ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Innovative Nature-Friendly Concept of Bank Stabilization and Its Effectiveness Evaluation
 
More details
Hide details
1
Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Department of Landscape Management, Zemědělská 1665/1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
 
 
Submission date: 2024-02-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-06-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-10-28
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-01-20
 
 
Corresponding author
Jan Deutscher   

Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Department of Landscape Management, Zemědělská 1665/1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Bank erosion can lead to land loss and increased sedimentation rates, which can alter the important ecosystem services of the water body. Currently, innovative nature-friendly approaches to bank stabilization have been encouraged over the “hard” civil engineering measures. In this study, the impulse for implementing an innovative stabilization technique arose when parts of the banks of the Hulín postmining sandpit were transformed into a two-meter-high erosion wall, and a technical stabilization structure was neither feasible nor appreciated by the general public for recreation or nature protection. Therefore, a new design of a so-called "half-bowl" sloping with additive nature-friendly stabilization measures SMs (grassing, willow cuttings, gravel bed, etc.) was tested. The evaluation of individual SMs consisted of: 1. visual assessment; 2. wave run-up modeling; and 3. granulometric analyses. All three tests indicated that a good degree of stability was achieved. At the same time, a comparison to biological (mild sloping with grassing) and technical (retaining wall) alternatives was also carried out. Both the low financial cost and relatively low land area requirements indicate that this approach offers a promising nature-friendly solution for bank stabilization in similar lakes.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
HOUT R., MALEVAL V., MAHE G., ROUVELLAC E., CROUZEVIALLE R., CERBELAUD F. UAV and LiDAR data in the service of bank gully erosion measurement in Rambla de Algeciras lakeshore. Water, 12 (10), 2748, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102....
 
2.
PELIKÁN P., MARKOVÁ J., ROSÍKOVÁ J., CARBOL S., VEJTASOVÁ K. The Efficiency of a Simple Stabilization Structure in a Water Reservoir. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27 (2), 2018. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes... PMid:14966370.
 
3.
COASTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER (US). Shore protection manual. US Army Coastal Engineering Research Center, 1973.
 
4.
KOTAŠKA S., DUCHAN D., PELIKÁN P., ŠPANO M. Spectral analysis of oscillatory wind wave parameters in fetch-limited deep-water conditions at a small reservoir and their prediction: Case Study of the Hulín Reservoir in the Czech Republic. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 72 (1), 95, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2....
 
5.
IGNATYEVA M., YURAK V., PUSTOKHINA N. Recultivation of post-mining disturbed land: Review of content and comparative law and feasibility study. Resources, 9 (6), 73, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/resour....
 
6.
SANGALLI P., FERNANDES J.P., TARDÍO G. Soil and water bioengineering as natural-based solutions. Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale, 317, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
7.
TISSERANT M., BOURGEOIS B., GONZÁLEZ E., EVETTE A., POULIN M. Controlling erosion while fostering plant biodiversity: A comparison of riverbank stabilization techniques. Ecological Engineering, 172, 106387, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
8.
ŠLEZINGR M., UHMANNOVÁ H. The Revitalization of Rivers—Bankside Trees and Shrubs. Proceedings of the Public Recreation and Landscape Protection—With Man Hand in Hand, pp. 301–304, 2014.
 
9.
DEUTSCHER J., ŠLEZINGR M., HEMR O., PELIKÁN P., SEDLÁČKOVÁ K. The stability of banks in post-mining lakes as a limit to their recreational potential. Public recreation and landscape protection—With environment hand in hand: Conference proceedings. Brno: Mendel University in Brno, 390, 2022. https://doi.org/10.11118/978-8....
 
10.
BRUS J., DEUTSCHER J., BAJER A., KUPEC P., OLIŠAROVÁ L. Monetary assessment of restored habitats as a support tool for sustainable landscape management in lowland cultural landscapes. Sustainability, 12 (4), 1341, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1204....
 
11.
Czech Technical Standard ČSN 75 0255 (7502558). Výpočet účinků vln na stavby na vodních nádržích a zdržích. Prague: Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví, 1988.
 
12.
PELIKÁN P., KOUTNÝ L. Hindcast of Wind Driven Wave Heights in Water Reservoirs. Soil and Water Research, 11 (3), 205, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17221/105/2....
 
13.
Czech Technical Standard ČSN EN ISO 14688-2. Geotechnical Investigation and Testing – Identification and Classification of Soil – Part 2: Principles for a Classification. Prague, 2005.
 
14.
QIN Z., LAI Y., TIAN Y. Study on failure mechanism of a plain irrigation reservoir soil bank slope under wind wave erosion. Natural Hazards, 109 (1), 567, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069....
 
15.
MOTOYASHIKI R., NAKAZA E., MIYAZATO N., FUKUMORI M., TANAKA S., SCHAAB C. The Wave Run-Up and Reflection Effects of Wave Breaking and Currents on Step-Type Seawalls With High Steps. Journal of JSCE, 12 (1), 23, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2208/journa....
 
16.
KREYENSCHULTE M., SCHÜRENKAMP D., BRATZ B., SCHÜTTRUMPF H., GOSEBERG N. Wave run-up on mortar-grouted riprap revetments. Water, 12 (12), 3396, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123....
 
17.
SMITH C.S., RUDD M.E., GITTMAN R.K., MELVIN E.C., PATTERSON V.S., RENZI J.J., SILLIMAN B.R. Coming to terms with living shorelines: a scoping review of novel restoration strategies for shoreline protection. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 434, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.....
 
18.
MCCULLOUGH C.H.D., SCHULTZE M., VANDENBERG J. Realizing beneficial end uses from abandoned pit lakes. Minerals, 10 (2), 133, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/min100....
 
19.
SCHULTZE M., VANDENBERG J., MCCULLOUGH C.D., CASTENDYK D. The future direction of pit lakes: part 1, Research needs. Mine Water and the Environment, 41 (2), 533, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230....
 
20.
MANTERO J., THOMAS R., HOLM E., RÄÄF C., VIOQUE I., RUIZ-CÁNOVAS C., ISAKSSON M. Pit lakes from Southern Sweden: natural radioactivity and elementary characterization. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 13712, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598... PMid:32792592 PMCid:PMC7426949.
 
21.
BENTHAUS F.C., TOTSCHE O., LUCKNER L. In-lake neutralization of East German lignite pit lakes: technical history and new approaches from LMBV. Mine Water and the Environment, 39 (3), 603, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230....
 
22.
CVIJANOVIĆ D. Conservation Value and Habitat Diversity of Fluvial Lakes and Gravel Pits in River-Floodplain Systems. In: Pešić V., Milošević D., Miliša M. (eds) Small Water Bodies of the Western Balkans. Springer Water. Springer, Cham, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
23.
IOANNIDOU D., SONNEMANN G., SUH S. Do we have enough natural sand for low‐carbon infrastructure? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24 (5), 1004, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.1....
 
24.
MING A., ROWELL I., LEWIN S., ROUSE R., AUBRY T., BOLAND E. Key messages from the IPCC AR6 climate science report, 2021. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top