ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Research on the Change of Sulfur Dioxide
Mass Concentration in Jilin Province, China
More details
Hide details
1
Shenyang Institute of Agricultural and Ecological Meteorology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,
Shenyang 110166, China
2
Northeast Geological S&T Innovation Center of China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, China
3
Key Laboratory of Agrometeorological Disasters, Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110166, China
4
Panjin Meteorological Service, Panjin 124000, China
5
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100091,
China
6
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric
Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
7
Panjin National Climate Observatory, Panjin 124010, China
Submission date: 2024-10-14
Final revision date: 2024-12-26
Acceptance date: 2025-01-24
Online publication date: 2025-04-14
Corresponding author
Xudong Zou
Shenyang Institute of Agricultural and Ecological Meteorology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,
Shenyang 110166, China
Rongping Li
Shenyang Institute of Agricultural and Ecological Meteorology, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,
Shenyang 110166, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Using the monitoring data and meteorological data of SO2 and other pollutants from nine cities in
Jilin Province between 2016 and 2021, analyze the annual and monthly variations and spatial distribution
of SO2 concentrations across the province, as well as the related impacts from other environmental
factors. The results showed that: (1) During the six-year period, no annual exceedance of the standard
limit was observed in the entire province. There was a significant decrease in SO2 concentrations across
Jilin Province from 2016 to 2018. There were 5 days with excessive daily values in the whole province,
all of which occurred in Baishan. Although SO2 levels in the province remained low from 2019 to
2021, they were 16.0% and 22.2% higher than the national average in 2020 and 2021, respectively.
According to the statistics of SO2–24h–98, there were severe exceedances in the entire province from
2016 to 2017. The annual trends of relative humidity and wind speed are not conducive to reducing
SO2 concentrations, while the annual changes in precipitation and temperature have a favorable effect.
The monthly average concentration of SO2 across the province exhibits a "decreasing first and then
increasing" trend. It is higher in January and December and reaches its lowest point in August. (2) The
geographical distribution of SO2 concentrations across the province shows high values centered in the
southern and central regions, while low values are centered in the northern and eastern regions. It shows
a zonal distribution from southeast to northwest. The spatial distribution of SO2–24h–98 in the province does not completely align with that of SO2, and at times, the high-value center can be found in Tonghua,
which is located in the southern part of the province. When comparing the similarity between spatial
distributions, the correlation between terrain and SO2 concentration is found to be higher, followed
by GDP. (3) In comparison with other pollutants, SO2 shows a positive correlation with PM2.5, PM10,
CO, NO2, and AQI, and a negative correlation with O3. Among them, the correlation with PM2.5 is the
highest, with a correlation coefficient of 0.79. The impact of relative humidity on SO2 varies significantly
between the heating and non-heating periods. During the heating period, the SO2 concentration first
increases and then decreases with the increase in relative humidity, reaching a maximum average
concentration of 26.1 μg·m−3 when the relative humidity is between 70% and 80% (inclusive). During
the non-heating period, however, the concentration level remains relatively low. An analysis of energy
consumption across the province over the past decade shows a significant decrease in coal consumption
and an increase in electricity and natural gas consumption, while the proportion of oil products has
increased by 2.1%.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
AAS W., MORTIER A., BOWERSOX V., CHERIAN R., FALUVEGI G., FAGERLI H., HAND J., KLIMONT Z., GALY-LACAUX C., LEHMANN C.M.B., MYHRE C.L., MYHRE G., OLIVIÉ D., SATO K., QUAAS J., RAO P.S.P., SCHULZ M., SHINDELL D., SKEIE R.B., STEIN A., TAKEMURA T., TSYRO S., VET R., XU X.B. Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 953, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:30700755 PMCid:PMC6353995.
2.
GIOSANU D., MARIAN M.C., CONSTANTIN D. Air pollution meteorology. Case study: SO2 and NO2 monitoring in Argeș county. Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 10 (20), 72, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.47068/ctns.....
3.
KUTTIPPURATH J., PATEL V.K., PATHAK M., SINGH A. Improvements in SO2 pollution in India: role of technology and environmental regulations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (52), 78637, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:35696063 PMCid:PMC9189448.
4.
JIANG L., HE S.X., CUI Y.Z., ZHOU H.F., KONG H. Effects of the socio-economic influencing factors on SO2 pollution in Chinese cities: A spatial econometric analysis based on satellite observed data. Journal of Environmental Management, 268, 110667, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:32383661.
5.
WU H.S., HONG S., HU M.G., LI Y.H., YUN W.Z. Assessment of the factors influencing sulfur dioxide emissions in Shandong, China. Atmosphere, 13 (1), 142, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos1....
6.
DONG X.Y., ZHAO X.G., PENG F., WANG D.L. Population based air pollution exposure and its influence factors by Integrating air dispersion modeling with GIS spatial analysis. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 479, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:31949216 PMCid:PMC6965307.
7.
RANAARIF S., YUWONO A.S. Analysis of the distribution of sulfur dioxide (SO2) pollutant in Bali Island for the 2011-2020 period. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 871, 012031, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
8.
HE H., VINNIKOV K.Y., LI C., KROTKOV N.A., JONGEWARD A.R., LI Z.Q., STEHR J.W., HAINS J.C., DICKERSON R.R. Response of SO2 and particulate air pollution to local and regional emission controls: A case study in Maryland. Earth's Future, 4 (4), 94, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EF....
9.
CAI M. Research on the implementation of air pollution control policies in Jilin province. Changchun: Jilin University of Finance and Economics, China, pp. 1, 2020.
10.
LI Z.H. Study on the temporal and spatial variation characteristics of typical air pollutants sources in Jilin City. Jilin: Northeast Electric Power University, China, pp.1, 2020.
11.
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. National standards of the people's republic of China: GB 3095-2012. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, China, pp. 4, 2012.
12.
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. National environmental protection standards of the people's republic of China: Technical Specifications for Environmental Air Quality Assessment (Trial): HJ 663-2013. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, China, pp. 2, 2013.
13.
ZHANG N., WANG Y. Mechanisms for the isolated convections triggered by the sea breeze front and the urban heat island. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 133 (4), 1143, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703....
14.
YANG H.M., PENG Q., ZHOU J., SONG G.J., GONG X.Q. The unidirectional causality influence of factors on PM2.5 in Shenyang city of China. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 8403, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:32439904 PMCid:PMC7242410.
15.
JION M.M.M.F., JANNAT J.N, MIA M.Y., ALI M.A., ISLAM M.S., IBRAHIM S.M., PAL S.C., ISLAM A., SARKER A., MALAFAIA G., BILAL M., ISLAM A.R.M.T. A critical review and prospect of NO2 and SO2 pollution over Asia: Hotspots, trends, and sources. Science of The Total Environment, 876, 162851, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:36921864.
16.
WEI J., LI Z.Q., WANG J., LI C., GUPTA P., CRIBB M. Ground-level gaseous pollutants (NO2, SO2, and CO) in China: daily seamless mapping and spatiotemporal variations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23 (2),1511, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23....
17.
KHREIS H., NIEUWENHUIJSEN M.J., ZIETSMAN J., RAMANIA T. Chapter 1 - Traffic-related air pollution: Emissions, human exposures, and health: An introduction. Traffic-Related Air Pollution, 1, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
18.
FILIGRANA P., LEVY J.I., GAUTHIER J., BATTERMAN S., ADAR S.D. Health benefits from cleaner vehicles and increased active transportation in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 32 (4), 538, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370... PMid:35288650 PMCid:PMC8919173.
19.
DANEK T., WEGLINSKA E., ZAREBA M. The influence of meteorological factors and terrain on air pollution concentration and migration: a geostatistical case study from Krakow, Poland. Scientific Reports, 1 (1), 11050, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:35773386 PMCid:PMC9244891.
20.
MA J.Z., CHU B.W., LIU J., LIU Y.C., ZHANG H.X., HE H. NOx promotion of SO2 conversion to sulfate: An important mechanism for the occurrence of heavy haze during winter in Beijing. Environmental Pollution, 233, 662, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp... PMid:29121601.
21.
LIANG Y., JIANG H., LIU X.Z. Characteristics of atmospheric ammonia and its impacts on SNA formatio in PM2.5 of Nanchang, China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 15 (4), 102059, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.....
22.
LI H., MA Y.L., DUAN F.K., ZHU L.D., MA T., YANG S., XU Y.Z., LI F., HUANG T., KIMOTO T., ZHANG Q.Q., TONG D., WU N.N., HU Y.X., HUO M.Y., ZHANG Q., GE X., GONG W.R., HE K.B. Stronger secondary pollution processes despite decrease in gaseous precursors: A comparative analysis of summer 2020 and 2019 in Beijing. Environmental Pollution, 279, 116923, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp... PMid:33751950.
23.
GUO H., GU X.F., MA G.X., SHI S.Y., WANG W.N., ZUO X., ZHANG X.C. Spatial and temporal variations of air quality and six air pollutants in China during 2015-2017. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 15201, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:31645580 PMCid:PMC6811589.
24.
BYRNE B., LIU J.J., BOWMAN K.W., PASCOLINICAMPBELL M., CHATTERJEE A., PANDEY S., MIYAZAKI K., WERF G.R., WUNCH D., WENNBERG P.O., ROEHL C.M., SINHA S. Carbon emissions from the 2023 Canadian wildfires. Nature, 632, 1, 2024.
25.
MANISALIDIS I., STAVROPOULOU E., STAVROPOULOS A., BEZIRTZOGLOU E.Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: A review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 14, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.... PMid:32154200 PMCid:PMC7044178.
26.
LIU Y.S., ZHOU Y., LU J.X. Exploring the relationship between air pollution and meteorological conditions in China under environmental governance. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 14518, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:32883992 PMCid:PMC7471117.
27.
JIAO X.Y., HE C.C., YU H., HE J., WANG C.J. Photogenerated hydroxyl radicals contribute to the formation of halogen radicals leading to ozone depletion on and within polar stratospheric clouds surface. Chemosphere, 291 (1), 132816, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem....
28.
ZOU X.D., CAI F., WANG X.Y., LI K.F., ZHANG Y.H., WANG H.Y., YANG H.B., LIU Y.C. Study on the change of ozone concentration in Liaoning province. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29 (9), 1830, 2020.
29.
SHEN Y., JIANG F., FENG S.Z., ZHENG Y.H., CAI Z., LYU X.P. Impact of weather and emission changes on NO2 concentrations in China during 2014-2019. Environmental Pollution, 269, 116163, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp... PMid:33280908.
30.
ZHANG X.R., XIAO X., WANG F., BRASSEUR G., CHEN S.Y., WANG J., GAO M. Observed sensitivities of PM2.5 and O3 extremes to meteorological condition in China and implications for the future. Environment International, 168, 107428, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envi... PMid:35985105.
31.
PERETTI M., PIÑEIRO G., LONG M.E.F., CARNELOS D.A. Influence of the precipitation interval on wet atmospheric deposition. Atmospheric Environment, 237, 117580, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmo....