REVIEW PAPER
Bibliometric and Visual Analyses of Low Carbon Technology Innovations: Developments, Hotspots, and Trends
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Liaoning University Sunwah International Business School
 
2
Chongqing Business Vocational College, China
 
3
School of Law and Public Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China
 
4
The University of Queensland, Australia
 
5
School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, China
 
6
Chuzhou Vocational and Technical College, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-04-08
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-06-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-06-23
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-10-07
 
 
Publication date: 2025-06-06
 
 
Corresponding author
Bo Dong   

Chuzhou Vocational and Technical College, 239000, Chuzhou, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(4):4541-4556
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
As low carbon globalization advances, low carbon technological innovation is attracting attention, and more efforts are being invested in technology-driven decarbonization of the economy. Low carbon globalization requires the optimal allocation of national scientific and technological resources on a global scale, which is the newest and fastest growing area of economic globalization, and therefore requires attention to low carbon technological innovation. In this paper, an in-depth bibliometric and visualization analysis based on 205 articles from the Web of Science core collection was conducted using Citespace and VOS viewer in order to analyze the knowledge structure, hot topics, and trend directions in the field. The study found that China has the highest number of articles published between 2012-2021 and is also the world’s largest carbon emitter, suggesting that large amounts of carbon emissions drive low carbon technological innovation. Xiamen University, Beijing Institute of Technology, and Tsinghua University are the most active institutions. In addition, cooperation between authors tends to be grouped and has been frequent in recent years. The co-occurring articles and keyword analyses identified three hotspots of low carbon technological innovation: ‘CO2 emission’, ‘policy’, and ‘energy’. In addition, keyword emergence analyses indicate that renewable energy, developing countries, and technology innovation themes are emerging trends. Low carbon technology innovation and renewable energy innovation in developing countries will be promoted.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
SOVACOOL B.K., NEWELL P., CARLEY S., FANZO J. Equity, technological innovation and sustainable behaviour in a low-carbon future. Nature human behaviour, 6 (3), 326, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562... PMid:35102347.
 
2.
LAI X., LIU J., SHI Q., GEORGIEV G., WU G. Driving forces for low carbon technology innovation in the building industry: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 299, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
3.
ZHANG M., LI B., YIN S. Is technological innovation effective for energy saving and carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. IEEE Access, 8, 83524, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
 
4.
PENASCO C., ANADON L.D., Verdolini, E. Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments. Nature Climate Change, 11 (3), 257, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558....
 
5.
PAPACHRISTOS G. Diversity in technology competition: The link between platforms and sociotechnical transitions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 291, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
6.
WONG C., KENG Z., MOHAMAD Z.F., AZIZAN S.A. Patterns of technological accumulation: The comparative advantage and relative impact of Asian emerging economies in low carbon energy technological systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 977, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
7.
KOASIDIS K., NIKAS A., NEOFYTOU H., KARAMANEAS A., GAMBHIR A., WACHSMUTH J., DOUKAS H. The UK and German low-carbon industry transitions from a sectoral innovation and system failures perspective. Energies, 13 (19), 4994, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1319....
 
8.
HUNTER G.W., SAGOE G., VETTORATO D., JIAYU D. Sustainability of low carbon city initiatives in China: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainability, 11 (16), 4342, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1116....
 
9.
SARIN S., HAON C., BELKHOUJA M., MAS-TUR A., ROIG-TIERNO N., SEGO T., CARLEY S. Uncovering the knowledge flows and intellectual structures of research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: A journey through history. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120210, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
10.
CHEN W., HU Z. Using evolutionary game theory to study governments and manufacturers' behavioral strategies under various carbon taxes and subsidies. Journal of cleaner production, 201, 123, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
11.
ZHU J., FAN Y., DENG X., XUE L. Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China. Nature communications, 10 (1), 4088, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467... PMid:31501437 PMCid:PMC6733790.
 
12.
SHEN N., LIAO H., DENG R., WANG Q. Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: empirical analysis of China's industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 171, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle... PMCid:PMC9858057.
 
13.
SU H., MOANIBA I.M. Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 49, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
14.
CHENG J., YI J., DAI S., XIONG Y. Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative. Journal of cleaner production, 231, 1158, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
15.
WEI Y., XU D., ZHANG K., CHENG J. Research on the innovation incentive effect and heterogeneity of the market-incentive environmental regulation on mineral resource enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (41), 58456, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
 
16.
BERGEK A., HEKKERT M., JACIBSSON S., MARKARD J., SANDEN B., TRUFFER B. Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 16, 51, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist....
 
17.
WANG H., CHEN Z., WU X., NIE X. Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? -Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method. Energy policy, 129, 930, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
18.
CALEL R., DECHEZLEPRETRE A. Environmental policy and directed technological change: evidence from the European carbon market. Review of economics and statistics, 98 (1), 173, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a....
 
19.
ALBRIZIO S., KOZLUK T., ZIPPERER V. Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
20.
LIN B., ZHU J. Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. Journal of environmental management, 247, 662, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:31279143.
 
21.
MIAO C., FANG D., SUN L., LUO Q. Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 126, 153, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
 
22.
SONG M., ZHAO X., SHANG Y. The impact of low-carbon city construction on ecological efficiency: Empirical evidence from quasi-natural experiments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157, 104777, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
 
23.
ALBINO V., ARDITO L., DANGELICO R.M., PETRUZZELLI A.M. Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis. Applied energy, 135, 836, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
 
24.
CHERO A., VINICHENKO V., JEWELL J., BRUTSCHIN E., SOVACOOL B. Integrating techno-economic, sociotechnical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 175, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss....
 
25.
TAN S., YANG J., YAN J., LEE C., HASHIM H., CHEN B. A holistic low carbon city indicator framework for sustainable development. Applied Energy, 185, 1919, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
 
26.
LI W., WANG W., WANG Y., ALI M. Historical growth in total factor carbon productivity of the Chinese industry - a comprehensive analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 170, 471, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
27.
GEHRSITZ M. The effect of low emission zones on air pollution and infant health. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 121, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem....
 
28.
ZHANG Y., PENG Y., MA C., SHEN B. Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100, 18, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top