ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Agricultural Environmental Efficiency
and Agricultural Environmental Kuznets Curve
Based on Technological Gap: the Case of China
Yan Wang1, Neng Shen2
More details
Hide details
1School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology,
Shanghai 200237, Republic of China
2School of Business, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Republic of China
Submission date: 2015-12-08
Acceptance date: 2016-02-06
Publication date: 2016-05-25
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016;25(3):1293-1303
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
With regards to the interchanging features of agricultural pollution and its negative impacts on China’s
eco-environment such as environmental degradation, this paper, by fully taking into consideration the gap
in environmental technology, incorporated the extended SBM directional distance function and Metaconstraints
efficiency function to estimate China’s agricultural environmental efficiency (roughly three
regions: eastern, central, and western China), and employed the panel model to study the environmental
Kuznets curve’s (EKC) characteristics and the causes of regional differences in agricultural environmental
efficiency under levels of different environmental technology. The study showed that, due to the signifi cant
differences in agricultural environmental production technology among the three different regions,
agricultural environmental efficiency presented a pattern of progressive decline, for instance; eastern China
> western China > central China. Although the agricultural environmental technology of eastern China
can reach 96.92% of the potential meta-constraint technology level, agricultural environmental technology
of central and western China only reach 83.71% and 79.37% of the potential meta-technology constraint,
respectively. The EKC curve of agricultural environmental efficiency was proved to be supportive of the
circumstances in China; however, as a result of the gap in environmental technology, the EKC curves of
different regions presented different turning points and stages. In addition to agricultural economic growth,
openness of trade, proportion of agriculture, agricultural technological level, income gap, and fiscal support
to agriculture have a significant effect on agricultural environmental efficiency, but both the impact direction
and the impact extent of these factors on agricultural environmental efficiency are different.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (14):
1.
A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Spatial Coupling between Poverty and the Environment: A Case Study from China
Jing Shuai, Xin Cheng, Xing Tao, Chuanmin Shuai, Bo Wang
Agronomy Journal
2.
Distribution-based effects of disaggregated GDP and environmental quality—a case of quantile on quantile estimates
Muhammad Shahid Hassan, Mubasher Iqbal, Noman Arshed
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
3.
Environmental Efficiency of Apple Production in China: A Translog Stochastic Frontier Analysis
Xiuguang Bai, Ruhul Salim, Harry Bloch
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
4.
Investigation of the STIRPAT model of environmental quality: a case of nonlinear quantile panel data analysis
Mansi Wang, Noman Arshed, Mubbasher Munir, Samma Faiz Rasool, Weiwen Lin
Environment, Development and Sustainability
5.
The Impact of Rural Households’ Part-Time Farming on Grain Output: Promotion or Inhibition?
Dongdong Ge, Xiaolan Kang, Xian Liang, Fangting Xie
Agriculture
6.
The Belt and Road Initiative and the Global Economy
John Joshua
7.
Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Convergence Characteristics of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in China from a Low-Carbon Perspective
Chunbin Zhang, Rong Zhou, Jundong Hou, Mengtong Feng
Sustainability
8.
Impact of rural digital economy development on agricultural eco-efficiency: evidence from mainland China
Cheng Che, Qi Yin, Qing Li, Suhui Li, Huixian Zheng, Xin Geng, Shoupeng Zhang
Frontiers in Energy Efficiency
9.
Enhancing Agricultural Eco-efficiency Amid Data Uncertainty: Saffron Farming Insights from a Semi-arid Region
Fatemeh Rastegaripour, Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi, Nasrin Ohadi, Abolfazl Tavassoli, Andrés Caballero-Calvo
Environmental Modeling & Assessment
10.
Testing the validity of disaggregated agricultural-induced growth–environmental pollution nexus in selected emerging economies
K. Appiah, R. Appah, W. Barnes, E. A. Darko
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
11.
Agricultural Eco-Efficiency: Challenges and Progress
Guofeng Wang, Rui Shi, Lingchen Mi, Jinmiao Hu
Sustainability
12.
Does asymmetric birch effect phenomenon matter for environmental sustainability of agriculture in Tunisia?
Talel Boufateh, Imed Attiaoui, Montassar Kahia
Environment, Development and Sustainability
13.
The role of agricultural green production technologies in improving low-carbon efficiency in China: Necessary but not effective
Peipei He, Junbiao Zhang, Wenjing Li
Journal of Environmental Management
14.
Sustainability assessment using STIRPAT approach to environmental quality: an extended panel data analysis
Noman Arshed, Mubbasher Munir, Mubasher Iqbal
Environmental Science and Pollution Research