ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Mapping Scientific Knowledge in Biomass
and Energy Conservation: Exploring Global
Research Trends and Future Directions
through Scientometric Analysis
More details
Hide details
1
International Faculty of Applied Technology, Yibin University, Yibin, 644000, Sichuan, PR China
2
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, 644000, Sichuan, PR China
3
Independent Scholar, Fene, 15520, Spain
4
Trier College of Sustainable Technology, Yantai University, Yantai Shandong, PR China
Submission date: 2024-08-12
Final revision date: 2024-11-30
Acceptance date: 2025-01-24
Online publication date: 2025-03-24
Muhammad Abid
International Faculty of Applied Technology, Yibin University, Yibin, 644000, Sichuan, PR China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Burning fossil fuels is a major contributor to global warming and climate change, threatening
biodiversity and presenting challenges for scientists and policymakers. To address these issues and
promote sustainable development, bioenergy is based on efficiently utilizing biomass resources such as
biomass feedstock for energy. Moreover, intensified global changes adversely affect our environment,
signifying the importance of biomass and energy conservation research as a re-emerging topic of
scientific interest. This study aims to comprehensively review the existing research trends, knowledge
gaps, and future research in this field. A scientometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace based
on 1177 articles retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection from 2000 to 2021. The leading
countries, authors, and institutions are the USA, the Chinese Academy of Science, and Prof. Dr. Mehdi
Bidabadi, respectively. The “Biomass and Bioenergy” is a prominent journal. European and North
American countries collectively contribute around 73% of the publications. While there has been an
increasing trend in publications over time, effective cooperation among institutions and authors, especially
in developing countries, remains weak. The current research hotspots include “metabolic pathway”,
“Clostridium ljungdahlii”, “short-term harvesting”, “anaerobic digestion”, “environmental impacts”,
and so on. Future research will focus on cutting-edge techniques, the potential of biomass feedstocks
for bioenergy, and the role of biomass feedstocks in mitigating climate change. This review provides comprehensive and valuable information for researchers, institutions, and policymakers to develop an
effective, environmentally friendly, and sustainable strategy to cope with global environmental issues.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (69)
1.
GIELEN D., GORINI R., WAGNER N., LEME R., GUTIERREZ L., PRAKASH G., ASMELASH E., JANEIRO L., GALLINA G., VALE G. Global energy transformation: a roadmap to 2050. IRENA. 2019.
2.
CASTOR J., BACHA K., NERINI F.F. SDGs in action: A novel framework for assessing energy projects against the sustainable development goals. Energy Research & Social Science. 68, 101556, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss....
3.
SAXENA R., ROSERO-CHASOY G., APARICIO E., LARA A., LOREDO A., ROBLEDO A., KOSTAS E.T., RODRÍGUEZ-JASSO R.M., RUIZ H.A. Third Generation Biorefineries Using Micro-and Macro-Algae. Springer, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
4.
TAZIKEH S., ZENDEHBOUDI S., GHAFOORI S., LOHI A., MAHINPEY N. Algal Bioenergy Production and Utilization: Technologies, Challenges, and Prospects. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 10 (3), 107863, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece....
5.
IRFAN M., RAZZAQ A., CHUPRADIT S., JAVID M., RAUF A., FAROOQI T.J.A. Hydrogen production potential from agricultural biomass in Punjab province of Pakistan. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47 (5), 2846, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhy....
6.
ABID M., WU J., SEYEDSALEHI M., HU Y.-Y., GUANGLIANG T. Novel insights of impacts of solid content on high solid anaerobic digestion of cow manure: kinetics and microbial community dynamics. Bioresource Technology. 333 (3), 125205, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior... PMid:33932808.
7.
PEREA-MORENO M.-A., SAMERÓN-MANZANO E., PEREA-MORENO A.-J. Biomass as renewable energy: Worldwide research trends. Sustainability. 11 (3), 863, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su1103....
8.
KANG Y., YANG Q., BARTOCCI P., WEI H., LIU S.S., WU Z., ZHOU H., YANG H., FANTOZZI F., CHEN H. Bioenergy in China: evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 127, 109842, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser... PMid:34234613 PMCid:PMC7144861.
9.
IRFAN M., RIAZ M., ARIF M.S., SHAHZAD S.M., HUSSAIN S., AKHTAR M.J., VAN DEN BERG L., ABBAS F. Spatial distribution of pollutant emissions from crop residue burning in the Punjab and Sindh provinces of Pakistan: uncertainties and challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 22 (21), 16475, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:26396020.
10.
LOHAN S.K., JAT H., YADAV A.K., SIDHU H., JAT M., CHOUDHARY M., PETER J.K., SHARMA P. Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81, 693, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
11.
YIN S., WANG X., XIAO Y., TANI H., ZHONG G., SUN Z. Study on spatial distribution of crop residue burning and PM2. 5 change in China. Environmental Pollution. 220, 204, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp... PMid:27646169.
12.
PIEROBON F., SIFFORD C., VELAPPAN H., GANGULY I. Air quality impact of slash pile burns: Simulated geospatial impact assessment for Washington State. Science of The Total Environment. 818, 151699, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:34798086.
13.
BABU S., RATHORE S.S., SINGH R., KUMAR S., SINGH V.K., YADAV S., YADAV V., RAJ R., YADAV D., SHEKHAWAT K. Exploring agricultural waste biomass for energy, food and feed production and pollution mitigation: A review. Bioresource Technology. 360 (2), 127566, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior... PMid:35788385.
14.
CHERUBINI F., ULGIATI S. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems-A LCA case study. Applied Energy. 87 (1), 47, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
16.
LAURIJSSEN J., MARSIDI M., WESTENBROEK A., WORRELL E., FAAIJ A. Paper and biomass for energy?: The impact of paper recycling on energy and CO2 emissions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 54 (12), 1208, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc....
17.
CHEN J., ZHANG B., LUO L., ZHANG F., YI Y., SHAN Y., LIU B., ZHOU Y., WANG X., LÜ X. A review on recycling techniques for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 149, 111370, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
18.
AMPESE L.C., SGANZERLA W.G., ZIERO H.D.D., MUDHOO A., MARTINS G., FORSTER-CARNEIRO T. Research progress, trends, and updates on anaerobic digestion technology: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 331, 130004, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
19.
JIMÉNEZ-ISLAS D., PÉREZ-ROMERO M.E., RIVERARÍOS J.M., FLORES-ROMERO M.B. A Bibliometric Analysis of Sugar Beet for Production of Biofuels. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 11 (3), 57, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep....
20.
KNAPCZYK A., FRANCIK S., JEWIARZ M., ZAWIŚLAK A., FRANCIK R. Thermal treatment of biomass: A bibliometric analysis-The torrefaction case. Energies. 14 (1), 162, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en1401....
21.
FERRARI G., PEZZUOLO A., NIZAMI A.-S., MARINELLO F. Bibliometric Analysis of Trends in Biomass for Bioenergy Research. Energies. 13 (14), 3714, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en1314....
22.
FAROOQI T.J.A., IRFAN M., PORTELA R., ZHOU X., SHULIN P., ALI A. Global progress in climate change and biodiversity conservation research. Global Ecology and Conservation. 38, e02272, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecc....
23.
LIAO H., TANG M., LI Z., LEV B. Bibliometric analysis for highly cited papers in operations research and management science from 2008 to 2017 based on Essential Science Indicators. Omega. 88, 223, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omeg....
24.
SOBRAL M., PESTANA M. Virtual reality and dementia: A bibliometric analysis. The European Journal of Psychiatry. 34 (3), 120, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps....
25.
LIN B., SU T. Mapping the oil price-stock market nexus researches: A scientometric review. International Review of Economics & Finance. 67, 133, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref....
26.
FAROOQI T.J.A., IRFAN M., ZHOU X., PAN S., ATTA A., LI J. Advancing Knowledge in Forest Water Use Efficiency Under Global Climate Change Through Scientometric Analysis. Forests. 15 (11), 1893, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15111....
27.
FAROOQI T.J.A., PORTELA R., XU Z., PAN S., IRFAN M., ALI A. Advancing forest hydrological research: exploring global research trends and future directions through scientometric analysis. Journal of Forestry Research. 35 (1), 128, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676....
28.
JACKSON R., FRIEDLINGSTEIN P., ANDREW R., CANADELL J., LE QUÉRÉ C., PETERS G. Persistent fossil fuel growth threatens the Paris Agreement and planetary health. Environmental Research Letters. 14 (12), 121001, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9....
29.
WBA W.B.A. WBA global bioenergy statistics 2017. World Bioenergy Association, Stockholm. 2017.
30.
ALEIXANDRE-TUDÓ J.L., CASTELLÓ-COGOLLOS L., ALEIXANDRE J.L., ALEIXANDRE-BENAVENT R. Renewable energies: Worldwide trends in research, funding and international collaboration. Renewable Energy. 139, 268, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
31.
FU C., MIELENZ J.R., XIAO X., GE Y., HAMILTON C.Y., RODRIGUEZ M., CHEN F., FOSTON M., RAGAUSKAS A., BOUTON J. Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (9), 3803, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1... PMid:21321194 PMCid:PMC3048149.
32.
PERLACK R.D. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billionton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.2172/885984 PMid:35665177.
33.
DEVI A., BAJAR S., KOUR H., KOTHARI R., PANT D., SINGH A. Lignocellulosic biomass valorization for bioethanol production: a circular bioeconomy approach. Bioenergy Research. 15 (4), 1820, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155... PMid:35154558 PMCid:PMC8819208.
34.
AHORSU R., MEDINA F., CONSTANTÍ M. Significance and challenges of biomass as a suitable feedstock for bioenergy and biochemical production: A review. Energies. 11 (12), 3366, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en1112....
35.
ELDIEHY K.S., BARDHAN P., BORAH D., GOHAIN M., RATHER M.A., DEKA D., MANDAL M. A comprehensive review on microalgal biomass production and processing for biodiesel production. Fuel. 324, 124773, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel....
37.
EDWARDS J., OTHMAN M., BURN S. A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 52, 815, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
38.
XUE S., SONG J., WANG X., SHANG Z., SHENG C., LI C., ZHU Y., LIU J. A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 117, 109474, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
39.
SCARLAT N., FAHL F., DALLEMAND J.-F., MONFORTI F., MOTOLA V. A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 94, 915, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
41.
STATISTICS G.B. World Bioenergy Association: Stockholm, Sweden. 2021.
43.
TRAPANI J., HALE K. Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science & Engineering Indicators 2020. National Science Foundation. 2019.
44.
ZHANG J., ZHANG Y., HU L., HUANG X., LIU Y., LI J., HU Q., XU J., YU H. Global trends and performances of magnetic resonance imaging studies on acupuncture: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14, 1415, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.... PMid:33551731 PMCid:PMC7854454.
45.
TILMAN D., HILL J., LEHMAN C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science. 314 (5805), 1598, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc... PMid:17158327.
46.
ADAK M.K., GHOSH A. Microbial Biomass for Sustainable and Renewable Energy in Wasteland Ecosystem and its Assessment. In book: Recent Technologies for Waste to Clean Energy and its Utilization, Springer Nature Singapore. 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
47.
ZHANG J., LUO W., WANG Z., CHEN Y., FU J., XU J., LV P. High-Level Production of Recombinant Lipase by Fed-Batch Fermentation in Escherichia coli and Its Application in Biodiesel Synthesis from Waste Cooking Oils. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 195 (1), 432, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010... PMid:36087232.
48.
SUNDARAM T., RAJENDRAN S., GNANASEKARAN L., RACHMADONA N., JIANG J.-J., KHOO K.S., SHOW P.L. Bioengineering strategies of microalgae biomass for biofuel production: recent advancement and insight. Bioengineered. 14 (1), 2252228, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1080/216559... PMid:37661811 PMCid:PMC10478748.
49.
SANGEETHA J., THANGADURAI D. Microalgal Biomass for Bioenergy Applications. Elsevier. 2023.
50.
GUO Z., WANG L., YU C. Over-expressing NadA quinolinate synthase in Escherichia coli enhances the bioelectrochemistry in microbial fuel cells. Biology Open. 12 (3), bio059554, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.05... PMid:36877035 PMCid:PMC10084859.
51.
POULSEN M., SCHWAB C., JENSEN B.B., ENGBERG R.M., SPANG A., CANIBE N., HØJBERG O., MILINOVICH G., FRAGNER L., SCHLEPER C. Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen. Nature Communications. 4 (1), 1, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms... PMid:23385573.
52.
SCHULZ S., MOLITOR B., ANGENENT L.T. Acetate augmentation boosts the ethanol production rate and specificity by Clostridium ljungdahlii during gas fermentation with pure carbon monoxide. Bioresource Technology. 369, 128387, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior... PMid:36435417.
53.
ANAWAR H.M., STREZOV V. Mutual effects of climate change and energy crops and their controls on biomass and bioenergy production. CRC Press. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1201/978131....
54.
LIU C.L.C., KUCHMA O., KRUTOVSKY K.V. Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Global Ecology and Conservation. 15, e00419, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecc....
55.
ZHOU H., TAN W., QIU Z., SONG Y., GAO S. A bibliometric analysis in gene research of myocardial infarction from 2001 to 2015. PeerJ. 6, e4354, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.... PMid:29456889 PMCid:PMC5813587.
56.
SAINJU U.M., SINGH H.P., SINGH B.P., WHITEHEAD W.F., CHILUWAL A., PAUDEL R. Cover crop and nitrogen fertilization influence soil carbon and nitrogen under bioenergy sweet sorghum. Agronomy Journal. 110 (2), 463, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj....
57.
RUIS S.J., BLANCO‐CANQUI H. Cover crops could offset crop residue removal effects on soil carbon and other properties: A review. Agronomy Journal. 109 (5), 1785, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj....
58.
PREZA-FONTES G., CHRISTIANSON L.E., GREER K., BHATTARAI R., PITTELKOW C.M. In-season split nitrogen application and cover cropping effects on nitrous oxide emissions in rainfed maize. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 326, 107813, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee....
59.
AUSTIN E.E., WICKINGS K., MCDANIEL M.D., ROBERTSON G.P., GRANDY A.S. Cover crop root contributions to soil carbon in a no‐till corn bioenergy cropping system. Gcb Bioenergy. 9 (7), 1252, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.1....
60.
LAUNAY C., HOUOT S., FRÉDÉRIC S., GIRAULT R., LEVAVASSEUR F., MARSAC S., CONSTANTIN J. Incorporating energy cover crops for biogas production into agricultural systems: benefits and environmental impacts. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 42 (4), 1, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593....
61.
RONZON T., SANJUÁN A.I. Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence. Journal of Cleaner Production. 254, 119832, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle... PMid:32362729 PMCid:PMC7171703.
62.
ZHU J., XIONG R., ZHAO F., PENG T., HU J., XIE L., XIE H., WANG K., JIANG C. Lightweight, high-strength, and anisotropic structure composite aerogel based on hydroxyapatite nanocrystal and chitosan with thermal insulation and flame retardant properties. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 8 (1), 71, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssus....
63.
FUJIMORI S., WU W., DOELMAN J., FRANK S., HRISTOV J., KYLE P., SANDS R., VAN ZEIST W.-J., HAVLIK P., DOMÍNGUEZ I.P. Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security. Nature Food. 3 (2), 110, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016... PMid:37117964.
64.
CHENG Y., HUANG M., LAWRENCE D.M., CALVIN K., LOMBARDOZZI D.L., SINHA E., PAN M., HE X. Future bioenergy expansion could alter carbon sequestration potential and exacerbate water stress in the United States. Science Advances. 8 (18), eabm8237, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv... PMid:35507646 PMCid:PMC11633087.
65.
MELILLO J., REILLY J., KICKLIGHTER D., GURGEL A., CRONIN T., PALTSEV S., SCHLOSSER C. Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important. Science. 326 (5958), 1397, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc... PMid:19933101.
66.
SEARCHINGER T., HEIMLICH R., HOUGHTON R.A., DONG F., ELOBEID A., FABIOSA J., TOKGOZ S., HAYES D., YU T.-H. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science. 319 (5867), 1238, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc... PMid:18258860 PMCid:PMC9104444.
67.
FARGIONE J., HILL J., TILMAN D., POLASKY S., HAWTHORNE P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science. 319 (5867), 1235, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc... PMid:18258862 PMCid:PMC9104444.
68.
TILMAN D., SOCOLOW R., FOLEY J.A., HILL J., LARSON E., LYND L., PACALA S., REILLY J., SEARCHINGER T., SOMERVILLE C. Beneficial biofuels-the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science. 325 (5938), 270, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc... PMid:19608900.
69.
FIELD C.B., CAMPBELL J.E., LOBELL D.B. Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 23 (2), 65, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree... PMid:18215439.