ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Huizhou Region’s Ecological Livability
and Influencing Factors Evaluation
Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS
More details
Hide details
1
Anhui Cultural Tourism Innovative Development Research Institute,Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
2
School of Arts, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
3
Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China
4
Anhui Institute of Contemporary Studies, Anhui Academy of Social Sciences, Hefei 203106, China
Submission date: 2024-06-13
Final revision date: 2024-07-25
Acceptance date: 2024-08-15
Online publication date: 2025-05-09
Publication date: 2025-11-04
Corresponding author
Yanlong Guo
Social Innovation Design Research Centre, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, HEFEI,ANHUI, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):7485-7500
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Evaluating ecological livability is to consider the balance between urban development and ecological
sustainability from an ecological perspective. This study takes the ecological environment of seven
counties in the Huizhou region as the object of study and summarizes an ecological livability index
system of evaluation which includes 18 indexes across five criteria: human habitat, resource utilization,
ecological maintenance, pollution treatment, and climatic environment. Using the entropy weight-
TOPSIS method, the study evaluates and analyzes the factors influencing the ecological livability
of each region. The spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics of the region are then analyzed using
ArcMap 10.8 to provide an example for ecological environment maintenance in the Huizhou region.
The following conclusions were obtained: (1) The overall level of urban eco-livability in Huangshan
City, Huizhou region, is low, with a slow downward trend before 2019 and a rapid increase after
2019, with the highest district and county eco-livability scores reaching “general level”. (2) Huizhou’s
ecological livability level is spatially structured around the urban region, with the structural features
of “high in the central area and poor in the periphery” and a tendency to radiate and extend outward
from the center. (3) By comparing the weighting coefficients of the evaluation indicators, it is found that
the four indicators of daily per capita domestic water consumption (C9), green space and plaza land
(C3), annual precipitation (C6), and current year afforestation area (C12) are the main factors influencing
the ecological livability.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (56)
1.
LIU T., ZHUO Y., PENG R., CAO G. Urban-rural population change and the regional types evolution of China's urbanization. Computers, Acta Geographica Sinica, 77 (12), 3006, 2022.
2.
ZHANG W., YI W., ZHANG J., MENG B., GAO X. A Study of Livable Cities in China (Beijing); social sciences academic press (CHINA); Beijing, China, pp. 1-6, 2006.
3.
GUOYU Q., XIAONAN Z. China's Urbanization and Its Ecological Environment Challenges in the 21st Centur. Advances in earth science, 34 (06), 640, 2019.
4.
DONG D., LUO Y., WANG L., TAI Y., GU K. Quality of Rural Human Settlement in Xin'an River-Qiandao Lake Ecological Compensation Experimental Area, Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Its Influence Mechanism. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 39 (1), 29, 2023.
5.
GONG F., CHEN X. Study on the Evaluation of Ecological Livable City in Anhui Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Theory. Chongqing Technol. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 555, 012089, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
6.
LI H., CAO Y., ZHANG S.H. Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration of ecological livable appropriate industry coordinated development level measurement. Statistics and Decision, 37 (6), 78, 2021.
7.
MOIRA L.Z., THOMAS L.T., ARUNPRAKASH T.K., AHJOND S.G., HERIBERTO C. A New Framework for Urban Sustainability Assessments: Linking Complexity, Information and Policy. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32 (6), 474, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
8.
China Society for Urban Science. Scientific evaluation criteria for livable cities, 2007.
9.
PAN Y., WANG Y., WANG Y., XIE Y., DONG J., LIU M. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Suitability for Ecological Livability of Green Spaces in the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration. Sustainability, 15 (22), 15964, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1522....
10.
CUI H., FANG H., TIAN Y., ZHENG W., LI W., TIAN W. Evaluation of Livability of Wuhan under Ecological Construction and Analysis of Its Spatial Pattern. Sustainability, 14 (18), 11283, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1418....
11.
FU B., YU D., ZHANG Y. The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China. Land Use Policy, 87, 104048, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
12.
DONG Y., HU Z., WU J., WANG J., YANG C., ZHANG J., XIA J., WU G. Evaluation of ecological livability of dwelling area based on multi-source data: A case study of Shenzhen City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42 (16), 6607, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
13.
LI C. Comprehensive evaluation of human settlements in 36 central cities of China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 31 (05), 1, 2017.
14.
SAEED U., AHMAD S.R., MOHEY-UD-DIN G., BUTT H.J., ASHRAF U. An Integrated Approach for Developing an Urban Livability Composite Index-A Cities' Ranking Road Map to Achieve Urban Sustainability. Sustainability, 14 (14), 8755, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1414....
15.
ZHENG C.D., MA K., SU J.R. Evaluation of Eco-Livable Cities Based on Resident Satisfaction. Statistics & Decision, 05, 64, 2014.
16.
XU J., ZHANG W., KAN L. Impact of Urban Population Density on Perception of Human Settlements in Hangzhou. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 42 (02), 208, 2022.
17.
WANG X., LIN T., WU X. The impact of land use/land cover changes on human settlements in sandylands. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 31 (01), 111, 2014.
18.
GHASEMI K., HAMZENEJAD M., MESHKINI A. The spatial analysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran Metropolis using multi-criteria decision making approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 382, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.....
19.
SOCHACKA B.A., RENOUF M.A., KENWAY S.J. Water-related liveability assessment: Indicators for evaluation of urban design. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105103, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.....
20.
OKULICZ-KOZARYN A., VALENTE R.R. Livability and Subjective Well-Being Across European Cities. Applied Research Quality Life, 14, 197, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482....
21.
DANIELAINI T.T., MAHESHWARI B., HAGARE D. A framework for evaluating ecohydrological-based liveability in a rapidly urbanising region of Indonesia. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 10 (3), 222, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1080/194631....
22.
STEPHENS C., SZABÓ Á., ALLEN J., ALPASS F. Livable Environments and the Quality of Life of Older People: An Ecological Perspective. The Gerontologist, 59 (4), 675, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront... PMid:29982561.
23.
LIU J., BI H., WANG H. Using multi-source data to assess livability in Hong Kong at the community-based level: A combined subjective-objective approach. Geography and Sustainability, 1 (4), 284, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geos....
24.
YAO X., ZHENG W., WANG D., AN M., WANG X., CHEN W., WANG W., CHI T. Micro-scale habitability evaluation of Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city based on multi-source data. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33 (09), 2493, 2022.
25.
KUTTY A.A., KUCUKVAR M., ONAT N.C., AYVAZ B., ABDELLA G.M. Measuring sustainability, resilience and livability performance of European smart cities: A novel fuzzy expert-based multi-criteria decision support model. Cities, 137, 104293, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.citi....
26.
SANKALP S., SAHOO S.N. Fuzzy AHP modelling of urbanization and environmental stress to rank selected Indian cities for liveability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 6727, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668....
27.
TENNAKOON M., RATHNASINGHE A., KULATUNGA U. Reconceptualising urban liveability: a quantitative assessment of inhabitant needs in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Urban Design International, 1, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289....
28.
WU X., HU F. Analysis of ecological carrying capacity using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Ecological Indicators, 113, 106243, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol... PMCid:PMC10664909.
29.
HAN B., LIU H., WANG R. Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods. Ecological Modelling, 318, 217, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
30.
WANG M., ZHAO X., GONG Q., JI Z. Measurement of Regional Green Economy Sustainable Development Ability Based on Entropy Weight-Topsis-Coupling Coordination Degree - A Case Study in Shandong Province, China. Sustainability, 11 (1), 280, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1101....
31.
WEI Z., JI D., YANG L. Comprehensive evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in Henan Province based on entropy weight TOPSIS - coupling coordination - obstacle model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 115820, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:37897572.
32.
FAN Y., LEI S. Evaluation of Urban Livability and Key Driving Forces in Shaanxi Province under "Five-in-One" General Layout. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 60 (02), 365, 2024.
33.
LI H., DUAN P., GUO H. Evaluation of Regional Ecological Livable Degree and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Xi'an. Ecological Economy, 35 (10), 80, 2019.
34.
LI H., XU G. The Survey & Evaluation and the Improvement Countermeasures of Urban Ecological Livable Degree in Suzhou: Form the Perspective of Residents' Satisfaction. Ecological Economy, 32 (12), 159, 2016.
35.
HAN J., YUAN K., HUANG L., MENG X. Evaluation and forecast of livability for the global city: A case study of Shanghai. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 01, 80, 2017.
36.
GE C., CHENG C., DU Y., DONG Z. Building a Demonstration Zone for Building a Beautiful China. Environmental Protection, 49 (10), 8, 2021.
37.
ZENG F. Study on the Joint Construction of Xin'an River-Thousand Island Lake Ecological Compensation Pilot Area. Academics, 269 (10), 58, 2020.
38.
SHEN M., XIE H. Transboundary ecological compensation in the Xin'an River Basin and its institutional arrangement of sustainability. China population, resources and environment, 30 (9), 156, 2020.
39.
JIN X., YE S., WU X., WANG Y., CHENG Y. A quality evaluation of human settlements in island cities: a comparison between Xiamen and Pingtan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36 (12), 3678, 2016.
40.
CHEN Y., ZHANG C., WANG J. On the evaluation and construction of eco-livable city in western underdeveloped areas - A case study of Guiyang. Journal of Guizhou Normal University. Natural Sciences, 35 (02), 7, 2017.
41.
XIAO Y., WANG J., HUANG H. Does economic development bring more livability? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126187, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
42.
ZHAO W., ZHOU A., YIN C. Unraveling the research trend of ecological civilization and sustainable development. A bibliometric analysis, 52, 1928, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280... PMid:37907802 PMCid:PMC10654311.
43.
TIAN S.B. A Review of Foreign Studies of Theories and Methods on Livable City. Economic Geography, 04, 535, 2008.
44.
FAN Z., WANG Y., FENG Y. Ecological Livability Assessment of Urban Agglomerations in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (24), 13349, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... PMid:34948957 PMCid:PMC8703757.
45.
ZHANG H., CHENG J., FENG Y., CHEN D., NI LIN., SUN H. An evaluation index system for ecological civilization construction in megacities and its research applications: the case of Wuhan City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35 (02), 547, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb20....
46.
YANG B., ZHANG J., LUO W., YU X., ZHANG X. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Hu'nan Province During 2009–2018 Based on TOPSIS and Coupling Coordination Development. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 41 (5), 357, 2021.
48.
CUI S., YU J., CHEN Y., HAN C. Research on temporal and spatial differentiation of urban human settlement environment quality in Hubei Province based on entropy TOPSIS. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 56 (04), 695, 2022.
49.
YI X., YUAN L., XIAO T., HUAN H., RUI W. Assessing spatial–temporal evolution and key factors of urban livability in arid zone: The case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 140, 108995, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
50.
HUANG D., JIANG J. Spatial-temporal Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Rural Revitalization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Statistics & Decision, 39 (05), 44, 2023.
51.
SHI T., ZHANG W., ZHOU Q., WANG K. Industrial structure, urban governance and haze pollution. Spatiotemporal evidence from China, 742, 139228, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:32623152.
52.
FENG Z., YANG Y., ZHANG D., TANG Y. Natural environment suitability for human settlements in China based on GIS. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 19, 437, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442....
53.
WANG Y., MIAO Z., LU Y., ZHU Y. The impact of economic development on urban livability: Evidence from 40 large and medium-sized cities of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 77 (10), 2529, 2022.
54.
WANG Y., LU Y., CHE B., CHEN B., DING Z. Eco-environment Evaluation for Human Settlements in Zhejiang Province. Mountain Research, 35 (03), 380, 2017.
55.
ZHANG H., JIANG F., WANG Y., CHENG J., QIAN C. Spatial heterogeneity and distribution characteristics of ecologically life & work facilitating level in the Yangtze River Delta city cluster. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28 (11), 73, 2018.
56.
KASHEF M. Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5 (2), 239, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar....