ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Quantifying Ecological Compensation for Cross-Regional Transfer of Industrial Hazardous Waste: A Case Study in Wenzhou, China
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Nanxun Innovation Institute, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, 310018, China
 
2
Zhejiang Ecological Environment Group Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, 310012, China
 
 
Submission date: 2025-10-23
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-01-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-01-27
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-06
 
 
Corresponding author
Yinfeng Xia   

Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Xuelin Str., 310018, Hangzhou, China
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Industrial hazardous waste (IHW) comes in a wide variety of types and is difficult to dispose of completely on a local scale. Cross-regional cooperation is an effective way to achieve the optimal allocation of resources. This study constructs an ecological compensation framework for the crossregional transfer of IHW, based on the generation and disposal status in Wenzhou, the utilization rate of disposal capacity, and the associated ecological environmental losses, development opportunity losses, and disposal costs. The results revealed that Wenzhou has sufficient capacity for IHW disposal, but the utilization rate is only 40%. Implementing the cross-regional transfer and disposal of IHW is conducive to utilizing the idle disposal capacity of Wenzhou and optimizing the resource allocation in the surrounding areas. Ecological compensation standards for various IHW were quantified. Among them, the incineration process requires the highest ecological compensation standard, which amounts to 1,629 CNY/t. The type of IHW with the largest disposal capacity in Wenzhou is HW17, and its recommended ecological compensation standard is 633.6 CNY/t. Full utilization of this disposal capacity can generate over 145 million CNY in ecological compensation income. This ecological compensation framework provides reasonable compensation standards and guidance for the cross-regional transfer of IHW and has strong applicability.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
CAMACHO J.A., RUIZ-PENALVER S.M., RODRIGUEZ M. Identification of Leading Hazardous Waste Generating Industries with High Improvement Potential in Spain. Science of The Total Environment, 731, 139207, 2020.
 
2.
DUAN H., HUANG Q., WANG Q., ZHOU B., LI J. Hazardous Waste Generation and Management in China: A Review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 158 (2-3), 221, 2018.
 
3.
GENG N., XIA Y., LU D., BAI Y., ZHAO Y., WANG H., REN L., XU C., HUA E., SUN G., CHEN X. The Bacterial Community Structure in Epiphytic Biofilm on Submerged Macrophyte Potamogetom Crispus L. and Its Contribution to Heavy Metal Accumulation in an Urban Industrial Area in Hangzhou. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 430, 128455, 2022.
 
4.
LIU R., LI J., HE G., FENG B., HUANG R., TIAN P., WANG L. Spatiotemporal variation and ecosystem service value assessment of green space system in Zhejiang Province, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37, 3119, 2018. [In Chinese]
 
5.
ZHAO J., RAO M., ZHANG H., WANG Q., SHEN Y., YE J., FENG K., ZHANG S. Evolution of Interspecific Interactions Underlying the Nonlinear Relationship between Active Biomass and Pollutant Degradation Capacity in Bioelectrochemical Systems. Water Research, 274, 123071, 2025.
 
6.
CHEN X., MA Y., FURST K., TAN Q., LIN W., SHI X., HUO J., LU X., LI J., LIN Y. Pathways to Zero Plastic Waste in Chinese Cities: Implications of Different Disposal Options under the Zero Waste Cities Policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 463, 142747, 2024.
 
7.
LI Y., FU Z., LI J. Assessing the Policy Benefits of Constructing "Zero-Waste Cities" in China: From the Perspective of Hazardous Waste Lifecycle Management. Science of The Total Environment, 918, 170184, 2024.
 
8.
FERREIRA S., GALLAGHER L. Protest Responses and Community Attitudes toward Accepting Compensation to Host Waste Disposal Infrastructure. Land Use Policy, 27 (2), 638, 2010.
 
9.
LI Y., CHEN X., FENG X., LV Y., ZHANG Z., QI Q. Investigation of the Allocation and Trading Strategy of Wastewater Emission Permits Considering Ecological Compensation. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 30, 103103, 2023.
 
10.
LIU C., LIU W., LU D., CHEN M., DUNFORD M., XU M. Eco-Compensation and Harmonious Regional Development in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 26, 283, 2016.
 
11.
SHANG W., GONG Y., WANG Z., STEWARDSON M.J. Eco-Compensation in China: Theory, Practices and Suggestions for the Future. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 162, 2018.
 
12.
GUAN X., LIU W., CHEN M. Study on the Ecological Compensation Standard for River Basin Water Environment Based on Total Pollutants Control. Ecological Indicators, 69, 446, 2016.
 
13.
CAMPANHAO L.M.B., RANIERI V.E.L. Guideline Framework for Effective Targeting of Payments for Watershed Services. Forest Policy and Economics, 104, 93, 2019.
 
14.
CAO S., YU Z., ZHANG J., FENG F., XU D., MU X. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ecosystem Services in China. Ecological Engineering, 125, 143, 2018.
 
15.
COSTANZA R., DE GROOT R., BRAAT L., KUBISZEWSKI I., FIORAMONTI L., SUTTON P., FARBER S., GRASSO M. Twenty Years of Ecosystem Services: How Far Have We Come and How Far Do We Still Need to Go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1, 2017.
 
16.
COSTANZA R., D'ARGE R., DE GROOT R., FARBER S., GRASSO M., HANNON B., LIMBURG K., NAEEM S., O'NEILL R.V., PARUELO J., RASKIN R.G., SUTTON P., VAN DEN BELT M. The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387, 253, 1997.
 
17.
FERREIRA S., MARQUES R.C. Contingent Valuation Method Applied to Waste Management. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 99, 111, 2015.
 
18.
XIE G., ZHANG C., ZHANG L., CHEN W., LI S. Improvement of the Evaluation Method for Ecosystem Service Value Based on Per Unit Area. Journal of Natural Resources, 30, 1243, 2015.
 
19.
DA MOTTA R.S., ORTIZ R.A. Costs and Perceptions Conditioning Willingness to Accept Payments for Ecosystem Services in a Brazilian Case. Ecological Economics, 147, 333, 2018.
 
20.
LOGAR I., BROUWER R., PAILLEX A. Do the Societal Benefits of River Restoration Outweigh Their Costs? A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 1075, 2019.
 
21.
ZHOU S., HUANG Y., HE H., ZHANG Z. Focusing on Structural Changes and Future Risks of Ecosystems: An Opportunity-Cost Based Ecosystem Service Account for Riparian Ecosystems and Its Case Study. Ecological Indicators, 158, 111523, 2024.
 
22.
ELOFSSON K., HIRON M., KACERGYTE I., PART T. Ecological Compensation of Stochastic Wetland Biodiversity: National or Regional Policy Schemes? Ecological Economics, 204, 107672, 2023.
 
23.
SHEN J., GAO X., HE W., SUN F., ZHANG Z., KONG Y., WAN Z., ZHANG X., LI Z., WANG J., LAI X. Prospect Theory in an Evolutionary Game: Construction of Watershed Ecological Compensation System in Taihu Lake Basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125929, 2021.
 
24.
CAI W., LIU C., ZHANG C., MA M., RAO W., LI W., HE K., GAO M. Developing the Ecological Compensation Criterion of Industrial Solid Waste Based on Emergy for Sustainable Development. Energy, 157, 940, 2018.
 
25.
ZHANG B., FENG Q., LU Z., LI Z., ZHANG B., CHENG W. Ecosystem Service Value and Ecological Compensation in Qilian Mountain National Park: Implications for Ecological Conservation Strategies. Ecological Indicators, 167, 112661, 2024.
 
26.
GENG J., LIANG C. Analysis of the Internal Relationship between Ecological Value and Economic Value Based on the Forest Resources in China. Sustainability, 13 (12), 6795, 2021.
 
27.
LI J., ZHANG Y., ZHANG H., GONG H., LIU Y. The research of Spatio-temporal characeristics and influence factors of Wenzhou ecological resilience based on the potential-elastic-stability model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44, 3253, 2024. [In Chinese]
 
28.
YANG P., ZHANG L.J., WANG X.J., WANG Z.L. Exploring the management of industrial hazardous waste based on recent accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 67, 104224, 2020.
 
29.
JALIGOT R., CHENAL J. Decoupling municipal solid waste generation and economic growth in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 130, 260, 2018.
 
30.
MEYER D.E., LI M., INGWERSEN W.W. Analyzing economy-scale solid waste generation using the United States environmentally-extended input-output model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 157, 104795, 2020.
 
31.
LU Y., XU C., WANG X. A Novel Modification Framework for Evaluating Ecosystem Service Value in China's Five Major Freshwater Lakes and Their Surrounding Cities from 2002 to 2022. Ecological Indicators, 177, 113711, 2025.
 
32.
GAUR V.K., SHARMA P., SIROHI R., AWASTHI M.K., DUSSAP C., PANDEY A. Assessing the impact of industrial waste on environment and mitigation strategies: A comprehensive review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 398, 123019, 2020.
 
33.
HONG J., HAN X., CHEN Y., WANG M., YE L., QI C., LI X. Life cycle environmental assessment of industrial hazardous waste incineration and landfilling in China. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22, 1054, 2017.
 
34.
YAN F., LI N., WU R. Grey water footprint model of heavy metal based on the hazard quotient. Ecological Indicators, 162, 112052, 2024.
 
35.
NIINIMAKI K., PETERS G., DAHLBO H., PERRY P., RISSANEN T., GWILT A. The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1 (4), 189, 2020.
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top