ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Effect of Anaerobic Co-Substrate on Removal
of COD, Phenol and Methane Production in Coal
Gasification Wastewater Treatment
More details
Hide details
1
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Science
and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Anaerobic Biotechnology, School of Environment and Civil Engineering,
Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Submission date: 2020-02-07
Final revision date: 2020-04-06
Acceptance date: 2020-04-09
Online publication date: 2020-07-13
Publication date: 2020-08-05
Corresponding author
Juan Mei
Suzhou University of Science and Technology, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020;29(6):4175-4181
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this paper, potato starch wastewater (PSW) was adopted as anaerobic co-substrate added in
influent of coal gasification wastewater (CGW). The control anaerobic biofilters (AF) and supplemented
AF were investigated in our research. Without co-digestion, both of the COD and total phenol removal
rates were only 30%, respectively. However, adding PSW (COD = 1000 mg/L) as co-substrate
meanwhile increasing concentration of CGW in influent step by step from phase 1 to phase 3. In phase
1 and 2, the effluent COD and total phenol reached 1000 mg/L and 50 mg/L, respectively. Further
increasing COD of PSW to 1500 mg/L in phase 4, the removal rates of COD and total phenol almost
reached 50%, respectively. The methane production rate was increased to 260 mLCH4/gCOD/d. In
order to further improve the treatment efficiency in co-digestion, the two-stage AFs were adopted in
our next study, the result indicated that with adding PSW (COD = 1500 mg/L) in the first stage AF
(R1) and extending the HRT of R1 to 48 h, both of the total removal rates of COD and total phenol
almost reached 75%, respectively, meanwhile methane production rate of the second AF (R2) rising to
300 mLCH4/gCOD/d in phase 4.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.