ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Can Market-Based Environmental Regulation Inhibit the Industrial Water Pollution?
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, No 666 Changhui Road, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
 
 
Submission date: 2023-11-17
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-02-28
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-03-25
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-06-26
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-02
 
 
Corresponding author
Hao Zhang   

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, No 666 Changhui Road, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(1):657-669
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Environmental tax, as an essential part of China’s green tax reform, plays a key role in promoting the construction of an ecological society. To empirically test the policy effect of environmental taxes, this study used the panel data from 274 prefecture-level cities for the period 2012-2020 to explore whether the implementation of environmental tax can reduce the intensity of industrial water pollution. The main results are as follows: (1) The implementation of environmental tax can significantly reduce the emission of industrial water pollution, and the policy effect has shown a persistent trend. (2) In terms of heterogeneity, we find that the impact of environmental tax on reducing industrial water pollution is higher in central-western regions. (3) Mechanism analysis shows that the policy effect of environmental tax is mainly through channels such as enhancing law enforcement rigidity and improving local green innovation. Our findings provide new evidence for understanding the green dividend effect of environmental tax and provide significant policy implications for China’s ecological society.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
VENNEMO H. Environmental Pollution in China: Status and Trends. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3 (2), 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/r....
 
2.
RU L., SI W. Environmental Regulation, Technical Efficiency and Water Pollutants Abatement Cost--Evidence from China's Sugar Industry. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 17 (5), 15, 2015.
 
3.
FENG Y., GUO B., WANG X., HU F. Facilitating or inhibiting? The impact of environmental information disclosure on enterprise investment value. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:38168851.
 
4.
BOVENBERG A.L., VAN DER PLOEG F. Environmental policy, public finance and the labour market in a second-best world. Journal of Public Economics, 55 (3), 349, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2....
 
5.
DISSOU Y., SIDDIQUI M.S. Can carbon taxes be progressive? Energy Economics, 42, 88, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
6.
LI P., LIN Z., DU H., FENG T., ZUO J. Do environmental taxes reduce air pollution? Evidence from fossil-fuel power plants in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113112, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:34174685.
 
7.
ABBAS J., WANG L., BEN BELGACEM S., PAWAR P.S., NAJAM H. Investment in renewable energy and electricity output: Role of green finance, environmental tax, and geopolitical risk: Empirical evidence from China. Energy, 269, 1266, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener... .
 
8.
HU S., WANG A., DU K. Environmental tax reform and greenwashing: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Energy Economics, 124, 106873, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
9.
BOZATLI O., AKCA H. The effects of environmental taxes, renewable energy consumption and environmental technology on the ecological footprint: Evidence from advanced panel data analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118857, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:37657289.
 
10.
GUO B., FENG W., CAI H., LIN J. Influence of public hospital reform on public health: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.... PMid:37033016 PMCid:PMC10079936.
 
11.
VERHOEF E.T., NIJKAMP P. Externalities in urban sustainability: Environmental versus localization-type agglomeration externalities in a general spatial equilibrium model of a single-sector monocentric industrial city. Ecological Economics, 40 (2), 157, 2002.
 
12.
HU Z., MIAO J., MIAO C. Agglomeration Characteristics of Industrial Pollution and Their Influencing Factors on The Scale of Cities of China. Geographical Research, 35 (8), 1470, 2016.
 
13.
LI C., FU C. The dynamic stability of relationships between population size and wastewater emissions. Resources Science, 38 (6), 1169, 2016.
 
14.
GENG Y., WANG M., SARKIS J., XUE B., ZHANG L., FUJITA T., DONG H. Spatial-temporal patterns and driving factors for industrial wastewater emission in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 116, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
15.
ZHUANG R., MI K., LIANG L. China's Industrial Wastewater Discharge Pattern and Its Driving Factors. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 27 (8), 1765, 2018.
 
16.
LUO C., WANG C. The Relationship between Population Size, Industrial Economy and Water Pollution Under the Idea of Sustainable Development. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 57 (7), 131, 2018.
 
17.
DENG Y., XU H. Foreign Direct Investment, Agglomeration Externalities and Environmental Pollution. Statistical Research, 33 (9), 47, 2016.
 
18.
LI R., ZHAO R., XIE Z., XIAO L., CHUAI X., FENG M., LUO H. Water-energy-carbon nexus at campus scale: Case of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power. Energy Policy, 166, 113001, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
19.
HOSOE M., NAITO T. Trans-boundary pollution transmission and regional agglomeration effects. Papers in Regional Science, 85 (1), 99, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435....
 
20.
GONG X., ZHANG H., PAN M. Market competition, environmental regulation and industrial pollution emissions. China Population, Resource and Environment, 27 (12), 52, 2017.
 
21.
GUO Q., CHENG C. Whether Policy Tools Can Effectively Improve the Quality of The Water Environment: Based on Panel Data Analysis in 30 Provinces. Social Science Research, (2), 53, 2023.
 
22.
PAN D., TANG J. The effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on water pollution control: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141550, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:32871310.
 
23.
LI S., LIU Y., LEI X. "Ten-point Water Plan" and the water information disclosure level of enterprises: A quasi-natural experiment based on high water sensitivity industry. Journal of Central South University (Social Sciences), 27 (3), 88, 2021.
 
24.
ZHOU Z., LIU J., ZHOU N., ZHANG T., ZENG H. Does the "10-Point Water Plan" reduce the intensity of industrial water pollution? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113048, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:34147992.
 
25.
LI J., CAO Y. Has Water Resource Tax Reform Improved Water Resource Utilization Efficiency: a DID- and SCM-based study. Tax and Economic Research, 26 (06), 59, 2021.
 
26.
LV Y., GE Y., GENG Y. Has the water resource tax reform improved the green efficiency of water resource? Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 36 (08), 77, 2022.
 
27.
SHEN J., WANG Y., ZHAO Z. Factors Influencing Public Participation in Urban Water Environmental Governance: Based on the Survey Data in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Resources Science, 43 (11), 2289, 2021. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci....
 
28.
GUO B., FENG Y., LIN J., WANG X. New energy demonstration city and urban pollutant emissions: An analysis based on a spatial difference-in-differences model. International Review of Economics and Finance, 91, 287, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref....
 
29.
TULLOCK G. Excess benefit. Water Resources Research, 3 (2), 643, 1967. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i....
 
30.
PEARCE D. The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming. The Economic Journal, 101 (407), 938, 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/223386....
 
31.
ZHU Y., TAYLOR D., WANG Z. The role of environmental taxes on carbon emissions in countries aiming for net-zero carbon emissions: Does renewable energy consumption matter? Renewable Energy, 218, 119239, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
 
32.
FAN Q., CHU C., GAO J. Effect of Environmental Regulation and Industrial Structure Upgrading High-quality Economic Development. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30 (6), 84, 2020.
 
33.
WEN H., ZHOU F. Environmental Regulation and the Green Total Factor Productivity in China's Provinces: Evidence from the Adjustment of Pollution Charges Standard. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 33 (2), 9, 2019.
 
34.
GUO B., FENG W., YU Y., ZHANG H., HU F. Can environmental tax improve the environmental investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (53), 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37853220.
 
35.
LIU G., YANG Z., ZHANG F., ZHANG N. Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: A quasi-natural experiment based on China's Environmental Protection Tax Law. Energy Economics, 109, 106000, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
 
36.
TIAN L.H., GUAN X., LI Z., LI X. Reform of Environmental Protection Fee-to-Tax and Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment: A Quasi-natural Experiment Based on the Implementation of the Environmental Protection Law. Journal of Finance and Economics, 48 (09), 32, 2022.
 
37.
FANG X., HU D. Corporate ESG Performance and Innovation: Empirical Evidence from A-share Listed Companies. Economic Research Journal, 58 (2), 91, 2023.
 
38.
GUO B., HU P., LIN J. The effect of digital infrastructure development on enterprise green transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa....
 
39.
YU J., LI X. An Empirical Study on the Effect of Environmental Tax on the Emission Reduction in China. Tax and Economic Research, 23 (5), 76, 2018.
 
40.
LU H., LIU Q., QI Y. Re-study on the Pollution Reduction Effect of Environmental Tax: Based on the Change of China's Sewage Charges Collection Standards. Journal of China University of Geosciences, Social Sciences Edition, 18 (05), 67, 2018.
 
41.
GUO J., FANG Y., YANG Y. Does China's Pollution Levy Standard Reform Promote Emissions Reduction? The Journal of World Economy, 42 (01), 121, 2019.
 
42.
WEN H., ZHONG Q. Environmental Protection Taxes and Green Technology Innovation of Enterprises: Evidence from the Adjustment of Pollution Charges Standard in China. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 38 (3), 91, 2020.
 
43.
LIU J., XIAO Y. China's Environmental Protection Tax and Green Innovation: Incentive Effect or Crowding-out Effect? Economic Research Journal, 57 (1), 72, 2022.
 
44.
JACOBSON L.S., LALONDE R.J., SULLIVAN D.G. Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers. The American Economic Review, 83 (4), 685, 1993. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp92-....
 
45.
GUO B., HU P., ZHANG H., WENG X., HU F. The improvement of energy-consuming right trading policy on the efficiency of urban green development. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
 
46.
GUO B., FENG Y., LIN J. Digital inclusive finance and digital transformation of enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104270, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top