About the Journal
In Memory of Professor Jerzy Radecki
Ownership and Management Statement
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Scope
Impact Factor
Indexed by
Journal Impact Factor contributing items
Publication Frequency
Revenue Sources & Business Model
Contact
Subscription
Current issue
Online first
Instructions for Authors
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Editorial policies
Publication Policy Overview
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
Plagiarism Policy
Conflict of Interest Policy
Open Access Policy
Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Advertising Policy
Direct Marketing & Manuscript Solicitation
Digital Archiving and Preservation Policy
CrossMark, Correction, and Retraction Policy
Archive
Publication Fees
Copyright & Licensing
Editorial policies
Publication Policy Overview
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics and Malpractice Policy
Plagiarism Policy
Conflict of Interest Policy
Open Access Policy
Instructions for Reviewers
Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies Policy
Advertising Policy
Direct Marketing & Manuscript Solicitation
Digital Archiving and Preservation Policy
CrossMark, Correction, and Retraction Policy
eISSN: 2083-5906
ISSN: 1230-1485
ISSN: 1230-1485
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Empowering Green Choices: How Laws Influence
Ecological Commitment, Environmental
Knowledge, and Green Technology Adoption
for a Cleaner Tomorrow
1
School of Economics, Tianjin University of Commerce, China
2
School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
3
Liaoning Police College, Dalian City, Liaoning, China
4
UE Business School, Division of Management and Administrative Sciences, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan
Submission date: 2023-12-28
Final revision date: 2024-02-26
Acceptance date: 2024-03-23
Online publication date: 2024-07-29
Publication date: 2025-01-02
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(1):311-327
KEYWORDS
environmentally friendly behaviorenvironmental lawsgreen technologiesecological knowledgeclean production
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The threat of environmental degradation caused by production activities is growing worldwide
owing to the unsustainable behavior of firms. Environmental legislation plays a central role in
developing firms’ conservation-oriented and nature-friendly behavior. Limited literature is available on
how environmental legislation affects firms’ nature-friendly behavior and adoption of environmentally
friendly technologies. This research presents an empirical investigation into the intricate interplay
between ecological commitment, environmental knowledge, firms’ nature-friendly behavior, and
the adoption of environmental technologies within organizations. Moreover, the study examines
the moderating role of environmental law between firms’ nature-friendly behavior and the adoption
of environmental technologies. Data were collected from 401 firms through face-to-face and online
surveys during the pandemic in China. The study used Partial least squares structural equation modeling
(PLS-SEM) to analyze the collected data. The results show significant associations between ecological
commitment (β = 0.421, p<0.01), environmental knowledge (β = 0.301, p<0.01) and firms’ naturefriendly
behavior. The findings also reveal that a firm’s nature-friendly behavior (β = 0.271, p<0.01)
positively influences its adoption of environmentally friendly technologies. Similarly, environmental
law positively and significantly moderates the relationship between firms’ nature-friendly behavior and
the adoption of environmental technologies. Therefore, firms should align their values and operations
with ecological commitment, fostering a culture of environmental responsibility that permeates all
levels of the organization.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (107)
1.
SHAHBAZ P., HAQ S.U., BOZ I. Linking climate change adaptation practices with farm technical efficiency and fertilizer use: A study of wheat-maize mix cropping zone of Punjab province, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:34655385.
2.
OPOKU E.E.O., YAN I.K.-M. Industrialization as driver of sustainable economic growth in Africa. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 28 (1), 30, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/096381....
3.
SULTANUZZAMAN M.R., FAN H., MOHAMUED E.A., HOSSAIN M.I., ISLAM M.A. Effects of export and technology on economic growth: Selected emerging Asian economies. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja. 32 (1), 2515, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/133167....
4.
LI G., FANG C., WANG S., SUN S. The effect of economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in China. Environmental Science & Technology. 50 (21), 11452, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.es... PMid:27709931.
5.
HAQ S.U., BOZ I., SHAHBAZ P. Adoption of climate-smart agriculture practices and differentiated nutritional outcome among rural households: A case of Punjab province, Pakistan. Food Security. 13, 913, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571....
6.
MEADOWS D.H., MEADOWS D.L., RANDERS J., BEHRENS W.W. The limits to growth. Routledge. 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/978042....
7.
MAKHLOUFI L., LAGHOUAG A.A., MEIRUN T., BELAID F. Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: The natural resource-based view and environmental policy perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment. 31 (1), 425, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.29....
8.
DEMIREL P., LI Q.C., RENTOCCHINI F., TAMVADA J.P. Born to be green: new insights into the economics and management of green entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 52, 759, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187....
9.
MONDAL S., SINGH S., GUPTA H. Assessing enablers of green entrepreneurship in circular economy: An integrated approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 388, 135999, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
10.
ALLEN J.C., MALIN S. Green entrepreneurship: A method for managing natural resources? Society and Natural Resources. 21 (9), 828, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419....
11.
ALWAKID W., APARICIO S., URBANO D. Cultural antecedents of green entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia: An institutional approach. Sustainability. 12 (9), 3673, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1209....
12.
FARINELLI F., BOTTINI M., AKKOYUNLU S., AERNI P. Green entrepreneurship: the missing link towards a greener economy. Atdf Journal. 8 (3/4), 42, 2011.
14.
SCHALTEGGER S., WAGNER M. Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment. 20 (4), 222, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.68....
15.
BABIAK K., TRENDAFILOVA S. CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 18 (1), 11, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.22....
16.
FERNANDO Y., WAH W.X., SHAHARUDIN M.S. Does a firm's innovation category matter in practising eco-innovation? Evidence from the lens of Malaysia companies practicing green technology. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 27 (2), 208, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-0....
17.
BRADLEY S.W., MCMULLEN J.S., ARTZ K., SIMIYU E.M. Capital is not enough: Innovation in developing economies. Journal of Management Studies. 49 (4), 684, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
18.
BANSAL P., DESJARDINE M.R. Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization. 12 (1), 70, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/147612....
19.
HOCKERTS K. Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 41 (1), 105, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.1....
20.
ARKESTEIJN K., OERLEMANS L. The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy. 33 (2), 183, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-....
21.
WENG M.-H., LIN C.-Y. Determinants of green innovation adoption for small and medium-size enterprises (SMES). African Journal of Business Management. 5 (22), 9154, 2011.
22.
YUNUS S., JAILANI S.F.A.K., HAIRUDDIN H., KASSIM E.S. Green IT adoption towards environmental sustainability: The moderating role of top management enforcement. IEEE. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS....
23.
KOO C., CHUNG N. Examining the eco-technological knowledge of Smart Green IT adoption behavior: A self-determination perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 88, 140, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
24.
CHAN A.P.C., DARKO A., AMEYAW E.E. Strategies for promoting green building technologies adoption in the construction industry - An international study. Sustainability. 9 (6), 969, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060....
25.
DARKO A., CHAN A.P.C., AMEYAW E.E., HE B.-J., OLANIPEKUN A.O. Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts' perspectives. Energy and Buildings. 144, 320, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbu....
26.
DARKO A., CHAN A.P.C., YANG Y., SHAN M., HE B.-J., GOU Z. Influences of barriers, drivers, and promotion strategies on green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The Ghanaian case. Journal of Cleaner Production. 200, 687, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
27.
ASADI S., NILASHI M., SAMAD S., RUPANI P.F., KAMYAB H., ABDULLAH R. A proposed adoption model for green IT in manufacturing industries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 297, 126629, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
28.
WANG X., CHO S.-H., SCHELLER-WOLF A. Green technology development and adoption: competition, regulation, and uncertainty - a global game approach. Management Science. 67 (1), 201, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2....
29.
MA D. Study on the construction path and evaluation system of eco-civilized city. Urban Studies. 16 (10), 80, 2009.
30.
HENRI J.-F., JOURNEAULT M. Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 35 (1), 63, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.....
31.
KESIDOU E., DEMIREL P. On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK. Research Policy. 41 (5), 862, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp....
32.
VERSCHUUREN J. Does Environmental Law Encourage Obstruct Eco-Innovations? Evidence from Case Studies in the Netherlands. European Energy and Environmental Law Review. 26 (2), 2017. https://doi.org/10.54648/EELR2....
33.
AKHTAR-KHAVARI A. Restoration and cooperation for flourishing socio-ecological landscapes. Transnational Legal Theory. 11 (1-2), 62, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/204140....
34.
MAIOR C., BERLINGHER D., DĂRĂU P.A., BOJA N. The synergy between natural and legal law in eco-ethics context. Journal of Legal Studies. 27 (41), 98, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2....
35.
XU J., HAN L., YIN W. Research on the ecologicalization efficiency of mariculture industry in China and its influencing factors. Marine Policy. 137, 104935, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marp....
36.
KISS A., SHELTON D. Guide to international environmental law. Brill. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.978....
37.
BRAM D. RELASI PEMAHAMAN HAKIM DAN KUALITAS PUTUSAN DALAM KASUS PIDANA LINGKUNGAN. Jurnal Yudisial. 4 (3), 339, 2011.
38.
BOYD W., KYSAR D.A., RACHLINSKI J.J. Law, environment, and the "nondismal" social sciences. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 8, 183, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
39.
NATARAJAN U., KHODAY K. Locating nature: Making and unmaking international law. Leiden Journal of International Law. 27 (3), 573, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/S09221....
40.
PAVLOVYCH G.A. Environmental and legal science: current state and prospects of development. Проблеми законності. 131, 79, 2015. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-....
41.
LIAN Z., QIAN Q., BAO L. Environment Knowledge, Law-Abiding Consciousness and Risk Perception Influencing Environmental Behavior. EDP Sciences. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3scon....
42.
JESTER J., FATIMA S., OPOKU A., BANGALORE N., HENNAWI F., NABBIE C., SARAVANAN S., DUIT A., HARGROVE A., SOMMER J.M. Narratives of Environmentalism in National Laws. The Journal of Environment & Development. 32 (1), 3, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049....
43.
HINES J.M., HUNGERFORD H.R., TOMERA A.N. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education. 18 (2), 1, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/009589....
44.
KELLEY H.H. Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York. 1978.
45.
RUSBULT C., ARRIAGA X. Interdependence in personal relationships. The Social Psychology of Personal Relationships. 79, 2000.
46.
RUSBULT C.E. Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 16 (2), 172, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1....
47.
LE B., AGNEW C.R. Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships. 10 (1), 37, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6....
48.
RUSBULT C.E., OLSEN N., DAVIS J.L., HANNON P.A. Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. Psychology Press. 2001.
49.
AGNEW C.R., VAN LANGE P.A., RUSBULT C.E., LANGSTON C.A. Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74 (4), 939, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-....
50.
MORRONE M., MANCL K., CARR K. Development of a metric to test group differences in ecological knowledge as one component of environmental literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education. 32 (4), 33, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/009589....
51.
LIU J., OUYANG Z., MIAO H. Environmental attitudes of stakeholders and their perceptions regarding protected area-community conflicts: A case study in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 91 (11), 2254, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:20619528.
52.
MA Y., LV L. Financial development, financial instability, and fiscal policy volatility: International evidence. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 64, 101873, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.naje....
53.
FIELDING K.S., HEAD B.W. Determinants of young Australians' environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research. 18 (2), 171, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/135046....
54.
ZAFAR A.U., QIU J., SHAHZAD M. Do digital celebrities' relationships and social climate matter? Impulse buying in f-commerce. Internet Research. 30 (6), 1731, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-0....
55.
VENKATESH V., THONG J.Y., XU X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly. 36 (1), 157, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2307/414104....
56.
KARAMPOURNIOTI E., WIEDMANN K.-P. Storytelling in online shops: the impacts on explicit and implicit user experience, brand perceptions and behavioral intention. Internet Research. 32 (7), 228, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-0....
57.
LEE C.-C., YEH W.-C., YU Z., LUO Y.-C. Knowledge sharing and innovation performance: a case study on the impact of organizational culture, structural capital, human resource management practices, and relational capital of real estate agents. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 10 (1), 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599....
58.
BYRNE B., STEWART S. The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling. 13 (2), 287, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328....
59.
HAIR J.J., BLACK W.C., BABIN B.J., ANDERSON R.E., TATHAM R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. 2006.
60.
HAIR J.F., SARSTEDT M., RINGLE C.M., MENA J.A. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 40, 414, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747....
61.
REINARTZ W., HAENLEIN M., HENSELER J. An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 26 (4), 332, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijre....
62.
HAIR JR J., HAIR JR J.F., HULT G.T.M., RINGLE C.M., SARSTEDT M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
63.
CHIN W.W. How to write up and report PLS analyses. Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Eds VV Esposito, WW Chin, J Henseler and H Wang. pp. 655-690. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
64.
CHEUNG G.W., RENSVOLD R.B. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. 9 (2), 233, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328....
65.
STEIGER J.H. EzPATH: causal modeling: a supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH: PC-MS-DOS, Version 1.0. Systat. 1989.
66.
KOLLMUSS A., AGYEMAN J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research. 8 (3), 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/135046... PMCid:PMC12935251.
67.
FRICK J., KAISER F.G., WILSON M. Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences. 37 (8), 1597, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
68.
DAVIS J.L., LE B., COY A.E. Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 31 (3), 257, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
69.
LEVINE D.S., STRUBE M.J. Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students. The Journal of Social Psychology. 152 (3), 308, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/002245... PMid:22558826.
70.
DUERDEN M.D., WITT P.A. The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30 (4), 379, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
71.
SU S., QAMRUZZAMAN M., KARIM S. Charting a sustainable future: the impact of economic policy, environmental taxation, innovation, and natural resources on clean energy consumption. Sustainability. 15 (18), 13585, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1518....
72.
WETZELS M., ODEKERKEN-SCHRÖDER G., VAN OPPEN C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly. 177, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/206502....
73.
COHEN J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020....
74.
PREACHER K.J., HAYES A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 36, 717, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0320... PMid:15641418.
75.
CHIN W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research. 295 (2), 295, 1998.
76.
CRONBACH L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16 (3), 297, 1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0231....
77.
CARLSON J.P., VINCENT L.H., HARDESTY D.M., BEARDEN W.O. Objective and subjective knowledge relationships: A quantitative analysis of consumer research findings. Journal of Consumer Research. 35 (5), 864, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1086/593688.
78.
RAHMAN K. Mitigating corruption risks in COVID-19 vaccine rollout. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. 2021.
79.
HENSELER J., RINGLE C.M., SARSTEDT M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 43, 115, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747....
80.
ROUF M.A., AKHTARUDDIN M. Factors affecting the voluntary disclosure: a study by using smart PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Law and Management. 60 (6), 1498, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-....
81.
FORNELL C., CHA J., BAGOZZI R. Advanced methods of marketing research. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 26 (4), 331, 1994.
82.
DAHL A. Ecological commitments: Why developmental science needs naturalistic methods. Child Development Perspectives. 11 (2), 79, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.1... PMid:28584562 PMCid:PMC5455774.
83.
CHUKWUKA E.J., NWOMIKO U.-N. Sustainability-oriented practices of eco-innovation, eco-commitment and organizational performance of a developing economy. World Journal of Research and Review. 6 (4), 262668, 2018.
84.
ROBICHET A., NIERAT P., COMBES F. First and last miles by cargo bikes: ecological commitment or economically feasible? The case of a parcel service company in Paris. Transportation Research Record. 2676 (9), 269, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/036119....
85.
TARUI N., POLASKY S. Environmental regulation with technology adoption, learning and strategic behavior. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 50 (3), 447, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
86.
GONZÁLEZ A., TERASVIRTA T., VAN DIJK D. Panel smooth transition regression models. Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney. 2005.
87.
GOODARZI S., MASINI A., AFLAKI S., FAHIMNIA B. Right information at the right time: Reevaluating the attitude-behavior gap in environmental technology adoption. International Journal of Production Economics. 242, 108278, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe....
88.
USMAN M., ROFCANIN Y., ALI M., OGBONNAYA C., BABALOLA M.T. Toward a more sustainable environment: Understanding why and when green training promotes employees' eco-friendly behaviors outside of work. Human Resource Management. 62 (3), 355, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22....
89.
KUAR L.-S., NG L.P., CHOONG Y.-O., CHEN I.-C., TEOH S.-Y., TEE C.-W. Hotels' green practices adoption: Determinants and top managers' environmental commitment. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR). 10 (2), 157, 2022. https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.....
90.
CSUTORA M. One more awareness gap? The behaviour-impact gap problem. Journal of Consumer Policy. 35 (1), 145, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603....
91.
JAYARAMAN V., SINGH R., ANANDNARAYAN A. Impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: an emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Research. 50 (5), 1395, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075....
92.
KRAUSE M.S., DROSTE N., MATZDORF B. What makes businesses commit to nature conservation? Business Strategy and the Environment. 30 (2), 741, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.26... PMCid:PMC7733002.
93.
HÄMÄLÄINEN E. Young Adults' Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Travelling Behavior. 2012.
94.
KHAN I., ZAKARI A., ZHANG J., DAGAR V., SINGH S. A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: New insights from three trilemma leadership. Energy. 248, 123619, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
95.
CHEN L., GAO F., GUO T., HUANG X. Mixed ownership reform and the short-term debt for long-term investment of non-state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis. 90, 102861, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa....
96.
HEO J., MURALIDHARAN S. What triggers young Millennials to purchase eco-friendly products?: the interrelationships among knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness, and environmental concern. Journal of Marketing Communications. 25 (4), 421, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/135272....
97.
MALIK S.Y., HAYAT MUGHAL Y., AZAM T., CAO Y., WAN Z., ZHU H., THURASAMY R. Corporate social responsibility, green human resources management, and sustainable performance: is organizational citizenship behavior towards environment the missing link? Sustainability. 13 (3), 1044, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1303....
98.
YONG J.Y., YUSLIZA M.Y., RAMAYAH T., CHIAPPETTA JABBOUR C.J., SEHNEM S., MANI V. Pathways towards sustainability in manufacturing organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management. Business Strategy and the Environment. 29 (1), 212, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.23....
99.
HALDORAI K., KIM W.G., GARCIA R.F. Top management green commitment and green intellectual capital as enablers of hotel environmental performance: The mediating role of green human resource management. Tourism Management. 88, 104431, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tour....
100.
RYAN R.M., DECI E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 55 (1), 68, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-... PMid:11392867.
101.
PELLETIER L.G., TUSON K.M., GREEN‐DEMERS I., NOELS K., BEATON A.M. Why are you doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 28 (5), 437, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559....
102.
WATSON R.T., BOUDREAU M.-C., CHEN A.J. Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly. 23, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2307/207214....
103.
YASIR M., MAJID A., QUDRATULLAH H. Promoting environmental performance in manufacturing industry of developing countries through environmental orientation and green business strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 275, 123003, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
104.
PROKOP V., GERSTLBERGER W., ZAPLETAL D., STRITESKA M.K. The double-edged role of firm environmental behaviour in the creation of product innovation in Central and Eastern European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 331, 129989, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
105.
NANGGONG A. Perceived benefit, environmental concern and sustainable customer behavior on technology adoption. The Asian Journal of Technology Management. 12 (1), 31, 2019. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.....
106.
ZHANG C., KHAN I., DAGAR V., SAEED A., ZAFAR M.W. Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 178, 121570, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
107.
LI G., WANG X., SU S., SU Y. How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness. Technology in Society. 59, 101136, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
CITATIONS (2):
1.
Incentive design for cultivated land quality protection based on atripartite evolutionary game model
Hongshan Chen, Shuang Xu, Chulin Pan, Hongpeng Guo
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Hongshan Chen, Shuang Xu, Chulin Pan, Hongpeng Guo
Environment, Development and Sustainability
2.
An Assessment of Conspicuous Behavior and Environmental Awareness as Predictive Factors of Sustainable Consumption for Sustainable Development
Arthur William Pereira da Silva, Ciro José Jardim de Figueiredo, Walid Abbas El‐Aouar, Eliana Andrea Severo, Ahiram Brunni Cartaxo de Castro, Juliana Carvalho de Sousa, Pablo Marlon Medeiros da Silva
Business Strategy & Development
Arthur William Pereira da Silva, Ciro José Jardim de Figueiredo, Walid Abbas El‐Aouar, Eliana Andrea Severo, Ahiram Brunni Cartaxo de Castro, Juliana Carvalho de Sousa, Pablo Marlon Medeiros da Silva
Business Strategy & Development
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2083-5906 |
| ISSN: | 1230-1485 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
