ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Impact of Computational Power on
Environmental Sustainability – A Comparative
Study Involving Two Categories
of National-Level Computing Infrastructure
More details
Hide details
1
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Submission date: 2023-10-18
Final revision date: 2024-03-27
Acceptance date: 2024-06-12
Online publication date: 2024-09-23
Publication date: 2025-05-09
Corresponding author
Wang Gaofeng
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(4):4125-4141
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Given the pivotal role of data and computational prowess in driving innovative competitiveness
during the digital epoch, this study expands the scrutiny of environmental impacts stemming from
digital technology. It investigates two distinct strata of national-level computing infrastructure (CI)—
namely, the National Supercomputing Centers (NSCs) and the National Big Data Centers (NBDCs)—
focusing on their influence on urban carbon emissions. Employing the synthetic control method,
the research unveils that despite the heightened energy consumption at both the NSCs and the NBDCs
(scale effect), these computational infrastructures exhibit disparate effects on urban carbon emissions.
This incongruity is principally explicated as follows: the establishment of NSCs amplifies regional
carbon emissions, while the carbon augmentation effects of the NBDCs are negligible. Furthermore,
through examinations of technological effects and compositional effects, it is ascertained that the CI
has not significantly improved the structure of local economic sectors, and its triggering effect on green
innovation is only evident in NSCs. These discerning findings elucidate that high energy consumption
is a major driver of carbon-intensive outcomes in supercomputing and data centers. Nonetheless, it
is imperative to underscore that under favorable conditions, computing infrastructure still possesses
the potential to significantly alleviate the adverse environmental “side effects”.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (48)
2.
JOPPA L., HERWEIJER C. How AI can enable a sustainable future. Microsoft in association with PwC, 2018.
24.
SHI D., DING H., WEI P., LIU J. Can Smart City Construction Reduce Environmental Pollution. China Industrial Economics, 363 (06), 117, 2018.
26.
POHL J., HILTY L.M., FINKBEINER M. How LCA contributes to the environmental assessment of higher order effects of ICT application: A review of different approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 698, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
27.
CHENG C., REN X., DONG K., DONG X., WANG Z. How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111818, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
29.
HAN D., DING Y., SHI Z., HE Y. The impact of digital economy on total factor carbon productivity: The threshold effect of technology accumulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (37), 55691, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
30.
ZHANG J., LYU Y., LI Y., GENG Y. Digital economy: An innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106821, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
31.
ABADIE A., GARDEAZARAL J. The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque country. American Economic Review, 93 (1), 113, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1257/000282....
32.
ABADIE A., DIAMOND A., HAINMUELLER J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (490), 493, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2....
33.
CHEN J., GAO M., CHENG S., HOU W., SONG M., LIU X., LIU Y., SHAN Y. County-level CO2 emissions and sequestration in China during 1997–2017. Scientific Data, 7 (1), 391, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597....
34.
SHAN Y., GUAN Y., HANG Y., ZHENG H., LI Y., GUAN D., LI J., ZHOU Y., LI L., HUBACEK K. City-level emission peak and drivers in China. Science Bulletin, 67 (18), 1910, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib....
35.
ARSHAD Z., ROBAINA M., BOTELHO A. The role of ICT in energy consumption and environment: an empirical investigation of Asian economies with cluster analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 32913, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
36.
HUA Y., XIE R., SU Y. Fiscal spending and air pollution in Chinese cities: Identifying composition and technique effects. China Economic Review, 47, 156, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chie....
37.
YANG X., WU H., REN S., RAN Q., ZHANG J. Does the development of the internet contribute to air pollution control in China? Mechanism discussion and empirical test. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 56, 207, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stru....
38.
CHEN W.Y. The role of urban green infrastructure in offsetting carbon emissions in 35 major Chinese cities: A nationwide estimate. Cities, 44, 112, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.citi....
39.
JAHNKE K., FENDT C., FOUESNEAU M., GEORGIEV I., HERBST T., KAASINEN M., KOSSAKOWSKI D., RYBIZKI J., SCHLECKER M., SEIDEL G., HENNING T., KREIDBERG L., RIX H. An astronomical institute's perspective on meeting the challenges of the climate crisis. Nature Astronomy, 4 (9), 812, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550....
40.
VAN DER TAK F., BURTSCHER L., ZWART S.P., TABONE B., NELEMANS G., BLOEMEN S., YOUNG A., WIJNANDS R., JANSSEN A., SCHOENMAKERS A. The carbon footprint of astronomy research in the Netherlands. Nature Astronomy, 5 (12), 1195, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550....
41.
ALESINA A., ZHURAVSKAYA E. Segregation and the Quality of Government in a Cross Section of Countries. American Economic Review, 101 (5), 1872, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10....
42.
GAO K., YUAN Y. Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China. Technology in Society, 70, 102035, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
43.
ZHANG S., WANG X. Does innovative city construction improve the industry–university–research knowledge flow in urban China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121200, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
46.
VAN HEDDEGHEM W., LAMBERT S., LANNOO B., COLLE D., PICKAVET M., DEMEESTER P. Trends in worldwide ICT electricity consumption from 2007 to 2012. Computer Communications, 50, 64, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comc....
47.
YANG H., WANG G. The impact of computing infrastructure on carbon emissions: An empirical study based on China National Supercomputing Center. Environmental Research Communications, 5 (9), 095015, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7....
48.
BATOOL Z., AHMED N., LUQMAN M. Examining the role of ICT, transportation energy consumption, and urbanization in CO2 emissions in Asia: a threshold analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (32), 78482, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....