ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Exploring Carbon Emissions in China’s
Electric Power Industry for Low-Carbon
Development: Drivers, Decoupling Analysis
and Policy Implications
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, China
Submission date: 2018-06-18
Final revision date: 2018-07-23
Acceptance date: 2018-08-02
Online publication date: 2019-03-14
Publication date: 2019-05-28
Corresponding author
Qi Wang
Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Huadian Road 687,North District, Baoding City, Hebei Province, China, 071000 Baoding, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019;28(5):3353-3367
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
As an important single source to carbon emissions, China’s power industry should bear social
responsibility for mitigating climate change. To explore what low-carbon development means for the
industry, a novel approach that combines the extended multilevel LMDI model with Tapio algorithm was
conducted to study the drivers of carbon emissions in the power industry and whether CO2 emissions
from power output is out of sync with economic development, covering the period from 1996 to 2016.
Our results come to the following:
1. Carbon emissions from electricity output are characterized by increases and volatility, with an
average annual growth rate of 7.05%. The carbon emission factor of electricity, facilitating to compute
CO2 data, shows a decline.
2. The positive driving factors are economic activity effect (169.53%), population scale effect (9.29%),
fuel mix structure effect (0.41%), and electricity trade effect (1.05%); the negative driving factors are
electricity intensity effect (-46.38%), power generation efficiency effect (-24.93%), and power generation
structure effect (-8.97%).
3. Weak decoupling and expansive decoupling are the main status during the research period.
The electricity intensity effect is the main force to promote the decoupling process.
4. The market-oriented reform in the power industry in 2003 has a significant effect. The generationside
competition mechanism successfully changes the historical developmental trend of the decoupling
elastic index.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (6):
1.
Predicting combined carbon emissions in urban regions considering micro-level enterprise electricity consumption data and macro-level regional data
Hengjun Zhou, Fei Qi, Chen Liu, Guilin Liu, Guangxu Xiao
Frontiers in Energy Research
2.
China’s power industry’s carbon emission intensity in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality: measurement and regional difference
Pinjie Xie, Baolin Sun, Li Liu, Yuwen Xie, Fan Yang, Rong Zhang
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
3.
Optimization and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Carbon Emission Rights Allocation in the Power Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
Dalai Ma, Yaping Xiao, Na Zhao
Sustainability
4.
Research on low carbon emission optimization operation technology of natural gas pipeline under multi-energy structure
En-Bin Liu, Yong Peng, Shan-Bi Peng, Bin Yu, Qi-Kun Chen
Petroleum Science
5.
Carbon Emission Influencing Factors and Scenario Prediction for Construction Industry in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
Wensheng Liu, Danchen Ren, Changbo Ke, Wei Ying, Payam Shafigh
Advances in Civil Engineering
6.
Characterizing Critical Sources of Carbon Emissions Using Principal Component Analysis
Moiz Qureshi, Muhammad Ismail, Muhammad Daniyal, Inzamamul Haq, Kassim Tawiah, Francis Kwame Bukari, Richard Kwame Ansah, Killian Asampana Asosega, Himadri Majumder
The Scientific World Journal