ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Impact of Excessive Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) on Species Diversity of Plants and Epigeic Insects
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Ecology, Plac Grunwaldzki 24a, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
 
2
Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation – State Research Institute, Department of Weed Science, Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wrocław, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-06-11
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-10-14
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-11-08
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-02-18
 
 
Corresponding author
Iwona Gruss   

Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Plant Protection, Plac Grunwaldzki 24a, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study examined the impact of artificial light at night (ALAN) emitted by a lit greenhouse complex in Poland on plant communities and surface-dwelling arthropods. The effects of ALAN were investigated at three different distances from the light source within agricultural ecosystems. Insect populations were sampled using Barber traps, while plant communities were assessed using the Braun- Blanquet method. The findings showed that ALAN did not cause significant overall changes in plant community composition. However, ordination analysis suggested species-specific shifts in response to light pollution, indicating that some plants may adapt differently depending on their proximity to the light source. ALAN caused a notable decrease in arthropod diversity, as measured by the Margalef index; however, not in taxa abundance. These results, based on a single growing season, highlight the potential ecological risks of nighttime lighting for insect biodiversity and emphasise the need for longterm studies to understand its effects fully.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
BENNIE J., DAVIES T.W., CRUSE D., BELL F., GASTON K.J. Ecological effects of artificial light night on wild plants. Journal of Ecology. 104, 611, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2....
 
2.
ŚCIĘŻOR T., CZAPLICKA A., CZAPLICKA Z. Light pollution in the Tatra National Park. Archives of Environmental Protection. 50 (4), 22, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2....
 
3.
GŁOWACKA B. Effect of light colour on the growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus. 1 (2), 93, 2002 [In Polish].
 
4.
KOŁTON A., WOJCIECHOWSKA R., CZAJA M. Modification of leaf morphology of sycamore maple and round-leaved bittersweet due to light pollution at night. In: P. Tabaka (Ed.), Artificial light at night - between threat and development, Monographs of Lodz University of Technology, Łódź, 236, pp. 19, 2022 [In Polish].
 
5.
FFRENCH-CONSTANT R.H., SOMERS-YEATES R., BENNIE J., ECONOMOU T., HODGSON D., SPALDING A., MCGREGOR P. Light pollution is associated with earlier tree budburst across the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283, 20160813, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2....
 
6.
ŚCIĘŻOR T., ESMUND I., CZAPLICKA A. An inventory of selected sources of light pollution in Tarnów. Technical Transactions. 117 (1), e2020022, 2020. https://doi.org/10.37705/TechT....
 
7.
ŠKVARENINOVÁ J., TUHÁRSKA M., ŠKVARENINA J., BABÁLOVÁ D., SLOBODNÍKOVÁ L., SLOBODNÍK B., STŘEDOVÁ H., MINĎAŠ J. Effects of light pollution on tree phenology in the urban environment. Moravian Geographical Reports. 25 (4), 282, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-20....
 
8.
KWAK M.J., JE S.M., CHENG H.C., SEO S.M., PARK J.H., BAEK S.G., KHAINE I., LEE T., JANG J., LI Y., KIM H., LEE J.K., KIM J., WOO S.Y. Night light-adaptation strategies for photosynthetic apparatus in yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) exposed to artificial night lighting. Forests. 9 (2), 0074, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/f90200....
 
9.
SINNADURAI S. High pressure sodium street lights affect crops in Ghana. World Crops. 33, 120, 1981.
 
10.
LEVY K., WEGRZYN Y., MOARAF S., BARNEA A., AYALI A. When night becomes day: artificial light at night alters insect behavior under semi-natural conditions. Science of The Total Environment. 926, 171905, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
11.
BORGES R.M. Impacts of artificial light at night on nocturnal and diurnal insect biology and diversity. Indian Journal of Entomology. 84 (2), 483, 2022. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2....
 
12.
BROWN J.A., LOCKWOOD J.L., PIANA M.R., BEARDSLEY C. Introduction of artificial light at night increases the abundance of predators, scavengers, and parasites in arthropod communities. iScience. 26, 106203, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci....
 
13.
MENTA C., REMELLI S. Soil health and arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation. Insects. 11, 54, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/insect....
 
14.
HALE R., MORRONGIELLO J.R., SWEARER S.E. Evolutionary traps and range shifts in a rapidly changing world. Biology Letters. 12, 20160003, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2....
 
15.
KAUNATH V., ECCARD J.A. Light attraction in carabid beetles: comparison among animals from the inner city and a dark sky reserve. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 10, 751288, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2....
 
16.
VAN DE SCHOOT E., MERCKX T., EBERT D., WESSELINGH R.A., ALTERMATT F., VAN DYCK H. Evolutionary change in flight to light response in urban moths comes with changes in wing morphology. Biology Letters. 20, 20230486, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2....
 
17.
YUEN S.W., BONEBRAKE T.C. Artificial night light alters nocturnal prey interception outcomes for morphologically variable spiders. PeerJ. 5, e4070, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.....
 
18.
MANFRIN A., SINGER G., LARSEN S., WEIß N., VAN GRUNSVEN R.H.A., WEIß N.-S., WOHLFAHRT S., MONAGHAN M.T., HÖLKER F. Artificial light at night affects organism flux across ecosystem boundaries and drives community structure in the recipient ecosystem. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 5, 61, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
 
19.
ECKHARTT G.M., RUXTON G.D. Artificial light at night may decrease predation risk for terrestrial insects. Biology Letters. 18, 20220281, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2....
 
20.
XU Q., WANG B., WU D., DU J., LIU Y., CHANG L. Light pollution increased night-active but not day-active Collembola in Hulunbuir grassland, China. Applied Soil Ecology. 197, 105329, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apso....
 
21.
ANIC V., GASTON K.J., DAVIES T.W., BENNIE J. Long-term effects of artificial nighttime lighting and trophic complexity on plant biomass and foliar carbon and nitrogen in a grassland community. Ecology and Evolution. 12, e9157, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9....
 
22.
EBELING A., MEYER S.T., ABBAS M., EISENHAUER N., HILLEBRAND H., LANGE M., SCHERBER C., VOGEL A., WEIGELT A., WEISSER W.W. Plant diversity impacts decomposition and herbivory via changes in aboveground arthropods. PLoS ONE. 9, e106529, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
23.
STEWART A.J.A. Impacts of artificial lighting at night on insect conservation. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 14, 163, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.1....
 
24.
WFO Plant List. Available online: https://wfoplantlist.org/ (accessed on 30 June 2025).
 
25.
MATUSZKIEWICZ W. A guide to identifying plant communities in Poland, 3rd ed.; Polish Scientific Publishers PWN: Warsaw, Poland, pp. 549, 2013 [In Polish].
 
26.
ZAJĄC M., ZAJĄC A. A Tentative list of segetal and ruderal Apophytes in Poland. Scientific Annals of the Jagiellonian University. Botanical Works. 24, 7, 1992 [In Polish].
 
27.
TOKARSKA-GUZIK B., DAJDOK Z., ZAJĄC M., ZAJĄC A., URBISZ A., DANIELEWICZ W., HOŁDYŃSKI C. Alien plants in Poland with particular emphasis on invasive species; General Directorate for Environmental Protection: Warsaw, Poland, pp. 197, 2012 [In Polish].
 
28.
RUTKOWSKI L. Key to vascular plants of lowland Poland. 2nd ed.; Polish Scientific Publishers PWN: Warsaw, Poland, pp. 814, 2004 [In Polish].
 
29.
ELLENBERG H., WEBER H.E., DÜLL R., WIRTH V., WERNER W., PAULISSEN D. Indicator values of plants in central Europe. Scripta Geobotanica. 18, 1, 1992 [In German].
 
30.
ZARZYCKI K., TRZCIŃSKA-TACIK H., RÓŻAŃSKI W., SZELĄG Z., WOŁEK J., KORZENIAK U. Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences: Kraków, Poland, pp. 183, 2002.
 
31.
MARGALEF R. Information theory in ecology. General Systems. 3, 36, 1958.
 
32.
CZAJA M., KOŁTON A., MURAS P. The complex issue of urban trees-stress factor accumulation and ecological service possibilities. Forests. 11 (9), 0932, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090....
 
33.
CZAJA M., KOŁTON A. How light pollution can affect spring development of urban trees and shrubs. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 77, 127753, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug....
 
34.
ZHOU C., NAKAMURA A., SONG X., KATABUCHI M. Artificial light at night (ALAN) influences understory plant traits through ecological processes: a two-year experiment in a rubber plantation in China. Ecologies. 4, 704, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecolog....
 
35.
ABUELSOUD W., CORTLEVEN A., SCHMÜLLING T. Photoperiod stress induces an oxidative burst-like response and is associated with increased apoplastic peroxidase and decreased catalase activities. Journal of Plant Physiology. 253, 153252, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplp....
 
36.
KIM J.A., KIM H.S., CHOI S.H., JANG J.Y., JEONG M.J., LEE S.I. The importance of the circadian clock in regulating plant metabolism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18 (12), 2680, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18....
 
37.
FRANK M., CORTLEVEN A., PĚNČÍK A., NOVAK O., SCHMÜLLING T. The photoperiod stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana depends on auxin acting as an antagonist to the protectant cytokinin. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23 (6), 2936, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23....
 
38.
XU F., GUO W., XU W., WEI Y., WANG R. Leaf morphology correlates with water and light availability: What consequences for simple and compound leaves? Progress in Natural Science. 19 (12), 1789, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc....
 
39.
ROEBER V.M., SCHMÜLLING T., CORTLEVEN A. The photoperiod: handling and causing stress in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12, 781988, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2....
 
40.
GOSSNER M.M., MENZEL F., SIMONS N.K. Less Overall, but More of the Same: Drivers of Insect Population Trends Lead to Community Homogenization. Biology Letters. 19, 20230007, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2....
 
41.
ZHANG R., TIAN D., WANG J., NIU S. Critical Role of Multidimensional Biodiversity in Contributing to Ecosystem Sustainability Under Global Change. Geography and Sustainability. 4, 232, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geos....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top