ORIGINAL RESEARCH
How Do Different Types of Government Accounting Interventions Affect Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China Based on fsQCA Model
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China 100083
 
 
Submission date: 2024-05-29
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-08-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-09-21
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-02-25
 
 
Publication date: 2025-11-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Wenyueyang Deng   

School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China 100083
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):7779-7794
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The government accounting department affects economic and social development to different degrees. Based on the sample of listed companies in the heavy pollution industry in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2011 to 2020 in China, we examined the impact path of the government accounting function on the corporate environmental performance using the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method. We found that there are four main paths to promote the improvement of corporate environmental performance: government financial accounting function-government auditing function-promoted, government auditing function-government cost management function-promoted, and two kinds of government financial accounting functiongovernment auditing function-government cost management function-promoted. In summary, the high government financial accounting function, high government audit function, and high government cost management function are generally confirmed as the core conditions for improving corporate environmental performance in different paths. In addition, we notice the relativity of edge conditions. The government performance management function and government debt management function are regarded as marginal conditions in some subgroups, and their impact on corporate environmental performance is relatively small or negligible. It is difficult for a single government accounting function to play a role in promoting corporate environmental performance.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
PAN X., LI M., GUO S., PU C. Research on the competitive effect of local government's environmental expenditure in China. Science of the Total Environment, 718, 137238, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:32086088.
 
2.
KOPITS G., CRAIG J. Transparency in government operations. Occasional Paper, 1998. https://doi.org/10.5089/978155... PMid:9644401.
 
3.
HOPE O., JIANG S., VYAS D. Government transparency and firm-level operational efficiency. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 49 (5-6), 752, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.1....
 
4.
SUN D., ZENG S., CHEN H., MENG X., JIN Z. Monitoring effect of transparency: how does government environmental disclosure facilitate corporate environmentalism? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28 (8), 1594, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.23....
 
5.
FENG J., GOODELL J.W., LI M., WANG Y. Environmental information transparency and green innovations. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 86, 101799, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intf....
 
6.
RUBAN A., RYDÉN L. Introducing environmental auditing as a tool of environmental governance in Ukraine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 505, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
7.
WANG W., WANG Z., MEI Y. Have government environmental auditing contributed to the green transformation of Chinese cities? Heliyon, 9 (12), e22709, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:38125416 PMCid:PMC10730587.
 
8.
ZHANG W., WANG X. Government audit, innovative activities, and green development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373....
 
9.
DE MOOR P., DE BEELDE I. Environmental auditing and the role of the accountancy profession: a literature review. Environmental Management, 36 (2), 205, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267... PMid:15995890.
 
10.
DUFLO E., GREENSTONE M., PANDE R., RYAN N. Truth-telling by third-party auditors and the response of polluting firms: experimental evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128 (4), 1499, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qj....
 
11.
WANG W., WANG X. Does provincial green governance promote enterprise green investment? Based on the perspective of government vertical management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 396, 136519, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
12.
HUANG R. Auditing the environmental accountability of local officials and the corporate green response: evidence from China. Applied Economics, 55 (34), 3950, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368....
 
13.
ZHANG Y., ZHANG Q., HU H., WANG C., GUO X. Accountability audit of natural resource, government environmental regulation and pollution abatement: an empirical study based on difference-in-differences model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137205, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
14.
ORSATTI G. Government R&D and green technology spillovers: the Chernobyl disaster as a natural experiment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49 (2), 581, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961....
 
15.
KASSOURI Y., BILGILI F., GARANG A.P.M. Are government energy technology research, development, and demonstration budgets converging or diverging? Insights from OECD countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34 (5), 563, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373....
 
16.
CAGLAR A.E., ULUG M. The role of government spending on energy efficiency R&D budgets in the green transformation process: insight from the top-five countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (50), 76472, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:35668270.
 
17.
ADEWUYI A.O. Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: a dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
 
18.
ZHANG Q., ZHANG S., DING Z., HAO Y. Does government expenditure affect environmental quality? Empirical evidence using Chinese city-level data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 143, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
 
19.
ZERAIBI A., BALSALOBRE-LORENTE D., SHEHZAD K. Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypotheses in Chinese provinces: a nexus between regional government expenditures and environmental quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (18), 9667, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:34574594 PMCid:PMC8466972.
 
20.
FAN W., YAN L., CHEN B., DING W., WANG P. Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China. Resources Policy, 77, 102760, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reso... PMid:36569596 PMCid:PMC9759629.
 
21.
WU X. Governance, Socially responsible Investment and Corporate Social Responsibility: game and implementation mechanism. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 40 (02), 185, 2012 [In Chinese].
 
22.
WANG F., JIANG T., GUO X. Government quality, environmental regulation and enterprise green technology innovation. Scientific Research Management, 39 (01), 26, 2018 [In Chinese].
 
23.
CHEN S., CHEN D. Haze pollution, government control and high-quality economic development. Economic Studies, 53 (02), 20, 2018 [In Chinese].
 
24.
LI Z., BAI X. Does local selective industrial policy promote the improvement of green competitiveness of manufacturing industry? Exploration of Economic Issues, (03), 165, 2021 [In Chinese].
 
25.
JIANG H., GAO J., CHEN Z. Can government investment funds guide social capital investment? Financial Research, (03), 44, 2022 [In Chinese].
 
26.
XIA S. Research on the effect of government investment fund on technological innovation of enterprises. Southern Finance, (04), 45, 2021 [In Chinese].
 
27.
CHEN X., CHEN Z., LUO F. Research on the dynamic effect of government investment fund on enterprise innovation. Accounting and Economic Studies, 36 (06), 20, 2022 [In Chinese].
 
28.
DENG L., LIU A. Effect analysis of environmental protection investment: Based on green total factor productivity perspective. Exploration of Economic Issues, (08), 134, 2019 [In Chinese].
 
29.
LIU C., TIAN X. Regional environmental protection investment, urbanization and green technology innovation: An empirical study based on spatial Durbin model and intermediary effect. Science and Technology Management Research, 40 (15), 236, 2020 [In Chinese].
 
30.
KANG X., ZHU T., LI W. Study on the effect of government green investment on high-quality economic development in the middle Yellow River Economic Zone: Based on the threshold effect of financial efficiency. Ecological Economy, 39 (04), 51, 2023 [In Chinese].
 
31.
ZHANG X. Study on the relationship between local government debt and environmental pollution under fiscal decentralization. Modern Management Science, (06), 60, 2016 [In Chinese].
 
32.
GUO Y., XUE J. Research on nonlinear environmental effects of local government debt. Statistical Research, 38 (12), 105, 2021 [In Chinese].
 
33.
ZHANG Z., DENG W. Study on the effect and path of local government debt on corporate ESG. Discussion on Modern Economy, (06), 10, 2022 [In Chinese].
 
34.
DU W., LI M. Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: Micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 82, 106382, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
35.
ZHANG L., YE F., YANG L., ZHOU G. Impact of Political Connections on Corporate Environmental Performance: From a Green Development Perspective. Sustainability, 11 (5), 1317, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1105....
 
36.
RÍOS A.M., GUILLAMÓN M.D., BENITO B., BASTIDA F. The influence of transparency on budget forecast deviations in municipal governments. Journal of Forecasting, 37 (4), 457, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.25....
 
37.
WANG H., TANG Z., ZHANG Z., DENG W. Can government environmental auditing and fiscal transparency promote the green development of heavy-polluting firms? Environmental Research Letters, 19 (7), 74054, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9....
 
38.
WANG X. 1994-2007: Investigation on deviation of budget and final accounts of fiscal revenue and expenditure in China. Exploration of Economic Problems, (09), 164, 2009 [In Chinese].
 
39.
WEI L., LIN B., ZHENG Z., WU W., ZHOU Y. Does fiscal expenditure promote green technological innovation in China? Evidence from Chinese cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, 106945, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar....
 
40.
LIU F., CHU D., JIANG C. Fiscal transparency, public expenditure structure and local government governance capacity. Economic Dynamics, (04), 107, 2021 [In Chinese].
 
41.
XU X., YAN Y. Does government investment crowd out private investment in China? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17 (1), 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/174878....
 
42.
YUAN D. A study on the determinants of local government investment: from the perspective of Tax budget and final accounts Deviation. The World Economy, 37 (08), 173, 2014 [In Chinese].
 
43.
ZHAO W., ZHANG Z. Is budget deviation driving up local government debt? Collection of Finance and Economics, (9), 33, 2020 [In Chinese].
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top