ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Impact of Industrial Structure Rationalization
and Upgrading on Well-Being Performance
of Carbon Emissions- Empirical Analysis Based on
Chinese Provincial Level
More details
Hide details
1
College of Bangor, Central South University of Forestry and Technology,
No. 498 Shaoshan South Road, Tianxin District, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China
2
College of Economics, Central South University of Forestry and Technology,
No. 498 Shaoshan South Road, Tianxin District, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China
Submission date: 2023-04-26
Final revision date: 2023-06-01
Acceptance date: 2023-07-10
Online publication date: 2023-09-18
Publication date: 2023-10-25
Corresponding author
Li Tao
College of Economics, Central South University of Forestry and Technology,
No. 498 Shaoshan South Road, Tianxin District, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2023;32(6):5347-5363
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The rapid economic development has caused a continuous increase in carbon emissions, which has
led to a series of problems such as environmental pollution and climate change, resulting in a decline
in economic, ecological and social welfare. The increase in human well-being generated by each unit
of carbon emissions can be expressed in terms of well-being performance of carbon emissions. Based
on provincial panel data from 2005 to 2020 in China, this paper provides an in-depth exploration of
the impact of the rationalization and upgrading of industrial structure on the well-being performance
of carbon emissions by constructing a fixed-effect model. The conclusions of the study are as follows:
(1) The rationalization of industrial structure at this stage has not yet had an impact on well-being
performance of carbon emissions, and upgrading can significantly contribute to the improvement
of well-being performance of carbon emissions. (2) the impact of industrial structure upgrading
on well-being performance of carbon emissions is heterogeneous. Advancedization only significantly
contributes to the well-being performance of carbon emissions of eastern regions, regions with
low natural resource endowments, regions with high external dependence and regions with high
environmental awareness. The conclusion of the paper provides an important reference for other
countries to optimize the industrial structure to improve well-being performance.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CITATIONS (5):
1.
Intellectual capital, digital transformation and firms’ financial performance: Evidence from ecological protection and environmental governance industry in China
Jian Yin, Jian Xu, Md. Mominur Rahman
PLOS ONE
2.
Rethinking Urban Growth: The Pivotal Role of Urban Spatial Structure in China’s Ecological Welfare Evolution
Haiguo Zhong, Qixuan Li, Xuan Zou
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
3.
Investigation of Diverse Urban Carbon Emission Reduction Pathways in China: Based on the Technology–Organization–Environment Framework for Promoting Socio-Environmental Sustainability
Haiyan Jiang, Jiaxi Lu, Ruidong Zhang, Xi Xiao
Land
4.
Enhancing tourism carbon emission efficiency through cultural and tourism industry integration in china: empirical evidence from industrial structure upgrading
Mengzhen Qiu, Zhaofeng Wang, Qinchang Chen, Jing Wang
Environment, Development and Sustainability
5.
An Emerging Force for Curbing Carbon
Emissions: Convergence of Digital
and Energy Industries
Jingbing Sun, Adila Abulimiti, Jianli Zhou
Polish Journal of Environmental Studies