ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Penman–Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation Models, Using Latitude–Temperature Data, in the State of Sinaloa, Mexico
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instituto Politécnico Nacional–Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR-IPN–SINALOA)
 
2
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa–Facultad de Ingeniería Mochis (UAS–FIM)
 
 
Submission date: 2024-07-08
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-10-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-10-28
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-12-30
 
 
Publication date: 2025-11-14
 
 
Corresponding author
Omar Llanes Cárdenas   

Instituto Politécnico Nacional–Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR-IPN–SINALOA)
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025;34(6):8063-8076
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The goal is to create regression models estimating the daily Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration (PMR) using latitude–temperature for the state of Sinaloa. The reference evapotranspiration was calculated (1979–2017) by the methods of Penman–Monteith using empirical equations (PMC), Hargreaves (HAC), and PMR. Prior to calculating PMC, the incident solar radiation (SR) was calculated. From the Acaponeta station (2005–2008, 2011–2013, and 2015–2017), all complete observed variables were obtained: mean temperature, incident solar radiation (SRg), average relative humidity, and average wind speed at a height of 10 m. The data from the eight weather stations were provided by the National Meteorological Service and the National Water Commission. The daily observed Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration (PMO) was calculated. For validation, three simple linear regressions (SLR) were applied: SR vs SRg, PMC vs PMO, and PMR vs PMO hypothesis tests were applied to each SLR: Pearson correlation (Pr) vs critical Pearson correlation (Pcr). All rP were significantly different from zero (> |0.576|): SRg vs SR (Pr = 0.951), PMC vs PMO ( Pr = 0 .592), and PMR vs PMO (Pr = 0.625). This study provides new models that can motivate and support intelligent irrigation in “the breadbasket of Mexico.”
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
RIBEIRO V.P., DESUÓ N.L., MARQUES P.A.A., ACHCAR J.A., JUNQUEIRA A.M., CHINATTO A.W., JR. JUNQUEIRA C.C.M., MACIEL C.D., BALESTIERI J.A.P. A Stochastic Bayesian Artificial Intelligence Framework to Assess Climatological Water Balance under Missing Variables for Evapotranspiration Estimates. Agronomy. 13, 2970, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agrono....
 
2.
RAHEEM A., AHMAD I., ARSHAD A., LIU J., REHMAN Z.U., SHAFEEQUE M., RAHMAN M.M., SAIFULLAH M., IQBAL U. Numerical Modeling of Groundwater Dynamics and Management Strategies for the Sustainable Groundwater Development in Water-Scarce Agricultural Region of Punjab, Pakistan. Water. 16, 34, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16010....
 
3.
UNITED NATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, POPULATION DIVISION. World Population Prospects. 2022.
 
4.
YU X.J., ZHANG L.X., ZHOU T.J., ZHENG J.H. Assessing the performance of CMIP6 models in simulating droughts across global drylands. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. 41 (2), 193, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376....
 
5.
ABEL D., ZIEGLER K., GBODE I.E., WEBER T., AJAYI O.V., TRAORÉ S.B., PAETH H. Robustness of climate indices relevant for agriculture in Africa deduced from GCMs and RCMs against reanalysis and gridded observations. Climate Dynamics. 62, 1077, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382....
 
6.
CARDOSO DO VALE T.M., CONSTANTINO S.M.E., BEZERRA C.J., BARBOSA A.L.M., BEZERRA B.G., TÔRRES R.D., RODRIGUES M.P. Climate and water balance influence on agricultural productivity over the Northeast Brazil. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 155, 879, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704....
 
7.
LLANES C.O., NORZAGARAY C.M., GAXIOLA A., PÉREZ G.E., MONTIEL M.J., TROYO D.E. Sensitivity of four indices of meteorological drought for rainfed maize yield prediction in the state of Sinaloa, Mexico. Agriculture. 12 (4), 525, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/agricu....
 
8.
GONZÁLEZ C.J.M., CERVANTES O.R., OJEDA B.W., LÓPEZ C.I. Predicción de la evapotranspiración de referencia mediante redes neuronales artificiales. Ingeniería Hidráulica de México. 23 (1), 127, 2008.
 
9.
SENTELHAS P.C., GILLESPIE T.J., SANTOS E.A. Evaluation of FAO Penman-Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada. Agricultural Water Management. 97 (5), 635, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwa....
 
10.
ZHANG J., ZHOU X., YANG S., AO Y. Spatiotemporal Variations in Evapotranspiration and Their Driving Factors in Southwest China between 2003 and 2020. Remote Sensing. 15, 4418, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1518....
 
11.
NIKOLAOU G., NEOCLEOUS D., MANES A., KITTA E. Calibration and validation of solar radiation‐based equations to estimate crop evapotranspiration in a semiarid climate. International Journal of Biometeorology. 68, 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484....
 
12.
SEKHAR S.M., PRASAD R.S., MAITY R. Climate change may cause oasification or desertification both: an analysis based on the spatio‐temporal change in aridity across India. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 155, 1167, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704....
 
13.
ESPINOSA E.B., FLORES M.H., HERNÁNDEZ R.A., CARRILLO F.G. Diseño de un sistema de riego hidrante parcelario con los métodos por turnos y Clement: análisis técnico económico. Terra Latinoamericana. 34 (4), 431, 2016.
 
14.
ZHAO L., WANG Y., SHI Y., ZHAO X., CUI N., ZHANG S. Selecting essential factors for predicting reference crop evapotranspiration through tree‐based machine learning and Bayesian optimization. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 155, 2953, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704....
 
15.
PEREIRA S.L., PAREDES P., OLIVEIRA M.C., MONTOYA F., LÓPEZ U.R., SALMAN M. Single and basal crop coefficients for estimation of water use of tree and vine woody crops with consideration of fraction of ground cover, height, and training system for Mediterranean and warm temperate fruit and leaf crops. Irrigation Science. 42 (6), 1019, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271....
 
16.
KIRAGA S., PETERS R.T., MOLAEI B., EVETT S.R., MAREK G. Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Genetic Algorithm-Optimized Machine Learning Models and Standardized Penman-Monteith Equation in a Highly Advective Environment. Water. 16 (1), 12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16010....
 
17.
PENG X., LIU X., WANG Y., CAI H. Evapotranspiration Partitioning and Estimation Based on Crop Coefficients of Winter Wheat Cropland in the Guanzhong Plain, China. Agronomy. 13, 2982, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agrono....
 
18.
FARMER W., STRZEPEK K., SCHLOSSER A.C., DROOGERS P., GAO X. A method for calculating reference evapotranspiration on daily time scales. Global Science Policy Change MIT. 195, 1, 2011.
 
19.
ALLEN R.G., PEREIRA L.S., RAES D., SMITH M. Evapotranspiración del cultivo: Guías para la determinación de los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos. Ed. FAO. 1998a.
 
20.
SABINO M., DE SOUZA A.P. Global Sensitivity of Penman-Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration to Climatic Variables in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Earth. 4, 714, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth4....
 
21.
ABDEL F.M.K., ABD E.K.S., ZHANG Z., MERWAD A.R.M.A. Exploring the Applicability of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks for Calculating Reference Evapotranspiration in Arid Regions. Sustainability. 15, 15494, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1521....
 
22.
ALLEN R.G., PEREIRA L.S., RAES D., SMITH M. Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO, FAO Irrigation and Drainage. 56, 300, 1998b.
 
23.
LIANG Y., FENG D., SUN Z., ZHU Y. Evaluation of Empirical Equations and Machine Learning Models for Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Prediction Using Public Weather Forecasts. Water. 15 (22), 3954, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15223....
 
24.
OKKAN U., FISTIKOGLU O., ERSOY B.Z., NOORI T.A. Analyzing the uncertainty of potential evapotranspiration models in drought projections derived for a semi‐arid watershed. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 155, 2329, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704....
 
25.
HARGREAVES G.H., SAMANI Z.A. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering Agriculture. 1 (2), 96, 1985. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.....
 
26.
TREZZA R. Estimación de la evapotranspiración de referencia a nivel mensual en Venezuela. cuál método utilizar? Bioagro. 20 (2), 89, 2008.
 
27.
TORO T.A.M., ARTEAGA R.R., VÁZQUEZ P.M.A., IBÁÑEZ C.L.A. Estimation models for the reference evapotranspiration value in the northern Banana zone of Antioquian Uraba (Colombia). Agrociencia. 49, 821, 2015.
 
28.
SECRETARÍA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERÍA, DESARROLLO RURAL, PESCA Y ALIMENTACIÓN (SAGARPA). Agenda Técnica Agrícola de Sinaloa, Segunda Edición; SAGARPA, Mexico City, Mexico, 242 p., 2015.
 
29.
COMISIÓN NACIONAL DEL AGUA (CONAGUA). Estaciones meteorológicas. 2024.
 
30.
COMISIÓN NACIONAL DEL AGUA (CONAGUA)-SERVICIO METEOROLÓGICO NACIONAL (SMN). Estaciones meteorológicas (Estación Acaponeta). 2024.
 
31.
OXFORD CAMBRIDGE AND RSA (OCR). Formulae and statistical tables (ST1), 8 p., 2022.
 
32.
GALINDO R.J.G., ALEGRÍA H. Toxic effects of exposure to pesticides in farm workers in Navolato, Sinaloa (Mexico). Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental. 34 (3), 505, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.....
 
33.
SECRETARÍA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERÍA, DESARROLLO RURAL, PESCA Y ALIMENTACIÓN (SAGARPA). Estimación de las exportaciones agroalimentarias a nivel de entidad federativa. 2011.
 
34.
LLANES C.O. Predictive association between meteorological drought and climate indices in the state of Sinaloa, northwestern Mexico. Arabian Journal of Geoscience, 16, 79, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517....
 
35.
GUIJARRO J.A. Homogenization of climatic series with Climatol. 2018.
 
36.
ALEXANDERSSON H. A homogeneity test applied to precipitation data. Journal of Climatology. 6, 661, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.33....
 
37.
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA). 2024.
 
38.
VARGA H.Z., SZALKA É., SZAKÁL T. Determination of Reference Evapotranspiration Using Penman-Monteith Method in Case of Missing Wind Speed Data under Subhumid Climatic Condition in Hungary. Atmospheric and Climate Science. 12, 235, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.20....
 
39.
LEAL L.H.D.C., ROCHA W.F.D.C. Model adequacy checking in homogeneity and stability studies. Journal of Metrology Society of India (MAPAN). 39, 445, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647....
 
40.
ZAR J.H. Biostatistical analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education. Inc. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey. 2010.
 
41.
LÓPEZ A.J.E., DÍAZ V.T., WATTS T.T., RODRÍGUEZ J.C., CASTELLANOS V.A.E., PARTIDA R.L., VELÁZQUEZ A.T.J. Evapotranspiración y coeficientes de cultivo de chile Bell en el Valle de Culiacán, México. Terra Latinoamericana. 33, 209, 2015.
 
42.
PUGH S., FOSDICK B.K., NEHRING M., GALLICHOTTE E.N., VANDEWOUDE S., WILSON A. Estimating cutoff values for diagnostic tests to achieve target specificity using extreme value theory. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 24, 30, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874... PMCid:PMC10851584.
 
43.
BRESSANE A., SIMINSKI A., GURJON G.I., PERES M.C., SCOFANO G.C., DOS SANTOS G.A.L., SILVA M.B., DE CASTRO L.C., GALANTE N.G. Prioritization of key indicators for the classification of successional stages in regenerating subtropical Atlantic Forest, Southern Brazil: a proposal based on multivariate order statistics. Environment Systems and Decisions. 43, 232, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669....
 
44.
LLANES C.O., ESTRELLA G.R.D., PARRA G.R.E., GUTIÉRREZ R.O.G., ÁVILA D.J.A., TROYO D.E. Modeling yield of irrigated and rainfed bean in central and southern Sinaloa state, Mexico, based on essential climate variables. Atmosphere. 15 (5), 573, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos1....
 
45.
FENG Y., JIA Y., CUI N., ZHAO L., LI C., GONG D. Calibration of Hargreaves model for reference evapotranspiration estimation in Sichuan basin of southwest China. Agricultural Water Management. 181 (2), 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwa....
 
46.
GU X., LONG A., HE X., WANG H., LAI X., PANG N., LIU H., YU H. Response of runoff to climate change in the Manas River Basin flow‐producing area, Northwest China. Applied Water Science. 14, 43, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201....
 
47.
KUMAR S., SHARDA R., GOYAL P., SIAG M., KAUR P. Reference Evapotranspiration Modelling Using Artificial Neural Networks Under Scenarios of Limited Weather Data: A Case Study in the Malwa Region of Punjab. Environment Modeling & Assessment. 29, 589, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666....
 
48.
CÓRDOVA M., CARRILLO R.G., CRESPO P., WILCOX B., CÉLLERI R. Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith (FAO 56 PM) Method for Calculating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Limited Data. Mountain Research and Development. 35 (3), 230, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JO....
 
49.
VALLE J.G.L.C., VOURLITIS G.L., AMORIM C.L.F., DA SILVA P.R., NOGUEIRA J.S., LOBO F.A., ABU R.MD.T.I., RANGEL R.T. Evaluation of FAO-56 Procedures for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Missing Climatic Data for a Brazilian Tropical Savanna. Water. 13 (3), 1763, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131....
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top