ORIGINAL RESEARCH
A Region-Specific Predictive Model for the Determination of the Wind-Erodible Soil Fraction
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
 
 
Submission date: 2025-07-09
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-09-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-10-02
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-12-01
 
 
Corresponding author
Petr Zalesak   

Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Accurate estimation of the wind-erodible fraction (EF), defined as the proportion of soil particles smaller than 0.84 mm, is essential for wind erosion models such as WEQ, RWEQ, WEPS, EPIC, or APEX. Conventional rotary sieving is often impractical, which has led to the use of predictive equations. This study evaluated the equation [30] for Czech soils and developed a region-specific model.
Methods: Seventy-eight soil samples representing major soil units across the Czech Republic were analyzed for particle-size distribution, organic carbon, and carbonate content. EF was determined using the flat sieve dry-sieving method. Multiple regression analysis was applied to assess the equation [30] and construct an improved model.
Results: The equation [30] exhibited substantial bias under local conditions. The refined model identified k ey p redictors, i ncluding s and (r = 0 .58), s ilt (r = – 0.50), c lay (r = – 0.43), a nd p articularly the sand-to-clay ratio (r = 0.65), while organic carbon and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) were insignificant. The model demonstrated high predictive performance (R² = 0.90; adjusted R² = 0.89).
Conclusion: The proposed equation provides a robust, region-specific alternative for EF estimation, significantly improving wind erosion risk assessment for Central European soils and underscoring the necessity of localized parameterization in wind erosion modeling.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (66)
1.
ZHAO Y., WU J., HE C., DING G. Linking wind erosion to ecosystem services in drylands: a landscape ecological approach. Landscape Ecology. 32, 2399, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980....
 
2.
WANG X., LANG L., HUA T., LI H., ZHANG C., MA W. Effects of aeolian processes on soil nutrient loss in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: an experimental study. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 18, 229, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368....
 
3.
YAN Y., WANG X., GUO Z., CHEN J., XIN X., XU D., YAN R., CHEN B., XU L. Influence of wind erosion on dry aggregate size distribution and nutrients in three steppe soils in northern China. Catena. 170, 159, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cate....
 
4.
CHAPPELL A., WEBB N.P., LEYS J.F., WATERS C.M., ORGILL S., EYRES M.J. Minimising soil organic carbon erosion by wind is critical for land degradation neutrality. Environmental Science & Policy. 93, 43, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
 
5.
XIAO L., LI G., ZHAO R., ZHANG L. Effects of soil conservation measures on wind erosion control in China: a synthesis. Science of the Total Environment. 778, 146308, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
6.
LIU Y., GAO Y., LIU B., CAO X., CHEN J. Biocementation for desert sand against wind-induced erosion with different treatment processes. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 24, 3265, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368....
 
7.
SHAN X., WANG X., ZHANG Y., LI Z., CHEN C. The effects of various cover crops on soil wind erosion in the Horqin Sandy Land of northern China. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 24 (11), 3585, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368....
 
8.
CHEPIL W.S. Dynamics of wind erosion: I. Nature of movement of soil by wind. Soil Science. 60 (4), 305, 1945. https://doi.org/10.1097/000106....
 
9.
ZHANG J., YANG M., SUN X., ZHANG F. Estimation of wind and water erosion based on slope aspects in the crisscross region of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 18, 1620, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368....
 
10.
WU X., WANG S., CHENG H., YANG Y. Variation of soil organic matter with particle size in the wind erosion region of northern China. Catena. 241, 108025, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cate....
 
11.
LYLES L. Basic wind erosion processes. Agricultural Ecosystems & Environment. 22, 91, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8....
 
12.
ZINGG A.W., CHEPIL W.S. Aerodynamics of wind erosion. Agricultural Engineering. 31, 279, 1950.
 
13.
MERRILL S.D., BLACK A.L., HALVORSON A.D. Soil-inherent wind erodibility: Progress and prospects. In Proceedings of Wind Erosion: An International Symposium/Workshop, Bismarck, ND, USA, pp. 3–5, 1997.
 
14.
MERRILL S.D., BLACK A.L., FRYREAR D.W., SALEH A., ZOBECK T.M., HALVORSON A.D., TANAKA D.L. Soil wind erosion hazard of spring wheat–fallow as affected by long-term climate and tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 63 (6), 1768, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1....
 
15.
ZHENG F.L., MERRILL S.D., HUANG C.H., TANAKA D.L., DARBOUX F., LIEBIG M.A., HALVORSON A.D. Runoff, soil erosion, and erodibility of conservation reserve program land under crop and hay production. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 68, 1332, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2....
 
16.
GARDNER W.R. Representation of soil aggregate-size distribution by a logarithmic-normal distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 20 (2), 151, 1956. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1....
 
17.
SINCLAIR H.R. JR. Soil data for Wind Erosion Prediction System. In Proceedings of the International Symposium/Workshop on Wind Erosion, pp. 3–5, 1997.
 
18.
CHEPIL W.S. Soil conditions that influence wind erosion. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 1185, 1958.
 
19.
WOODRUFF N.P., SIDDOWAY F.H. A wind erosion equation. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 29, 602, 1965. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1....
 
20.
FRYREAR D.W., SALEH A., BILBRO J.D., SCHOMBERG H.M., STOUT J.E., ZOBECK T.M. Revised Wind Erosion Equation (RWEQ). Wind Erosion and Water Conservation Research Unit, USDA-ARS-SPA Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, Technical Bulletin No. 1, 1998.
 
21.
HAGEN L.J., WAGNER L.E., TATARKO J.L., SKIDMORE E.L., DURAR A.A., STEINER L.J., ELMINYAWI I. Wind erosion prediction system: technical description. In Proceedings of WEPP/WEPS Symposium, August, pp. 91–111, 1995.
 
22.
SHIYATYI E.I. Wind structure and velocity over a rugged soil surface. Vestnik selʹskokhozi︠ a ︡ ĭstvennoĭ Nauki. 10 (10), 10, 1965.
 
23.
CHEPIL W.S. Measurement of wind erosiveness of soils by dry sieving procedure. Scientific Agriculture. 23 (3), 154, 1942.
 
24.
CHEPIL W.S., BISAL F. A rotary sieve method for determining the size distribution of soil clods. Soil Science. 56 (2), 95, 1943. https://doi.org/10.1097/000106....
 
25.
CHEPIL W.S. Improved rotary sieve for measuring state and stability of dry soil structure. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings. 16 (3), 192, 1952. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1....
 
26.
CHEPIL W.S. A compact rotary sieve and the importance of dry sieving in physical soil analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 26 (1), 4, 1962. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1....
 
27.
LÓPEZ M.V., DE DIOS HERRERO J.M., HEVIA G.G., GRACIA R., BUSCHIAZZO D.E. Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies. Geoderma. 139 (3–4), 407, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
28.
DÍAZ-ZORITA M., PERFECT E., GROVE J.H. Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure. Soil and Tillage Research. 64 (1–2), 3, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-....
 
29.
DÍAZ-ZORITA M., GROVE J.H., PERFECT E. Sieving duration and sieve loading impacts on dry soil fragment size distributions. Soil and Tillage Research. 94 (1), 15, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stil....
 
30.
FRYREAR D.W., KRAMMES C.A., WILLIAMSON D.L., ZOBECK T.M. Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 49 (2), 183, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1080/002245....
 
31.
BOUAJILA A., OMAR Z., AJJARI A., BOL R., BRAHIM N. Improved estimation and prediction of the wind-erodible fraction for Aridisols in arid southeast Tunisia. Catena. 211, 106001, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cate....
 
32.
GUO Z., CHANG C., WANG R., LI J. Comparison of different methods to determine wind-erodible fraction of soil with rock fragments under different tillage/management. Soil and Tillage Research. 168, 42, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stil....
 
33.
MOTAMENI S., SOROUSH A., FATTAHI S.M., ESLAMI A. A data-driven approach for assessing the wind-induced erodible fractions of soil. Journal of Arid Environments. 222, 105152, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jari....
 
34.
RAKKAR M.K., BLANCO-CANQUI H., TATARKO J. Predicting soil wind erosion potential under different corn residue management scenarios in the central Great Plains. Geoderma. 353, 25, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
35.
USMAN H. Wind erosion in northeastern Nigeria. 1. Erodibility factors. Arid Land Research and Management. 9, 457, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1080/153249....
 
36.
COLAZO J.C., BUSCHIAZZO D.E. Soil dry aggregate stability and wind erodible fraction in a semiarid environment of Argentina. Geoderma. 159 (1–2), 228, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
37.
AVECILLA F., PANEBIANCO J.E., BUSCHIAZZO D.E. Variable effects of saltation and soil properties on wind erosion of different textured soils. Aeolian Research. 18, 145, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeol....
 
38.
KARAOĞLU M., ŞİMŞEK U., ERDEL E., TOHUMCU F. A case study: Wind characteristics of Igdir province in terms of wind erosion and introduction of second wind erosion area. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 27 (11), 7460, 2018.
 
39.
MOTAGHI F.A., HAMZEHPOUR N., ABASIYAN S.M.A., RAHMATI M. The wind erodibility in the newly emerged surfaces of Urmia Playa Lake and adjacent agricultural lands and its determining factors. Catena. 194, 104675, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cate....
 
40.
KOZLOVSKY DUFKOVÁ J., PROCHÁZKA V., SZTURC J., MAŠÍČEK T. Using the equation for computing the wind erodible fraction of soils in the conditions of the Czech Republic. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae. 24 (1), 63, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-20....
 
41.
MOZAFFARI H., REZAEI M., OSTOVARI Y. Soil sensitivity to wind and water erosion as affected by land use in southern Iran. Earth. 2 (2), 287, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth2....
 
42.
ZHANG B.J., XIONG D.H., LIU L., TANG Y.F. Wind erodibility indices of aeolian sandy soils impacted by different vegetation restoration: a case study from the Shannan valley of the Yarlung Zangbo River. Journal of Mountain Science. 19, 2830, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629....
 
43.
BRÁZDIL R., CHROMÁ K., DOLÁK L., ZAHRADNÍČEK P., ŘEHOŘ J., DOBROVOLNÝ P., ŘEZNÍČKOVÁ L. The 100-year series of weather-related fatalities in the Czech Republic: interactions of climate, environment, and society. Water. 15 (10), 1965, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15101....
 
44.
MATĚJKA K., MODLINGER R. Climate, Picea abies stand state, and Ips typographus in the Czech Republic from a viewpoint of long-term dynamics. Available online: https://www.infodatasys.cz/cli... (accessed on 23 June 2025).
 
45.
DECREE No. 227/2018 Coll. Decree on the characteristics of rated soil ecological units and the procedure for their management and updating. Available online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/c... (accessed on 10 February 2025).
 
46.
SÁŇKA M., MATERNA J. Indikátory kvality zemědělských a lesních půd ČR. Ministerstvo životního prostředí: Praha, Czech Republic, 2004 [In Czech].
 
47.
ZÁDOROVÁ T., ŽÍŽALA D., PENÍŽEK V., VANĚK A. Harmonisation of a large-scale historical database with the actual Czech soil classification system. Soil and Water Research. 15, 101, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17221/41/20....
 
48.
ZÁDOROVÁ T., SKÁLA J., ŽÍŽALA D., VANĚK A., PENÍŽEK V. Harmonization of a large-scale national soil database with the World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. Geoderma. 384, 114819, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
49.
NĚMEČEK J., DAMAŠKA J., HRAŠKO J., BEDRNA Z., ZUSKA V., TOMÁŠEK M., KALENDA M. Survey of Agricultural Soils in Czechoslovakia. Ministry of Agriculture: Prague, Czechoslovakia, Vol. 1, 1967 [In Czech].
 
50.
NĚMEČEK J., KOZÁK J. The Czech taxonomic soil classification system and the harmonization of soil maps. In European Soil Bureau – Research Report. 7, 47, 2001.
 
51.
QI S., REN X., MENG Z., DANG X., LI H., JIA R. Dust release during playa activation in a typical semiarid steppe. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 32 (2), 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
 
52.
LI H., MENG Z., DANG X., QI S., BAO S. Grain size characteristics from dry playa Chagan Nur in northern China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 32 (1), 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
 
53.
PANSU M., GAUTHEYROU J., LOYER J.Y. Soil Analysis. Sampling, Instrumentation and Quality Control. A.A. Balkema: Abington, UK, 2001.
 
54.
PAETZ A., WILKE B.M. Soil sampling and storage. In Manual for Soil Analysis. Soil Biology, Margesin R., Schinner F., Eds., Springer: Berlin, Germany, pp. 1–45, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-....
 
55.
BLANCO-CANQUI H., TATARKO J., STALKER A.L., SHAVER T.M., VAN DONK S.J. Impacts of corn residue grazing and baling on wind erosion potential in a semiarid environment. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 80 (4), 1027, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2....
 
56.
DIAZ-ZORITA M., GROVE J.H., PERFECT E. Sampling and sieving procedures for measuring soil dry aggregate size distributions. In 15th International Soil Tillage Research Organisation (ISTRO) Conference, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, USA, 2000.
 
57.
ČSN EN ISO 17892-4. Geotechnical investigation and testing – Laboratory testing of soil – Part 4: Determination of particle size distribution. Institute for Technology Standardization, Metrology and State Testing, 2017.
 
58.
KROETSCH D., WANG C. Particle size distribution. In Carter M.R., Gregorich E.G. (Eds.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edn., CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 713–725, 2008.
 
59.
SHELDRICK B.H., WANG C. Particle size distribution. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Soil Analysis, Carter M.R., Ed., Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 499–512, 1993.
 
60.
WALKLEY A., BLACK I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 37, 29, 1934. https://doi.org/10.1097/000106....
 
61.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). Soil quality – Determination of carbonate content – Volumetric method. ISO 10693, 1995.
 
62.
ÖNORM L. 1084 Chemical Analyses of Soils: Determination of Carbonate. Austrian Standards Institute: Vienna, Austria, 1999.
 
63.
DE SANTANA F.B., OTANI S.K., DE SOUZA A.M., POPPI R.J. Comparison of PLS and SVM models for soil organic matter and particle size using vis-NIR spectral libraries. Geoderma Regional. 27, e00436, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
64.
ZHONG L., GUO X., XU Z., DING M. Soil properties: Their prediction and feature extraction from the LUCAS spectral library using deep convolutional neural networks. Geoderma. 402, 115366, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
65.
POPPIEL R.R., DA SILVEIRA PAIVA A.F., DEMATTÊ J.A.M. Bridging the gap between soil spectroscopy and traditional laboratory: Insights for routine implementation. Geoderma. 425, 116029, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
66.
SAFANELLI J.L., HENGL T., PARENTE L.L., MINARIK R., BLOOM D.E., TODD-BROWN K., GHOLIZADEH A., DE SOUSA MENDES W., SANDERMAN J. Open Soil Spectral Library (OSSL): Building reproducible soil calibration models through open development and community engagement. PLoS One. 20 (1), e0296545, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top