ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Exploring the Human-Land Nexus in China’s
Xin’an River Basin: Remote Sensing Analysis
of Ecosystem Services Variability and Synergy
More details
Hide details
1
Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Anhui University, Hefei, 203106, China
2
Community Development Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei, 203106, China
3
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Lancaster University, UK, Lancaster, UK
Submission date: 2024-04-11
Final revision date: 2024-05-28
Acceptance date: 2024-06-12
Online publication date: 2024-10-21
Publication date: 2025-05-09
Corresponding author
Xin Su
Community Development Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei, 203106, China
Yanlong Guo
Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Anhui University, Hefei, 203106, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(4):4027-4040
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study scrutinized the Xin’an River Basin from 2017 to 2022, employing refined methodologies
such as updated ecosystem service value tables, welfare assessment systems encompassing material,
health, and public well-being metrics, human-environment coupling models, and advanced remote
sensing technologies for land use patterns and satellite data analysis. Key findings revealed that:
(1) The valuation of ecosystem services exhibited periods of equilibrium followed by slight declines, with
a spatial distribution pattern described as ‘rising at the periphery, diminishing at the core’, culminating
in a modest overall depreciation. (2) Human settlement welfare demonstrated a distinct geographical
trend of ‘enhancement in the southeast, reduction in the northwest’, highlighting exceptional welfare
in Jiande City, Shexian, and Chun’an County. (3) Over the observation period, the dynamic interplay
between ecosystem services and human settlement welfare fluctuated, reaching its zenith in 2018 and
its nadir in 2020. This interaction displayed a spatial gradient of ‘excellent in the southeast, subpar
in the central regions, and favorable in the northwest’, indicating an overall moderate level of integration.
The results underscore a mutual adjustment and a clear convergence towards minimal functional discord
between the two systems.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
BEETON R.J., LYNCH A.J.J. Most of nature: A framework to resolve the twin dilemmas of the decline of nature and rural communities. Environmental Science & Policy, 23 (12), 45, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
2.
TAN L., YANG G. Market-oriented Watershed Payment for Ecosystem Services: Progress and Future Perspectives. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 42 (7), 1218, 2022.
3.
Proceedings of the 3rd 2017 International Conference on Sustainable Development (ICSD 2017). Available online:
http://creativecommons.org/lic... (accessed on 11 March 2024).
4.
WU J. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape ecology, 28 (4), 999, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980....
5.
WANG D., ZHENG H. Ecosystem services supply and consumption and their relationships with human well-being. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24 (6), 1747, 2013.
8.
YING L., KONG L. The research progress and prospect of ecological security and its assessing approaches. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42 (5), 1679, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
9.
WANG D., LI Y. Ecosystem services' spatial characteristics and their relationships with residents' well-being in Miyun Reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34 (1), 70, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
10.
XIE G., YAN L. Expert knowledgebased valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23 (5), 911, 2008.
11.
ZHOU L., SU X. Simulation of the coupling relationships between ecosystem services and human well-being in Chongqing. China Environmental Science, 43 (5), 2560, 2023.
13.
HUANG G., JIANG Y. Advances in human well-being research: a sustainability science perspective. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36 (23), 7519, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
14.
NELSON E.J., KAREIVA P. Climate change's impact on key ecosystem services and the human well-being they support in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11 (9), 483, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1890/120312.
15.
TAN X., WU G. Progress in time use research in the framework of well-being. Economic Perspectives, 55 (7), 151, 2014.
16.
WANG B., TANG H. Human Well-Being and Its Applications and Prospects in Ecology. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 32 (5), 697, 2016.
17.
REN Y., LONG Y. Impact of Watershed Eco-compensation Policy on Water Pollution Intensity in the Compensated Area: A Case Study of the Xin'an River Basin. Economic Geography, 43 (11), 181, 2023.
19.
XIE G., LU C. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 18 (2), 189, 2003.
20.
YANG H., DIETZ T. Changes in human well-being and rural livelihoods under natural disasters. Ecological Economics, 151 (9), 184, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
21.
ORTEGA M.M., RUBIERA M.F., PÉREZ G.B. Ranking residential locations based on neighborhood sustainability and family profile. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28 (1), 49, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/135045....
22.
ZHANG Q., KONG Q., ZHANG M. New-type urbanization and ecological well-being performance: A coupling coordination analysis in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River urban agglomerations, China. Ecological Indicators, 159 (2), 111678, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
23.
WANG M., SU M.M., GAN C. A coordination analysis on tourism development and resident well-being in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421 (10), 138361, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....