ORIGINAL RESEARCH
A Multi-level Ecological Security Pattern Study of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park from the Perspective of Ecological Quality and Landscape Risk Synergy
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Design, Anhui Polytechnic University, Anhui 241000, China
 
 
Submission date: 2025-08-30
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-10-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-11-08
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-02-18
 
 
Corresponding author
Meilin Meng   

School of Design, Anhui Polytechnic University, 8 Beijing Middle Road, Qiujiang District, Wuhu Cit, 241000, WuHu, China
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park (HTNP) and its surrounding areas face the dual challenges of ecological fragmentation and environmental degradation, yet few studies have quantitatively integrated Ecological Environment Quality (EEQ) and Landscape Ecological Risk (LER) to guide spatial governance. This study aims to construct a multi-level Ecological Security Pattern (ESP) that integrates EEQ and LER, providing a scientific basis for balancing conservation and development. Using multi-source remote sensing data from 2002 to 2022, GIS spatial analysis, and the Least Cumulative Resistance (LCR) model, we identified ecological source areas, corridors, and buffer zones, and validated connectivity through Ecological Risk Index (ERI) and patch aggregation indices. Results indicate a pronounced distance-decay gradient and corridors in the ERI. The 2022 ERI increased from 0.149 at 2,500 m to 0.163 at 10,000 m, whereas the 12 ecological corridor networks significantly enhanced landscape connectivity in the park’s peripheral areas. The core area maintained high ecological integrity and stability, while coastal zones still exhibited high-risk fragmentation clusters associated with human expansion. Accordingly, integrating EEQ and LER coupling into ESP construction can effectively enhance ecological resilience and provide decision-making support for adaptive spatial governance of HTNP.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (44)
1.
DEBINSKI D.M., HOLT R.D. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation biology. 14 (2), 342, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523....
 
2.
DORNER B., LERTZMAN K., FALL J. Landscape pattern in topographically complex landscapes: issues and techniques for analysis. Landscape Ecology. 17 (8), 729, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022....
 
3.
BAORONG H., YI W., LIYANG S., CONGLIN Z., DUOWEI C., JING S., SIYUAN H. Pilot programs for national park system in China: Progress, problems and recommendations. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences. 33 (1), 76, 2018 [In Chinese].
 
4.
WANG C., YU C., CHEN T., FENG Z., HU Y., WU K. Can the establishment of ecological security patterns improve ecological protection? An example of Nanchang, China. Science of the Total Environment. 740, 140051, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...
 
5.
PICKETT S.T., CADENASSO M.L. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science. 269 (5222), 331, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
6.
LI W., KANG J., WANG Y. Exploring the interactions and driving factors among typical ecological risks based on ecosystem services: A case study in the Sichuan-Yunnan ecological barrier area. Ecological Indicators. 170, 113000, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
7.
BAGUETTE M., BLANCHET S., LEGRAND D., STEVENS V.M., TURLURE C. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biological Reviews. 88 (2), 310, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12....
 
8.
MITCHELL M.G., SUAREZ-CASTRO A.F., MARTINEZ-HARMS M., MARON M., MCALPINE C., GASTON K.J., JOHANSEN K., RHODES J.R. Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 30 (4), 190, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree....
 
9.
DE LANGE H.J., SALA S., VIGHI M., FABER J.H. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment - A review and perspectives. Science of the Total Environment. 408 (18), 3871, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
10.
LI X., LI S., ZHANG Y., O'CONNOR P.J., ZHANG L., YAN J. Landscape ecological risk assessment under multiple indicators. Land. 10 (7), 739, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10....
 
11.
LEUVEN R.S., POUDEVIGNE I. Riverine landscape dynamics and ecological risk assessment. Freshwater Biology. 47 (4), 845, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365....
 
12.
XU W., WANG J., ZHANG M., LI S. Construction of landscape ecological network based on landscape ecological risk assessment in a large-scale opencast coal mine area. Journal of Cleaner Production. 286, 125523, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
13.
HU X., XU H. A new remote sensing index for assessing the spatial heterogeneity in urban ecological quality: A case from Fuzhou City, China. Ecological Indicators. 89, 11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
14.
ZHANG Y., ZHANG C., ZHANG X., WANG X., LIU T., LI Z., LIN Q., JING Z., WANG X., HUANG Q. Habitat quality assessment and ecological risks prediction: an analysis in the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal (Suzhou Section). Water. 14 (17), 2602, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172....
 
15.
SASAKI T., FURUKAWA T., IWASAKI Y., SETO M., MORI A.S. Perspectives for ecosystem management based on ecosystem resilience and ecological thresholds against multiple and stochastic disturbances. Ecological Indicators. 57, 395, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
16.
TINGHUI M. Nature and environment of the Hainan Province of China. Kyoto University of Education Environmental Education Research Annual Report/Annual Report of Environmental Education Research at Kyoto University of Education. 17, 141, 2009.
 
17.
LI L., TANG H., LEI J., SONG X. Spatial autocorrelation in land use type and ecosystem service value in Hainan Tropical Rain Forest National Park. Ecological Indicators. 137, 108727, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
18.
WEI L., LI M., MA Y., WANG Y., WU G., LIU T., GONG W., MAO M., ZHAO Y., WEI Y. Construction of an Ecological Security Pattern for the National Park of Hainan Tropical Rainforest on the Basis of the Importance of the Function and Sensitivity of Its Ecosystem Services. Land. 13 (10), 1618, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13....
 
19.
HAN N., YU M., JIA P., ZHANG Y., HU K. Influence of Human Activity Intensity on Habitat Quality in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, China. Chinese Geographical Science. 34 (3), 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769....
 
20.
HAINES-YOUNG R., CHOPPING M. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography. 20 (4), 418, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913....
 
21.
LI J., PENG X., TANG R., GENG J., ZHANG Z., XU D., BAI T. Spatial and temporal variation characteristics of ecological environment quality in China from 2002 to 2019 and influencing factors. Land. 13 (1), 110, 2024.
 
22.
HERBEI M.V., CIOLAC V., ŞMULEAC A., NISTOR E., CIOLAC L. Georeferencing of topographical maps using the software ARCGIS. Research Journal of Agricultural Science. 42 (3), 595, 2010.
 
23.
YANG X., YAN L., ZENG L. How to handle uncertainties in AHP: The Cloud Delphi hierarchical analysis. Information Sciences. 222, 384, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.....
 
24.
LI J., PENG X., LI C., LUO Q., PENG S., TANG H., TANG R. Renovation of traditional residential buildings in Lijiang based on AHP-QFD methodology: A case study of the Wenzhi Village. Buildings. 13 (8), 2055, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildi....
 
25.
YE H., YANG Z., XU X. Ecological corridors analysis based on MSPA and MCR model - A case study of the Tomur World Natural Heritage Region. Sustainability. 12 (3), 959, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1203....
 
26.
WEI Q., HALIKE A., YAO K., CHEN L., BALATI M. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern in Ebinur Lake Basin based on MSPA-MCR models. Ecological Indicators. 138, 108857, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
27.
ANSELIN L. Local spatial autocorrelation. Other Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics. 711, 2020.
 
28.
O'NEILL R.V., KRUMMEL J.R., GARDNER R.E.A., SUGIHARA G., JACKSON B., DEANGELIS D., MILNE B., TURNER M.G., ZYGMUNT B., CHRISTENSEN S. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology. 1 (3), 153, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0016....
 
29.
ZHOU Z., LI J. The correlation analysis on the landscape pattern index and hydrological processes in the Yanhe watershed, China. Journal of Hydrology. 524, 417, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd....
 
30.
CUI L., ZHAO Y., LIU J., HAN L., AO Y., YIN S. Landscape ecological risk assessment in Qinling Mountain. Geological Journal. 53, 342, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.311....
 
31.
LIU C., LI W., XU J., ZHOU H., LI C., WANG W. Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators. 137, 108734, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
32.
TANG X. The establishment of national park system: A new milestone for the field of nature conservation in China. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 8 (4), 195, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge....
 
33.
ZONG L. The path to effective national park conservation and management: Hainan tropical rainforest National Park System Pilot Area. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 8 (4), 225, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge....
 
34.
HUANG X., WANG X., ZHANG X., ZHOU C., MA J., FENG X. Ecological risk assessment and identification of risk control priority areas based on degradation of ecosystem services: A case study in the Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Indicators. 141, 109078, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
35.
XU Y., PU L., ZHANG R., ZHU M., ZHANG M., BU X., XIE X., WANG Y. Effects of agricultural reclamation on soil physicochemical properties in the mid-eastern coastal area of China. Land. 10 (2), 142, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10....
 
36.
SALVIANO I.R., GARDON F.R., DOS SANTOS R.F. Ecological corridors and landscape planning: a model to select priority areas for connectivity maintenance. Landscape Ecology. 36 (11), 3311, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980....
 
37.
MA J., LI L., JIAO L., ZHU H., LIU C., LI F., LI P. Identifying ecological security patterns considering the stability of ecological sources in ecologically fragile areas. Land. 13 (2), 214, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13....
 
38.
DING X., ZHOU C., ZHONG W., TANG P. Addressing uncertainty of environmental governance in environmentally sensitive areas in developing countries: a precise-strike and spatial-targeting adaptive governance framework. Sustainability. 11 (16), 4510, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1116....
 
39.
HE C., GAO B., HUANG Q., MA Q., DOU Y. Environmental degradation in the urban areas of China: Evidence from multi-source remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 193, 65, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.....
 
40.
MAGUIRE D.J. An overview and definition of GIS. Geographical information systems: Principles and applications. 1 (1), 9, 1991.
 
41.
NAVEH Z., LIEBERMAN A.S. Landscape ecology: theory and application. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
 
42.
ZHOU G., HUAN Y., WANG L., ZHANG R., LIANG T., HAN X., FENG Z. Constructing a multi-leveled ecological security pattern for improving ecosystem connectivity in the Asian water Tower region. Ecological Indicators. 154, 110597, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
43.
ZHANG W., CHANG W.J., ZHU Z.C., HUI Z. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Chinese coastal cities based on land use change. Applied Geography. 117, 102174, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apge....
 
44.
WU X., PAN J., ZHU X. Optimizing the ecological source area identification method and building ecological corridor using a genetic algorithm: A case study in Weihe River Basin, NW China. Ecological Informatics. 80, 102519, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoi....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top