ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Moving Towards Environmental Sustainability: Executive Environmental Experience and Corporate Environmental Investment
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Economics and Management College, China University of Geosciences, 430078, Wuhan, China
 
2
Wuhan Institute of Industrial Innovation and Development, 430079, Wuhan, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-10-07
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-12-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-01-03
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-03-17
 
 
Corresponding author
Chao Wang   

Economics and Management College, China University of Geosciences, 430078, Wuhan, China
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
As environmental sustainability becomes increasingly critical to corporate strategies, firms must adapt to growing environmental concerns and regulatory pressures. Despite substantial research on environmental investment, the role of executive environmental experience remains underexplored. We use text mining techniques to measure executive environmental experience and a two-way fixed effects model to examine how executive environmental experience affects corporate environmental investment decisions. Our analysis reveals that executives with strong environmental backgrounds are more likely to drive significant investments in environmental initiatives. Our study also identifies two key mechanisms: heightened environmental attention and enhanced green innovation, through which executive experience influences corporate behavior. Heterogeneity analysis results show that the effect of executive environmental experience is magnified when firms are located in regions with high environmental penalties. Executive environmental experience significantly enhances the environmental investment of heavy polluters compared to non-heavy polluters. Meanwhile, media attention also amplifies the positive effect of executive environmental experience. The findings offer new insights into the micro-level drivers of environmental investment and contribute to the growing literature on corporate environmental governance. This research extends the upper echelon theory by integrating environmental economics and provides valuable guidance for firms aiming to enhance their sustainability practices.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (71)
1.
JIANG Q.S., TANG P.C. All roads lead to Rome? Carbon emissions, pollutant emissions and local officials' political promotion in China. Energy Policy, 181, 113700, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
2.
LI G.X., WU H.Y., JIANG J.S., ZONG Q.Q. Digital finance and the low-carbon energy transition (LCET) from the perspective of capital-biased technical progress. Energy Economics, 120, 106623, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
3.
WANG C., WANG L., ZHAO S.K., YANG C.Y., ALBITAR K. The impact of Fintech on corporate carbon emissions: Towards green and sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.37....
 
4.
WANG C., LI J.P., YI Y., YANG S.W. Crowding in or crowding out? Executive environmental attention and ESG performance of mining listed companies. Mineral Economics, 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563....
 
5.
ZHANG W., KE J.J., DING Y.G., CHEN S.C. Greening through finance: Green finance policies and firms' green investment. Energy Economics, 131, 107401, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
6.
HUANG H., CHANG Y.P., ZHANG L.Y. CEO's marketing experience and firm green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32 (8), 5211, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.34....
 
7.
HAMBRICK D.C. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 334, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.20....
 
8.
FANG X.B., LIU M.T. Facilitation or inhibition? Government environmental attention and corporate green technology innovation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/096405....
 
9.
WANG Z.C., YU X.Y., ZHANG W.M. Chinese-style carbon emission reduction: Micro mechanisms of state-owned enterprises. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103527, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref....
 
10.
MA Y., FENG G.F., YIN Z.J., CHANG C.P. ESG disclosures, green innovation, and greenwashing: All for sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.321....
 
11.
HUANG L.Y., LEI Z.J. How environmental regulation affect corporate green investment: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123560, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
12.
CHEN Z.F., ZHANG X., CHEN F.L. Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120744, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
13.
O'SULLIVAN D., ZOLOTOY L., FAN Q.L. CEO early-life disaster experience and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42 (11), 2137, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.32....
 
14.
REN S.G., SUN H.L., TANG Y. CEO's hometown identity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 49 (7), 2455, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
 
15.
CHEN W., ZHU Y.F., WANG C.Y. Executives' overseas background and corporate green innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30 (1), 165, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.23....
 
16.
LIU G.Q., YANG Z.Q., ZHANG F., ZHANG N. Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: A quasi-natural experiment based on China's Environmental Protection Tax Law. Energy Economics, 109, 106000, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
17.
GU Y., HO K.C., YAN C., GOZGOR G. Public environmental concern, CEO turnover, and green investment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, 100, 105379, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
18.
QIAN X.S., DING H., DING Z.F. Governmental inspection and firm environmental protection expenditure: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 123, 106284, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ....
 
19.
GUO Q.H., WEI Y.D. Confucianism and corporate environmental protection investment: Evidence from heavily polluting listed companies in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.39....
 
20.
WHITE J.V., BORGHOLTHAUS C.J. Who's in charge here? A bibliometric analysis of upper echelons research. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1012, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
 
21.
HAMBRICK D.C., MASON P.A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 193, 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434 PMCid:PMC10984457.
 
22.
NEELY B.H., LOVELACE J.B., COWEN A.P., HILLER N.J. Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of Management, 46 (6), 1029, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920....
 
23.
WANG Z., FU H., REN X., GOZGOR G. Exploring the carbon emission reduction effects of corporate climate risk disclosure: Empirical evidence based on Chinese A-share listed enterprises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, 103072, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa....
 
24.
YANG J., WANG Y.Z., TANG C., ZHANG Z.H. Can digitalization reduce industrial pollution? Roles of environmental investment and green innovation. Environmental Research, 240, 117442, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr... PMid:37879394.
 
25.
DENG M.J., TANG H., LUO W.B. Can the green experience of CEO improve ESG performance in heavy polluting companies? Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.41....
 
26.
HUANG R.L., WEI J.C. Does CEOs' green experience affect environmental corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 79, 205, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.....
 
27.
FARRUKH M., ANSARI N., RAZA A., WU Y.H., WANG H. Fostering employee's pro-environmental behavior through green transformational leadership, green human resource management and environmental knowledge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121643, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
28.
LU H., XU W.T., CAI S.H., YANG F., CHEN Q.Q. Does top management team responsible leadership help employees go green? The role of green human resource management and environmental felt-responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29 (4), 843, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.22....
 
29.
CHEN H., DENG J., LU M., ZHANG P., ZHANG Q. Government environmental attention, credit supply and firms' green investment. Energy Economics, 134, 107547, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
30.
CHEN J.Y., GENG Y., LIU R. Carbon emissions trading and corporate green investment: The perspective of external pressure and internal incentive. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32 (6), 3014, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.32....
 
31.
LIU C. Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 118, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcor....
 
32.
ATIF M., ALAM M.S., HOSSAIN M. Firm sustainable investment: Are female directors greener? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29 (8), 3449, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.25....
 
33.
SCHALTENBRAND B., FOERSTL K., AZADEGAN A., LINDEMAN K. See what we want to see? The effects of managerial experience on corporate green investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 150 (4), 1129, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551....
 
34.
JIANG X.D., YANG J., YANG W., ZHANG J. Do employees' voices matter? Unionization and corporate environmental responsibility. International Review of Economics & Finance, 76, 1265, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref....
 
35.
LONG Z.E., DUAN Y.L., ZHAN H. The impact of organizational-level political connection on environmental strategy in private firms. Economic Modelling, 132, 106644, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ....
 
36.
WANG L.K., SU Y., HUANG H.S., GONG Y., WANG W.Q. Director's network location and corporate environmental investment in the carbon neutrality age. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32 (6), 3178, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.32....
 
37.
ZHOU B., DING H. How public attention drives corporate environmental protection: Effects and channels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122486, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
38.
HO K.C., SHEN X.X., YAN C., HU X. Influence of green innovation on disclosure quality: Mediating role of media attention. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122314, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
39.
SHEN Y., FU Y., SONG M. Does digital transformation make enterprises greener? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 1642, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.....
 
40.
DING Q., HUANG J.B., CHEN J.Y. Does digital finance matter for corporate green investment? Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Energy Economics, 117, 106476, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
41.
JAVEED S.A., LATIEF R., CAI X., SAN ONG T. Digital finance and corporate green investment: A perspective from institutional investors and environmental regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 446, 141367, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
42.
WU W., YANG S., LI A., CHEN Y., CHEN S.C. Does interest rate liberalization affect corporate green investment? Energy Economics, 131, 107377, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
43.
ZHONG Q.M., WEN H.W., LEE C.C. How does economic growth target affect corporate environmental investment? Evidence from heavy-polluting industries in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106799, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
44.
TANG P.C., WANG C., JIANG Q.S., LIU X., WANG J.Y. Symbol or substance? Environmental regulations and corporate environmental actions decoupling. Journal of Environmental Management, 346, 118950, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:37696070.
 
45.
HU J., WU H.Y., YING S.X. Environmental regulation, market forces, and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from the implementation of cleaner production standards in China. Journal of Business Research, 150, 606, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
 
46.
LI R.Q., RAMANATHAN R. The interactive effect of environmental penalties and environmental subsidies on corporate environmental innovation: Is more better or worse? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123193, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
47.
ZHU X.H., LIU R., CHEN J.Y. Corporate environmental investment and supply chain financing: The moderating role of environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32 (4), 1559, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.32....
 
48.
CHEN Y.F., MA Y.B. Does green investment improve energy firm performance? Energy Policy, 153, 112252, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
49.
ZHANG X.L., SONG Y., ZHANG M. Exploring the relationship of green investment and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese corporate performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137444, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
50.
PORTER M.E., LINDE C.V.D. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 97, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.....
 
51.
MA Y.B., LU L., CUI J.B., SHI X.P. Can green credit policy stimulate firms' green investments? International Review of Economics & Finance, 91, 123, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref....
 
52.
ZHANG Q., YU Z., KONG D.M. The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98, 102254, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
53.
CHEN Z., KAHN M.E., LIU Y., WANG Z. The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88, 468, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
54.
LUO K., ZHANG K. Executive's environmental background and sustainable development: Evidence from substantial green innovation. Sustainable Development, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.294....
 
55.
ZOR S. A neural network-based measurement of corporate environmental attention and its impact on green open innovation: Evidence from heavily polluting listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, 139815, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
56.
ZHENG M., FENG G., JIANG R., CHANG C. Does environmental, social, and governance performance move together with corporate green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32 (4), 1670, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.32....
 
57.
YUAN B., CAO X. Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society, 68, 101868, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
58.
HAWN O. How media coverage of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility influences cross-border acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 42 (1), 58, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.32....
 
59.
HALDER S.C., MALIKOV E. Smoothed LSDV estimation of functional-coefficient panel data models with two-way fixed effects. Economics Letters, 192, 109239, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ....
 
60.
JOCHMANS K., VERARDI V. Instrumental-variable estimation of exponential-regression models with two-way fixed effects with an application to gravity equations. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37 (6), 1121, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.29....
 
61.
JOCHMANS K., VERARDI V. Fitting exponential regression models with two-way fixed effects. Stata Journal, 20 (2), 468, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/153686....
 
62.
BARON E.J. School spending and student outcomes: Evidence from revenue limit elections in Wisconsin. American Economic Journal-Economic Policy, 14 (1), 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20....
 
63.
ZHOU T., ZHANG N. Does air pollution decrease labor share? Evidence from China. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 82, 102706, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloe....
 
64.
TANG P., LIU X., HONG Y., YANG S. Moving beyond economic criteria: Exploring the social impact of green innovation from the stakeholder management perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30 (3), 1042, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.24....
 
65.
ZAMEER H., WANG Y., SAEED M.R. Net-zero emission targets and the role of managerial environmental awareness, customer pressure, and regulatory control toward environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30 (8), 4223, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.28....
 
66.
HAO X., CHEN F., CHEN Z. Does green innovation increase enterprise value? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31 (3), 1232, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.29....
 
67.
FOULON B., MARSAT S. Does environmental footprint influence the resilience of firms facing environmental penalties? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32 (8), 6154, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.34....
 
68.
HOU Q.Y., ZHANG Q. The Effect and Mechanism of ESG Performance on Corporate Debt Financing Costs: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in the Heavy-Polluting Industries. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33 (2), 1753, 2024. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
 
69.
BURKE J.J. Do Boards Take Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues Seriously? Evidence from Media Coverage and CEO Dismissals. Journal of Business Ethics, 176 (4), 647, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551....
 
70.
HOLM D.B., DROGENDIJK R., UL HAQ H. An attention-based view on managing information processing channels in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36 (2), 101106, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scam....
 
71.
BRIELMAIER C., FRIESL M. The attention-based view: Review and conceptual extension towards situated attention. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25 (1), 99, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.1....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top