ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Introduction of Resin Barrier to Improve the Efficiency of Electrokinetic Remediation for Pb-Contaminated Soil
,
 
,
 
,
 
Fei Ye 1
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Hebei Key Laboratory of Heavy Metal Deep-Remediation in Water and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
 
2
Hebei Key Laboratory of Agroecological Safety, Hebei University of Environmental Engineering, Qinhuangdao 066102, China
 
 
Submission date: 2023-10-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-01-22
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-03-24
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-11
 
 
Publication date: 2025-01-02
 
 
Corresponding author
Shuaijie Wang   

Hebei Key Laboratory of Heavy Metal Deep-Remediation in Water and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Yanshan University, China
 
 
Haiyun Qi   

Hebei Key Laboratory of Agroecological Safety, Hebei University of Environmental Engineering, Qinhuangdao 066102, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(1):867-877
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Developing an effective strategy to solve the “focus effect” of the traditional electrokinetic remediation (EKR) method during treatment of Pb-contaminated soil is challenging, but meaningful. Here, a novel permeable reactive barrier was constructed by coupling H+ modified D001 resins (H-type D001) with the electrokinetic remediation (EKR) method to achieve this goal. Owing to the existence of ion exchange between Pb2+ and H+, after introduction of H-type D001 resin into the EKR systems, the “focusing effect” was significantly weakened. To be specific, Pb2+ ions were effectively adsorbed by the resin barrier (RB) before migrating to the precipitation zone, and the adsorption of Pb2+ ions enabled H+ ions to be desorbed from the H-type D001 resins, thus improving the pH environment required for EKR. As a result, Pb2+ removal efficiency of the traditional EKR method was improved. Compared with the EKR method, the removal efficiency of Pb in soil by the RB-EKR method improved by 37.8%, relatively. Analysis on mass distribution proportion of Pb removed indicated that the majority (53.01%) of Pb was removed by RB adsorption process. This work provides a simple but effective method for modifying the traditional electrokinetic remediation system to improve remediation ability towards treating heavy metal-polluted soil.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
LADO L.R., HENGL T., REUTER H.I. Heavy metals in European soils: a geostatistical analysis of the FOREGS Geochemical database. Geoderma. 148, 189, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
2.
MARRUGO-NEGRETE J., PINEDO-HERNÁNDEZ J., DÍEZ S. Assessment of heavy metal pollution, spatial distribution and origin in agricultural soils along the Sinú River Basin, Colombia. Environmental Research. 154, 380, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr... PMid:28189028.
 
3.
KUMAR V., SHARMA A., KAUR P., SINGH SIDHU G.P., BALI A.S., BHARDWAJ R., THUKRAL A.K., CERDA A. Pollution assessment of heavy metals in soils of India and ecological risk assessment: A state-of-the-art. Chemosphere. 216, 449, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem... PMid:30384315.
 
4.
SÁNCHEZ-CASTRO I, MOLINA L, PRIETOFERNÁNDEZ M Á, et al. Past, present and future trends in the remediation of heavy-metal contaminated soil-Remediation techniques applied in real soil-contamination events. Heliyon. 9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:37484356 PMCid:PMC10360604.
 
5.
CHEN Y.G., HE X.L.S., HUANG J.H., LUO R., GE H.Z. Impacts of heavy metals and medicinal crops on ecological systems, environmental pollution, cultivation, and production processes in China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 219, 112336, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoe... PMid:34044310.
 
6.
WANG L. Damage and remediation of soil heavy metal pollution. Modern Agriculture. 487, 73, 2017.
 
7.
HE X.W., WANG Y.X., FANG Z.Q., CUI X.Y., ZHANG S.Y. Pollution characteristics and pollution risk evaluation of heavy metals in soil of lead-zinc mining area. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology. 6, 476, 2016.
 
8.
CHEN Y., CHEN X., JIANG R., LI S., MA X., SUN Y., ZHANG T., FENG Z. Bioaccumulation characteristics of typical pollutants in seafood from coastal waters of Jiangsu, China. Continental Shelf Research. 263, 105030, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.....
 
9.
WIECZOREK J., BARAN A., BUBAK A. Mobility, bioaccumulation in plants, and risk assessment of metals in soils. Science of The Total Environment. 882, 163574, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:37084910.
 
10.
ALI A., HUSSAIN M.Z., AZAM S.M., MUSTAFA G., AFZAL G., IDREES M., LQBAL K.J. Studies on bioaccumulation of lead and arsenic in different tissues of Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 57, 254, 2023.
 
11.
LI X.Y., YE F., ZHANG H., AHMAD MUNIR, ZENG Z.X., WANG S.J., WANG S.F., GAO D.W., ZHANG Q.R. Ternary rGO decorated W18O49@g-C3N4 composite as a full-spectrum-responded Z-scheme photocatalyst for efficient photocatalytic H2O2 production and water disinfection. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 11 (4), 110329, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece....
 
12.
AYYANAR A., THATIKONDA S. Experimental and Numerical studies on remediation of mixed metal-contaminated sediments by electrokinetics focusing on fractionation changes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 193, 316, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661... PMid:33931801.
 
13.
VILLEN-GUZMAN M., PAZ-GARCIA J.M., AMAYA-SANTOS G. Effects of the buffering capacity of the soil on the mobilization of heavy metals. Equilibrium and kinetics. Chemosphere. 131, 78, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem... PMid:25781866.
 
14.
MOHAMADI S., SAEEDI M., MOLLAHOSSEINI A. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mixed contaminants from a high buffering soil by focusing on mobility risk. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 7, 103470, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece....
 
15.
PHAM T.D., SILLANPÄÄ M. Electrokinetic remediation of organic contamination. Environmental Technology Reviews. 4, 103, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/216225....
 
16.
ZHANG S., ZHANG J., CHENG X., MEI Y., HU C., WANG M., LI G.F. Electrokinetic remediation of soil containing Cr(VI) by photovoltaic solar panels and a DC‐DC converter. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 90, 693, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4....
 
17.
GIDUDU B., CHIRWA E.M.N. The Role of pH, Electrodes, Surfactants, and Electrolytes in Electrokinetic Remediation of Contaminated Soil. Molecules. 27, 7381, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecu... PMid:36364207 PMCid:PMC9657640.
 
18.
LU P., FENG Q., MENG Q., YUAN T. Electrokinetic remediation of chromium- and cadmium-contaminated soil from abandoned industrial site. Separation & Purification Technology. 98, 216, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepp....
 
19.
CAMESELLE C. Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of a contaminated soil. Electrochimica Acta. 181, 31, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elec....
 
20.
ZHOU D.M., DENG C.F., CANG L., ALSHAWABKEH A.N. Electrokinetic remediation of a Cu-Zn contaminated red soil by controlling the voltage and conditioning catholyte pH. Chemosphere. 61, 519, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chem... PMid:16202805.
 
21.
TANEJA S., KARACA O., HARITASH A.K. Combined effects of high voltage gradient and electrolyte conditioning on electrokinetic remediation for chromium (VI)-contaminated soils. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. 34 (13), 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210....
 
22.
GAO J.M., CAI Z.P., SUN S.Y., LIAO X.J., HUANG X.R., CHEN H.S., LIU J.Y. Study on circulation-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals with different organic acids as electrolytes. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae. 43, 9, 2023.
 
23.
SHAO Y.Y., XIONG B. Process and influence factors of electro-kinetic remediation of chromium contaminated soil. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering. 10, 10, 2016.
 
24.
CAI Z., SUN Y., DENG Y., ZHENG X., SUN S., SINKKONEN A., ROMANTSCHUK M. Enhanced Electrokinetic Remediation of Cadmium (Cd)-Contaminated Soil with Interval Power Breaking. International Journal of Environmental Research. 16, 31, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742....
 
25.
ROSESTOLATO D., BAGATIN R., FERRO S. Electrokinetic remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals (mercury in particular). Chemical Engineering Journal. 264, 16, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
 
26.
XU Y., LU Q., LI J., WAN L., CHEN S., LU Y. Effect of humus on the remediation of arsenic-contaminated soil by electrokinetic technology. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 21, 101297, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.....
 
27.
HU W., CHENG W.C., WANG Y., WEN S., XUE Z.F. Applying a nanocomposite hydrogel electrode to mitigate polarization and focusing effect in electrokinetic remediation of an Cu-and Pb-contaminated loess. Environmental Pollution. 333, 122039, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp... PMid:37336350.
 
28.
NG Y.S., SEN GUPTA B., HASHIM M.A. Remediation of Pb/Cr co-contaminated soil using electrokinetic process and approaching electrode technique. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23, 546, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:26330317.
 
29.
TANG J., HE J., XIN X., HU H., LIU T. Biosurfactants enhanced heavy metals removal from sludge in the electrokinetic treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal. 334, 2579, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
 
30.
XU Y., XIA W., HOU H., ZHANG J., QIAN G. Remediation of chromium-contaminated soil by electrokinetics and electrokinetics coupled with CaAl-LDH permeable reaction barrier. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 24, 20479, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:28710730.
 
31.
CHEN J.L., YANG S.F., WU C.C., TONG S.S. Effect of ammonia as a complexing agent on electrokinetic remediation of copper-contaminated soil. Separation and Purification Technology. 79, 157, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepp....
 
32.
RYU B.G., PARK G.Y., YANG J.W., BAEK K. Electrolyte conditioning for electrokinetic remediation of As, Cu, and Pb-contaminated soil. Separation and Purification Technology. 79, 170, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepp....
 
33.
KIM W.S., KIM S.O., KIM K.W. Enhanced electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from soils assisted by ion exchange membranes. Journal of Hazardous Materials. B118, 93, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhaz... PMid:15721533.
 
34.
MERDOUD O., AKRETCHE D.E. Electroremediation of an industrial area contaminated by chromium. Journal of Environmental Science and Health (Part A). 43, 866, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/109345... PMid:18569296.
 
35.
LIU F., FU R.B., XU Z. Optimization of electrode configuration in soil electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science. 36, 678, 2015.
 
36.
MARIN N.M., DOLETE G., MOTELICA L., TRUSCA R., OPREA O.C., FICAI A. Preparation of Eco-Friendly Chelating Resins and Their Applications for Water Treatment. Polymers. 15, 2251, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1... PMid:37242827 PMCid:PMC10223174.
 
37.
TANG Q., WU H., ZHOU M., YANG D. Preparation of a new gel-type lignin-based cationic adsorption resin for efficient removal of Ca2+ from aqueous solutions. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 241, 124505, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbi... PMid:37085079.
 
38.
FU L., ZU J., HE L., GU E., WANG H. An adsorption study of 99Tc using nanoscale zero-valent iron supported on D001 resin. Frontiers in Energy. 14, 11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708....
 
39.
ZHENG Y., XIONG C., YAO C., YE F., JIANG J., ZHENG X., ZHENG Q. Adsorption performance and mechanism for removal of Cd (II) from aqueous solutions by D001 cation-exchange resin. Water Science and Technology. 69, 833, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.20... PMid:24569284.
 
40.
ZENG Y.G., LI L. Study on treatment of heavy metal ions of chemical wastewater by ion exchange resin. Advanced Materials Research. 955, 2230, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.sc....
 
41.
WANG S., YIN W., BU H., ZENG W., LI P., ZHENG X., CHANG P., WU J. A facile modification of cation exchange resin by nano-sized goethite for enhanced Cr (VI) removal from water. Environmental Technology. 43, 1833, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/095933... PMid:33225859.
 
42.
KUANG S.P., DONG Z.W., WANG B.C., WANG H.H., LI J.L., SHAO H.B. Changes of sensitive microbial community in oil polluted soil in the coastal area in Shandong, China for ecorestoration. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 207, 111551, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoe... PMid:33254409.
 
43.
WU J.N., ZHANG J., XIAO C. Focus on factors affecting pH, flow of Cr and transformation between Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in the soil with different electrolytes. Electrochimica Acta. 211, 652, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elec....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top