ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Socio-Economic Impact Mechanism of Ecosystem Services Value, a PCA-GWR Approach
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing,China
 
2
Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute, Wuhan,China
 
3
Monitoring Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing,China
 
4
School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
 
 
Submission date: 2020-03-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2020-04-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2020-04-18
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-09-02
 
 
Publication date: 2020-11-10
 
 
Corresponding author
Zhenya Zhu   

College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, Beijing, China
 
 
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021;30(1):977-986
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper comprehensively used three methods to explore the global and local impact mechanism of socioeconomic on ecosystem services value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, which included principal component analysis (PAC), ordinary least square (OLS) and geographic weighted regression (GWR). The results suggested that, the primary industry related factors were the main socioeconomic factors, while factors such as the second industry, the third industry, the fiscal revenue and so on, had little effect on it. Socioeconomic factors can affect or change the value of ecosystem services to a certain extent. The comprehensive factor of primary industry had a negative effect, and the negative effect of the total population factor was weaker than the comprehensive factor, meanwhile, the effect of the simplification factor of the primary industry was positive or negative. The local model of a PCA-GWR can better solve the spatial non-stationarity of the dependent and the independent variables, and the local model was better than the global model of OLS and PCA-OLS. A standard GWR model can be further improved to reflect the local differences of the impact mechanism in more detail.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
 
CITATIONS (6):
1.
Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and the Key Influencing Factors of PM2.5 and PM10 in Heilongjiang, China from 2014 to 2018
Longhui Fu, Qibang Wang, Jianhui Li, Huiran Jin, Zhen Zhen, Qingbin Wei
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
 
2.
Scale effects and spatial heterogeneity of driving factors in ecosystem services value interactions within the Tibet autonomous region
Jiamin Liu, Xiutong Pei, Bingzhi Liao, Hengxi Zhang, Wang Liu, Jizong Jiao
Journal of Environmental Management
 
3.
Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of land use, urbanization, and ecosystem service value in China: A national-scale analysis
Kaisheng Wu, Dong Wang, Haiyan Lu, Gengyuan Liu
Journal of Cleaner Production
 
4.
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Services and Their Trade-Offs and Synergies in Response to Natural and Social Factors: Evidence from Yibin, Upper Yangtze River
Chaojie Tian, Liheng Pang, Quanzhi Yuan, Wei Deng, Ping Ren
Land
 
5.
Detection of the Spatio-Temporal Differentiation Patterns and Influencing Factors of Wheat Production in Huang-Huai-Hai Region
Yifan Zhang, Bingjun Li
Foods
 
6.
Spatial–Temporal Variations of the Gross Ecosystem Product under the Influence of the Spatial Spillover Effect of Urbanization and Ecological Construction in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China
Lin Ji, Yuanjing Qi, Qun’ou Jiang, Chunhong Zhao
Land
 
eISSN:2083-5906
ISSN:1230-1485
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top