ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Assessing Indoor Air Quality Using
Chemometric Models
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, Terengganu, Malaysia
2
East Coast Environmental Research Institute, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Gong Badak Campus,
Terengganu, Malaysia
3
Kulliyyah of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, Pahang, Malaysia
4
Institute of Medical Science and Technology, University of Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia
5
Faculty of Health Science, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Gong Badak Campus, Terengganu, Malaysia
Submission date: 2017-04-06
Final revision date: 2017-09-29
Acceptance date: 2017-10-01
Online publication date: 2018-05-24
Publication date: 2018-07-09
Corresponding author
Azman Azid
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Faculty Bioresources and Food Industry, Besut Campus, 22200 Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018;27(6):2443-2450
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The objectives of this study are to identify the significant variables and to verify the best statistical
method for determining the effect of indoor air quality (IAQ) at 7 different locations in Universiti Sultan
Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia. The IAQ data were collected using in-situ measurement. Principal
component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), linear discrimination
analysis (LDA), and agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) were used to classify the significant
variables as well as to compare the best method for determining IAQ levels. PCA verifies only 4 out
of 9 parameters (PM10, PM2.5, PM1.0, and O3) and is the significant variable in IAQ. The PLS-DA model
classifies 89.05% correct of the IAQ variables in each station compared to LDA with only 66.67% correct.
AHC identifies three cluster groups, which are highly polluted concentration (HPC), moderately polluted
concentration (MPC), and low-polluted concentration (LPC) area. PLS-DA verifies the groups produced
by AHC by identifying the variables that affect the quality at each station without being affected by
redundancy. In conclusion, PLS-DA is a promising procedure for differentiating the group classes and
determining the correct percentage of variables for IAQ.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (7):
1.
Research on Data Correction Method of Micro Air Quality Detector Based on Combination of Partial Least Squares and Random Forest Regression
Bing Liu, Wangwang Yu, Yishu Wang, Qibao Lv, Chaoyang Li
IEEE Access
2.
Advanced Chemometric Techniques for Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Assessment: A Review
Shaikh Manirul Haque, Yunusa Umar, Abuzar Kabir
Chemosensors
3.
A method for calibrating measurement data of a micro air quality monitor based on MLR-BRT-ARIMA combined model
Bing Liu, Peijun Jiang
RSC Advances
4.
A data calibration method for micro air quality detectors based on a LASSO regression and NARX neural network combined model
Bing Liu, Yueqiang Jin, Dezhi Xu, Yishu Wang, Chaoyang Li
Scientific Reports
5.
Advancing sustainable air quality through calibration of miniature air quality monitors with SRA-SVR combined model
Xiaofei Wang
Frontiers in Environmental Science
6.
Re-calibrating measurements of low-cost air quality monitors using PCR-GPR air quality forecasting models
Bing Liu, Shuting Yang, Junqi Wang, Afaq Ahmad
PLOS ONE
7.
Application of RR-XGBoost combined model in data calibration of micro air quality detector
Bing Liu, Xianghua Tan, Yueqiang Jin, Wangwang Yu, Chaoyang Li
Scientific Reports