ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Comprehensive River Health Evaluation
Indicator System and Its Application
More details
Hide details
1
School of Water Conservancy & Environment Engineering, Zhejiang University of Water Resources
and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
School of Engineering, University of Birstol, Bristol, BS8 1TB, UK
3
Zhejiang Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310002, China
4
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Zhejiang University of Water Resources
and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China
5
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing,102206, China
Submission date: 2023-12-09
Final revision date: 2024-02-29
Acceptance date: 2024-04-13
Online publication date: 2024-05-31
Publication date: 2025-01-09
Corresponding author
Dongjing Huang
School of Water Conservancy & Environment Engineering, Zhejiang University of Water Resources
and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(2):1165-1177
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Maintaining a healthy state of rivers is the basis for their functions, and the scientific evaluation
of river health has significant implications for the environment, ecology, and socio-economics.
In this study, the practical needs of river management and the need to establish a new type
of human-water relationship were considered, resulting in the construction of a river health evaluation
indicator system with 13 indicators based on the criteria of hydrology and water quality, habitat
structure, aquatic organisms, social services, and river management. Additionally, a comprehensive
index of river health assessments was proposed to judge the health level of the river. The comprehensive
river health evaluation indicator system was applied to the Taihu Lake Basin, and the results indicated
that the evaluation indicator system could objectively and scientifically reflect the health level
of the river. The comprehensive index of river health assessment was calculated to be 73.38, indicating
that the overall health of the river was in a “healthy” state. However, further improvements were needed
in areas such as river connectivity. The study presents a new evaluation system and methodology
that facilitate the development of effective strategies for river conservation and management.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
XIE Z.H. China's historical evolution of environmental protection along with the forty years' reform and opening‑up. *Environmental Science and Ecotechnology*, 1, 8, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese....> PMCid:PMC9488037.
2.
BIAN J., REN H., LIU P. Evaluation of urban ecological well‑being performance in China: A case study of 30 provincial capital cities. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 254, 9, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
3.
BABEL M.S., SHINDE V.R., SHARMA D., DANG N.M. Measuring water security: A vital step for climate change adaptation. *Environmental Research*, 185, 12, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr...> PMid:32222634.
4.
HABERSACK H., HEIN T., STANICA A., LISKA I., MAIR R., JÄGER E., HAUER C., BRADLEY C. Challenges of river basin management: Current status of, and prospects for, the River Danube from a river engineering perspective. *Science of the Total Environment*, 543, 828, 2016. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:26589137.
5.
SHI T., YANG S.Y., ZHANG W., ZHOU Q. Coupling coordination degree measurement and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between economic development and ecological environment – Empirical evidence from tropical and subtropical regions of China. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 244, 11, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
6.
XU H.T., CAO L.K., WANG L.Q., ZHENG X.Y. Development of a new water ecological health assessment method for small river in Shanghai, China. *Journal of Water and Climate Change*, 12 (4), 1123, 2021. <
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.20...>.
7.
FU Y.F., LIU Y.Y., XU S.G., XU Z.H. Assessment of a Multifunctional River Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model in Xiaoqing River, Eastern China. *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health*, 19 (19), 18, 2022. <
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> PMid:36231561 PMCid:PMC9565060.
8.
WANG S., ZHANG Q., YANG T., ZHANG L.Q., LI X.P., CHEN J. River health assessment: Proposing a comprehensive model based on physical habitat, chemical condition and biotic structure. *Ecological Indicators*, 103, 446, 2019. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol...>.
9.
AZARNIVAND A., CHITSAZ N., MALEKIAN A. Designing a risk‑based multi‑criteria framework for river health assessment: A case study of Taleghan basin, Iran. *International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology*, 7, 63, 2017. <
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST....>.
10.
JIAO H.B., LI Y.A., WEI H.B., LIU J., CHENG L.M., CHEN Y.R. Construction of River Health Assessment System in Areas with Significant Human Activity and Its Application. *Water*, 15 (16), 20, 2023. <
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162...>.
11.
JIN Y., LEE S., KANG T., KIM Y., LEE N. Framework for Healthiness Assessment of Water Cycle to Decide the Priority of Enhancement and Restoration Plans. *Water*, 15 (1), 27, 2023. <
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010...>.
12.
DENG X.J., XU Y.P., HAN L.F., YU Z.H., YANG M.N., PAN G.B. Assessment of river health based on an improved entropy‑based fuzzy matter‑element model in the Taihu Plain, China. *Ecological Indicators*, 57, 85, 2015. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol...>.
13.
WANG T.L., ZHONG M.M., LU M.L., XU D.J., XUE Y.G., HUANG J., BLANEY L., YU G. Occurrence, spatiotemporal distribution, and risk assessment of current‑use pesticides in surface water: A case study near Taihu Lake, China. *Science of the Total Environment*, 782, 13, 2021. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:33839661.
14.
ZHANG Q.J., LIU T., LIU L., FAN Y.F., RAO W\.X., ZHENG J.L., QIAN X. Distribution and sedimentation of microplastics in Taihu Lake. *Science of the Total Environment*, 795, 11, 2021. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:34252771.
15.
LI L., ZHAO X.L., LIU D., SONG K., LIU Q., HE Y.J. Occurrence and ecological risk assessment of PPCPs in typical inflow rivers of Taihu Lake, China. *Journal of Environmental Management*, 285, 8, 2021. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv...> PMid:33601264.
16.
CAI W\.W., XIA J.H., YANG M.Z., WANG W\.M., DOU C.B., ZENG Z., DONG S.A., SHENG L.T. Cross‑basin analysis of freshwater ecosystem health based on a zooplankton‑based Index of Biotic Integrity: Models and application. *Ecological Indicators*, 114, 12, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol...>.
17.
HOUSSOU A.M., ADJAHOUINOU D.C., BONOU C.A., MONTCHOWUI E. Plankton Index of Biotic Integrity (P‑IBI) for assessing ecosystem health within the Oueme River basin, Republic of Benin. *African Journal of Aquatic Science*, 45 (4), 452, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.2989/160859...>.
18.
WU Z.S., KONG M., CAI Y.J., WANG X.L., LI K.Y. Index of biotic integrity based on phytoplankton and water quality index: Do they have a similar pattern on water quality assessment? A study of rivers in Lake Taihu Basin, China. *Science of the Total Environment*, 658, 395, 2019. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:30579197.
19.
YANG Z., WANG Y.F. The cloud model‑based stochastic multi‑criteria decision‑making technology for river health assessment under multiple uncertainties. *Journal of Hydrology*, 581, 17, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd...>.
20.
SHAN C.J., YANG J.H., DONG Z.C., HUANG D.J., WANG H. Study on River Health Assessment Weight Calculation. *Polish Journal of Environmental Studies*, 29 (2), 1839, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes...>.
21.
LI T.H., DING Y., XIA W. An integrated method for waterway health assessment: A case in the Jingjiang reach of the Yangtze River, China. *Physical Geography*, 39 (1), 67, 2018. <
https://doi.org/10.1080/027236...>.
22.
LUONG T.N., HWANG S., IM N. Harbour Traffic Hazard Map for real‑time assessing waterway risk using Marine Traffic Hazard Index. *Ocean Engineering*, 239, 12, 2021. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocea...>.
23.
LIU S.Y., ZHANG Q., XIE Y.Y., XU P.C., DU H.H. Evaluation of Minimum and Suitable Ecological Flows of an Inland Basin in China Considering Hydrological Variation. *Water*, 15 (4), 19, 2023. <
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040...>.
24.
CHEN H., HUANG S.H., XU Y.P., TEEGAVARAPU R.S.V., GUO Y.X., NIE H., XIE H.W., ZHANG L.Q. River ecological flow early warning forecasting using baseflow separation and machine learning in the Jiaojiang River Basin, Southeast China. *Science of the Total Environment*, 882, 14, 2023. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:37087001.
25.
MAITY S., MAITI R., SENAPATI T. Evaluation of spatio‑temporal variation of water quality and source identification of conducive parameters in Damodar River, India. *Environmental Monitoring and Assessment*, 194 (4), 308, 2022. <
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661...> PMid:35353265.
26.
JIANG C., CHEN H., GROSSART H.P., ZHANG Q., STOKS R., ZHAO Y., JU F., LIU W., YANG Y. Frequency of occurrence and habitat selection shape the spatial variation in the antibiotic resistome in riverine ecosystems in eastern China. *Environmental Microbiome*, 17 (1), 53, 2022. <
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793...> PMid:36324162 PMCid:PMC9632137.
27.
ZHANG C., KUAI S.Y., TANG C.H., ZHANG S.H. Evaluation of hydrological connectivity in a river floodplain system and its influence on the vegetation coverage. *Ecological Indicators*, 144, 13, 2022. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol...>.
28.
THI T.D., MINH D.D. Riverbank Stability Assessment under River Water Level Changes and Hydraulic Erosion. *Water*, 11 (12), 20, 2019. <
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122...>.
29.
COLE L.J., STOCKAN J., HELLIWELL R. Managing riparian buffer strips to optimise ecosystem services: A review. *Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment*, 296, 12, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee...>.
30.
SOUZA G.B.G., VIANNA M. Fish-based indices for assessing ecological quality and biotic integrity in transitional waters: A systematic review. *Ecological Indicators*, 109, 11, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol...>.
31.
WANG Y., LIU J.J., LIU W., FENG Q., LI B.L., LU H., WANG S. Spatial variation in macrobenthic assemblages and their relationship with environmental factors in the upstream and midstream regions of the Heihe River Basin, China. *Environmental Monitoring and Assessment*, 193 (2), 22, 2021. <
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661...> PMid:33426620 PMCid:PMC7797420.
32.
LI K.L., CHEN R.S., LIU G.H. Cryosphere Water Resources Simulation and Service Function Evaluation in the Shiyang River Basin of Northwest China. *Water*, 13 (2), 22, 2021. <
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020...>.
33.
ZHAO M.X., LIU Y.Y., WANG Y., CHEN Y., DING W\.F. Effectiveness assessment of reservoir projects for flash flood control, water supply and irrigation in Wangmo Basin, China. *Science of the Total Environment*, 851, 14, 2022. <
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:35948129.
34.
XIAO W., CHENG K.Y., JUN W., WANG L.B. Water Functional Zoning Coordination Research in Tri‑Provincial Area of Jiangsu‑Zhejiang‑Shanghai, Taihu Basin. South Korea, 2018.
35.
PESIC A.M., BRANKOV J., JOKSIMOVIC D.M. Water quality assessment and populations' perceptions in the National Park Djerdap (Serbia): key factors affecting the environment. *Environment Development and Sustainability*, 22 (3), 2365, 2020. <
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668...>.