ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Estimation of Carbon Footprint of Honey Production: A Case from China
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2024-01-25
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-03-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-04-13
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-05-10
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Jiarong Qian   

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, 100081, Beijing, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(2):1125-1136
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The carbon footprint is used to quantify the amount of carbon emitted throughout the production process. It is considered a crucial environmental metric amid global warming concerns, drawing attention from both consumers and producers. Given China’s status as the leading producer of honey worldwide, there is a pressing need for an environmental sustainability metric to assess the life cycle carbon emissions associated with beekeeping with a view to sustainable development. This study assesses the carbon footprint of Chinese honey products from the “cradle” to the “gate”, revealing that the carbon footprint is 0.81±0.106 CO2eq/kg honey. This value is distributed across various stages of honey production, encompassing hive management, long-distance transport for pollination, honey extraction and processing, as well as the transport of processed honey. It is noteworthy that the calculated carbon emissions associated with these stages are 0.054, 0.339, 0.299, and 0.118 kg CO2eq/kg honey, accounting for 6.84%, 40.29%, 37.93%, and 14.92% of the total carbon emissions in honey production, respectively. This indicates that long-distance transport for pollination and the honey extraction process play a pivotal role in the honey production process, with fossil fuels consumed for long-distance transport and electricity consumed for honey extraction and processing being the primary sources.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
KACZAN D.J., ORGILL-MEYER J. The impact of climate change on migration: a synthesis of recent empirical insights. *Climatic Change*, 158 (3), 281, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584...>.
 
2.
CORBERA E., ROTH D., WORK C. Climate change policies, natural resources and conflict: implications for development. *Climate Policy*, 19 (1), 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1080/146930...>.
 
3.
RAN C., ZHANG Y. The driving force of carbon emissions reduction in China: Does green finance work. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 421, 138502, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
 
4.
DUAN H., ZHOU S., JIANG K., BERTRAM C., HARMSEN M., KRIEGLER E., VAN VUUREN D.P., WANG S., FUJIMORI S., TAVONI M. Assessing China's efforts to pursue the 1.5°C warming limit. *Science*, 372 (6540), 378, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc...> PMid:33888636.
 
5.
TIAN Y., ZHANG J., LI B. Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and factor decomposition of agricultural carbon emission based on input angle-taking Hubei Province for example. *Research of Agricultural Modernization*, 32 (6), 752, 2011.
 
6.
SCHMIDHUBER J., TUBIELLO F.N. Global food security under climate change. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, 104 (50), 19703, 2007. <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0...> PMid:18077404 PMCid:PMC2148361.
 
7.
BAI Y., DENG X., JIANG S., ZHAO Z., MIAO Y. Relationship between climate change and low‑carbon agricultural production: A case study in Hebei Province, China. *Ecological Indicators*, 105, 438, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol...>.
 
8.
XU X., HUANG X., HUANG J., GAO X., CHEN L. Spatial‑temporal characteristics of agriculture green total factor productivity in China, 1998-2016: based on more sophisticated calculations of carbon emissions. *International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health*, 16 (20), 3932, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph...> PMid:31623101 PMCid:PMC6843840.
 
9.
HUANG X., FENG C., QIN J., WANG X., ZHANG T. Measuring China's agricultural green total factor productivity and its drivers during 1998-2019. *Science of the Total Environment*, 829, 154477, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:35304138.
 
10.
SU L., WANG Y., YU F. Analysis of regional differences and spatial spillover effects of agricultural carbon emissions in China. *Heliyon*, 9 (6), 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli...> PMid:37303571 PMCid:PMC10250807.
 
11.
YANG F. Impact of agricultural modernization on agricultural carbon emissions in China: A study based on the spatial spillover effect. *Environmental Science and Pollution Research*, 30 (39), 91300, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356...> PMid:37477811.
 
12.
TUBIELLO F.N., ROSENZWEIG C., CONCHEDDA G., KARL K., GÜTSCHOW J., P. XUEYAO, OBLI‑LARYEA G., WANNER N., QIU S.Y., DE BARROS J. Greenhouse gas emissions from food systems: building the evidence base. *Environmental Research Letters*, 16 (6), 065007, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9...>.
 
13.
SANDER M., HEIM N., KOHNLE Y. Label‑Awareness: wie genau schaut der Konsument hin? – Eine Analyse des Label‑Bewusstseins von Verbrauchern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Lebensmittelbereichs. *Berichte über Landwirtschaft – Zeitschrift für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaft*, 2016.
 
14.
FAO, APIMONDIA. *Good beekeeping practices for sustainable apiculture*. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 25, Rome, 2021.
 
15.
SKINNER M. Bee brood consumption: an alternative explanation for hypervitaminosis A in KNM‑ER 1808 (*Homo erectus*) from Koobi Fora, Kenya. *Journal of Human Evolution*, 20 (6), 493, 1991. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2...>.
 
16.
ALLSOP K.A., MILLER J.B. Honey revisited: A reappraisal of honey in pre‑industrial diets. *British Journal of Nutrition*, 75 (4), 513, 1996. <https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN199...> PMid:8672404.
 
17.
YILDIZ O., CAN Z., SARAL Ö., YULUĞ E., ÖZTÜRK F., ALIYAZICIOĞLU R., CANPOLAT S., KOLAYLI S. Hepatoprotective potential of chestnut bee pollen on carbon tetrachloride‑induced hepatic damages in rats. *Evidence‑Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine*, 461478, 2013. <https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/4...> PMid:24250716 PMCid:PMC3819792.
 
18.
SARAL Ö., YILDIZ O., ALIYAZICIOĞLU R., YULUĞ E., CANPOLAT S., ÖZTÜRK F., KOLAYLI S. Apitherapy products enhance the recovery of CCl₄‑induced hepatic damages in rats. *Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences*, 46 (1), 194, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-14...> PMid:27511354.
 
19.
ALVAREZ‑SUAREZ J.M., TULIPANI S., ROMANDINI S., BERTOLI E., BATTINO M. Contribution of honey in nutrition and human health: a review. *Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism*, 3, 15, 2010. <https://doi.org/10.3233/s12349...>.
 
20.
FENG‑FENG P. Apiculture in China. *Bee World*, 71 (3), 104, 1990. <https://doi.org/10.1080/000577...>.
 
21.
GARCÍA N.L. The current situation on the international honey market. *Bee World*, 95 (3), 89, 2018. <https://doi.org/10.1080/000577...>.
 
22.
PIPPINATO L., BLANC S., MANCUSO T., BRUN F. A sustainable niche market: how does honey behave? *Sustainability*, 12 (24), 10678, 2020. <https://doi.org/10.3390/su1224...>.
 
23.
WANG P., HAN X. Development, analysis, and verification of an intelligent auxiliary beekeeping device mounted on a crawler transporter. *Computers and Electronics in Agriculture*, 212, 108148, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp...>.
 
24.
POCOL C.B., ŠEDÍK P., BRUMĂ I.S., AMUZA A., CHIRSANOVA A. Organic beekeeping practices in Romania: Status and perspectives towards a sustainable development. *Agriculture*, 11 (4), 281, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.3390/agricu...>.
 
25.
SIMONE‑FINSTROM M., LI‑BYARLAY H., HUANG M.H., STRAND M.K., RUEPPELL O., TARPY D.R. Migratory management and environmental conditions affect lifespan and oxidative stress in honey bees. *Scientific Reports*, 6 (1), 32023, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32...> PMid:27554200 PMCid:PMC4995521.
 
26.
PIGNAGNOLI A., PIGNEDOLI S., CARPANA E., COSTA C., DAL PRÀ A. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions from honey production: Two‑year survey in Italian beekeeping farms. *Animals*, 13 (4), 766, 2023. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ani130...> PMid:36830553 PMCid:PMC9952000.
 
27.
STANDARDIZATION I.O.F. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. *International Organization for Standardization*, 1998.
 
28.
CHEN Z., NGO H.H., GUO W. A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes. *Science of the Total Environment*, 426, 13, 2012. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit...> PMid:22521163.
 
29.
ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. *International Organization for Standardization*, 2006.
 
30.
MINX J.C., WIEDMANN T., WOOD R., PETERS G.P., LENZEN M., OWEN A., SCOTT K., BARRETT J., HUBACEK K., BAIOCCHI G. Input-output analysis and carbon footprinting: an overview of applications. *Economic Systems Research*, 21 (3), 187, 2009. <https://doi.org/10.1080/095353...>.
 
31.
GARCÍA R., FREIRE F. Carbon footprint of particleboard: A comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050 and Climate Declaration. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 66, 199, 2014. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
 
32.
ISO. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework. 2010.
 
33.
ARZOUMANIDIS I., RAGGI A., PETTI L. Life cycle assessment of honey: considering the pollination service. *Administrative Sciences*, 9 (1), 27, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci...>.
 
34.
KENDALL A., YUAN J., BRODT S.B. Carbon footprint and air emissions inventories for US honey production: case studies. *The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment*, 18, 392, 2013. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367...>.
 
35.
MUJICA M., BLANCO G., SANTALLA E. Carbon footprint of honey produced in Argentina. *Journal of Cleaner Production*, 116, 50, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle...>.
 
36.
PIGNAGNOLI A., PIGNEDOLI S., CARPANA E., COSTA C., DAL PRÀ A. Carbon footprint of honey in different beekeeping systems. *Sustainability*, 13 (19), 11063, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.3390/su1319...>.
 
37.
MOREIRA M., CORTÉS A., LIJÓ L., NOYA I., PIÑEIRO O., OMIL B., BARRAL M. Environmental implications of honey production in the natural parks of northwestern Spain. 2019.
 
38.
VÁSQUEZ‑IBARRA L., IRIARTE A., VILLALOBOS P., MEZA RENGEL F., REBOLLEDO‑LEIVA R., ANGULO‑MEZA L., GONZÁLEZ‑ARAYA M.C. A wide environmental analysis of beekeeping systems through life cycle assessment: key contributing activities and influence of operation scale. *International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability*, 20 (5), 790, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.1080/147359...>.
 
39.
ARZOUMANIDIS I., PETTI L., RAUCCI D., RAGGI A. Multifunctional modelling in the life cycle assessment of honey considering pollination. *The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment*, 26, 643, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367...>.
 
40.
ULLAH A., GAJGER I.T., MAJOROS A., DAR S.A., KHAN S., SHAH A.H., KHABIR M.N., HUSSAIN R., KHAN H.U., HAMEED M. Viral impacts on honey bee populations: A review. *Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences*, 28 (1), 523, 2021. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs...> PMid:33424335 PMCid:PMC7783639.
 
41.
LU Z.-Q., WU C.-G., WU N.-Y., LU H.-L., WANG T., XIAO R., LIU H., WU X.-H. Change trend of natural gas hydrates in permafrost on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (1960–2050) under global warming and their impacts on carbon emissions. *China Geology*, 5 (3), 475, 2022. <https://doi.org/10.31035/cg202...>.
 
42.
ZHANG Y., LI X.Q., LI H.M., ZHANG Q.H., GAO Y., LI X.J. Antibiotic residues in honey: A review on analytical methods by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. *TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry*, 110, 344, 2019. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac...>.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top