ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Rural Fire Risk Assessment in GIS Environment Using Fuzzy Logic and the AHP Approaches
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Turkey
 
 
Submission date: 2020-11-19
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-02-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-04-21
 
 
Online publication date: 2021-09-01
 
 
Publication date: 2021-10-01
 
 
Corresponding author
Mehmet Çağlar   

Business Administration, Quantitative Methods, Yildiz Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021;30(6):4971-4984
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Fires all around the world have caused irreparable environmental and economic losses due to the increase in global warming. Risk assessments are curial for taking measures to keep negative effects of natural hazards to a minimum and to ensure sustainability of the nature. In this regard, the aim of this study is to evaluate rural area fire risk in the seven geographical regions of Turkey. Since fire sensitive areas in rural regions are generally composed of forest areas, data on the size of forest areas, number of forest fires and temperatures are the main starting points of this study. Analysis was carried out using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Logic approaches. In this study the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Logic approaches were integrated with the Geographical Information Systems. The results obtained from the AHP and Fuzzy Logic approaches were compared and evaluated. The results of the study show that the Aegean, Mediterranean and Marmara regions have the highest rural area fire risk levels. The fire risk assessments results obtained by the AHP and Fuzzy Logic approaches overlap on the basis of geographical regions. Integrating the AHP and Fuzzy Logic with GIS for rural area fire risk assessment provide valid, reliable and very important results in making the necessary planning and ensuring sustainability of the environment.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (15):
1.
Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Bulanık Mantık Yaklaşımlarının İhaleyi Kazanacak Kuruluşun Seçiminde Kullanılması
Serhat Altıntaş, Latif Onur Uğur
Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science
 
2.
Geoinformatics and Machine Learning for Comprehensive Fire Risk Assessment and Management in Peri-Urban Environments: A Building-Block-Level Approach
Anastasia Yfantidou, Melpomeni Zoka, Nikolaos Stathopoulos, Martha Kokkalidou, Stella Girtsou, Michail-Christos Tsoutsos, Diofantos Hadjimitsis, Charalampos Kontoes
Applied Sciences
 
3.
Orman Yangınına Sebep Olan Kriterlerin Bulanık Ortamda Değerlendirilmesi
Burcu Tezcan, Tamer Eren
Politeknik Dergisi
 
4.
Sustainable Risk Mapping of High-Speed Rail Networks Through PS-InSAR and Geospatial Analysis
Seung-Jun Lee, Hong-Sik Yun, Sang-Woo Kwak
Sustainability
 
5.
Optimal allocation model of forest fire detection towers in protected areas based on fire occurrence risk: Where and how to act?
Antonio Henrique Cordeiro Ramalho, Nilton Cesar Fiedler, Alexandre Rosa dos Santos, Ronie Silva Juvanhol, Telma Machado de Oliveira Pelúzio, Henrique Machado Dias, Reginaldo Sérgio Pereira, Fernanda Dalfior Maffioletti, Jâmille Silva Araújo, Mariana de Aquino Aragão, Gabriel Madeira da Silva Guanaes, Leonardo Duarte Biazatti, Fernanda Moura Fonseca Lucas
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
 
6.
Integer programming based on spherical fuzzy AHP and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS for wildfire equipment planning
Burcu Tezcan, Tamer Eren
Environment Systems and Decisions
 
7.
Geospatial modeling of wildfire susceptibility on a national scale in Montenegro: A comparative evaluation of F-AHP and FR methodologies
Filip Vujović, Aleksandar Valjarević, Josep Vila-Subirós, Ante Šiljeg, Tin Lukić
Open Geosciences
 
8.
Determining the most effective way of intervention in forest fires with fuzzy logic modeling : the case of Antalya/Türkiye
Ahmet Şahiner, Temel Ermiş, Mete Hakan Karakoyun, Muhammad Wasim Awan
Natural Hazards
 
9.
Enhancing Landslide Vulnerability Mapping Through Automated Fuzzy Logic Algorithm-Based Methodology
Adrián G. Bruzón, Patricia Arrogante-Funes, Ariadna Álvarez-Ripado, Dina Osuna, Carlos J. Novillo, Fátima Arrogante-Funes
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
 
10.
Machine learning methods for wildfire risk assessment
Carlos Brys, David Luis La Red Martínez, Marcelo Marinelli
Earth Science Informatics
 
11.
Elektrikli Araç Şarj İstasyonu Konumunun Belirlenmesinde Bulanık Mantık DEMATEL-CBS-TOPSIS Yaklaşımı
Burçin Paçacı, Kürşat Çubuk, Serpil Erol
Journal of Polytechnic
 
12.
Risk Assessment of Compound Dynamic Disaster Based on AHP-EWM
Runjie Zhang, Da Tian, Hongwei Wang, Xinyue Kang, Gang Wang, Lianman Xu
Applied Sciences
 
13.
Fuzzy Comprehensive Safety Evaluation of Pipeline Disaster in China-Russia Crude Oil Permafrost Region Based on Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process-Entropy Weight Method
Yangyang Shen, Dongxu Chen, Min Zhang, Ting Zuo, Yonghong Wang
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 
14.
Regional-scale risk assessment of forest fires induced by distribution lines via a hybrid approach
Hongrui Jiang, Jiaqing Zhang, Long Ding, Binbin Zhang, Tao Sun, Jie Ji
JUSTC
 
15.
Wildfire risk assessment in Sichuan Province, China: hazard modeling approach considering different combinations of classification criteria and connection values of factor attributes
Weiting Yue, Yunji Gao, Yu Ma, Ziqun Ye, Yuchun Zhang
International Journal of Wildland Fire
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top