ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Impact of Computational Power on Environmental Sustainability – A Comparative Study Involving Two Categories of National-Level Computing Infrastructure
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
 
 
Submission date: 2023-10-18
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-03-27
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-06-12
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-09-23
 
 
Publication date: 2025-05-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Wang Gaofeng   

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(4):4125-4141
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Given the pivotal role of data and computational prowess in driving innovative competitiveness during the digital epoch, this study expands the scrutiny of environmental impacts stemming from digital technology. It investigates two distinct strata of national-level computing infrastructure (CI)— namely, the National Supercomputing Centers (NSCs) and the National Big Data Centers (NBDCs)— focusing on their influence on urban carbon emissions. Employing the synthetic control method, the research unveils that despite the heightened energy consumption at both the NSCs and the NBDCs (scale effect), these computational infrastructures exhibit disparate effects on urban carbon emissions. This incongruity is principally explicated as follows: the establishment of NSCs amplifies regional carbon emissions, while the carbon augmentation effects of the NBDCs are negligible. Furthermore, through examinations of technological effects and compositional effects, it is ascertained that the CI has not significantly improved the structure of local economic sectors, and its triggering effect on green innovation is only evident in NSCs. These discerning findings elucidate that high energy consumption is a major driver of carbon-intensive outcomes in supercomputing and data centers. Nonetheless, it is imperative to underscore that under favorable conditions, computing infrastructure still possesses the potential to significantly alleviate the adverse environmental “side effects”.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
WATSON R.T., CORBETT J., BOUDREAU M.C., WEBSTER J. An information strategy for environmental sustainability. Communications of the ACM, 55 (7), 28, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/220924... https://doi.org/10.1145/220924....
 
2.
JOPPA L., HERWEIJER C. How AI can enable a sustainable future. Microsoft in association with PwC, 2018.
 
3.
JONES N. How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world's electricity. Nature, 561 (7722), 163, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586... https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586....
 
4.
IEA. Data Centres and Data Transmission Networks, IEA, Paris, 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/da....
 
5.
WANG J., DONG K., DONG X., TAGHIZADEHHESARY F. Assessing the digital economy and its carbon-mitigation effects: The case of China. Energy Economics, 113, 106198, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
6.
LUO K., LIU Y., CHEN P.F., ZENG M. Assessing the impact of digital economy on green development efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Energy Economics, 112, 106127, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
7.
ZOU W., PAN M. Does the construction of network infrastructure reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in "Broadband China". Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (1), 242, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
8.
DONG F., HU M., GAO Y., LIU Y., ZHU J., PAN Y. How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries. Science of The Total Environment, 852, 158401, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
9.
WU D., XIE Y., LYU S. Disentangling the complex impacts of urban digital transformation and environmental pollution: Evidence from smart city pilots in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 88, 104266, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.....
 
10.
GUO J., WANG L., ZHOU W., WEI C. Powering green digitalization: Evidence from 5G network infrastructure in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182, 106286, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
 
11.
BIANCHINI S., DAMIOLI G., GHISETTI C. The environmental effects of the "twin" green and digital transition in European regions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 84, 877, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640... https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640....
 
12.
MOYER J.D., HUGHES B.B. ICTs: do they contribute to increased carbon emissions? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (5), 919, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
13.
STEVENS A.R., BELLSTEDT S., ELAHI P.J., MURPHY M.T. The imperative to reduce carbon emissions in astronomy. Nature Astronomy, 4 (9), 843, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550... https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550....
 
14.
OPEN DATA CENTER COMMITTEE. White Paper on Carbon Efficiency of Data Center Computing Power, 2022. http://www.odcc.org.cn/downloa....
 
15.
MENG F., ZHANG W. Digital finance and regional green innovation: evidence from Chinese cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (59), 89498, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
16.
ZHANG H. Trade Openness and Green Total Factor Productivity in China: The Role of ICT-Based Digital Trade. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 809339, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.... https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
 
17.
WANG L., WU Y., HUANG Z., WANG Y. How Big Data Drives Green Economic Development: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1055162, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.... https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
 
18.
KOU J., XU X. Does internet infrastructure improve or reduce carbon emission performance?-A dual perspective based on local government intervention and market segmentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134789, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
19.
FAN L., ZHANG Y., JIN M., MA Q., ZHAO J. Does New Digital Infrastructure Promote the Transformation of the Energy Structure? Energies, 15 (23), 8784, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1523... https://doi.org/10.3390/en1523....
 
20.
GALIANI S., QUISTORFF B. The synth_runner package: Utilities to automate synthetic control estimation using synth. The Stata Journal, 17 (4), 834, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/153686... https://doi.org/10.1177/153686....
 
21.
GROSSMAN G.M., KRUEGER A.B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper w3914, 1991. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914 https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914.
 
22.
BROCK W.A., TAYLOR M.S. Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 1749, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-... https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-....
 
23.
HALDAR A., SETHI N. Environmental effects of Information and Communication Technology-Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111754, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
24.
SHI D., DING H., WEI P., LIU J. Can Smart City Construction Reduce Environmental Pollution. China Industrial Economics, 363 (06), 117, 2018.
 
25.
LIOBIKIENĖ G., BUTKUS M. Scale, composition, and technique effects through which the economic growth, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and trade affect greenhouse gas emissions. Renewable Energy, 132, 1310, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
 
26.
POHL J., HILTY L.M., FINKBEINER M. How LCA contributes to the environmental assessment of higher order effects of ICT application: A review of different approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 698, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
27.
CHENG C., REN X., DONG K., DONG X., WANG Z. How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111818, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
28.
ALLEN M. The huge carbon footprint of large-scale computing. Physics World, 35 (3), 46, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7....
 
29.
HAN D., DING Y., SHI Z., HE Y. The impact of digital economy on total factor carbon productivity: The threshold effect of technology accumulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (37), 55691, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
30.
ZHANG J., LYU Y., LI Y., GENG Y. Digital economy: An innovation driving factor for low-carbon development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106821, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
31.
ABADIE A., GARDEAZARAL J. The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque country. American Economic Review, 93 (1), 113, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282....
 
32.
ABADIE A., DIAMOND A., HAINMUELLER J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (490), 493, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2....
 
33.
CHEN J., GAO M., CHENG S., HOU W., SONG M., LIU X., LIU Y., SHAN Y. County-level CO2 emissions and sequestration in China during 1997–2017. Scientific Data, 7 (1), 391, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597....
 
34.
SHAN Y., GUAN Y., HANG Y., ZHENG H., LI Y., GUAN D., LI J., ZHOU Y., LI L., HUBACEK K. City-level emission peak and drivers in China. Science Bulletin, 67 (18), 1910, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib....
 
35.
ARSHAD Z., ROBAINA M., BOTELHO A. The role of ICT in energy consumption and environment: an empirical investigation of Asian economies with cluster analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 32913, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
36.
HUA Y., XIE R., SU Y. Fiscal spending and air pollution in Chinese cities: Identifying composition and technique effects. China Economic Review, 47, 156, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chie....
 
37.
YANG X., WU H., REN S., RAN Q., ZHANG J. Does the development of the internet contribute to air pollution control in China? Mechanism discussion and empirical test. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 56, 207, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stru....
 
38.
CHEN W.Y. The role of urban green infrastructure in offsetting carbon emissions in 35 major Chinese cities: A nationwide estimate. Cities, 44, 112, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.citi....
 
39.
JAHNKE K., FENDT C., FOUESNEAU M., GEORGIEV I., HERBST T., KAASINEN M., KOSSAKOWSKI D., RYBIZKI J., SCHLECKER M., SEIDEL G., HENNING T., KREIDBERG L., RIX H. An astronomical institute's perspective on meeting the challenges of the climate crisis. Nature Astronomy, 4 (9), 812, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550....
 
40.
VAN DER TAK F., BURTSCHER L., ZWART S.P., TABONE B., NELEMANS G., BLOEMEN S., YOUNG A., WIJNANDS R., JANSSEN A., SCHOENMAKERS A. The carbon footprint of astronomy research in the Netherlands. Nature Astronomy, 5 (12), 1195, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550....
 
41.
ALESINA A., ZHURAVSKAYA E. Segregation and the Quality of Government in a Cross Section of Countries. American Economic Review, 101 (5), 1872, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10....
 
42.
GAO K., YUAN Y. Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China. Technology in Society, 70, 102035, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
43.
ZHANG S., WANG X. Does innovative city construction improve the industry–university–research knowledge flow in urban China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121200, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
44.
ELHORST J.P. Matlab software for spatial panels. International Regional Science Review, 37 (3), 389, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001....
 
45.
SADORSKY P. Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 48, 130, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
46.
VAN HEDDEGHEM W., LAMBERT S., LANNOO B., COLLE D., PICKAVET M., DEMEESTER P. Trends in worldwide ICT electricity consumption from 2007 to 2012. Computer Communications, 50, 64, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comc....
 
47.
YANG H., WANG G. The impact of computing infrastructure on carbon emissions: An empirical study based on China National Supercomputing Center. Environmental Research Communications, 5 (9), 095015, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7....
 
48.
BATOOL Z., AHMED N., LUQMAN M. Examining the role of ICT, transportation energy consumption, and urbanization in CO2 emissions in Asia: a threshold analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (32), 78482, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top