ORIGINAL RESEARCH
The Impact of Penalty on Residents’ Waste
Separation Behavior:
A Moderated Mediation Model
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Submission date: 2022-07-26
Final revision date: 2022-11-06
Acceptance date: 2022-11-21
Online publication date: 2023-01-13
Publication date: 2023-02-23
Corresponding author
Shichun Xu
School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2023;32(2):1145-1158
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
To alleviate the plight of municipal solid waste management, penalties were implemented in China.
However, it is unclear how penalty affects residents’ waste separation behavior. This study aims to
analyze the impact of penalty on residents’ waste separation behavior and the role of personal norms and
trust in authorities. A theoretical model of the impact of penalty on residents’ waste separation behavior
was established based on deterrence theory and normative activation model. Using online survey data
from 628 respondents in Zhengzhou, China, an empirical analysis was performed by employing the
moderated mediation model. The results showed that residents’ perceived penalty certainty and penalty
severity positively influenced their waste separation behavior through the mediation effect of personal
norm. Penalty certainty had a direct impact on waste separation behavior, whereas penalty severity had
no direct impact on waste separation behavior. Trust in authorities positively moderated the mediation
effect of personal norm. The higher the trust in authorities, the stronger mediating effect of personal
norm. Some recommendations were proposed to improve residents’ waste separation behavior under
the mandatory policy. This paper presents a new perspective and theoretical guidelines for the local
government to improve residents’ waste separation behaviors in China and offers useful insights into
waste separation management for other countries.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (9):
1.
Regional Differences and Evolution Trends
of Zero Waste Performance in China
Mengge Hao, Feng Zhang
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
2.
Examining Patriotism and Environmental Responsibility for Waste Separation in Ghana
Bernard Afriyie Osei, Emmanuel Brentuo, Zha Yong
Environmental Management
3.
A review of the differential impacts of China’s mandatory waste sorting policies on urban–rural household waste sorting
Xiaomei Shao, Soo Khoon Goh, Mou Leong Tan
Frontiers in Sustainability
4.
How does the digital economy affect the provincial “zero-waste city” construction? Evidence from China
Meng-Ge Hao, Shi-Chun Xu, Xiao-Na Meng, Xiao-Fei Xue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
5.
The Role of Trust and Perceived Social Justice in the Waste Recycling Practices of Households in Latvia
Linda Veliverronena, Agnese Davidsone
Sustainability
6.
The impact of digital intelligence on energy-intensive firms’ green transformation
Mengge Hao, Feng Zhang, Shichun Xu, Zhixin Dong, Zhengxia He
Environmental Research Communications
7.
Factors influencing the willingness to delay retirement among university teachers in Sichuan, China
Yuqiao Shen, Supit Boonlab, Sanitdech Jintana
International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES
8.
Residents’ reactance and their intervention strategies in the context of mandatory waste separation
Wei Li, Han Su, Xiaoguang Liu, Zhihao Wang, Guomin Li
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
9.
Policy Tools, Policy Perception, and Compliance with Urban Waste Sorting Policies: Evidence from 34 Cities in China
Yingqian Lin, Shuaikun Lu, Guanmao Yin, Baolong Yuan
Sustainability