ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Matthew or Diffusion Effect: Impact of Digital
Finance on Green Innovation Gap?
More details
Hide details
1
School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Science and Technology,
No. 168 Taifeng Road, Huainan 232001, Anhui, Peoples R China
2
Mining Enterprise Safety Management of Humanities and Social Science Key Research Base in Anhui Province,
No. 168 Taifeng Road, Huainan 232001, Anhui, Peoples R China
3
Economics and Management School, Dongguan University of Technology, No. 1 University Road,
Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Submission date: 2024-05-08
Final revision date: 2024-08-16
Acceptance date: 2024-09-21
Online publication date: 2025-01-22
Publication date: 2025-11-04
Corresponding author
Chenhui Ding
Economics and Management School, Dongguan University of Technology, No. 1 University Road,
Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):7437-7455
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Digital finance can revolutionize the financial system and bridge the gap between urbanization
and green innovation. This study provides novel insights into how digital finance influences regional
green innovation disparities in China, using panel data from 284 prefectures (2011-2020). The findings
indicate that (1) regional green innovation experiences a “Matthew effect” of digital finance, with notable
variations in structure. This conclusion is robust to instrumental variable and difference-in-differences
tests. The “Matthew effect” shows a dynamic superposition effect with a diminishing marginal
effect in the time dimension. (2) Mechanism analysis suggests that while digital finance weakens the
“Matthew effect” by reducing financing restrictions and capital mismatch, it widens the regional green
innovation gap by promoting market demand, innovation, and entrepreneurial vigor. (3) Heterogeneity
analysis shows that the “Matthew effect” of digital finance on the green innovation gap is more
evident in cities with weak commercial charm. (4) Effective governance, including entrepreneurship,
intellectual property protection, and financial regulation, is crucial for mitigating the “Matthew effect.”
This study provides insights into the complex relationship between digital finance and regional green
innovation disparities, offering valuable implications for policymakers seeking to foster the harmonious
development of regional green innovation.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (54)
1.
OBOBISA E.S., CHEN H., MENSAH I.A. The impact of green technological innovation and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in African countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121670, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
2.
BORSATTO J.M.L.S., AMUI L.B.L. Green innovation: Unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 445, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resc... PMCid:PMC7592848.
3.
WANG K.-L., SUN T.-T., XU R.-Y., MIAO Z., CHENG Y.-H. How does internet development promote urban green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122017, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....
4.
LV Y., XIE Y., LOU X. Study on the Space-time transition and convergence trend of China's regional green innovation efficiency. The journal of quantitative economics & technological economics, 37 (05), 78, 2020.
5.
ZENG X., WEI M., ZHOU J. Digital economy, factor allocation, and regional technological convergence. Economic Survey, 40 (01), 3, 2023.
6.
LI D., ZENG T. Are China's intensive pollution industries greening? An analysis based on green innovation efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120901, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
7.
ABDULLAH M., ZAILANI S., IRANMANESH M., JAYARAMAN K. Barriers to green innovation initiatives among manufacturers: the Malaysian case. Review of Managerial Science, 10 (4), 683, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846....
8.
LIN B., MA R. How does digital finance influence green technology innovation in China? Evidence from the financing constraints perspective. J Environ Manage, 320, 115833, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv... PMid:35940011.
9.
TAGHIZADEH-HESARY F., PHOUMIN H., RASOULINEZHAD E. COVID-19 and regional solutions for mitigating the risk of SME finance in selected ASEAN member states. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74, 506, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.....
10.
WANG Z.J., YAN J.L., XU S.K., YI Z., HUANG Y.J., ZHANG X.D. Analysis of the impact of local government debt policy on the financial ecological environment-based on debt level and debt structure perspectives. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.....
11.
CALLENS I., TYTECA D. Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms A productive effciency perspective. Ecological Economics, 28 (1), 41, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-....
12.
CAO S.P., NIE L., SUN H.P., SUN W.F., TAGHIZADEH-HESARY F. Digital finance, green technological innovation and energy-environmental performance: Evidence from China's regional economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129458, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle....
13.
GOMBER P., KAUFFMAN R.J., PARKER C., WEBER B.W. On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35 (1), 220, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1080/074212....
14.
DEMERTZIS M., MERLER S., WOLFF G.B. Capital Markets Union and the Fintech Opportunity. Journal of Financial Regulation, 4 (1), 157, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fj....
16.
WU F., MAO C. Business Environment and Entrepreneurial Motivations of Urban Students. Front Psychol, 11, 1483, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.... PMid:32848974 PMCid:PMC7399197.
17.
AUTIO E. Strategic Entrepreneurial Internationalization: A Normative Framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11 (3), 211, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.12....
18.
VON BRIEL F., DAVIDSSON P., RECKER J. Digital Technologies as External Enablers of New Venture Creation in the IT Hardware Sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42 (1), 47, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1177/104225....
19.
WANG J., DENG K. Impact and mechanism analysis of smart city policy on urban innovation: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 574, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.....
20.
LI C., WEN M., JIANG S., WANG H. Assessing the effect of urban digital infrastructure on green innovation: mechanism identification and spatialtemporal characteristics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11 (1), 320, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599....
21.
LIBEN-NOWELL D., KLEINBERG J. Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (12), 4633, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0... PMid:18353985 PMCid:PMC2290760.
22.
WANG Y., XIUPING S., ZHANG Q. Can fintech improve the efficiency of commercial banks? - An analysis based on big data. Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 101338, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riba... PMCid:PMC10068213.
23.
XIE S., JIN C., SONG T., FENG C. Research on the long tail mechanism of digital finance alleviating the relative poverty of rural households. PLoS One, 18 (4), e0284988, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journa... PMid:37104485 PMCid:PMC10138262.
24.
ZHANG M., LIU Y. Influence of digital finance and green technology innovation on China's carbon emission efficiency: Empirical analysis based on spatial metrology. Sci Total Environ, 838 (Pt 3), 156463, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit... PMid:35660603.
25.
DUGGAL V.G., SALTZMAN C., KLEIN L.R. Infrastructure and productivity: An extension to private infrastructure and it productivity. Journal of Econometrics, 140 (2), 485, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeco....
26.
PHILIPPON T. Has the US Finance Industry Become Less Efficient? On the Theory and Measurement of Financial Intermediation. American Economic Review, 105 (4), 1408, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20....
27.
FUSTER A., GOLDSMITH-PINKHAM P., RAMADORAI T., WALTHER A. Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. The Journal of Finance, 77 (1), 5, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.1....
28.
WU G., CAI Y. A Study on the Impact of Digital Finance on the Efficiency of Urban Green Economy Development, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33 (3), 3431, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes... PMid:19183675.
29.
ZHOU G., ZHU J., LUO S. The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: Mediating effect of green finance. Ecological Economics, 193, 107308, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
30.
ZHANG L., XIANG G.-P., MA Y.-F. Analysis on the influence mechanism of digital finance on regional innovation gap. Reform, (05), 88, 2021.
31.
FENG S., ZHANG R., LI G. Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 61, 70, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stru....
32.
WANG X., WANG X., REN X., WEN F. Can digital financial inclusion affect CO2 emissions of China at the prefecture level? Evidence from a spatial econometric approach. Energy Economics, 109, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
33.
WANG L., WANG Y., SUN Y., HAN K., CHEN Y. Financial inclusion and green economic efficiency: evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65 (2), 240, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1080/096405....
34.
WANG X., ZHAO Y. Does the matthew effect exist in digital finance development? Empirical evidence from poor and non-poor households. Journal of Financial Research, (07), 114, 2020.
35.
FENG S., CHONG Y., LI G., ZHANG S. Digital finance and innovation inequality: evidence from green technological innovation in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29 (58), 87884, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356... PMid:35819670.
36.
YU J., ZHANG R., GONG X. How does digital finance affect green total factor productivity: Characteristics of dynamics, identification of mechanisms and spatial effects. Modern Economic Science, 44 (06), 42, 2022.
37.
DU C., ZHANG Y. The regional innovation effect of digital finance. Finance & Economics, (05), 30, 2020.
38.
ZHONG T., HUANG Y., SUN F. Digital inclusive finance and green technology innovation: Dividend or gap. Financial Economics Research, 37 (03), 131, 2022.
39.
GUO F., KONG T., WANG J. Analysis of the spatial agglomeration effect of Internet finance: Evidence from the Internet finance development index. Studies of International Finance, (08), 75, 2017.
40.
ZHANG X., WAN G., ZHANG J., HE Z. Digital economy, financial inclusion, and inclusive growth. Economic Research Journal, 54 (08), 71, 2019.
41.
WU Y., ZHANG Y. Digital economic and regional innovation: From the perspective of financing and intellectual property protection. South China Journal of Economics, (09), 36, 2021.
42.
BAI J.-H., LIU Y.-Y. Can outward foreign direct investment improve the resource misallocation of China. China Industrial Economics, (01), 60, 2018.
43.
SAUNILA M. Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5 (4), 260, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.....
44.
ZHAO T., ZHANG Z., LIANG S. Digital economy, entrepreneurship, and high-quality economic development: Empirical evidence from urban China. Management World, 36 (10), 65, 2020.
45.
LI Z., CHEN H., MO B. Can digital finance promote urban innovation? Evidence from China. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23 (2), 285, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.... PMCid:PMC11376576.
46.
ZHAO H., TANG H., LI S. Can Digital Finance Improve Urban Environmental Performance? Evidence From Partially Linear Functional-Coefficient Model. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33 (5), 5969, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
47.
FERRANDO A., RUGGIERI A. Financial constraints and productivity: Evidence from euro area companies. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 23 (3), 257, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1....
49.
LI W., PANG W. Digital inclusive finance, financial mismatch and the innovation capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Heliyon, 9 (2), e13792, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli... PMid:36865464 PMCid:PMC9971175.
50.
HANSEN B.E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93 (2), 345, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-....
51.
SONG D., LI C., LI X. Does the construction of new infrastructure promote the 'quantity' and 'quality' of green technological innovation. China population, resources and environment, 31 (11), 155, 2021.
52.
LIU C., LI Q., ZHANG S., WANG Y. How does financial technology affect enterprise innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Economic Review, (01), 30, 2022.
53.
QIN Z., FAN Z., ANDRIANARIMANANA M.H., YU S. Impact of Climate Risk on Farmers' Income: The Moderating Role of Digital Inclusive Finance. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33 (3), 2799, 2024.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
54.
FANG Z., RAZZAQ A., MOHSIN M., IRFAN M. Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China. Technology in Society, 68, 101844, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech....