ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Effect of the Three-Field Crop Rotation System and Cereal Monoculture on Grain Yield and Quality and the Economic Efficiency of Durum Wheat Production
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Faculty of Agrobioengineering, Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
 
2
University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Faculty of Agrobioengineering, Department of Economics and Agribusiness, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2021-02-03
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-03-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-03-18
 
 
Online publication date: 2021-08-31
 
 
Publication date: 2021-10-01
 
 
Corresponding author
Anna Nowak   

University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Akademicka 13, 20-950, Lublin, Poland
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021;30(6):5297-5305
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A small-plot field experiment was performed to evaluate the effect of the three-field system of crop rotation and cereal monoculture on grain yield and quality and the economic effectiveness of durum wheat production. The experimental factors were tillage systems (TS): 1) conventional tillage (CT), 2) reduced tillage (RT) and 3) no tillage (NT); crop sequence (CS): 1) crop rotation A: pea – durum wheat – spring barley; 2) crop rotation B: pea – spring wheat – durum wheat; 3) cereal monoculture (CM): spring barley – spring wheat – durum wheat. The highest yield of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) was recorded for crop rotation A, a significantly lower one for crop rotation B, and the lowest for cereal monoculture. The grain yield in CT was also higher than in NT (by 17.3%). The wet gluten content in grain, sedimentation index and the grain weight per volume were to a larger extent dependent on CS than TS, while the content of protein in grain – on TS rather than on CS. From the economic point of view, the best results were recorded for CT of wheat and for crop rotation A: pea – durum wheat – spring wheat. The study also showed that monoculture was not profitable, even with an NT system.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (6):
1.
The Grain Protein Content of Polish Cereals Other than Wheat: Can It Be Increased by Combining a Crop Sequence System, Cultivar Selection, and Plant Protection?
Marta K. Kostrzewska, Magdalena Jastrzębska
Agriculture
 
2.
Climate and farming system dominate wheat yield responses across European pedoclimatic zones, despite widespread soil nutrient surpluses
Manuel Conde-Cid, Paula Pérez-Rodríguez, Andrés Rodríguez-Seijo, Manuel Arias-Estévez, Antía Gómez-Armesto, Flora Alonso-Vega, Juan Carlos Nóvoa-Muñoz, Claudia Campillo-Cora, Vanesa Santás-Miguel, María J. I. Briones, Irene Ollio, Eva Lloret, Silvia Martínez-Martínez, Raúl Zornoza, Jasper Vanbesien, Noémie Hisette, Maarten De Boever, Lieven Waeyenberge, Stefan Schrader, Jozsef Dezso, Nikola Grujić, Barbara Simon, Igor Dekemati, Simon Bo Lassen, Kristian Koefoed Brandt, Kaire Loit, Marian Põldmets, Merrit Shanskiy, Juha-Matti Pitkänen, Krista Peltoniemi, David Fernández-Calviño
Plant and Soil
 
3.
Energy Crisis—Alternative Use of Winter Bread Wheat Grain Depending on Protein Content
Hanna Klikocka, Witold Szczepaniak
Agronomy
 
4.
Spelt in Diversified and Spelt-Based Crop Rotations: Grain Yield and Technological and Nutritional Quality
Maria Wanic, Magdalena Jastrzębska, Marta K. Kostrzewska, Mariola Parzonka
Agriculture
 
5.
Effects of foliar applied asparagine, glycine and citric acid on cadmium uptake and yield in wheat
Özlem Ete Aydemir
PeerJ
 
6.
Next-Generation Strategies for Crop Improvement
Vineeta Dixit, Priti Upadhyay, Ekta Shukla, Manish K. Vishwakarma
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top