ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Spatial and Temporal Dynamic Correlation
Analysis of Landscape Fragmentation
and Ecological Sensitivity in Hainan
Tropical Rainforest National Park
and its Surrounding Areas
More details
Hide details
1
School of Design, Anhui Polytechnic University, Anhui 241000, China
Submission date: 2025-03-11
Final revision date: 2025-04-13
Acceptance date: 2025-05-12
Online publication date: 2025-07-28
Corresponding author
Meilin Meng
School of Design, Anhui Polytechnic University, 安徽省芜湖市鸠江区北京中路8, 241000, 安徽, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park (HTNP) prioritizes preserving its tropical rainforest
ecology, requiring careful balance between conservation and surrounding development. This study
utilized ArcGIS 10.8, Fragstats 4.2, and GeoDa 1.20 to analyze landscape fragmentation and ecological
vulnerability in HTNP and its surroundings from 2002 to 2022, providing a basis for conservation
and development zoning. Results showed a higher Largest Patch Index (LPI) within HTNP. At the
same time, Patch Density (PD) was greater in urbanized coastal areas but declined in the western,
northeastern, and southern outskirts, indicating reduced landscape degradation. Low Landscape Shape
Index (LSI) and Shannon’s Evenness Index (SHEI) suggested minimal human impact. Between 2002
and 2007, PD, LPI, LSI, Contagion Index (CONTAG), and SHEI decreased, reducing fragmentation.
From 2017 to 2022, PD and LSI declined further, improving landscape integrity, though CONTAG
increased due to coastal urbanization. Spatial autocorrelation analysis showed LPI and CONTAG
positively correlated with habitat quality, while PD, LSI, and SHEI were negatively correlated, with LPI
having the strongest association. Moran’s Index indicated declining PD and CONTAG but increasing
LPI, LSI, and SHEI from 2002 to 2022, reflecting landscape and habitat quality changes. These findings
support conservation zones, development belts, and buffer zones in HTNP.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
BAORONG H., YI W., LIYANG S., CONGLIN Z., DUOWEI C., JING S., SIYUAN H. Pilot programs for national park system in China: Progress, problems and recommendations. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version), 33 (1), 76, 2018.
2.
ZONG L. The path to effective national park conservation and management: Hainan tropical rainforest National Park System Pilot Area. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 8 (4), 225, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge....
3.
YAO X., ZHOU L., WU T., YANG X., REN M. Ecosystem services in National Park of Hainan Tropical Rainforest of China: Spatiotemporal dynamics and conservation implications. Journal for Nature Conservation, 80, 126649, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.....
4.
DAI E., LU R., YIN J. Identifying the effects of landscape pattern on soil conservation services on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Global Ecology and Conservation, 50, e02850, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecc....
5.
HU J., ZHANG J., LI Y. Exploring the spatial and temporal driving mechanisms of landscape patterns on habitat quality in a city undergoing rapid urbanization based on GTWR and MGWR: The case of Nanjing, China. Ecological Indicators, 143, 109333, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
6.
YANG H., XU W., YU J., XIE X., XIE Z., LEI X., WU Z., DING Z. Exploring the impact of changing landscape patterns on ecological quality in different cities: A comparative study among three megacities in eastern and western China. Ecological Informatics, 77, 102255, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoi....
7.
FU B.-J., ZHAO W.-W., CHEN L.-D., LIU Z.-F., Lü Y.-H. Eco-hydrological effects of landscape pattern change. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 1, 25, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355....
8.
HERSPERGER A.M., BÜRGI M., WENDE W., BACĂU S., GRĂDINARU S.R. Does landscape play a role in strategic spatial planning of European urban regions? Landscape and Urban Planning, 194, 103702, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
9.
KOWE P., MUTANGA O., DUBE T. Advancements in the remote sensing of landscape pattern of urban green spaces and vegetation fragmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 42 (10), 3797, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/014311....
10.
LIANG L., GONG P. Urban and air pollution: a multi-city study of long-term effects of urban landscape patterns on air quality trends. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 18618, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
11.
SHI J., JIN R., ZHU W., TIAN L., LV X. Effects of multi-scale landscape pattern changes on seasonal water quality: a case study of the Tumen River Basin in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (51), 76847, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
12.
ZHANG M., WANG J., LI S., FENG D., CAO E. Dynamic changes in landscape pattern in a large-scale opencast coal mine area from 1986 to 2015: A complex network approach. Catena, 194, 104738, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cate....
13.
MINGWU Z., HAIJIANG J., DESUO C., CHUNBO J. The comparative study on the ecological sensitivity analysis in Huixian karst wetland, China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2, 386, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proe....
14.
NAUJOKAITIS‐LEWIS I.R., CURTIS J.M., ARCESE P., ROSENFELD J. Sensitivity analyses of spatial population viability analysis models for species at risk and habitat conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 23 (1), 225, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523....
15.
JIN X., WEI L., WANG Y., LU Y. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment: A case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 563, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668....
16.
SHI Y., LI J., XIE M. Evaluation of the ecological sensitivity and security of tidal flats in Shanghai. Ecological Indicators, 85, 729, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
17.
MANOLAKI P., ZOTOS S., VOGIATZAKIS I.N. An integrated ecological and cultural framework for landscape sensitivity assessment in Cyprus. Land Use Policy, 92, 104336, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
18.
HU X., MA C., HUANG P., GUO X. Ecological vulnerability assessment based on AHP-PSR method and analysis of its single parameter sensitivity and spatial autocorrelation for ecological protection - A case of Weifang City, China. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107464, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
19.
KANG J., ZHANG X., ZHU X., ZHANG B. Ecological security pattern: A new idea for balancing regional development and ecological protection. A case study of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26, e01472, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecc....
20.
LI L., TANG H., LEI J., SONG X. Spatial autocorrelation in land use type and ecosystem service value in Hainan Tropical Rain Forest National Park. Ecological Indicators, 137, 108727, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
21.
JIANG R., XIE C., MAN Z., AFSHARI A., CHE S. LCZ method is more effective than traditional LUCC method in interpreting the relationship between urban landscape and atmospheric particles. Science of The Total Environment, 869, 161677, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
22.
LIU J.-H., GAO J.-X., MA S., WANG W.-J., ZOU C.-X. Evaluation of ecological sensitivity in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 30 (10), 1607, 2015.
23.
YANG X., YAN L., ZENG L. How to handle uncertainties in AHP: The Cloud Delphi hierarchical analysis. Information Sciences, 222, 384, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.....
24.
LI J., PENG X., LI C., LUO Q., PENG S., TANG H., TANG R. Renovation of traditional residential buildings in Lijiang based on AHP-QFD methodology: A case study of the Wenzhi Village. Buildings, 13 (8), 2055, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildi....
25.
FU C., XU Y., BUNDY A., GRÜSS A., COLL M., HEYMANS J.J., FULTON E.A., SHANNON L., HALOUANI G., VELEZ L. Making ecological indicators management ready: assessing the specificity, sensitivity, and threshold response of ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators, 105, 16, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
26.
PAN F., TIAN C., SHAO F., ZHOU W., CHEN F. Evaluation of ecological sensitivity in Karamay, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22, 329, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442....
27.
O'NEILL R.V., KRUMMEL J.R., GARDNER R.E.A., SUGIHARA G., JACKSON B., DEANGELIS D., MILNE B., TURNER M.G., ZYGMUNT B., CHRISTENSEN S. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1, 153, 1988.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0016....
28.
ZHOU Z., LI J. The correlation analysis on the landscape pattern index and hydrological processes in the Yanhe watershed, China. Journal of Hydrology, 524, 417, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd....
29.
CUI L., ZHAO Y., LIU J., HAN L., AO Y., YIN S. Landscape ecological risk assessment in Qinling Mountain. Geological Journal, 53, 342, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.311....
30.
KANG L., YANG X., GAO X., ZHANG J., ZHOU J., HU Y., CHI H. Landscape ecological risk evaluation and prediction under a wetland conservation scenario in the Sanjiang Plain based on land use/cover change. Ecological Indicators, 162, 112053, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
31.
HAN Y., ZHAO W., PEREIRA P. Global COVID-19 pandemic trends and their relationship with meteorological variables, air pollutants and socioeconomic aspects. Environmental Research, 204, 112249, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr....
32.
FLOYD D.M. Race, ethnicity and use of the National Park System, 1999.
33.
WANG G., INNES J.L., WU S.W., KRZYZANOWSKI J., YIN Y., DAI S., ZHANG X., LIU S. National Park development in China: conservation or commercialization? Ambio, 41, 247, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280....
34.
SHAFER C.L. National Park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44 (2-3), 123, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-....
35.
BARON J.S., GUNDERSON L., ALLEN C.D., FLEISHMAN E., MCKENZIE D., MEYERSON L.A., OROPEZA J., STEPHENSON N. Options for national parks and reserves for adapting to climate change. Environmental Management, 44, 1033, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267....
36.
NELSON J. National parks and protected areas, national conservation strategies and sustainable development. Geoforum, 18 (3), 291, 1987.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7....
37.
KIM J.-W., NAM H.-K. Conservation strategy based on ecological characteristics of national parks in Korea. The Korean Journal of Ecology, 19 (1), 93, 1996.
38.
WOODLEY S. A scheme for ecological monitoring in national parks and protected areas. Environments, 23, 50, 1996.
39.
GRANTHAM H., DUNCAN A., EVANS T., JONES K., BEYER H., SCHUSTER R., WALSTON J., RAY J., ROBINSON J., CALLOW M. Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nature Communications, 11 (1), 5978, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467....
40.
ZHAO Y., QU Z., ZHANG Y., AO Y., HAN L., KANG S., SUN Y. Effects of human activity intensity on habitat quality based on nighttime light remote sensing: A case study of Northern Shaanxi, China. Science of the Total Environment, 851, 158037, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...
41.
ZHOU Q., TU C., FU C., LI Y., ZHANG H., XIONG K., ZHAO X., LI L., WANIEK J.J., LUO Y. Characteristics and distribution of microplastics in the coastal mangrove sediments of China. Science of the Total Environment, 703, 134807, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
42.
LU Y., WANG R., ZHANG Y., SU H., WANG P., JENKINS A., FERRIER R.C., BAILEY M., SQUIRE G. Ecosystem health towards sustainability. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 1 (1), 1, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1890/EHS14-....