ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Do Green Supply Chains Promote Firm Environmental Information Disclosure?
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Politics and Public Administration, Soochow University, Suzhou,China
 
2
Undergraduate College, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-03-29
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-04-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-04-27
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-08-05
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Chengcheng Zhu   

Undergraduate College, Harbin Engineering University, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(2):1807-1822
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the impact of green supply chains on firms' environmental information disclosure, utilizing the Supply Chain Innovation and Application Pilot Policy (SCIAPP) as a quasinatural experiment. It explores the policy's effect by employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model with panel data from A-share listed firms in China spanning from 2012 to 2021. The findings indicate that, firstly, SCIAPP significantly enhances environmental information disclosure among pilot firms, suggesting that green supply chains foster such disclosures. Secondly, SCIAPP's impact mechanism involves improving executives' environmental awareness and bolstering external media scrutiny. Thirdly, SCIAPP's effect is more pronounced in firms with stronger internal controls and those located in regions with higher environmental concerns. Based on these conclusions, the study proposes recommendations to advance the development of green supply chains and promote firms' environmental information disclosure.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
PENG Y., JI Y. Can Informal Environmental Regulation Promote Green Innovation? - A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Environmental Information Disclosure Policy. *Polish Journal of Environmental Studies*, 31 (3), 2795, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes...>.
 
2.
LIN S. Can environmental information disclosure improve urban green economic efficiency? New evidence from the mediating effects model. *Frontiers in Environmental Science*, 10, 920879, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs....>.
 
3.
XUE D., WANG J., ZHU Z. Impact of environmental information disclosure on certified public accountant audit of Chinese listed companies in the energy industry. *Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences*, 5 (2), 377, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2...>.
 
4.
WANG S., WANG H., WANG J., YANG F. Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? *Science of the Total Environment*, 714, 136855, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:32018986.
 
5.
ZHANG J., YANG Y. Can environmental disclosure improve price efficiency? *Finance Research Letters*, 52, 103556, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl....>.
 
6.
ZHENG Y., GE C., LI X., DUAN X., YU T. Configurational analysis of environmental information disclosure: Evidence from China's key pollutant‑discharge listed companies. *Journal of Environmental Management*, 270, 110671, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv...> PMid:32721281.
 
7.
CHEN Y., XU Z., WANG X., YANG Y. How does green credit policy improve corporate social responsibility in China? *Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management*, 30 (2), 889, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.23...>.
 
8.
LIU G., GUO L. How does mandatory environmental regulation affect corporate environmental information disclosure quality? *Finance Research Letters*, 54, 103702, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl....>.
 
9.
SIMING Y., LINGLI X., PENG D., ZHAOHUI Q., QIANQIAN Z., TUANJIE Z. The impact of air pollution on corporate environmental information disclosure. *Finance Research Letters*, 59, 104793, 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl....>.
 
10.
GUO C., JIANG Y., WU Y. The dark side of digital finance: evidence from environmental information disclosure of Chinese listed companies. *Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal*, 14 (2), 313, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-...>.
 
11.
CHAO S., WANG S., LI H., YANG S. Does Confucian culture contribute to corporate environmental information disclosure? *Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management*, 30 (5), 2435, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.24...>.
 
12.
WANG M., LI W., ZHANG Y., CHENG X., CUI K. Entrepreneur heterogeneity and environmental information disclosure in new energy industry. *Polish Journal of Environmental Studies*, 32 (4), 3845, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes...>.
 
13.
HUSSAIN M.J., TIAN G., ASHRAF A., KHAN M.K., YING L. CEO ability and corporate environmental sustainability information disclosure. *Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility*, 32 (1), 24, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.1...>.
 
14.
ZHANG P., DONG Y. Strategy transformation of big data green supply chain using improved genetic optimization. *Soft Computing*, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500...>.
 
15.
GHADERI Z., SHAKORI H., BAGHERI F., HALL C.M., RATHER R.A., MOAVEN Z. Green supply chain management, environmental costs and supply chain performance in the hotel industry. *Current Issues in Tourism*, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1080/136835...>.
 
16.
AGYABENG‑MENSAH Y., BAAH C., AFUM E. Roles of green supply chain learning, creativity, and citizenship behavior in circular supply chain performance. *Journal of Environmental Planning and Management*, 67 (3), 609, 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1080/096405...>.
 
17.
TRUONG Y., BERRONE P. Environmental innovation as a source of higher market valuation. *Journal of Business Research*, 142, 113, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus...>.
 
18.
SIMPSON D., SROUFE R. Stakeholders, reward expectations and firms' use of the ISO 14001 management standard. *International Journal of Operations & Production Management*, 34 (7), 830, 2014. <https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-...>.
 
19.
ZHAO X., JIA M. Environmental award, legitimacy dominance, and corporate pollution. *Environment, Development and Sustainability*, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668...>.
 
20.
HOUQE M.N., OPARE S., ZAHIR‑UL‑HASSAN M.K., AHMED K. Carbon emissions, agency costs, and firm performance. *Journal of Risk and Financial Management*, 15 (4), 152, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15...>.
 
21.
KIM S.E., SHIRAN M., KENNEDY R., WANG Z., URPELAINEN J. Hide and brag: The strategic use of media in China’s war on air pollution. *Environmental Politics*, 33 (1), 138, 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1080/096440...>.
 
22.
KONG G., KONG D., WANG M. Does media attention affect firms' environmental protection efforts? *The Singapore Economic Review*, 65 (03), 577, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1142/S02175...>.
 
23.
ZHANG Y., ZHANG R., ZHANG C. Environmental regulation or media coverage? *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 358, 132024, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
 
24.
YAN X. Media attention, environmental regulation & corporate environmental responsibility. *Finance Research Letters*, 58, 104532, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl....>.
 
25.
WANG X., WU G., XIANG Z., ZHANG J. Air pollution and media slant: evidence from Chinese corporate news. *Emerging Markets Finance and Trade*, 58 (10), 2880, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1080/154049...>.
 
26.
MAO F., HOU Y., WANG H., XIN X. Broadband China Strategy & river pollution: evidence. *Polish Journal of Environmental Studies*, 32 (6), 5733, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes...>.
 
27.
AL‑TUWAIJRI S.A., CHRISTENSEN T.E., HUGHES II K.E. Environmental disclosure, performance & economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. *Accounting, Organizations and Society*, 29 (5–6), 447, 2004. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-...>.
 
28.
ZHANG M., WANG A., ZHOU S. Analysts' earnings pressure & environmental information disclosure. *Borsa Istanbul Review*, 23 (2), 495, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir....>.
 
29.
LIU T., CAO X. Executive environmental awareness & green innovation. *Journal of the Knowledge Economy*, 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132...>.
 
30.
GULDIKEN O., TUPPER C., NAIR A., YU H. Media coverage & IPO stock performance. *Journal of Business Research*, 72, 24, 2017. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus...>.
 
31.
JACOBSON L.S., LALONDE R.J., SULLIVAN D.G. Earnings losses of displaced workers. *The American Economic Review*, 685, 1993. <https://doi.org/10.17848/wp92-...>.
 
32.
NUNN N., QIAN N. Potato's contribution to urbanization. *The Quarterly Journal of Economics*, 126 (2), 593, 2011. <https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qj...> PMid:22073408.
 
33.
CAI X., LU Y., WU M., YU L. Environmental regulation & FDI. *Journal of Development Economics*, 123, 73, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdev...>.
 
34.
HECKMAN J.J., ICHIMURA H., TODD P.E. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. *The Review of Economic Studies*, 64 (4), 605, 1997. <https://doi.org/10.2307/297173...>.
 
35.
TU Q., WANG Y. Environmental protection taxes in China. *Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society*, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8...>.
 
36.
ZHAO L., WANG D., WANG X., ZHANG Z. Green finance & TFP. *Economic Analysis and Policy*, 79, 765, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap....>.
 
37.
ZHANG Z. Energy internet & ESG performance. *Heliyon*, 10 (2), 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli...> PMid:38293490 PMCid:PMC10827452.
 
38.
WANG X., ZHANG Z., CHUN D. Internal control & technological innovation. *Sustainability*, 13 (23), 13122, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.3390/su1323...>.
 
39.
LI C., MA X., FU T., GUAN S. Public concern over haze pollution. *Science of the Total Environment*, 755, 142397, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:33011599.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top