ORIGINAL RESEARCH
From Online to Offline: Understanding the Connection between Perceived Interactivity and Pro-environment Behavior
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Geographical Sciences and Tourism, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514011, China
 
2
Modern Business Research Center, Academe of Zhejiang Cultural Industry Innovation & Development, School of Tourism and Urban-rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China
 
 
Submission date: 2024-02-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-04-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-07-04
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-10-25
 
 
Publication date: 2025-07-05
 
 
Corresponding author
Guanghui Qiao   

Modern Business Research Center, Academe of Zhejiang Cultural Industry Innovation & Development, School of Tourism and Urban-rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(5):5281-5291
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
With the exacerbation of environmental pollution, pro-environmental behavior is becoming increasingly imperative. The emergence of mobile mini programs plays a pivotal role in promoting such behavior. However, there remains a dearth of research examining the influence of perceived interactivity on pro-environmental behavior. In line with the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model, this study aims to investigate the impact of perceived interactivity on pro-environmental behavior. Utilizing a questionnaire survey of 336 Ant Forest users, the partial least squares method was employed to analyze the data. The findings reveal that control, responsiveness, and connectivity positively influence user engagement. Moreover, user engagement significantly correlates with brand love and user satisfaction. Additionally, brand love and user satisfaction significantly contribute to user stickiness, thereby fostering pro-environmental behavior. This study represents the first attempt to explore the influence of perceived interactivity on pro-environmental behavior.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (87)
1.
YANG Z., KONG X., SUN J., ZHANG Y. Switching to Green Lifestyles: Behavior Change of Ant Forest Users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15 (9), 1819, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:30142899 PMCid:PMC6164512.
 
2.
GARDNER G.T., STERN P.C. Environmental problems and human behavior. Allyn and Bacon Boston. 1996.
 
3.
HOLMGREN M., KABANSHI A., LANGEBORG L., BARTHEL S., COLDING J., ERIKSSON O., SÖRQVIST P. Deceptive sustainability: Cognitive bias in people's judgment of the benefits of CO2 emission cuts. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 64, 48, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
4.
MEEHL G.A., KARL T., EASTERLING D.R., CHANGNON S., PIELKE JR R., CHANGNON D., EVANS J., GROISMAN P.Y., KNUTSON T.R., KUNKEL K.E. An introduction to trends in extreme weather and climate events: observations, socioeconomic impacts, terrestrial ecological impacts, and model projections. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 81 (3), 413, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0...<0413:AITTIE>2.3.CO;2.
 
5.
VLEK C., STEG L. Human Behavior and Environmental Sustainability: Problems, Driving Forces, and Research Topics. Wiley Online Library. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540....
 
6.
ZHANG B., HU X., GU M. Promote pro-environmental behaviour through social media: An empirical study based on Ant Forest. Environmental Science & Policy. 137, 216, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envs....
 
7.
LEE H., KURISU K., HANAKI K. Influential Factors on Pro-Environmental Behaviors: A Case Study in Tokyo and Seoul. Low Carbon Economy. 4 (3), 13, 2013.
 
8.
MILFONT T.L., SIBLEY C.G. Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: A one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 90, 85, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid....
 
9.
CASALÓ L.V., ESCARIO J.-J. Heterogeneity in the association between environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behavior: A multilevel regression approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 175, 155, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
10.
GANSSER O.A., REICH C.S. Influence of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) and environmental concerns on pro-environmental behavioral intention based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Journal of Cleaner Production. 382, 134629, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
11.
DE DOMINICIS S., SCHULTZ P.W., BONAIUTO M. Protecting the Environment for Self-interested Reasons: Altruism Is Not the Only Pathway to Sustainability. Frontiers in Psychology. 8, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.... PMid:28701979 PMCid:PMC5487490.
 
12.
REES J.H., KLUG S., BAMBERG S. Guilty conscience: motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic Change. 130 (3), 439, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584....
 
13.
BOEVE-DE PAUW J., VAN PETEGEM P. Because My Friends Insist or Because It Makes Sense? Adolescents' Motivation towards the Environment. Sustainability. 9 (5), 750, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050....
 
14.
LACROIX K., GIFFORD R., CHEN A. Developing and validating the Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers (DIPB) scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 63, 9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
15.
CHEN M.-F. Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people's energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan-moral obligation matters. Journal of Cleaner Production. 112, 1746, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
16.
KURISU K.H., BORTOLETO A.P. Comparison of waste prevention behaviors among three Japanese megacity regions in the context of local measures and sociodemographics. Waste Management. 31 (7), 1441, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasm... PMid:21470842.
 
17.
ASENSIO O.I., DELMAS M.A. Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (6), E510, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1... PMid:25583494 PMCid:PMC4330782.
 
18.
GIFFORD R.D., CHEN A.K.S. Why aren't we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change. 140 (2), 165, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584....
 
19.
TAM K.-P., CHAN H.-W. Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 53, 213, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
20.
MI L., XU T., SUN Y., ZHAO J., LV T., GAN X., SHANG K., QIAO L. Playing Ant Forest to promote online green behavior: A new perspective on uses and gratifications. Journal of Environmental Management. 278, 111544, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:33129025.
 
21.
CHEN B., FENG Y., SUN J., YAN J. Motivation Analysis of Online Green Users: Evidence From Chinese "Ant Forest". Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.... PMid:32714238 PMCid:PMC7344309.
 
22.
WANG S., IBRAHIEM M.H., LI M. Motivations Influencing Alipay Users to Participate in the Ant Forest Campaign: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (24), 17034, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:36554915 PMCid:PMC9779548.
 
23.
ASHFAQ M., ZHANG Q., ALI F., WAHEED A., NAWAZ S. You plant a virtual tree, we'll plant a real tree: Understanding users' adoption of the Ant Forest mobile gaming application from a behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 310, 127394, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
24.
ZHANG Y., XIAO S., ZHOU G. User continuance of a green behavior mobile application in China: An empirical study of Ant Forest. Journal of Cleaner Production. 242, 118497, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
25.
ASHFAQ M., ZHANG Q., ZAFAR A.U., MALIK M., WAHEED A. Understanding Ant Forest continuance: effects of user experience, personal attributes and motivational factors. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 122 (2), 471, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-0....
 
26.
ZHANG L., SHAO Z., BENITEZ J., ZHANG R. How to improve user engagement and retention in mobile payment: A gamification affordance perspective. Decision Support Systems. 168, 113941, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.....
 
27.
ZHOU F., LIN Y., MOU J. Unpacking the effect of gamified virtual CSR cocreated on users' pro-environmental behavior: A holistic view of gamification affordance. Technology in Society. 73, 102228, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
 
28.
CAO Y., KOU F., HU H., WAN G. How gamified cooperation and competition motivate low-carbon actions: An investigation of gamification in a popular online payment platform in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 324, 116259, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:36174473.
 
29.
ZHANG C., LI Y., WU B., LI D. Tourism App User Stickiness and Purchase Intention from the Perspective of Interactivity. Tourism Tribune. 32 (6), 109, 2017.
 
30.
MEHRABIAN A., RUSSELL J.A. An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US. 1974.
 
31.
ALI F. Hotel website quality, perceived flow, customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. 7 (2), 213, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-0....
 
32.
PARBOTEEAH D.V., VALACICH J.S., WELLS J.D. The Influence of Website Characteristics on a Consumer's Urge to Buy Impulsively. Information Systems Research. 20 (1), 60, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1....
 
33.
FANG J., ZHAO Z., WEN C., WANG R. Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement. International Journal of Information Management. 37 (4), 269, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin....
 
34.
ALI F., TERRAH A., WU C., ALI L., WU H. Antecedents and consequences of user engagement in smartphone travel apps. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. 12 (2), 355, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-0....
 
35.
SCANNELL L., GIFFORD R. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30 (3), 289, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv....
 
36.
KHASHE S., HEYDARIAN A., GERBER D., BECERIK-GERBER B., HAYES T., WOOD W. Influence of LEED branding on building occupants' pro-environmental behavior. Building and Environment. 94, 477, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buil....
 
37.
KURISU K., KURISU K. What are pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs)? Springer Japan. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-....
 
38.
HUNTER L.M., HATCH A., JOHNSON A. Cross-National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors. Social Science Quarterly. 85 (3), 677, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038....
 
39.
WU G. The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward the Website. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 5 (2), 29, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/152520....
 
40.
HOFFMAN D.L., NOVAK T.P. Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing. 60 (3), 50, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224....
 
41.
LAUREL B. Computers as theatre. Addison-Wesley, New York: Addison-Wesley. 2013.
 
42.
JACQUES R., PREECE J., CAREY T. Engagement as a Design Concept for Multimedia. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication. 24, 49, 1995. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2VG7....
 
43.
ALZUBAIDI H., SLADE E.L., DWIVEDI Y.K. Examining antecedents of consumers' pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness. Journal of Business Research. 122, 685, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus....
 
44.
SUH A., WAGNER C., LIU L. Enhancing User Engagement through Gamification. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 58 (3), 204, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/088744....
 
45.
AJZEN I. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 32 (4), 665, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559....
 
46.
LEE D., MOON J., KIM Y.J., YI M.Y. Antecedents and consequences of mobile phone usability: Linking simplicity and interactivity to satisfaction, trust, and brand loyalty. Information & Management. 52 (3), 295, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2....
 
47.
CHEUNG C.M.K., SHEN X.-L., LEE Z.W.Y., CHAN T.K.H. Promoting sales of online games through customer engagement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 14 (4), 241, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eler....
 
48.
ALALWAN A.A., ALGHARABAT R.S., BAABDULLAH A.M., RANA N.P., QASEM Z., DWIVEDI Y.K. Examining the impact of mobile interactivity on customer engagement in the context of mobile shopping. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 33 (3), 627, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-0....
 
49.
SONG J.H., ZINKHAN G.M. Determinants of Perceived Web Site Interactivity. Journal of Marketing. 72 (2), 99, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.7....
 
50.
ZHAO L., LU Y. Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: An empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention. Decision Support Systems. 53 (4), 825, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.....
 
51.
CHEN K., YEN D.C. Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity. Information & Management. 42 (1), 217, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2....
 
52.
LI X., TIAN L., WANG S. Impact of Social Interaction on Customer Engagement in China's Social Commerce-A Moderated Chain Mediation Model. Behavioral Sciences. 13 (7), 541, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs1307... PMid:37503988 PMCid:PMC10376239.
 
53.
SHIMP T.A., MADDEN T.J. Consumer-object relations: A conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg's triangular theory of love. Advances in Consumer Research. 15, 163, 1988.
 
54.
ALBERT N., MERUNKA D. The role of brand love in consumer‐brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 30 (3), 258, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/073637....
 
55.
VERNUCCIO M., PAGANI M., BARBAROSSA C., PASTORE A. Antecedents of brand love in online network-based communities. A social identity perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 24 (7), 706, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-1....
 
56.
LOUREIRO S.M.C., GORGUS T., KAUFMANN H.R. Antecedents and outcomes of online brand engagement. Online Information Review. 41 (7), 985, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08....
 
57.
BATRA R., AHUVIA A., BAGOZZI R.P. Brand Love. Journal of Marketing. 76 (2), 1, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.....
 
58.
MASREK M.N., RAZALI M.H., RAMLI I., ANDROMEDA T. User engagement and satisfaction: The case of web digital library. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE). 7 (4), 19, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.....
 
59.
LU H.-P., LIN J.C.-C., HSIAO K.-L., CHENG L.-T. Information sharing behaviour on blogs in Taiwan: Effects of interactivities and gender differences. Journal of Information Science. 36 (3), 401, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555....
 
60.
SEDDON P.B. A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research. 8 (3), 240, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8....
 
61.
ISLAM J.U., HOLLEBEEK L.D., RAHMAN Z., KHAN I., RASOOL A. Customer engagement in the service context: An empirical investigation of the construct, its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 50, 277, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jret....
 
62.
NOH M.J., LEE K.T. An analysis of the relationship between quality and user acceptance in smartphone apps. Information Systems and e-Business Management. 14 (2), 273, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257....
 
63.
ZOTT C., AMIT R., DONLEVY J. Strategies for value creation in e-commerce: best practice in Europe. European Management Journal. 18 (5), 463, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-....
 
64.
CARROLL B.A., AHUVIA A.C. Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters. 17 (2), 79, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002....
 
65.
ELSOTOUHY M.M., GHONIM M.A., ALASKER T.H., KHASHAN M.A. Investigating Health and Fitness App Users' Stickiness, WOM, and Continuance Intention Using S-O-R Model: The Moderating Role of Health Consciousness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/104473....
 
66.
BHATTACHERJEE A. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly. 25 (3), 351, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/325092....
 
67.
WANG W.-T., WANG Y.-S., LIU E.-R. The stickiness intention of group-buying websites: The integration of the commitment-trust theory and e-commerce success model. Information & Management. 53 (5), 625, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2....
 
68.
GAO L., BAI X., PARK A. Understanding Sustained Participation in Virtual Travel Communities from the Perspectives of IS Success Model and Flow Theory. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. 41 (4), 475, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634....
 
69.
LIEN C.-H., CAO Y., ZHOU X. Service quality, satisfaction, stickiness, and usage intentions: An exploratory evaluation in the context of WeChat services. Computers in Human Behavior. 68, 403, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
70.
SHAO Z., ZHANG L., CHEN K., ZHANG C. Examining user satisfaction and stickiness in social networking sites from a technology affordance lens: uncovering the moderating effect of user experience. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 120 (7), 1331, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-1....
 
71.
TSAO W.-Y. Enhancing competitive advantages: The contribution of mediator and moderator on stickiness in the LINE. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 21 (6), 933, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jret....
 
72.
ASPARA J., LUO X., DHAR R. Effect of intelligence on consumers' responsiveness to a pro-environmental tax: Evidence from large-scale data on car acquisitions of male consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 27 (4), 448, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps....
 
73.
CHENG H. Research on influencing Factors of Tourism Experience Sharing Behavior in Travel Websites. Resource Development & Market. 37 (3), 358, 2021.
 
74.
SHARMA S.K., SHARMA M. Examining the role of trust and quality dimensions in the actual usage of mobile banking services: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management. 44, 65, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin....
 
75.
GAO L., WAECHTER K.A., BAI X. Understanding consumers' continuance intention towards mobile purchase: A theoretical framework and empirical study - A case of China. Computers in Human Behavior. 53, 249, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.....
 
76.
GLEIM M.R., SMITH J.S., ANDREWS D., CRONIN J.J. Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption. Journal of Retailing. 89 (1), 44, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jret....
 
77.
GRAY S.G., RAIMI K.T., WILSON R., ÁRVAI J. Will Millennials save the world? The effect of age and generational differences on environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Management. 242, 394, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:31059952.
 
78.
LIU P., TENG M., HAN C. How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors? The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions. Science of The Total Environment. 728, 138126, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:32361356.
 
79.
HAIR J.J., SARSTEDT M., HOPKINS L., KUPPELWIESER V. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review. 26 (2), 106, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10....
 
80.
HAIR J.F., RISHER J.J., SARSTEDT M., RINGLE C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31 (1), 2, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11....
 
81.
QURESHI I., COMPEAU D. Assessing Between-Group Differences in Information Systems Research: A Comparison of Covariance- and Component-Based SEM. MIS Quarterly. 33 (1), 197, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/206502....
 
82.
PODSAKOFF P.M., MACKENZIE S.B., LEE J.-Y., PODSAKOFF N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88 (5), 879, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9... PMid:14516251.
 
83.
FORNELL C., LARCKER D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research. 18 (3), 382, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/315098....
 
84.
KIM Y.H., KIM D.J., WACHTER K. A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems. 56, 361, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.....
 
85.
CAO P., LIU S. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Technology Stimuli on Sustainable Consumption Behavior: Evidence from Ant Forest Users in China. Behavioral Sciences. 13 (7), 604, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs1307... PMid:37504051 PMCid:PMC10376423.
 
86.
YUE T., LONG R., CHEN H. Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy. 62, 665, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
87.
WANG Z., WANG X., GUO D. Policy implications of the purchasing intentions towards energy-efficient appliances among China's urban residents: Do subsidies work? Energy Policy. 102, 430, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpo....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top