ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Estimation of Soybean Yield under Cadmium Stress using UAV Remote Sensing Images and a Hyperspectral Recognition Model for Soybean Physiological and Ecological Characterization
Sen Jia 1,2
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
 
2
College of Agriculture and Hydraulic Engineering, Suihua University, Suihua 152061, Heilongjiang, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-12-26
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-02-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-03-04
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-04-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Futi Xie   

College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Satellite remote sensing has low spatial resolution and is easily affected by weather, making monitoring difficult in real-time. Near-ground lidar equipment is expensive, and data processing is complex, so its scope of application is narrow. This paper uses UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) remote sensing images and hyperspectral recognition models to estimate the impact of cadmium stress (CD stress) on soybean yield, analyze the physiological and ecological characteristics of soybeans, and provide a scientific basis for crop management and environmental pollution control. This paper uses UAV hyperspectral images to collect soybean field data and calibrate CD stress through soil and plant samples. After preprocessing the data, the vegetation index and other features were extracted to analyze the effect of CD stress on soybean growth. A hyperspectral recognition model was constructed to predict the effect of CD stress on soybean yield. The experimental results showed that increased cadmium concentration inhibited soybean photosynthesis and sugar metabolism and aggravated plants’ oxidative damage. The red edge and short-wave infrared bands showed obvious reflectivity changes. Based on the spectral characteristics, a hyperspectral recognition model was constructed. The transformer model was used to effectively classify and identify soybeans under CD stress and predict their yield changes. In the model evaluation, the Transformer model showed excellent performance with an accuracy of 92.8%, a recall rate of 95%, and an F1 score of 92.1%. The 10-fold cross-validation showed that the model performed stably on different data sets, and the accuracy and recall rates remained high. Using UAV remote sensing images combined with the hyperspectral recognition model for soybean physiological and ecological characterization can effectively capture the characteristics of CD stress and provide scientific prediction data for classification and yield estimation.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
REHMAN M., PAN J., MUBEEN S., MA W., LUO D., CAO S. Intercropping of kenaf and soybean affects plant growth, antioxidant capacity, and uptake of cadmium and lead in contaminated mining soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (38), 89638, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37454378.
 
2.
TADJOURI H., MEDJEDDED H., NEMMICHE S., CHADLI R., MOULAY M. Stress response induced by cadmium in soybeans (Glycine max L.) and health risk assessment. Plant Physiology Reports. 27 (2), 321, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502....
 
3.
PENUELAS J., COELLO F., SARDANS J. A better use of fertilizers is needed for global food security and environmental sustainability. Agriculture & Food Security. 12 (1), 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066....
 
4.
HU Z., ZHAO Y. Principle and technology of coordinated control of eco-environment of mining areas and river sediments in Yellow River watershed. Journal of China Coal Society. 47 (1), 438, 2022.
 
5.
LIU H., LYU H., ZHANG W., JIANG J., LI X., XUE S. Surfactant-modified SiO2/FeS nanocomposites for remediation of cadmium pollution. Journal of Central South University. 31 (4), 1163, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771....
 
6.
LIU L., CHEN L., LIU Y., YANG D., ZHANG X., LU N. Satellite remote sensing for global stocktaking: Methods, progress and perspectives. National Remote Sensing Bulletin. 26 (2), 243, 2022.
 
7.
SHANGGUAN M., YANG Z., SHANGGUAN M., LIN Z., LIAO Z., GUO Y. Remote sensing oil in water with an all-fiber underwater single-photon Raman lidar. Applied Optics. 62 (19), 5301, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.488... PMid:37707235.
 
8.
JUMAAH H.J., AMEEN M.H., MOHAMED G.H., AJAJ Q.M. Monitoring and evaluation Al-Razzaza lake changes in Iraq using GIS and remote sensing technology. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science. 25 (1), 313, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs....
 
9.
ZHU Q., GUO X., LI Z. A review of multi-class change detection for satellite remote sensing imagery. Geo-spatial Information Science. 27 (1), 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/100950....
 
10.
WANG B., WANG H., MAO X., WU S., LIAO Z., ZANG Y. Optical system design method of near-Earth short-wave infrared star sensor. IEEE Sensors Journal. 22 (22), 22169, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2....
 
11.
MA F., YUAN M., KOZAK I. Multispectral imaging: Review of current applications. Survey of Ophthalmology. 68 (5), 889, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surv... PMid:37321478.
 
12.
SARIC R., NGUYEN V.D., BURGE T., WHELAN J., LEWSEY M.G., ČUSTOVIĆ E. Applications of hyperspectral imaging in plant phenotyping. Trends in Plant Science. 27 (3), 301, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpla... PMid:34998690.
 
13.
DONOVAN G.H., GATZIOLIS D., DERRIEN M., MICHAEL Y.L., PRESTEMON J.P., DOUWES J. Shortcomings of the normalized difference vegetation index as an exposure metric. Nature Plants. 8, 617, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477... PMid:35697731.
 
14.
CHANG G.J., OH Y., GOLDSHLEGER N., SHOSHANY M. Biomass estimation of crops and natural shrubs by combining red-edge ratio with normalized difference vegetation index. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing. 16 (1), 014501, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.....
 
15.
PRADAWET C., KHONGDEE N., SPREER W.P.W., CADISCH T.H.G. Thermal imaging for assessment of maize water stress and yield prediction under drought conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 209 (1), 56, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12....
 
16.
YANG L., LUO S., WU Z., RONG X., HAN Y. Low Nitrogen Stress Stimulated Nitrate Uptake Rate Modulated by Auxin in Brassica napus L. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 22 (3), 3500, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729....
 
17.
WILSON A.N., GUPTA K.A., KODURU B.H., KUMAR A., JHA A., CENKERAMADI L.R. Recent advances in thermal imaging and its applications using machine learning: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal. 23 (4), 3395, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2....
 
18.
SALGUEIRO J.L., PEREZ L., SANCHEZ A., CANCEL A., MÍGUEZ C. Microalgal biomass quantification from the non-invasive technique of image processing through red-green-blue (RGB) analysis. Journal of Applied Phycology. 34 (2), 871, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811....
 
19.
ZUO Z., LIU C., HAN Q., SONG J. Unmanned aerial vehicles: Control methods and future challenges. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica. 9 (4), 601, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.20....
 
20.
LIU M., WU Y., LI G., LIU M., HU R., ZOU H. Classification of cow behavior patterns using inertial measurement units and a fully convolutional network model. Journal of Dairy Science. 106 (2), 1351, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.20... PMid:36460498.
 
21.
LI L., XUE J. Determination of 10 trace elements in kaolin by ICP-MS with microwave digestion. Rock and Mineral Analysis. 41 (1), 22, 2022.
 
22.
LIU S., HAN Z., KONG X. Organic matrix effects in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a tutorial review. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews. 57 (6), 461, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/057049....
 
23.
ISLAM M.N., RAUF A., FAHAD F.I. Superoxide dismutase: an updated review on its health benefits and industrial applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 62 (26), 7282, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/104083... PMid:33905274.
 
24.
TESFA M., DIA A., MAHÉ F., JANOT N., MARSAC R. Estimating the Acid-Base Properties and Electrical Charge of Organic Matter Using Spectrophotometry. Environmental Science & Technology. 57 (32), 12053, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.es... PMid:37527409.
 
25.
BAKER H.M., RAHOOMI T.D., ABDEL-HALIM H. Spectrophotometric method for determination of chromium ion in aqueous solution using ninhydrin. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 13 (10), 382, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2....
 
26.
BATES S., HASTIE T., TIBSHIRANI R. Crossvalidation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it? Journal of the American Statistical Association. 119 (546), 1434, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/016214... PMid:39308484 PMCid:PMC11412612.
 
27.
DIZON N.D., HOGAN J.A. Holistic processing of color images using novel quaternion-valued wavelets on the plane: A promising transformative tool [hypercomplex signal and image processing]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 41 (2), 51, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.20....
 
28.
GHEYSI M.E.I., BONYAD A.E. Investigating the effect of different atmospheric correction methods in forest biomass estimation using Vegetation indices. Forest Research and Development. 10 (2), 205, 2024.
 
29.
ZHANG J., REID J.S., MILLER S.D., ROMÁN M., WANG Z., SPURR R.J.D. Sensitivity studies of nighttime top-of-atmosphere radiances from artificial light sources using a 3-D radiative transfer model for nighttime aerosol retrievals. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 16 (10), 2531, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16....
 
30.
EMERSON R.W. Mann-Whitney U test and t-test. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. 117 (1), 99, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/014548....
 
31.
LARSSON E., SCHABACK R. Scaling of radial basis functions. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis. 44 (2), 1130, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum....
 
32.
MOHAMMADI M., FATEMI A.S.M., TALKHABLOU M. Prediction of the shear strength parameters from easily-available soil properties by means of multivariate regression and artificial neural network methods. Geomechanics and Geoengineering. 17 (2), 442, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/174860....
 
33.
BELETE D.M., HUCHAIAH M.D. Grid search in hyperparameter optimization of machine learning models for prediction of HIV/AIDS test results. International Journal of Computers and Applications. 44 (9), 875, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/120621....
 
34.
COSENZA Z., ASTUDILLO R., FRAZIER P.I., BAAR K., BLOCK D.E. Multi-information source Bayesian optimization of culture media for cellular agriculture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 119 (9), 2447, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28... PMid:35538846 PMCid:PMC9541924.
 
35.
KONONCHUK R., CAI J., ELLIS F., THEVAMARAN R., KOTTOS T. Exceptional-point-based accelerometers with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. Nature. 607 (7920), 697, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586... PMid:35896648.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top