ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Effects of Simulated Litter Inputs on Soil Microbial
Biomass Carbon Pools in Alpine Meadows
More details
Hide details
1
Academy of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Qinghai University, 810016, Xining, China
Submission date: 2025-04-14
Final revision date: 2025-05-29
Acceptance date: 2025-06-12
Online publication date: 2025-09-25
Corresponding author
Kejia De
Academy of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Qinghai University, 810016, Xining, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
To reveal the response of the soil microbial biomass carbon pool (MBCP) in alpine meadows
to litter inputs, the present study was conducted to simulate the effect of litter inputs on MBCP
in ungrazed, lightly grazed, and moderately grazed alpine meadows. In this study, four level gradients,
T0 (0 g·C·m2), T1 (1.39 g·C·m2), T2 (3.48 g·C·m2), and T3 (6.97 g·C·m2²), were set up in alpine meadows as
the research object, and the effects of different levels of litter inputs on MBCP in ungrazed, lightly grazed,
and moderately grazed alpine meadows were analyzed. The results showed that with increasing litter
input, S-β-XYS, S-β-GC, S-FDA, S-DHA, and CBH all had maximum values at T3. Soil S-β-XYS,
S-β-GC, GOD, and S-DHA under light grazing were higher than those under ungrazed and moderately
grazed. The peak values of S-β-XYS, S-β-GC, and S-DHA were at T3, which were 16.87 U/g, 41.09 U/g,
and 21.01 U/g, respectively. MBCP was higher in lightly grazed than in ungrazed and moderately grazed
at different levels of litter input and peaked at 18.72 g/ m2 at T3. Structural equation modeling showed
that soil microbial biomass in ungrazed alpine meadows was significantly positively correlated with
MBCP, and enzyme activities were negatively correlated.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (44)
1.
BREIDENBACH A., SCHLEUSS P.-M., LIU S., SCHNEIDER D., DIPPOLD M.A., DE LA HAYE T., MIEHE G., HEITKAMP F., SEEBER E., MASON-JONES K. Microbial functional changes mark irreversible course of Tibetan grassland degradation. Nature Communications. 13 (1), 2681, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467....
2.
FRIEDLINGSTEIN P., O'SULLIVAN M., JONES M.W., ANDREW R.M., HAUCK J., OLSEN A., PETERS G.P., PETERS W., PONGRATZ J., SITCH S. Global carbon budget 2020. Earth System Science Data Discussions. 2020, 1, 2020.
3.
YANG H., SHAOJIE M., CHENGMING S., JIANLONG L., WEIMIN J. Summary of research on estimation of organic carbon storage in grassland ecosystem. Chin J Grassland. 33, 107, 2011.
4.
LU X., KELSEY K.C., YAN Y., SUN J., WANG X., CHENG G., NEFF J.C. Effects of grazing on ecosystem structure and function of alpine grasslands in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A synthesis. Ecosphere. 8 (1), e01656, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1....
5.
ZHU Q., CHEN H., PENG C., LIU J., PIAO S., HE J.-S., WANG S., ZHAO X., ZHANG J., FANG X. An early warning signal for grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Nature Communications. 14 (1), 6406, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467....
6.
ZOU J., LUO C., XU X., ZHAO N., ZHAO L., ZHAO X. Relationship of plant diversity with litter and soil available nitrogen in an alpine meadow under a 9-year grazing exclusion. Ecological Research. 31, 841, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284....
7.
WEN Q., ZHAO X., CHEN H., TUO D., LIN Q. Distribution characteristics of microbial mass carbon in different soil aggregates in a semi-arid region. Chinese Agricultural Science. 37 (10), 1504, 2004.
8.
DENG Q., CHENG X., HUI D., ZHANG Q., LI M., ZHANG Q. Soil microbial community and its interaction with soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following afforestation in central China. Science of the Total Environment. 541, 230, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
9.
LIU X., LIN T.-C., VADEBONCOEUR M.A., YANG Z., CHEN S., XIONG D., XU C., LI Y., YANG Y. Root litter inputs exert greater influence over soil C than does aboveground litter in a subtropical natural forest. Plant and Soil. 444, 489, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104....
10.
WANG Q., YU Y., HE T., WANG Y. Aboveground and belowground litter have equal contributions to soil CO2 emission: an evidence from a 4-year measurement in a subtropical forest. Plant and Soil. 421, 7, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104....
11.
LUDWIG B., SCHULZ E., RETHEMEYER J., MERBACH I., FLESSA H. Predictive modelling of C dynamics in the long‐term fertilization experiment at Bad Lauchstädt with the Rothamsted Carbon Model. European Journal of Soil Science. 58 (5), 1155, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
12.
PAN F., ZHANG W., LIANG Y., LIU S., WANG K. Increased associated effects of topography and litter and soil nutrients on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass along vegetation successions in karst ecosystem, southwestern China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 25, 16979, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
13.
PIOLI S., SARNEEL J., THOMAS H.J., DOMENE X., ANDRÉS P., HEFTING M., REITZ T., LAUDON H., SANDÉN T., PISCOVÁ V. Linking plant litter microbial diversity to microhabitat conditions, environmental gradients and litter mass loss: Insights from a European study using standard litter bags. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 144, 107778, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
14.
ZHAO Q., CLASSEN A.T., WANG W.-W., ZHAO X.-R., MAO B., ZENG D.-H. Asymmetric effects of litter removal and litter addition on the structure and function of soil microbial communities in a managed pine forest. Plant and Soil. 414, 81, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104....
15.
BANSAL S., SHELEY R.L., BLANK B., VASQUEZ E.A. Plant litter effects on soil nutrient availability and vegetation dynamics: changes that occur when annual grasses invade shrub-steppe communities. Plant Ecology. 215, 367, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258....
16.
HASSAN N., SHER K., RAB A., ABDULLAH I., ZEB U., NAEEM I., SHUAIB M., KHAN H., KHAN W., KHAN A. Effects and mechanism of plant litter on grassland ecosystem: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 41 (4), 341, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chna....
17.
LIN W., DE K., XIANG X., FENG T., LI F., WEI X. Effects of simulated litter inputs on plant-microbe carbon pool trade-offs in degraded alpine meadows. Frontiers in Plant Science. 16, 1549867, 2025.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2....
18.
FANIN N., BERTRAND I. Aboveground litter quality is a better predictor than belowground microbial communities when estimating carbon mineralization along a land-use gradient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 94, 48, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
19.
XIANG X., DE K., ZHANG L., LIN W., FENG T., QIAN S., WEI X., WANG W., XU C., GENG X. Short-term relationships between biomass and nutrients in alpine meadows under nitrogen addition. Chinese Journal of Grassland. 45 (1), 53, 2023.
20.
XIAO Q., HUANG Y., WU L., TIAN Y., WANG Q., WANG B., XU M., ZHANG W. Long-term manuring increases microbial carbon use efficiency and mitigates priming effect via alleviated soil acidification and resource limitation. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 57, 925, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374....
21.
ZHOU W., QIN X., LYU D., QIN S. Effect of glucose on the soil bacterial diversity and function in the rhizosphere of Cerasus sachalinensis. Horticultural Plant Journal. 7 (4), 307, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.....
22.
LIN W., ZHANG L., XIANG X., FENG T., LI F., WEI X., WANG W., DE K. Dynamic changes of vegetation biomass and nutrients in degraded alpine meadows in the Sanjiangyuan area. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 37 (7), 2024.
23.
VANCE E.D., BROOKES P.C., JENKINSON D.S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 19 (6), 703, 1987.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0....
24.
LI Y.-Y., DONG S.-K., WEN L., WANG X.-X., WU Y. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools and their relationship to plant and soil dynamics of degraded and artificially restored grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Geoderma. 213, 178, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
25.
DE OLIVEIRA T.B., DE LUCAS R.C., DE ALMEIDA SCARCELLA A.S., CONTATO A.G., PASIN T.M., MARTINEZ C.A., DE MORAES M.D.L.T. Effects of multiple climate change factors on exoenzyme activities and CO2 efflux in a tropical grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 148, 107877, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
26.
GONG S., ZHANG T., GUO R., CAO H., SHI L., GUO J., SUN W. Response of soil enzyme activity to warming and nitrogen addition in a meadow steppe. Soil Research. 53 (3), 242, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1071/SR1414....
27.
DEFOREST J.L. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 41 (6), 1180, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
28.
MAŁACHOWSKA-JUTSZ A., MATYJA K. Discussion on methods of soil dehydrogenase determination. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 16, 7777, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762....
29.
MORI T., AOYAGI R., KITAYAMA K., MO J. Does the ratio of β-1,4-glucosidase to β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase indicate the relative resource allocation of soil microbes to C and N acquisition? Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 160, 108363, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
30.
LIU Y.-D., YUAN G., AN Y.-T., ZHU Z.-R., LI G. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel bifunctional cellobiohydrolase/β-xylosidase from a metagenomic library of mangrove soil. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 162, 110141, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzm....
31.
ZHAO H., JIANG Y., NING P., LIU J., ZHENG W., TIAN X., SHI J., XU M., LIANG Z., SHAR A.G. Effect of different straw return modes on soil bacterial community, enzyme activities and organic carbon fractions. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 83 (3), 638, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2....
32.
HUANG Z., KE Z., MA Y., XIA C., HE Q., ZHANG Q. Effects of different degrees of disturbance by plateau Pika on plant diversity, soil bulk density, and water content. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University. 42 (6), 1348, 2024.
33.
LIU P., QIN Y., MO H., ZHOU Z., MENG W., HUANG Q., MA J. Effects of Litter Input and Removal on Soil Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activity, and Stoichiometry in Karst of Loropetalum chinense. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition). 41 (6), 179, 2023.
34.
LI Q., LI S., WANG X., LIU B., ZHANG G., ZHANG C., GAO Y., MEI H., WANG Y. Influences of changing carbon inputs on soil microbial carbon metabolism in natural secondary forests in Yimeng mountainous area. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 41 (10), 4110, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
36.
LEFF J.W., WIEDER W.R., TAYLOR P.G., TOWNSEND A.R., NEMERGUT D.R., GRANDY A.S., CLEVELAND C.C. Experimental litterfall manipulation drives large and rapid changes in soil carbon cycling in a wet tropical forest. Global Change Biology. 18 (9), 2969, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
37.
LI P., YANG Y., HAN W., FANG J. Global patterns of soil microbial nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in forest ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 23 (9), 979, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12....
38.
SNIEGOCKI R., MOON J.B., RUTROUGH A.L., GIRENEUS J., SEELAN J.S.S., FARMER M.C., WEINDORF D.C., NAITHANI K. Recovery of soil microbial diversity and functions along a tropical montane forest disturbance gradient. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 10, 853686, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
39.
CLEVELAND C.C., LIPTZIN D. C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: is there a "Redfield ratio" for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry. 85, 235, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533....
40.
HU X., WU N., YIN P., WU Y. Effects of snowpack and litter input on soil microbial count and biomass in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Science. 32 (3), 359, 2013.
41.
WEI X., WU F., HEDĚNEC P., YUE K., PENG Y., YANG J., ZHANG X., NI X. Changes in soil faunal density and microbial community under altered litter input in forests and grasslands. Fundamental Research. 2 (6), 954, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre....
42.
AAMIR M., RAI K., DUBEY M., ZEHRA A., TRIPATHI Y., DIVYANSHU K., SAMAL S., UPADHYAY R. Impact of climate change on soil carbon exchange, ecosystem dynamics, and plant-microbe interactions. In: Climate Change and Agricultural Ecosystems: Current Challenges and Adaptation. Woodhead Publishing, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
43.
ZHENG Y., YU C., XIAO Y., YE T., WANG S. The impact of utilizing oyster shell soil conditioner on the growth of tomato plants and the composition of inter-root soil bacterial communities in an acidic soil environment. Frontiers in Microbiology. 14, 1276656, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
44.
ASPAROUHOV T., MUTHÉN B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal. 16 (3), 397, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1080/107055....