envi... PMid:33601224.
11.
ZHAO Y., KONG D., FU J., ZHANG Y., CHEN Y., LIU Y., CHANG Z., LIU Y., LIU X., XU K., JIANG C., FAN Z. Air pollution exposure and childhood asthma hospitalizations. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 798746, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.... PMid:34976938 PMCid:PMC8718688.
12.
SURIT P., WONGTANASARASIN W., BOONNAG C., WITTAYACHAMNANKUL B. AQI and emergency visits for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. PLoS One, 18 (11), e0294107, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMid:37972204 PMCid:PMC10653395.
13.
PRAKASH J., AGRAWAL S.B., AGRAWAL M. Global Trends of Acidity in Rainfall. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23 (1), 398, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729... PMid:36415481 PMCid:PMC9672585.
14.
GRENNFELT P., ENGLERYD A., FORSIUS M., HOV Ø., RODHE H., COWLING E. Acid rain and air pollution: 50 years of progress. Ambio, 49 (4), 849, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280... PMid:31542884 PMCid:PMC7028813.
15.
LEE Y.G., LEE P.H., CHOI S.M., AN M.H., JANG A.S. Effects of Air Pollutants on Airway Diseases. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18 (18), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:34574829 PMCid:PMC8465980.
16.
WANG C., WOLTERS P.J., CALFEE C.S., LIU S., BALMES J.R., ZHAO Z., KOYAMA T., WARE L.B. Long-term ozone exposure & telomere length. Environmental International, 141, 105780, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envi... PMid:32417614 PMCid:PMC7535086.
17.
WANG Z., LIU J., WANG B., ZHANG B., DENG N. Health benefits from risk information of air pollution in China. Scientific Reports, 13 (1), 15432, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:37723248 PMCid:PMC10507042.
20.
TIAN X., GUAN T., GUO Y., ZHANG G., KONG J. Oligodendrocyte susceptibility to CO poisoning. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 815, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.... PMid:32903698 PMCid:PMC7438756.
21.
ROCA-BARCELÓ A., CRABBE H., GHOSH R., et al. Carbon monoxide poisoning hospitalization trends in England. Preventive Medicine, 136, 106104, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypme... PMid:32353574 PMCid:PMC7262581.
22.
WEAVER L.K. Carbon monoxide poisoning. Undersea Hyperbaric Medical Society, 47 (1), 151, 2020.
23.
NING K., ZHOU Y.Y., ZHANG N., SUN X.J., LIU W.W., HAN C.H. Neurocognitive sequelae post-CO poisoning. Medical Gas Research, 10 (1), 30, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2045-9... PMid:32189667 PMCid:PMC7871936.
24.
ALHARTHY N., ALANAZI A., ALMOQAYTIB A., et al. CO poisoning demographics in Riyadh ED. Int. J. Emergency Medicine, 17 (1), 25, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245... PMid:38408885 PMCid:PMC10895805.
25.
YU J., LEE J., CHO Y., OH J., KANG H., LIM T.H., KO B.S. Carboxyhemoglobin levels by blood gas vs pulse oximetry. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14 (2), 168, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm140... PMid:38392600 PMCid:PMC10890311.
26.
GAO X., WEI W., YANG G.D. Predictors of delayed sequelae after CO poisoning. Front Med (Lausanne), 11, 1333197, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2... PMid:38371510 PMCid:PMC10869438.
27.
BHATTI U.A., HASHMI M.Z., SUN Y., MASUD M., NIZAMANI M.M. AI applications for reducing carbon emissions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
28.
AWEWOMOM J., DZEBLE F., TAKYI Y.D., et al. Environmental pollution control through policy & prevention. Discover Environment, 2 (1), 8, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274....
29.
JONIDI JAFARI A., CHARKHLOO E., PASALARI H. Urban air pollution control policies: systematic review. Journal of Environmental Health Sciences Engineering, 19 (2), 1911, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201... PMid:34900316 PMCid:PMC8617239.
30.
RAKHOLIA R., LE Q., VU K., HO B.Q., CARBAJO R.S. AI-based PM2.5 forecasting in Ho Chi Minh City. Urban Climate, 46, 101315, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucli... PMCid:PMC9720438.
31.
SHEN Z., ZHANG Z., CUI L., XIA Z., ZHANG Y. PM2.5 & landscape coupling in inland vs waterfront cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102, 107194, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
32.
SYED A.S., SIERRA-SOSA D., KUMAR A., ELMAGHRABY A. IoT in smart cities: technologies, practices, challenges. Smart Cities, 4 (2), 429, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartc....
33.
ALAHI M.E.E., SUKKUEA A., TINA F.W., NAG A., et al. IoT + AI integration for smart cities. Sensors, 23 (11), 5206, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115... PMid:37299934 PMCid:PMC10256108.
34.
RAKHOLIA R., LE Q., VU K.H.N., HO B.Q., CARBAJO R.S. Ho Chi Minh City outdoor air quality dataset. Data Brief, 46, 108774, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.... PMid:36478689 PMCid:PMC9720438.
35.
CHRISTAKIS I., TSAKIRIDIS O., KANDRIS D., STAVRAKAS I. Air pollution monitoring via WSN and sensor aging correction. Electronics, 12 (8), 1842, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/electr....
36.
BHATTI U., MENGXING H., NEIRA MOLINA H., MARJAN S., et al. MFFCG: fused hyperspectral image classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 229, 120496, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa....
37.
LI Y., GUO J.-E., SUN S., LI J., WANG S., ZHANG C. AI techniques for air quality forecasting: scientometric analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 149, 105329, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
38.
BHATTI U., TANG H., WU G., MARJAN S., HUSSAIN A. Deep Learning with GCNs: overview & applications. Int. J. Intelligent Systems, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8....
39.
MÉNDEZ M., MERAYO M.G., NÚÑEZ M. ML algorithms to forecast air quality: survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462... PMid:36820441 PMCid:PMC9933038.
40.
RAVINDIRAN G., HAYDER G., KANAGARATHINAM K., et al. ML-based AQ prediction in Visakhapatnam. Chemosphere, 338, 139518, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem... PMid:37454985.
42.
ESSAMLALI I., NHAILA H., EL KHAILI M. Supervised ML for pollutant prediction: systematic review. Sustainability, 16 (3), 976, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1603....
43.
IMAM M., ADAM S., DEV S., NESA N. Statistical learning for AQ monitoring. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 22, 200333, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa....
45.
MOURSI A.S., EL-FISHAWY N., DJAHEL S., SHOUMAN M.A. IoT-enabled AQ monitoring/prediction at the edge. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7 (6), 2923, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747... PMid:34777973 PMCid:PMC8320723.
49.
BHATTI U.A., MASUD M., BAZAI S.U., TANG H. AI-based precision agriculture: editorial. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2... PMid:37496855 PMCid:PMC10368138.
52.
IHNE-SCHUBERT S.M., KIRCHER M., WERNER R.A., et al. VAR for rare disease organ response prediction. PLoS One, 18 (8), e0289921, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMid:37561769 PMCid:PMC10414553.
53.
ZHANG L., WANG R., LI Z., LI J., GE Y., WA S., HUANG S., LV C. Time-Series Neural Network with kernel filter & attention. Information, 14 (9), 500, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/info14....
54.
KUMAR K., PANDE B.P. Air pollution prediction with ML in Indian cities. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol, 20 (5), 5333, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762... PMid:35603096 PMCid:PMC9107909.
55.
GUPTA S., MOHTA Y., HEDA K., et al. AQI prediction with ML: comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2023, 1, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4....
56.
BILBAN M., GÖKMEN M. SVM, Gradient Boosting & ANN in engine tests: review. Renewable Energy Sources Energy Policy & Management, 2 (1), 2021.
57.
HASSAN M., BESHR E. Soil cone index prediction & renewable suitability via ML. Scientific Reports, 14 (1), 2924, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:38316847 PMCid:PMC10844313.
59.
YAZDANI A., ZAHMATKESHAN M., RAVANGARD R., et al. ML for COVID-19 detection with clinical data. Med J Islam Repub Iran, 36, 110, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri... PMid:36447543 PMCid:PMC9700415.
60.
GONG J., DING L., LU Y., QIONG Z., YUN L., BEIDI D. PM2.5 prediction scientometric analysis. Heliyon, 9 (3), e14526, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:36950620 PMCid:PMC10025157.
63.
XIA W., JIANG Y., CHEN X., ZHAO R. ML in municipal solid waste management. Waste Management & Research, 40 (6), 609, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1177/073424... PMid:34269157 PMCid:PMC9016669.
66.
BHATTI U.-A., BAZAI S.-U., HUSSAIN S., et al. Tree disease recognition via DL + hyperspectral data. Computers, Materials & Continua; Frontiers in Plant Science, 77 (1), 681, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2....
71.
QUINN A.J., LOPES-DOS-SANTOS V., DUPRET D., NOBRE A.C., WOOLRICH M.W. EMD & Hilbert–Huang analysis in Python. Journal Open Source Software, 6 (59), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.... PMid:33855259 PMCid:PMC7610596.