ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Kinetics of Oxygen Dissolution and Modeling of the Aeration Process in Wastewater Treatment Bioreactors
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Hydraulic and Water Engineering, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12 Stepan Bandera Str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79013
 
 
Submission date: 2026-04-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-07-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-07-31
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-09-18
 
 
Corresponding author
Vadym Fasuliak   

Department of Hydraulic and Water Engineering, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 12 Stepan Bandera Str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79013
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Aeration is a key and the most energy-intensive process in biological wastewater treatment using activated sludge systems in aeration tanks, accounting for up to 50-90% of the total energy consumption of wastewater treatment plants. The efficiency of biological treatment largely depends on providing activated sludge microorganisms with a sufficient concentration of dissolved oxygen as well as ensuring proper mixing of the sludge mixture within the reactor. Therefore, improving the efficiency of aeration systems is an important task for reducing operational costs and increasing the overall sustainability of wastewater treatment facilities.
This paper examines the theoretical foundations of the aeration process in biological wastewater treatment systems. Particular attention is given to the mechanisms of oxygen mass transfer from the gas phase into the liquid phase and the factors influencing this process. The key parameters characterizing oxygen transfer efficiency are analyzed, including the volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient (KLa) and the α-factor, which reflects the influence of wastewater properties on oxygen transfer. Understanding these parameters is essential for the correct design, optimization, and operation of aeration systems in activated sludge reactors. The presented theoretical analysis contributes to improving the energy efficiency and operational performance of modern wastewater treatment plants.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
FAN H., QI L., LIU G., ZHANG Y., FAN Q., WANG H. Aeration optimization through operation at low dissolved oxygen concentrations: Evaluation of oxygen mass transfer dynamics in different activated sludge systems. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 55, 224, 2017.
 
2.
DREWNOWSKI J., REMISZEWSKA-SKWAREK A., DUDA S., ŁAGÓD G. Aeration process in bioreactors as the main energy consumer in a wastewater treatment plant.Review of Solutions and Methods of Process Optimization. Processes, 7 (5), 311, 2019.
 
3.
WHITMAN W.G. The two-film theory of gas absorption. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 5, 429, 1962.
 
4.
ABUSAM A., KEESMAN K.J., SPANJERS H., VAN STRATEN G., MEINEMA K. Evaluation of control strategies using an oxidation ditch benchmark. Water Science and Technology, 45 (4-5), 151, 2002.
 
5.
BOUJELBEN I., SAMET Y., MESSAOUD M., BEN MAKHLOUF M., MAALEJ S. Descriptive and multivariate analyses of four Tunisian wastewater treatment plants: A comparison between different treatment processes and their efficiency improvement. Journal of Environmental Management, 187, 63, 2016.
 
6.
FRANKE M., JUNG R., FAULSTICH M. Energy optimization of wastewater treatment plants. Wasser und Abfall, 12, 30, 2010.
 
7.
MASŁON A., CZARNOTA J., SZAJA A., SZULZYK-CIEPLAK J., ŁAGÓD G. The enhancement of energy efficiency in a wastewater treatment plant through sustainable biogas use: Case study from Poland. Energies, 13 (22), 6056, 2020.
 
8.
MYSZOGRAJ S., BOCHEŃSKI D., MĄKOWSKI M., PŁUCIENNIK-KOROPCZUK E. Biogas, solar and geothermal energy-The way to a net-zero energy wastewater treatment plant: A case study. Energies, 14 (21), 6898, 2021.
 
9.
HAO X., LIU R., HUANG X. Evaluation of the potential for operating carbon neutral WWTPs in China. Water Research, 87, 424, 2015.
 
10.
PARMAR R., MAJUMDER S.K. Microbubble generation and microbubble-aided transport process intensification-A state-of-the-art report. Chemical Engineering and Processing, Process Intensification, 64, 79, 2013.
 
11.
GLOVER G.C., PRINTEMPS C., ESSEMIANI K., MEINHOLD J. Modelling of wastewater treatment plants - How far shall we go with sophisticated modelling tools? Water Science and Technology, 53 (3), 79, 2006.
 
12.
LE MOULLEC Y., POTIER O., GENTRIC C., LECLERC J.P. Activated sludge pilot plant: Comparison between experimental and predicted concentration profiles using three different modelling approaches. Water Research, 45 (10), 3085, 2011.
 
13.
SHUKLA B.K., GOEL A., SHARMA P.K., SIHAG P., SHUKLA A.K. Machine learning enhanced aeration systems for optimizing oxygen transfer efficiency for sustainable and safe wastewater management. Scientific Reports, 15, 2025.
 
14.
KIZHISSERI M.I., SAKR M., MARAQA M., MOHAMED M.M. A comparative bench scale study of oxygen transfer dynamics using micro-nano bubbles and conventional aeration in water treatment systems. Heliyon, 11 (4), e41687, 2025.
 
15.
ABU HASAN H., AZAHAR N.A., MUHAMAD M.H. Insights into aeration intensification in biofilm reactors for efficient wastewater treatment. Water, 17 (13), 1861, 2025.
 
16.
HASAN D.N., MIZZOURI N.S. Optimization of wastewater aeration time in decentralized sequencing batch reactors in Duhok City, Iraq. ARO - The Scientific Journal of Koya University, 14 (1), 137, 2026. https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.1....
 
17.
NGUYEN A.T., TANIGUCHI T., ECIOLAZA L., CAMPOS V., PALHARES R., SUGENO M. Fuzzy control systems: Past, present and future. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 14 (1), 56, 2019.
 
18.
VERA I., SÁEZ K., VIDAL G. Performance of 14 full-scale sewage treatment plants: Comparison between four aerobic technologies regarding effluent quality, sludge production and energy consumption. Environmental Technology, 34 (15), 2267, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/095933... PMid:24350481.
 
19.
GU Y., LI Y., YUAN F., YANG Q. Optimization and control strategies of aeration in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418 (2), 138008, 2023.
 
20.
HERRMANN-HEBER R., REINECKE S.F., HAMPEL U. Dynamic aeration for improved oxygen mass transfer in the wastewater treatment process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 386 (56), 122068, 2020.
 
21.
METCALF & EDDY. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, USA, pp. 55, 2014.
 
22.
FENU A., GUGLIELMI G., JIMENEZ J., SPERANDIO M., SAROJ D., LESJEAN B., BREPOLS C., THOEYE C., NOPENS I. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: A critical review with special regard to MBR specificities. Water Research, 44 (15), 4272, 2010.
 
23.
DOWNING A.L., SCRAGG L.J. The effect of synthetic detergents on the rate of aeration in diffused-air activated sludge plants. Water & Waste Treatment Journal, 7, 102, 1958.
 
24.
DOWNING A.L., TRUESDALE G.A. Some factors affecting the rate of solution of oxygen in water. Journal of Applied Chemistry, 5 (10), 570, 1955.
 
25.
CALDERBANK P.H., MOO-YOUNG M.B. The continuous phase heat and mass-transfer properties of dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science, 16 (1-2), 39, 1961.
 
26.
AKITA K., YOSHIDA F. Gas holdup and volumetric mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 12 (1), 76, 1973.
 
27.
GARCIA-OCHOA F., GOMEZ E., SANTOS V.E., MERCHUK J. Oxygen uptake rate in microbial processes: An overview. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 49 (3), 289, 2010.
 
28.
HENKEL J. Oxygen Transfer Phenomena in Activated Sludge. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt: Darmstadt, Germany, 2010.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top